Djokovic vs Nadal peak for peak on clay?

Djokovic vs Nadal peak for peak on clay


  • Total voters
    52
Like I said, this poster is a Federer fan. He is trying to wreak havoc on the Djokovic fan base by giving them all a bad name. Unfortunately, he/she/Lew has fallen into desperate times, hence threads like these. I suggest we all do our part to agree with everything OP says until he/she/Lew leaves us forever out of boredom.

What say you all?
 
Like I said, this poster is a Federer fan. He is trying to wreak havoc on the Djokovic fan base by giving them all a bad name. Unfortunately, he/she/Lew has fallen into desperate times, hence threads like these. I suggest we all do our part to agree with everything OP says until he/she/Lew leaves us forever out of boredom.

What say you all?

sounds like a plan
 
Like I said, this poster is a Federer fan. He is trying to wreak havoc on the Djokovic fan base by giving them all a bad name. Unfortunately, he/she/Lew has fallen into desperate times, hence threads like these. I suggest we all do our part to agree with everything OP says until he/she/Lew leaves us forever out of boredom.

What say you all?

I guess anyone saying Novak BOAT is a Fredfan in disguise now?
 
Like I said, this poster is a Federer fan. He is trying to wreak havoc on the Djokovic fan base by giving them all a bad name. Unfortunately, he/she/Lew has fallen into desperate times, hence threads like these. I suggest we all do our part to agree with everything OP says until he/she/Lew leaves us forever out of boredom.

What say you all?
Why would I be fan of Fraud who pissed his pants anytime he came up against a peak ATG??? He’s the GOAT of winning slams vs Roddick, Hewitt, Bagdhatis, Gonzalez and Blake.
 
Wawrinka > Djokovic > Nadal

:unsure:

I don't like Wawrinka but he's simply untouchable in his Stanimal mode. He's like a no holding back Superman when he decides to go for the kill. I'm yet to see anyone who can take more than a set from the Stanimal.*


*Stanimal is different from regular Wawrinka who's beatable for the big 3.
 
1. WTF

2. You're seriously counting 2015 Nadal in this comparison. Dude was awful all year and he lost matches to all sorts of people throughout the year. He even lost CC matches to Murray and Wawrinka who had never beaten him on the surface before. At RG he was awful too.

3. 2011 was impressive from Novak but Nadal has definitely played better CC seasons (2008 and 2010 both stick out to me) so "peak-for-peak" is a misnomer.

4. Clay Bo3 BOAT? With just 9 clay Masters compared to Nadal's 26? Yup, no bias here for sure.

5. Wilander has made several clueless statements in the past, as I'm sure many of you can remember. This is one of them.

6. Begone troll.
This guy calls 2015 Nadal peak. Need I say more?
 
Nadal, but it's closer than people think. Djokovic in 2011 did beat Peak Nadal twice in straights, and there's no doubt in my mind he would've given Nadal a serious fight at RG. 2012 Nadal however was just a better clay player, however. I'd do anything to see 2012 Nadal play 2011 Djokovic on clay, true peak for peak. But Peak Nadal would probably win since he's just better suited for clay than Djokovic is.
 
Nadal, but it's closer than people think. Djokovic in 2011 did beat Peak Nadal twice in straights, and there's no doubt in my mind he would've given Nadal a serious fight at RG. 2012 Nadal however was just a better clay player, however. I'd do anything to see 2012 Nadal play 2011 Djokovic on clay, true peak for peak. But Peak Nadal would probably win since he's just better suited for clay than Djokovic is.
Fair answer my friend and fellow Djokovic fan.
 
Nadal, but it's closer than people think. Djokovic in 2011 did beat Peak Nadal twice in straights, and there's no doubt in my mind he would've given Nadal a serious fight at RG. 2012 Nadal however was just a better clay player, however. I'd do anything to see 2012 Nadal play 2011 Djokovic on clay, true peak for peak. But Peak Nadal would probably win since he's just better suited for clay than Djokovic is.

Peak Novak couldn't quite routine Federer at RG 11, though?
 
Now hear me out. Obviously nadal is the GOAT on clay with his incredible longevity, consistency and sheer amount of wins.
However, we know that Novak is 2-0 in 2011 and 2-0 in 2015 on clay. So nadal is 0-4 vs peak Djokovic.

Can we conclude Djokovic has the highest ever peak on clay? I think we can at least say he’s the clay BO3 BOAT.

Wilander (expert analyst, commentator and ATG) agrees with me:

Could you please add a change vote option?
 
He did.

But you wrote "I think we can all agree that both of them would routine Peak Federer on clay".

I think that's a little over the top, when Federer took out peak Djokovic at Roland Garros in his best season, when he owned Nadal.
Sure, Djokovic wouldn't beat Fed 10/10 times on clay. But I wouldn't put so much into that one RG11 match - it was an unlikely outcome, doesn't automatically mean Federer owns Peak Djokovic on clay. I don't think it's unreasonable to say if 2011 Fed and 2011 Nole met 10 times on clay, Djokovic would win more times than Federer.
 
Sure, Djokovic wouldn't beat Fed 10/10 times on clay. But I wouldn't put so much into that one RG11 match - it was an unlikely outcome, doesn't automatically mean Federer owns Peak Djokovic on clay. I don't think it's unreasonable to say if 2011 Fed and 2011 Nole met 10 times on clay, Djokovic would win more times than Federer.

I never said Federer owns Djokovic on clay. Why would I? The whole world knows that's not true.

You said Djokovic would routine peak Federer on clay. And I said that's a little over the top, and used RG 2011 as example.

They are 4-4 on clay. I'm sure you know.
 
Now hear me out. Obviously nadal is the GOAT on clay with his incredible longevity, consistency and sheer amount of wins.
However, we know that Novak is 2-0 in 2011 and 2-0 in 2015 on clay. So nadal is 0-4 vs peak Djokovic.

Can we conclude Djokovic has the highest ever peak on clay? I think we can at least say he’s the clay BO3 BOAT.

Wilander (expert analyst, commentator and ATG) agrees with me:


Nice try.

p.s. Let me teach you something useful. When Wilander says something it means that the truth is the opposite of that.
 
Back
Top