Djokovic won’t win 2019 USO

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 762343
  • Start date Start date
Even if he doesn't, he's still had a hell of a year thus far. Keep the expectations low, one thing he's definitely winning will be the 2020 AO however.
 
His coach Wajda, told today that they are going for the GS record. So, there's no doubt he will be motivated once again. By snatching USO and AO he's made a massive step in tying Nadal and then he has open road to rush to 20 and beyond and finish it off quickly before retiring. He has to do it quickly considering his age.
 
His coach Wajda, told today that they are going for the GS record. So, there's no doubt he will be motivated once again. By snatching USO and AO he's made a massive step in tying Nadal and then he has open road to rush to 20 and beyond and finish it off quickly before retiring. He has to do it quickly considering his age.

We'll see a lot of records broken in the next few years.
 
Thiem won IW and that's sometimes a good omen for the USO (Flavia Pennetta for instance), I'd go with RBA or Thiem.

I see a Novak-Nadal final already. RBA has pretty much reached his ceiling. Thiem is not consistent enough.
 
Novak is the firm favourite. A younger player might surprise us.
Keep dreaming bud regarding youngsters ;). I dream too but it sucks. Youngsters might surprise again but NOT the way we want too. Watch them drop out in a few first rounds again and again :eek:. One might make it to the QF :happydevil:. I'm joking but I seriously lost my hope for them :sick:
 
Keep dreaming bud regarding youngsters ;). I dream too but it sucks. Youngsters might surprise again but NOT the way we want too. Watch them drop out in a few first rounds again and again :eek:. One might make it to the QF :happydevil:. I'm joking but I seriously lost my hope for them :sick:

I think from here on out the young guys will be more competitive. This USO is the first slam I give the young gen a realistic chance of winning. They nearly beat Nadal there last year. I do expect at least one of them to do well. Not a dream at all, just a prediction.
 
with the USOpen courts as slow as molasses, I fancy Thiem to make deep inroads. He even bageled Nadal last time and Nadal had to finish him off in 3 very tight sets.

So yeah Thiem has a very good chances considering he is young and will be up for the task. If djoker has to face him in his draw, that will very likely end his run.
 
Djokovic won 5/6 grass finals. How many HC finals did he win?

10 out of 15...perfect 7 at AO and lopsided 3 at USO (lost more finals, than he won, totally should have beaten Murray in that 2012 final and Nadal either in 2010 or in 2013, kinda layed an egg there! Wawrinka deserved his win over Djokovic though as he played fantastic, whilst Djokovic has already been in the beginning phases of his famous career "slump")
 
10 out of 15...perfect 7 at AO and lopsided 3 at USO (lost more finals, than he won, totally should have beaten Murray in that 2012 final and Nadal either in 2010 or in 2013, kinda layed an egg there! Wawrinka deserved his win over Djokovic though as he played fantastic, whilst Djokovic has already been in the beginning phases of his famous career "slump")
So why is he better on HC again?

There are 2 HC GS tournaments and 1 grass, so taking that into account Djokovic is clearly better on grass than HC?
 
So why is he better on HC again?

There are 2 HC GS tournaments and 1 grass, so taking that into account Djokovic is clearly better on grass than HC?

Because of his 55 hard court titles? because of his 24 hard court masters titles? because of 5 YEC titles won on hard courts? And that is on top of those 10 hard court grand slams! LOL 55 titles out of 75 won on hard courts against just 6 on grass...i dunno...to me the pattern is pretty damn clear...LMAO
 
Well, no has defended USO for over a decade so recent history is against him
On the other hand, whenever Djoker won AO and Wimbledon in a season, he also added US Open to them:
2011
novak-djokovic-tennis_3169935.jpg

862a.jpg

djokovic-us-open-2011.jpg


2015
1422797551_novak-djokovic-australian-open-2015.jpg

480513268-1436782642-800.jpg

f_20150913_NED21675.jpg


2019
b0765-15486132653032-800.jpg

g844ahfg_novak-djokovic_625x300_15_July_19.jpg

36601.png
 
Because of his 55 hard court titles? because of his 24 hard court masters titles? because of 5 YEC titles won on hard courts? And that is on top of those 10 hard court grand slams! LOL 55 titles out of 75 won on hard courts against just 6 on grass...i dunno...to me the pattern is pretty damn clear...LMAO
You didn't get the point, did you?

How many masters are there on grass?
 
You didn't get the point, did you?

How many masters are there on grass?

It doesn't matter how many events there are on grass, what matters is percentage ratio and surface distribution of player and that what decides what is his best surface! LOL These days many top players ignore grass warm-up tournaments to be mentally and physically ready for the Wimbledon...
 
He will be the overwhelming favourite to win any slams he enters for the next 2 years at the very least with the exception of FO.Also he never really gets injured and his decline is really slow if at all.He has good 5 years in him with no real competition outside clay.If he can't win at least 6 slams in these 5 years he will really underachieve.
 
He will be the overwhelming favourite to win any slams he enters for the next 2 years at the very least with the exception of FO.Also he never really gets injured and his decline is really slow if at all.He has good 5 years in him with no real competition outside clay.If he can't win at least 6 slams in these 5 years he will really underachieve.
He needs to win them with the next couple of years since he’s now 32. Winning gets harder past 35.
 
He did play well but he could have been even better in my opinion. Especially at Wimbledon. And of course, he’ll be the favorite for USO.

You are right on both counts: he is the favorite AND he is unlikely to win. In a 128-player competition, the favorite is usually unlikely to win. The bookmakers currently have him at about 5/4, which makes him a pretty firm favorite but not more likely than the entirety of the field. Probably gives him about a 40% chance.
 
You are right on both counts: he is the favorite AND he is unlikely to win. In a 128-player competition, the favorite is usually unlikely to win. The bookmakers currently have him at about 5/4, which makes him a pretty firm favorite but not more likely than the entirety of the field. Probably gives him about a 40% chance.

@Imperator On this note, I just read these words of Nate Silver on the US Democratic primary, which he wrote a week ago:

"It’s worth keeping in mind that in a field of 20-something candidates with no runaway frontrunner, all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Joe Biden is probably going to lose. Kamala Harris is probably going to lose. Elizabeth Warren is probably going to lose. Bernie Sanders is probably going to lose. And so forth." To which I adapt:

"It's worth keeping in mind that in a field of 128 candidates with no runaway frontrunner [and even arguably then], all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Novak Djokovic is probably going to lose. Rafael Nadal is probably going to lose. Roger Federer is probably going to lose."

That said, I see that the bookmakers already have Nadal as in with around a 50% chance at Roland Garros 2020. He's just so dominant there that the usual rules don't apply - he is a runaway frontrunner.
 
@Imperator On this note, I just read these words of Nate Silver on the US Democratic primary, which he wrote a week ago:

"It’s worth keeping in mind that in a field of 20-something candidates with no runaway frontrunner, all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Joe Biden is probably going to lose. Kamala Harris is probably going to lose. Elizabeth Warren is probably going to lose. Bernie Sanders is probably going to lose. And so forth." To which I adapt:

"It's worth keeping in mind that in a field of 128 candidates with no runaway frontrunner [and even arguably then], all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Novak Djokovic is probably going to lose. Rafael Nadal is probably going to lose. Roger Federer is probably going to lose."

That said, I see that the bookmakers already have Nadal as in with around a 50% chance at Roland Garros 2020. He's just so dominant there that the usual rules don't apply - he is a runaway frontrunner.
Nadal at FO is just insane and not subject to normal rules.

Federer is insane on grass...thats what makes yesterday sting for his fans and i do sympathise...just not with the Royal Box or John Bercow!!!
 
Nadal at FO is just insane and not subject to normal rules.

Federer is insane on grass...thats what makes yesterday sting for his fans and i do sympathise...just not with the Royal Box or John Bercow!!!

Federer without Djokovic, is very close to the level of Nadal's dominance in their preferred surface.
The Swiss would have 11 Wimbledon titles, only 10 defeats there, and he would have won 5! Wimbledon titles being over 30 years old (the same as the legendary Borg).
Federer has 13 semifinals there, Nadal has 12 semifinals in RG.
Both have 12 finals in their favorite Major (all-time record in male tennis players)
Federer has 5! Wimbledon finals being more than 30 years old (the same as McEnroe and Nadal in their career).
Nadal has 3 consecutive titles in RG being over 30 years old (the third largest domain in the open era of that tournament only surpassed byhimself twice and the great Borg).

The Serbian has inflicted a lot of damage on Federer, without any doubt.
 
Federer without Djokovic, is very close to the level of Nadal's dominance in their preferred surface.
The Swiss would have 11 Wimbledon titles, only 10 defeats there, and he would have won 5! Wimbledon titles being over 30 years old (the same as the legendary Borg).
Federer has 13 semifinals there, Nadal has 12 semifinals in RG.
Both have 12 finals in their favorite Major (all-time record in male tennis players)
Federer has 5! Wimbledon finals being more than 30 years old (the same as McEnroe and Nadal in their career).
Nadal has 3 consecutive titles in RG being over 30 years old (the third largest domain in the open era of that tournament only surpassed byhimself twice and the great Borg).

The Serbian has inflicted a lot of damage on Federer, without any doubt.

But thats exactly why Federer st wimbledon is nowhere near Nadal at Roland Gorras. Nadal doesnt have a Djokovic or whoever at the french open who beats him in the final, he has not a single rival there and never had.

Saying that i think that dominating at wimbledon is much harder than dominating at the french open
 
Yes, it seems a bit silly to make such a statement so early but that’s my feeling. Before the start of 2019, I predicted 2 GS wins for Djoko : AO and Wimby. I never had the feeling he would get USO and last events reinforced my opinion.

First of all, the younger players are clearly harder to deal with on HC than on grass or clay. And Djokovic’s level dropped after AO, I don’t know if it’s because he’s 32 but he hasn’t had the same explosiveness ever since the AO. The field will be hungrier than ever, it will be difficult to make it to the final and I feel like someone will pull an upset.

If Djokovic does win, obviously I’ll be glad and I will happily bump this thread to mock myself (unless someone does it before me). :D
This title thread would never get my attention unless it is written by Sureshs.
 
But thats exactly why Federer st wimbledon is nowhere near Nadal at Roland Gorras. Nadal doesnt have a Djokovic or whoever at the french open who beats him in the final, he has not a single rival there and never had.

Saying that i think that dominating at wimbledon is much harder than dominating at the french open

No, the problem for Federer is that he is almost 6 years older than Djokovic, while Nadal is one year older than Nole.

If the Swiss were only a couple of years older than the Serbian, I ask you, what do you think the result would be in the 2014, 2015 and 2019 finals?
 
First of all, the younger players are clearly harder to deal with on HC than on grass or clay.

What young player could seriously challenge Novak at the USO, unless he's injured or seriously ill? I think he could have pneumonia and he'd still beat Tsitsipas, FAA, Shapo, Zverev, Thiem or any of the other young guys. Whoever is winning the USO will come from a pool of three names: Novak, Fed or Nadal.
 
I don't see him winning it either.

I think Federer will win the USO.
Is the USO the slowest of the non-clay slams? AO was slow again this year after 2 years being faster. It is between the USO and AO for the slowest non-clay slam. Given that, it will provide challenges for Federer. I am hopeful though.
 
Djoker is a heavy favourite for the US Open with Federer and Nadal his only challengers as usual. Nadal will be more of a challenge at the US Open than at Wimbledon.
 
Is the USO the slowest of the non-clay slams? AO was slow again this year after 2 years being faster. It is between the USO and AO for the slowest non-clay slam. Given that, it will provide challenges for Federer. I am hopeful though.
Were you at the AO? It was fast, in fact very fast. Craig Tiley had to come up with a bs excuse as to why it was so slick.
 
No, the problem for Federer is that he is almost 6 years older than Djokovic, while Nadal is one year older than Nole.

If the Swiss were only a couple of years older than the Serbian, I ask you, what do you think the result would be in the 2014, 2015 and 2019 finals?
Hiding behind age is cowardice. Fed doesn't do it, why should you?

You mention 14 and 15, Fed was thr same age as Peakovic is now, what's your point?

Salty excuses mean nothing when greatness is being rewritten
 
Federer without Djokovic, is very close to the level of Nadal's dominance in their preferred surface.
The Swiss would have 11 Wimbledon titles, only 10 defeats there, and he would have won 5! Wimbledon titles being over 30 years old (the same as the legendary Borg).
Federer has 13 semifinals there, Nadal has 12 semifinals in RG.
Both have 12 finals in their favorite Major (all-time record in male tennis players)
Federer has 5! Wimbledon finals being more than 30 years old (the same as McEnroe and Nadal in their career).
Nadal has 3 consecutive titles in RG being over 30 years old (the third largest domain in the open era of that tournament only surpassed byhimself twice and the great Borg).

The Serbian has inflicted a lot of damage on Federer, without any doubt.
Venus without Serena, Sharapova without Serena, Halep without Ostapenko, Agassi without Sampras, Sampras without Agassi, Azarenka without Serena, Sharapova without Azarenka.

It really all means zilch in the end, because anyone can make an argument like that, its pure fantasy.
 
You do know grass is not Novak's best surface, don't you?
Disagree, I think although he didn't play well in the final against Fed, he's had very few losses on grass in his career. Plus he's won more matches at Wimby than at any other Slam (this surprised me).
 
I think it would be fitting for Federer to win it. He deserves another slam.
For berating Djok and his family for years when Nole was just a pup? For the arrogance displayed when he bested Djok before Nole became superhuman? He doesn't deserve another Slam, Novak won't allow him to get another.
 
Back
Top