Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by gplracer, Mar 5, 2012.
Samprass and Federer
Irony...with respect to what? That 100 is supposed to be better?
Sampras used 85, trolljob post.
You forgot me.
Laver used 65.
DJ uses around 98. Currently No1.
Didn't William Renshaw and Richard Sears 25 sq in rackets?
That's nothing rosewall was able to hit 80 mph backhands with a ping pong paddle.
Nadal and Djokovic don't use 90 sq in frames, so the thread title is wrong
And with a tennis racket, he was hitting them at 100
Haha! Spank you very much!
oh, that's awesome!!!!
In fact every time i think of it, makes me spill my Darjeeling Tea.
The main thing that Sampras and Federer have in common is they both have single-handed backhands and both have great serves.
Good movers, slightly above average forehands?
Yeah but more curious about the single-handed backhand. What racquet sizes do other single-handed backhand players have?
Don't they also have in common more slams than Nadal?
Nadal is 25, so of course Nadal has less slams. He's not an alien you know. A 25-year-old with 14 or 16 slams :lol:
Thanks for agreeing that both Sampras and Federer are better than Nadal
Then no wonder neither are the greatest. :shock:
A remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection.
Correspondence in nature or in time of occurrence.
The expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
And that is because of Federer's superior H2H against Nadal ???
Are you implying that Hrbaty is a better player than Nadal & Federer?
Nadal leads Federer 8-2 in slam H2H. How about Hrbaty?
Hrbaty has a 100% record over Nadal in slams. Suck out.
Hrbaty and Nadal have never met at a slam, ever.
They've met in Lyton 2003, Auckland 2004, Auckland 2005, Barcelona 2005. Nadal won Barcelona. Hrbaty won the rest.
Oh dear lord.
Bulzilla has a losing H2H to every "poaster" on TTW
I just defeated Gorecki and Crazy man.
I'm sorry. are you arguing the fact that Hrbaty has a leading h2h to Nadal?
no matter what thread is opened, no matter what subject is discussed, you can be sure that once the Nadal starts to pour in, any logical debate is over
I'm not arguing anything. I'm posting the FACT that Nadal and Hrbaty have never met in a slam. Maybe you should learn how to read before you post on a messageboard.
I post with facts. You post with pictures.
BAHAHAHAHA! GREATEST TENNIS COMMERCIAL EVER!!!
There is actually writing underneath the picture. It's only an image if there is no text. Once text has been added, the format automatically becomes 'text'. These are facts that I submit to you.
and how does your fact relate to mine within the context of the dicussion?
i recomend you read the thread from the very first post before replying.
this thread is polluted now.
Why don't you ask yourself.... You started this train of conversation, when you posted this to rossi46-
This thread was always polluted. OP couldn't even be bothered to spell Sampras correctly and post #3 disproves the OP's premise. Also, other posters chimed in with their own opinion of who the two greatest players were....Basically it was a mess to start with.
Are you Rossi?
That's what happens when anyone brings up Nadal in a conversation that didn't initially involve him.
90% of the time, it's DjokovicForTheWin.
looks like someone starts biting off his % now
99% would've been an exaggeration, even if it feels about right. :twisted:
(was he tested afterwards ?...)
Your absence in these sort of threads with your way of using questions to answer other questions have been felt. Welcome back!
OP, why do you call him Sampr-ass?
Federer's serve, while effective, is not in the same league's as Sampras'.
Just like Sampras' ground game, while effective, is not in the same league as Federer's.
Ergo Sampras net game >> Federer...
Separate names with a comma.