DOES TENNIS NEED BIG RULE CHANGES?

[blablavla]

Eliminate 2nd serve.

That's it. That alone would fix a lot of things.

you are too obsessed with this idea while it is a too big change, so probably won't happen any time soon.
think as well that recreational players play same rules and same court dimension like the pros.
on recreational level, playing 1 service only will increase the frustration level and might in theory endanger the popularity of the sport at a global level.

 

[Johnatan]

Some rule changes I would suggest:

- ohbh players should start each game with 15:0 advantage... Beautiful ohbh starts with 30:0 advantage...

- Laver cup to be 5th slam, retroactively

- Dirt is not a surface, ban it from calendar, erase all results retroactively

- frame touch which launches ball on upper part of stadium should be considered winner

- 40:15, with two match point, is auto win... No need for another point...

Ahahaha yes you’re right Dirt is not a surface to play tennis on ! Who woke up a morning spilled a bag of sand in their living room, slid and fell on it and be like : WOW That is a GREAT surface to play tennis

 

[UnderratedSlam]

you are too obsessed with this idea while it is a too big change, so probably won't happen any time soon.
think as well that recreational players play same rules and same court dimension like the pros.
on recreational level, playing 1 service only will increase the frustration level and might in theory endanger the popularity of the sport at a global level.

You are obsessed with comparing pro tennis with amateur tennis, which is a far more useless and silly obsession.

This is what... the 115th time you compare the incomparable?

 

[blablavla]

You are obsessed with comparing pro tennis with amateur tennis, which is a far more useless and silly obsession.

This is what... the 115th time you compare the incomparable?

glad that I have a personal fan now, who is actually counting my comparisons.
kudos

 

[UnderratedSlam]

glad that I have a personal fan now, who is actually counting my comparisons.
kudos

So the police are fans of criminals because they follow their activities?

Great logic from you... yet again.

 

[blablavla]

So the police are fans of criminals because they follow their activities?

Great logic from you... yet again.

it all depends on point of view.
to my knowledge, police people receive a salary for following criminal activities.
do you get paid for following my activity? no? then you're my fan

 

[UnderratedSlam]

it all depends on point of view.
to my knowledge, police people receive a salary for following criminal activities.
do you get paid for following my activity? no? then you're my fan

So historians are all fans of Hitler and Stalin because they follow their activities?

Just one more example to make you understand how flawed your logic is.

Being paid or not is irrelevant, it's like saying "yeah, but cops wear blue and you wear green".

 

[blablavla]

So historians are all fans of Hitler and Stalin because they follow their activities?

Just one more example to make you understand how flawed your logic is.

Being paid or not is irrelevant, it's like saying "yeah, but cops wear blue and you wear green".

it might come as a surprise to you, but yes, historians as well often follow such personalities because they have to produce some output, otherwise they don't get salaries, or honorary for writing books or other forms of reward.
But yeah, I can see that you and logic... I'll better skip this part.

congrats keyboard warrior.
you're getting better at typing countless words in texts that shall look smart but in fact bear little to no sense.

P.S.
don't have time to debate with you, as it is a waste of time.
so, I'll ignore your posts till they start bearing meaning

 

[UnderratedSlam]

it might come as a surprise to you, but yes, historians as well often follow such personalities because they have to produce some output, otherwise they don't get salaries, or honorary for writing books or other forms of reward.
But yeah, I can see that you and logic... I'll better skip this part.

congrats keyboard warrior.
you're getting better at typing countless words in texts that shall look smart but in fact bear little to no sense.

P.S.
don't have time to debate with you, as it is a waste of time.
so, I'll ignore your posts till they start bearing meaning

So ALL historians get paid?

What about hobby historians? They don't exist? Student historians?

(Don't even try to refute this, coz you keep comparing tennis pros with tennis amateurs hence amateur historians are the same as pro historians according to your logic...)

 

[Lotus_Island]

So ALL historians get paid?

What about hobby historians? They don't exist? Student historians?

(Don't even try to refute this, coz you keep comparing tennis pros with tennis amateurs hence amateur historians are the same as pro historians according to your logic...)

It's all the same. Most history can be found on wiki anyway.

 

[Markus Kaila]

There would be no first serve.

Only one serve ball would mean that the tallest players would get a nice present, unfair.