Sweets3450
New User
In this interview Federer goes on to explain he uses about over 60 rackets every year, replacing all 12 of his rackets 5 times a year because they lose their stiffness. It's also something that gets mentioned on the forums here. "Micro fractures" is the common term.
I have used this frame since I was in middle school. It's a 3/10 condition going by TW for sale ratings, you can see where I used duct tape on the frame where I wore the bumper away in college a decade ago.
I bought these from a TW poster, they're in 9/10 condition and have barely seen use.
All of these rackets feel identical. I can not tell a difference in feel or play between these fresh ones and the ones I have used for almost two decades. Why is this?
My best guesses:
-I'm not skilled enough to notice. I'm maybe a 5.5 player nowadays
-The rackets I recently acquired are also old and have been worn more than their paint reveals, perhaps stored in poor conditions. I remember we got access to a radar gun in college and we were all messing around with it. I can crank a high forehand over 100mph easily according to that radar gun. So it's not likely these newer ones have been used anywhere near as hard as my old ones since I'm a big hitter.
-The "micro fractures" have no pragmatic meaning to the average player. Rackets losing their stiffness only applies to the top professionals who are sponsored or can afford to replace them every year because either they can notice or simply do it for peace of mind their equipment is not to blame.
Have any of you purchased new frames and noticed any differences? Do they actually feel stiffer or have any beneficial differences such as being crisper? If anybody knows somebody with a Babolat RDC machine near NYC I'd love to put each racket on the machine and see what it says.
On the Babolot RDC stiffness:
I've been searching for new rackets and find some of the consumer measurements confusing and obfuscate the decision making process. I tried the RF97 as the RDC stiffness rating was similar to my old 6.1 Hyper Pro Staff but actually felt far stiffer and gave me an injury. I've also used the PS97 Counterveil and Yonex Vcore 97 for a few hours and both felt far stiffer. So I've been skeptical the stiffness rating means anything at all to anybody not a technician or manufacturer. I'm really skeptical the RDC stiffness rating has any practical use. It's measured by putting a pivot in the center of the racket and pulling down at the tip. The old Wilson measurement would measure the flexibility from tip to tip, not including any pivot point in the middle. Hence the Wilson naming convention - 5.0, 6.1, 6.9, etc. I have played with multiple Wilson rackets that felt appropriately more or less stiff according to its model name as that was its flexibility rating. However, I have played with multiple frames different RDC ratings and some felt stiffer at lower ratings and others felt the same with differing ratings. From my experience, it's a useless measurement to the consumer. Unlike a weight measurement which is going to feel the same regardless of materials and composition, the stiffness rating does not really explain how a racket is going to feel as the actual stiffness can differ purposely on certain areas of a racket.
I have used this frame since I was in middle school. It's a 3/10 condition going by TW for sale ratings, you can see where I used duct tape on the frame where I wore the bumper away in college a decade ago.
I bought these from a TW poster, they're in 9/10 condition and have barely seen use.
All of these rackets feel identical. I can not tell a difference in feel or play between these fresh ones and the ones I have used for almost two decades. Why is this?
My best guesses:
-I'm not skilled enough to notice. I'm maybe a 5.5 player nowadays
-The rackets I recently acquired are also old and have been worn more than their paint reveals, perhaps stored in poor conditions. I remember we got access to a radar gun in college and we were all messing around with it. I can crank a high forehand over 100mph easily according to that radar gun. So it's not likely these newer ones have been used anywhere near as hard as my old ones since I'm a big hitter.
-The "micro fractures" have no pragmatic meaning to the average player. Rackets losing their stiffness only applies to the top professionals who are sponsored or can afford to replace them every year because either they can notice or simply do it for peace of mind their equipment is not to blame.
Have any of you purchased new frames and noticed any differences? Do they actually feel stiffer or have any beneficial differences such as being crisper? If anybody knows somebody with a Babolat RDC machine near NYC I'd love to put each racket on the machine and see what it says.
On the Babolot RDC stiffness:
I've been searching for new rackets and find some of the consumer measurements confusing and obfuscate the decision making process. I tried the RF97 as the RDC stiffness rating was similar to my old 6.1 Hyper Pro Staff but actually felt far stiffer and gave me an injury. I've also used the PS97 Counterveil and Yonex Vcore 97 for a few hours and both felt far stiffer. So I've been skeptical the stiffness rating means anything at all to anybody not a technician or manufacturer. I'm really skeptical the RDC stiffness rating has any practical use. It's measured by putting a pivot in the center of the racket and pulling down at the tip. The old Wilson measurement would measure the flexibility from tip to tip, not including any pivot point in the middle. Hence the Wilson naming convention - 5.0, 6.1, 6.9, etc. I have played with multiple Wilson rackets that felt appropriately more or less stiff according to its model name as that was its flexibility rating. However, I have played with multiple frames different RDC ratings and some felt stiffer at lower ratings and others felt the same with differing ratings. From my experience, it's a useless measurement to the consumer. Unlike a weight measurement which is going to feel the same regardless of materials and composition, the stiffness rating does not really explain how a racket is going to feel as the actual stiffness can differ purposely on certain areas of a racket.
Last edited: