Djokovic has won every significant tournament. Twice.

[duaneeo]

I think the guy is just trolling or being salty as usual when it comes to Djokovic.

I actually give praise when it is deserved, as my comment pre-2018 Cincinnati when Nole would (actually) win Cincinnati:

Winning all 9 current Masters would be a phenomenal achievement. Djokovic's record is already very diverse...5 different Masters at least 4 times, 8 different Masters at least twice, and titles on outdoor hard/indoor hard/clay at least 4 times.

 

[I Am Finnish]

Djokovic only won RG because of Nadal's injuries (2016 wrist, 2021 foot).
Djokovic is a PRETENDER.
And he's still failed to capture the slam record.
Epic fail, despite the cheap titles.

 

[mr tonyz]

Lol. You're actually serious. Djokovic was 18 and 19 in 2005 and 2006 and not a top player so like I said, if you need to include these results to make a point you don't have much of an argument. He wasn't even ranked in the top 20 in 2006 so even if he lost to the #75 player in the world I wouldn't care.

Djokovic reached the top 40 in the world singles rankings after making his first quarterfinal appearance at a Grand Slam event, coming at the French Open, and also by reaching the fourth round at Wimbledon that year.[41]

Three weeks after Wimbledon, Djokovic won his first ATP title at the Dutch Open in Amersfoort without losing a set, defeating Nicolás Massú in the final. He won his second career title at the Moselle Open in Metz, France, and moved into the top 20.[42] He also reached his first career Masters quarterfinal at Madrid during the indoor hardcourt season.[43]

Florent Serra In 2005 he had his most successful year, winning three out of four Challenger finals,[4] and his first ATP tour title, in Bucharest. He won his second title the following year in Adelaide.[2]

You cannot defend Djoker's 2006 loss to this guy was poor & definitely counts. On paper & in terms of results , Djoker was the superior player @ that time.

You cannot keep harping on about 2006 without comparing his weaker opponent to Djoker's 2006.

& what about the other 5 losses Djoker suffered to non Federer/Murray opponents. How about all those?

I've provided you with a ton of reasonable evidence that all adds up to Djoker NEVER being a lock for a Cincinnati M1000.

The only foregone conclusions that we could ever make are Rafa @ RG & Rome/M.C/Barca. & even then Rafa has never won 100% of the time.

 

[mr tonyz]

I watched this match & i feel that the combination of the night conditions allowed Djoker to punish Nadal which caused Nadal to look lost & to spray Unforced Errors left & right. Yet Rafa despite all this Rafa was 1 point away from going 2-1 up after forging his way back & breaking back TWICE to lose that set by an inch.

I do firmly believe that Nadal's Tiebreaker was poor as he made some terrible mistakes. But after a 1.5 hour slugfest in set #3 he was simply worn down into submission & the 4th set proved it.

USO 2011 Final 3rd & 4th set vibes came rearing back here.