Yea I have seen him plenty of times and I know how good he was on grass. but in 2011 he was till 25 years old, he was in a wimbledon final. You telling me Nadal got so mich worse in a couple of months after 2010, but still made it to 7 finals?
If Nadal won majority of those 7 finals you would be here talking about what a season he had. Don't say you wouldn't. What you can't admit is that peak djokovic beat a nadal in his prime. and thats why you and most of Nadals fans is talking down nadal in 2011. You guys are never fair and can't give cred where it's due. Djokovic beat him 7 times in a row in 4 masters and 3 slam finals. thats as good as any season nadal has had - BUT - the difference is he lost all finals! And it was not because he was a worse player.
If my grandma had balls, she'd be my grandpa.
Second of all, once again you fail to read my posts or you create your own interpretation. I never said a word about Djokovic. Yes, he beat prime, but not
peak Nadal. So don't tell me I can't admit this and can't give Djokovic credit. You do know not every single post has got to resolve around somebody giving Djokovic credit and admitting how good he is, right? I was talking about Nadal here, so don't start drifting away from the discussion once again, like you did yesterday.
It is a well known fact among the tennis world that Nadal produced his best level on clay during the 2005-2010 period and also 2012. It is also a well known fact Nadal's best level on grass was during 2007-2008, with 2010/2011 being second best. Yeah, if he won 3 slams in 2011, but he didn't.
Sometimes posts by you or Djokovic2011 make me wonder if you ever read other people's responses and try to contribute meaningfully to a certain discussion or you just post your own stuff without even looking.