You do know grass is not Novak's best surface, don't you?He did play well but he could have been even better in my opinion. Especially at Wimbledon. And of course, he’ll be the favorite for USO.
His coach Wajda, told today that they are going for the GS record. So, there's no doubt he will be motivated once again. By snatching USO and AO he's made a massive step in tying Nadal and then he has open road to rush to 20 and beyond and finish it off quickly before retiring. He has to do it quickly considering his age.
Thiem won IW and that's sometimes a good omen for the USO (Flavia Pennetta for instance), I'd go with RBA or Thiem.
Keep dreaming bud regarding youngstersNovak is the firm favourite. A younger player might surprise us.
Keep dreaming bud regarding youngsters. I dream too but it sucks. Youngsters might surprise again but NOT the way we want too. Watch them drop out in a few first rounds again and again
. One might make it to the QF
. I'm joking but I seriously lost my hope for them
![]()
You do know grass is not Novak's best surface, don't you?
Djokovic can win on grass but not HC? Sure, bro.
Nadal won AO and not RG in 2009. Doesn't make him more favored at AO than RG.Where were you in 2014 ?
Djokovic won 5/6 grass finals. How many HC finals did he win?
But Novak has been more successful at Wimbledon than at the USONadal won AO and not RG in 2009. Doesn't make him more favored at AO than RG.
So why is he better on HC again?10 out of 15...perfect 7 at AO and lopsided 3 at USO (lost more finals, than he won, totally should have beaten Murray in that 2012 final and Nadal either in 2010 or in 2013, kinda layed an egg there! Wawrinka deserved his win over Djokovic though as he played fantastic, whilst Djokovic has already been in the beginning phases of his famous career "slump")
Nadal won AO and not RG in 2009. Doesn't make him more favored at AO than RG.
That was not my point. My point was that if he's already won Wimbledon on grass, he should be favored to win USO on hard.Your point was that Djoko can’t lose on HC if he wins on grass. 2014 disproves this claim.
So why is he better on HC again?
There are 2 HC GS tournaments and 1 grass, so taking that into account Djokovic is clearly better on grass than HC?
On the other hand, whenever Djoker won AO and Wimbledon in a season, he also added US Open to them:Well, no has defended USO for over a decade so recent history is against him
You didn't get the point, did you?Because of his 55 hard court titles? because of his 24 hard court masters titles? because of 5 YEC titles won on hard courts? And that is on top of those 10 hard court grand slams! LOL 55 titles out of 75 won on hard courts against just 6 on grass...i dunno...to me the pattern is pretty damn clear...LMAO
That was not my point. My point was that if he's already won Wimbledon on grass, he should be favored to win USO on hard.
You didn't get the point, did you?
How many masters are there on grass?
With the slow UO courts, he is the favourite. Who is going to beat him?
He needs to win them with the next couple of years since he’s now 32. Winning gets harder past 35.He will be the overwhelming favourite to win any slams he enters for the next 2 years at the very least with the exception of FO.Also he never really gets injured and his decline is really slow if at all.He has good 5 years in him with no real competition outside clay.If he can't win at least 6 slams in these 5 years he will really underachieve.
He did play well but he could have been even better in my opinion. Especially at Wimbledon. And of course, he’ll be the favorite for USO.
I always favour Nadal at USO..its not by chance in 3 finals he is 2-1 v Djokovic.I feel good about Rafa at the USO if healthy. Djokovic is still the overall favorite though.
Nadal arguably played best tennis past two years at USO and Thiem took him to the wire last year.Thiem won IW and that's sometimes a good omen for the USO (Flavia Pennetta for instance), I'd go with RBA or Thiem.
You are right on both counts: he is the favorite AND he is unlikely to win. In a 128-player competition, the favorite is usually unlikely to win. The bookmakers currently have him at about 5/4, which makes him a pretty firm favorite but not more likely than the entirety of the field. Probably gives him about a 40% chance.
Disagree with the thread title.
Djokovic is a strong favourite to complete another 3-slam season this year.
If Thiem wants to take out Nole, he'd better win the whole thing.This guy!
Nadal at FO is just insane and not subject to normal rules.@Imperator On this note, I just read these words of Nate Silver on the US Democratic primary, which he wrote a week ago:
"It’s worth keeping in mind that in a field of 20-something candidates with no runaway frontrunner, all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Joe Biden is probably going to lose. Kamala Harris is probably going to lose. Elizabeth Warren is probably going to lose. Bernie Sanders is probably going to lose. And so forth." To which I adapt:
"It's worth keeping in mind that in a field of 128 candidates with no runaway frontrunner [and even arguably then], all of the candidates are fairly heavy underdogs. Novak Djokovic is probably going to lose. Rafael Nadal is probably going to lose. Roger Federer is probably going to lose."
That said, I see that the bookmakers already have Nadal as in with around a 50% chance at Roland Garros 2020. He's just so dominant there that the usual rules don't apply - he is a runaway frontrunner.
Nadal at FO is just insane and not subject to normal rules.
Federer is insane on grass...thats what makes yesterday sting for his fans and i do sympathise...just not with the Royal Box or John Bercow!!!
Federer without Djokovic, is very close to the level of Nadal's dominance in their preferred surface.
The Swiss would have 11 Wimbledon titles, only 10 defeats there, and he would have won 5! Wimbledon titles being over 30 years old (the same as the legendary Borg).
Federer has 13 semifinals there, Nadal has 12 semifinals in RG.
Both have 12 finals in their favorite Major (all-time record in male tennis players)
Federer has 5! Wimbledon finals being more than 30 years old (the same as McEnroe and Nadal in their career).
Nadal has 3 consecutive titles in RG being over 30 years old (the third largest domain in the open era of that tournament only surpassed byhimself twice and the great Borg).
The Serbian has inflicted a lot of damage on Federer, without any doubt.
This title thread would never get my attention unless it is written by Sureshs.Yes, it seems a bit silly to make such a statement so early but that’s my feeling. Before the start of 2019, I predicted 2 GS wins for Djoko : AO and Wimby. I never had the feeling he would get USO and last events reinforced my opinion.
First of all, the younger players are clearly harder to deal with on HC than on grass or clay. And Djokovic’s level dropped after AO, I don’t know if it’s because he’s 32 but he hasn’t had the same explosiveness ever since the AO. The field will be hungrier than ever, it will be difficult to make it to the final and I feel like someone will pull an upset.
If Djokovic does win, obviously I’ll be glad and I will happily bump this thread to mock myself (unless someone does it before me).![]()
But thats exactly why Federer st wimbledon is nowhere near Nadal at Roland Gorras. Nadal doesnt have a Djokovic or whoever at the french open who beats him in the final, he has not a single rival there and never had.
Saying that i think that dominating at wimbledon is much harder than dominating at the french open
First of all, the younger players are clearly harder to deal with on HC than on grass or clay.
Is the USO the slowest of the non-clay slams? AO was slow again this year after 2 years being faster. It is between the USO and AO for the slowest non-clay slam. Given that, it will provide challenges for Federer. I am hopeful though.I don't see him winning it either.
I think Federer will win the USO.
Thiem won IW and that's sometimes a good omen for the USO (Flavia Pennetta for instance), I'd go with RBA or Thiem.
Were you at the AO? It was fast, in fact very fast. Craig Tiley had to come up with a bs excuse as to why it was so slick.Is the USO the slowest of the non-clay slams? AO was slow again this year after 2 years being faster. It is between the USO and AO for the slowest non-clay slam. Given that, it will provide challenges for Federer. I am hopeful though.
Hiding behind age is cowardice. Fed doesn't do it, why should you?No, the problem for Federer is that he is almost 6 years older than Djokovic, while Nadal is one year older than Nole.
If the Swiss were only a couple of years older than the Serbian, I ask you, what do you think the result would be in the 2014, 2015 and 2019 finals?
Venus without Serena, Sharapova without Serena, Halep without Ostapenko, Agassi without Sampras, Sampras without Agassi, Azarenka without Serena, Sharapova without Azarenka.Federer without Djokovic, is very close to the level of Nadal's dominance in their preferred surface.
The Swiss would have 11 Wimbledon titles, only 10 defeats there, and he would have won 5! Wimbledon titles being over 30 years old (the same as the legendary Borg).
Federer has 13 semifinals there, Nadal has 12 semifinals in RG.
Both have 12 finals in their favorite Major (all-time record in male tennis players)
Federer has 5! Wimbledon finals being more than 30 years old (the same as McEnroe and Nadal in their career).
Nadal has 3 consecutive titles in RG being over 30 years old (the third largest domain in the open era of that tournament only surpassed byhimself twice and the great Borg).
The Serbian has inflicted a lot of damage on Federer, without any doubt.
I agree, he's the HC and grass GOAT now.Djokovic won 5/6 grass finals. How many HC finals did he win?
Disagree, I think although he didn't play well in the final against Fed, he's had very few losses on grass in his career. Plus he's won more matches at Wimby than at any other Slam (this surprised me).You do know grass is not Novak's best surface, don't you?
For berating Djok and his family for years when Nole was just a pup? For the arrogance displayed when he bested Djok before Nole became superhuman? He doesn't deserve another Slam, Novak won't allow him to get another.I think it would be fitting for Federer to win it. He deserves another slam.