I think Djokovic is the most complete player of all-time. He hasn’t any weaknesses, and in his peak, he was/is an unstoppable machine.
But he may never be the GOAT in terms of Slam titles for a few reasons. Apart of having top-class rivals, one reasons is that he started winning consistently relatively late (2011) and probably will not keep on winning into his 35+ years like Federer.
But not being the greatest ever in terms of longevity doesn‘t mean that you can‘t be still the best and most complete player to ever step on the court. Right?
But he may never be the GOAT in terms of Slam titles for a few reasons. Apart of having top-class rivals, one reasons is that he started winning consistently relatively late (2011) and probably will not keep on winning into his 35+ years like Federer.
But not being the greatest ever in terms of longevity doesn‘t mean that you can‘t be still the best and most complete player to ever step on the court. Right?
