No. Because Soderling had more upside to his game even when he was languishing within the bottom end of the top 100.
It doesn't matter how much he's talked about. It's about watching the matches, not following what John McEnroe thinks. And yes, he had a more powerful, fluid game that could translate to other surfaces more freely. That is why he did well on both clay and indoors.Really? How so? Was he talked about more at the time??
He can be a thorn in the ass for a set or so, but Nadal will dethorn the thorn with his loopy shots.and dethorne Nadal at RG??
He can be a thorn in the ass for a set or so, but Nadal will dethorn the thorn with his loopy shots.
Happened once. Rafa has beaten Søderling 3 times in RG.Soderling crushes Nadal at RG though.
Happened once. Rafa has beaten Søderling 3 times in RG.
Really? How so? Was he talked about more at the time??
I believe so. I feel Nadal is ripe for a dethornment.
Right... because beating a 33-year old Nadal = beating a 23-year old Nadal.
Does Nadal really need to be dethroned at this point? He's only won like 11 RGs.
Yes, but let's face it both Soderling and Monfils are two pathetic moonballers in the big scheme if you consider tennis history.No. Because Soderling had more upside to his game even when he was languishing within the bottom end of the top 100.
Why are you even putting Monfils in the same sentence as Soderling? Better yet, what makes you think this kid is even in Monfils' league? Lol..Yes, but let's face it both Soderling and Monfils are two pathetic moonballers in the big scheme if you consider tennis history.
40/2018 R64 Shanghai Masters Hard Stefanos Tsitsipas Gael Monfils 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 1.73 - 2.10Why are you even putting Monfils in the same sentence as Soderling? Better yet, what makes you think this kid is even in Monfils' league? Lol..
I didn't know you drank.Khachanov, Fognini, Schwartzman, Thiem, Djokovic, Basilashvilli - all these have genuine chances to take out Nadal next year.
So if a player beats another player that means they are automatically better? I guess Benjamin Becker is better than Agassi because he beat him in their last match.40/2018 R64 Shanghai Masters Hard Stefanos Tsitsipas Gael Monfils 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 1.73 - 2.10
Khach players the winner next so we may have Khach > Tsits > Monfils
We're you living under a rock for Khach's last 4 hour and 20 minute match?
You're really doubling down on Monfils? Even Khach is on track with the pigeonfils ranking by age and the mental differences are just huge. Please don't prop up the fools who've been bending over for years and years.So if a player beats another player that means they are automatically better? I guess Benjamin Becker is better than Agassi because he beat him in their last match.
Thiem isn't far off Monfils.You're really doubling down on Monfils? Even Khach is on track with the pigeonfils ranking by age and the mental differences are just huge. Please don't prop up the fools who've been bending over for years and years.
To be honest Khach is not that different from Thiem and Tsitsipas is far above.
But Djokovic will be 32, so "any top 20 player should be able to dethrone Djokovic based on his avanced tennis age".Rafa will be 33 years old during next year's RG final. In reality, any top 20 player should be able to dethrone him just based on his advanced tennis age. Yet the only guy mentally capable of beating him BO5 on clay is Djokovic. Forget Thiem or any next gens, they wet the bed whenever they see Rafa prowling on the other side of the net.
It was easy to finish matches in 2003-2007. It's a different era now. Class of 2007 and 2008 had it easy.Thiem isn't far off Monfils.
Question though Meles, how would you rate Gasquet? Or similar young talents from previous eras?
is that the perfect oxymoron ?a bad Nadal loss.