Beating an injured Nadal is no tie breaker because he got spanked by Wawrinka the next match. ...
Federer past his peak in 2011 beat in peak Novak at the roland garros and prevented him from meeting nadal in the final ... So thats the real tie breaker .... even if you say novak beat him next year that still won't compensate because federer was past his peak ....
1. There is no tiebreaker because there is no tie. Djokovic won more matches at the French (and will win more), has more semi-final appearances, and has a higher winning percentage.
2. Even if there were a tie, that is an absolutely ridiculous "tiebreaker." Taking one match out of 50 to make a blanket statement about their entire careers on a surface is completely absurd.