DRII
G.O.A.T.
Well I'm saying there's not enough evidence. I certainly agree Queens/Halle is not a perfect event to draw conclusions from, but I was seeking to counter the assumption that Nadal would very logically do better at grass tournaments, with another possibility. Not because I think I am right, but I could be. We don't have enough evidence either way. Also like I said he has had some scares at Wimbledon where he would have been out in a 3 set match. I do agree that often players look at Queens/Halle as a warm up, though Nadal won in in 2008 and Federer often has come from the RG final to winning Halle. Not saying Nadal woudn't win grass masters but it's not an automatic conclusion that he would either.
Nadal is clearly the 2nd best grass court player of this current generation, right behind Federer.
So why would it be illogical to assume he would benefit from more high level grass court tournaments and an actual grass season