socallefty
G.O.A.T.
Just like all other tennis fans, I’ve been watching a lot of replays of old Grand Slam finals and semifinals on the Tennis Channel and YouTube since the shutdown of Pro tournaments in March. I am in my fifties and grew up watching Borg, McEnroe, Connors, Lendl, Becker, Sampras, Edberg, Agassi etc. before watching today‘s players like Federer, Djokovic, Nadal etc. In fact, I was a big fan of McEnroe in the Eighties and Sampras in the Nineties and definitely liked their serve-and-volley style at that time. However, when I watched replays of old matches from the Eighties/Nineties including classics like Borg/McEnroe 1980, Edberg/Becker 1989, Sampras/Agassi 1995/1999, Sampras/Rafter 2000 etc., I just did not enjoy them at all compared to watching epic Federer/Nadal, Nadal/Djokovic and Djokovic/Federer matches from the last fifteen years. Does anyone else feel the same way?
The matches from the Eighties/Nineties on quicker courts (including faster grass at Wimbledon) seem like servebot tennis (even a baseliner like Agassi has so many service winners against Sampras) and the passing shots are so inferior before poly strings. The groundstroke styles pre-dating modern ATP technique seem so outdated and quirky/awkward with so little topspin and angles. Watching these old strokes in Grand Slam epic finals from 20-30 years ago looks likes watching club-level players with bad technique these days. The movement and footwork and level of defense seems so bad compared to modern tennis. Even though I grew up watching those players and liked serve-and-volleyers battling baseliners in those days, I feel like the quality of shot-making, athleticism, defense, building points from the baseline etc. has improved so much in the 21st century that for me, matches from the Eighties/Nineties are not enjoyable anymore. Do others feel the same after being forced to watch classic match replays on TV in the last few months?
I have never been someone to complain about the slowing down of courts and have always enjoyed watching high-level modern players compete even with different styles like Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Del Potro, Wawrinka etc. I like watching long baseline rallies or points being finished at the net as long as the technique and shot-making is great. I don’t like watching servebots like Isner, Karlovic, Opelka etc. and Nineties tennis had so many servebots at Wimbledon in particular that the major tournaments including Wimbledon made the business decision to slow down courts to get more viewers. Tennis is way more popular now everywhere except in the US than it was in the past and I don’t see the tournaments speeding up courts anytime soon. After watching all these replays of old matches. I’m thankful for that. I am also happy that players with quirky-looking flat groundstrokes like Connors and McEnroe cannot make it even to the college level these days as they frankly now look ugly to me. I would much rather watch Federer’s forehand, Wawrinka’s backhand, Djokovic‘s backhand, Thiem’s groundstrokes etc. and the movement and defense of modern players along with less service aces and less volleys. The modern players may not serve-and-volley anymore but most of them finish points well at the net when they get short balls and I do not bemoan the reduced effectiveness of net play when everything else has become so much more aesthetically pleasing.
I don’t think this is a controversial opinion if you watch classic matches and modern epics with an open mind, but I am sure that there will be many who disagree.
The matches from the Eighties/Nineties on quicker courts (including faster grass at Wimbledon) seem like servebot tennis (even a baseliner like Agassi has so many service winners against Sampras) and the passing shots are so inferior before poly strings. The groundstroke styles pre-dating modern ATP technique seem so outdated and quirky/awkward with so little topspin and angles. Watching these old strokes in Grand Slam epic finals from 20-30 years ago looks likes watching club-level players with bad technique these days. The movement and footwork and level of defense seems so bad compared to modern tennis. Even though I grew up watching those players and liked serve-and-volleyers battling baseliners in those days, I feel like the quality of shot-making, athleticism, defense, building points from the baseline etc. has improved so much in the 21st century that for me, matches from the Eighties/Nineties are not enjoyable anymore. Do others feel the same after being forced to watch classic match replays on TV in the last few months?
I have never been someone to complain about the slowing down of courts and have always enjoyed watching high-level modern players compete even with different styles like Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Del Potro, Wawrinka etc. I like watching long baseline rallies or points being finished at the net as long as the technique and shot-making is great. I don’t like watching servebots like Isner, Karlovic, Opelka etc. and Nineties tennis had so many servebots at Wimbledon in particular that the major tournaments including Wimbledon made the business decision to slow down courts to get more viewers. Tennis is way more popular now everywhere except in the US than it was in the past and I don’t see the tournaments speeding up courts anytime soon. After watching all these replays of old matches. I’m thankful for that. I am also happy that players with quirky-looking flat groundstrokes like Connors and McEnroe cannot make it even to the college level these days as they frankly now look ugly to me. I would much rather watch Federer’s forehand, Wawrinka’s backhand, Djokovic‘s backhand, Thiem’s groundstrokes etc. and the movement and defense of modern players along with less service aces and less volleys. The modern players may not serve-and-volley anymore but most of them finish points well at the net when they get short balls and I do not bemoan the reduced effectiveness of net play when everything else has become so much more aesthetically pleasing.
I don’t think this is a controversial opinion if you watch classic matches and modern epics with an open mind, but I am sure that there will be many who disagree.