TheGhostOfAgassi
Talk Tennis Guru
Do you know you look better than the false one you posted?It was a completely different sport 45 years ago.
You are really cute
Sorry, a bit of topic. I just wanted you to know.
Do you know you look better than the false one you posted?It was a completely different sport 45 years ago.
But he did put them down at the biggest stages unless they beat his Slam count. It’s really as simple as this. How on earth should Djokovic be the GOAT instead when he doesn’t manage to do it?For me, Nole doesn't need the slam count to be GOAT. I can accept that the slam count is the simplest and broadest GOAT definition available and this is a minority opinion...
Sure Roger had multiple eras, court speeds and racquet technologies to contend with and has probably the most stylistic and statistical claims to GOAT, but he just could not put other ATGs down and establish himself as first among equals on the biggest stages. That is hard to overcome when considering the history of what is a non-contact version of combat sport.
The period 2010 and 2017 for Federer can be looked at in two ways:
1) By a Fed hater such as yourself, which you have already stated in your post and no matter what Federer does/achieves (backed up by your moving the goal-posts) will never get through to you
2) Federer actually won 5 slams during that period and was back to No1 on 2 occasions (2012/17)....and all done between the ages of 28.5 to 36 when most ATGs in the past have done near squat in that age bracket.
Exactly.Djokovic needs something to keep him motivated and he needs a goal to strive for. This is basically it. Now I would prefer if he kept this private but being the extrovert he is, that's not really in his personality. He pretty much wears his heart on his sleeve. I have no idea why this would upset anyone though which is strange. Why wouldn't he believe he could do it? What champion of that caliber wouldn't believe they could do it? What should he say? I can only win one more Slam? You always aim for the stars whether you make it there or not.
Rafa hasn't destroyed any of Fed's records. Born to destroy them LOL.Exactly. Rafa will fight until his last breath to take down that slam record. Sometimes I feel he was almost born to destroy Feds records.
Novak as well in this position now.
Therefor all the hate from that fangroup not to be mentioned.
Rafa hasn't destryoed any of Fed's records. Born to destroy them LOL.
Djokovic and Nadal are just younger than him.For me, Nole doesn't need the slam count to be GOAT. I can accept that the slam count is the simplest and broadest GOAT definition available and this is a minority opinion. Of course he needs a bit more but if he aims for the slam count, he could pick up a few more records that Roger simply couldn't manage, eg RG, CYGS, another Nole Slam etc. If he equals Nadal in slam count at 17 and Roger stays at 20, Nole might have achieved enough to satisfy me. I doubt it will play out that way but if so, I would have to give credit where it's due.
Sure Roger had multiple eras, court speeds and racquet technologies to contend with and has probably the most stylistic and statistical claims to GOAT, but he just could not put other ATGs down and establish himself as first among equals on the biggest stages. That is hard to overcome when considering the history of what is a non-contact version of combat sport.
I am a massive Roger fan and will teach my children to play like Roger. I was taught to play like Edberg and Mac, but it doesn't mean I can't acknowledge the superiority of Lendl and Borg.
Exactly.
He has every right to believe he can do it. His ability also justified his mentality.
If it were Zverev who said it, then yeah, he would be rightfully ridiculed.
Obviously just the clay records, but those were never Fed's to begin with.I was wondering which records those are.
Maybe she can list them?
![]()
Rafa hasn't destroyed any of Fed's records. Born to destroy them LOL.
I am saying that Djokovic can say it because he has the pedigree to say it and shooting for the stars is a realistic goal for him.And why would Zverev say that? That’s an odd comparison.
For me, Nole doesn't need the slam count to be GOAT. I can accept that the slam count is the simplest and broadest GOAT definition available and this is a minority opinion. Of course he needs a bit more but if he aims for the slam count, he could pick up a few more records that Roger simply couldn't manage, eg RG, CYGS, another Nole Slam etc. If he equals Nadal in slam count at 17 and Roger stays at 20, Nole might have achieved enough to satisfy me. I doubt it will play out that way but if so, I would have to give credit where it's due.
Sure Roger had multiple eras, court speeds and racquet technologies to contend with and has probably the most stylistic and statistical claims to GOAT, but he just could not put other ATGs down and establish himself as first among equals on the biggest stages. That is hard to overcome when considering the history of what is a non-contact version of combat sport.
I am a massive Roger fan and will teach my children to play like Roger. I was taught to play like Edberg and Mac, but it doesn't mean I can't acknowledge the superiority of Lendl and Borg.
You still remember my picture or someone sent it to you?Do you know you look better than the false one you posted?
You are really cute
Sorry, a bit of topic. I just wanted you to know.
I still remember it.You still remember my picture or someone sent it to you?
I am saying that Djokovic can say it because he has the pedigree to say it and shooting for the stars is a realistic goal him.
My comparison was meant to illustrate that it's not like a lesser player has said, so I don't see why Novak's ambition sounds ridiculous.
I will be very surprised if Federer doesn't get to 21. I will also be surprised if Nadal doesn't get to 22.I will be very surprised If Djoko or Nads reaches 21.
Hopefully they will prevent each other of making it.![]()
Agree - more than fair in all aspects.Man, posters here really love to get worked up about silly stuff!
What did you expect him to say? He’s already one of the best and most successful players in the history of the sport. He just returned in pretty dramatic fashion to #1 in the world. Obviously he will aim as high as possible.
I don’t think he can win another 6-7 slams but he may be able to win enough to be a contender for GOAT status. And that doesn’t require 21 slams.
I think that he won't.
Let us see who is more realistic and knowledgeable about tennis between the two of us.
![]()
He doesn't think he will surpass him, he thinks he can. Big difference.
What’s the point of this whole website?Yes, but, what is the point of this thread then?
![]()
What's the difference? If he doesn't think he will surpass Federer, he thinks he can't. If he thinks he will surpass Federer, he thinks he can.He doesn't think he will surpass him, he thinks he can. Big difference.
We might need a little help from the Djoker, but thats what friends are for right?I will be very surprised if Federer doesn't get to 21. I will also be surprised if Nadal doesn't get to 22.
Hopefully, I am the Nostradamus of tennis.![]()
He doesn't think he will surpass him, he thinks he can. Big difference.
What's the difference? If he doesn't think he will surpass Federer, he thinks he can't. If he thinks he will surpass Federer, he thinks he can.
Why RG10 - USO16? Do you read minds or are you two one and the same person? When one reads 'the period 2010 - 2017', it is interpreted logically as AO10 - USO17, unless of course you want to move goal posts to suit your own agenda.He meant RG10 - UO16.
1 slam won out of 27.
Again, this is the exact title of the article:Nole needs to surpass Nadal first before thinking about Federer. I think it's disrespectful to bypass Nadal since he only mention about chasing Federer, as if he knows for sure that he will pass Nadal.
What’s the point of this whole website?![]()
What’s the point of this whole website?![]()
Probably should’ve won 2-3 more. USO 2011-2012, 1 Wimbledon comes to mind.He meant RG10 - UO16.
1 slam won out of 27.
He wrote "between" 2010 and 2017.Why RG10 - USO16? Do you read minds or are you two one and the same person? When one reads 'the period 2010 - 2017', it is interpreted logically as AO10 - USO17, unless of course you want to move goal posts to suit your own agenda.