Does the US Open have any plans on having a roof?

RCizzle65

Hall of Fame
It's known to rain a lot around September in New York, I know a lot of people would be against it, but the Rod Laver has a roof, and Centre Court just got a roof, and Philippe Chatrier plans to have one by 2011. I know traditionalists would love not to have the roof (I didn't like the roof at Wimbledon), but the other big tournaments decided to have one, so why none on Arthur Ashe? Or did I just miss the memo?
 
the opening on the top of the stadium is ridiculously bigger than those at the other three places mentioned...costs would be ridiculous if it were deemed possible at all to have a roof. nevermind the fact that it rains more during wimbledon and they dont have night matches there or at chartrier so a roof might be neccessary be there rain a few days during the tournament. these are just quick thoughts...
 
Before they really discuss adding a roof they would first have to tear down that monstrosity, Arthur Ashe.
 
Last edited:
the opening on the top of the stadium is ridiculously bigger than those at the other three places mentioned...costs would be ridiculous if it were deemed possible at all to have a roof. nevermind the fact that it rains more during wimbledon and they dont have night matches there or at chartrier so a roof might be neccessary be there rain a few days during the tournament. these are just quick thoughts...

Before they really discuss adding a roof thery would first have to tear down that monstrosity, Arthur Ashe.

Yes. I doubt very much that it would be possible to put a roof on the the current Arthur Ashe. The roof on wimbledon center court was possible because the sides of that structure are straight up and down. The top tier of Arthur Ashe flares outward. Any roof put over that would be so huge and so heavy that it would collapse inward, imho
 
wasn't there some talk (or maybe just a suggestion) about a year ago about building a roof, and then letting the Islanders play there in the winter since their arena is falling down?
 
Before they really discuss adding a roof thery would first have to tear down that monstrosity, Arthur Ashe.

After only 12 yrs of existence? Maybe you could put a "Hamburg" style umbrella roof.
 
The USO obviously doesn't mind being the 2nd best hard court slam. Besides the roof, they need to dump the final set breakers and add a rest day between semi and final.
 
They should simply get covers for the courts, like they have in Wimbledon. It's beyond stupid that they don't have them yet.
 
They should simply get covers for the courts, like they have in Wimbledon. It's beyond stupid that they don't have them yet.

Agreed. It's very sad to see that Arthur Ashe was never built thinking about the sport, the fans or the players
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how much bigger Ashe is than the next biggest arean, but it is way bigger. Apart from the logistics of such a huge roof (and a safe one), I suspect it would then take somewhere in the region of about an hour to close and an hour to open it. That's a lot of rain on the courts if they were factoring in 10% chance of rain -- and then it poured torrentially.
 
I wrote in another thread that Arthur Ashe is a terrible stadium to have a roof since it rises so high and fans out at the top giving it a massive perimeter at the top.

Also, retrofitting Ashe with a roof would be much more difficult that just simply building a secondary 10-12,000 seat stadium with an easily, quickly retractable roof, like Rod Laver Arena at the AO.

But, it would be sort of bizarre to have the court with the roof not be the main show court. But, I doubt the USTA is going to give up on Ashe, so that would be the only choice.

It could work. Just have certain Ashe Stadium ticket holders (most likely the ones who paid the most) be "premier" ticket holders, such that if the match has to be moved to the roofed court, they will still have a seat.

Have the tickets for the remaining ticketholders clearly explain that they are only valid for Ashe Stadium and in the event of weather-related events forcing play inside on the roofed court, thsoe tickeholders are out of luck.

Of course, will any of this happen? The USTA certainly has enough cash.
 
The USO obviously doesn't mind being the 2nd best hard court slam. Besides the roof, they need to dump the final set breakers and add a rest day between semi and final.

Wholly agreed. They also need to stop with all the tacky, cheesy, cringe-inducing gimmicks. Let's bring prestige back to the slams. After Wimbledon, US Open was my favorite championships. Over the past 3 years, Australian and Garros have made a strong case for being number 2 on my list.
 
Last edited:
first off. i cant ever remember the tournament starting so late in august. my bday is aug 30, the USO always seemed to be in the middle of the tourny when my bday came. ive never seen it start after my bday.

maybe if they go back to previous scheduling we can avoid september rains *and* being preempted for frikking college football.

as you can tell, im less than thrilled with the coverage.
 
What match will they show? Ladies semis and men's quarters are scheduled at the same time. Could it be us Americans will be treated to Serena v Kim. At the very least, they can turn the USTA streams back on.
 
I think we should be asking the T.V. companies, they are the ones making those decisions, not the USTA.

What's ironic is that the USTA built the new 60 million dollar indoor courts for rainy days, but no covers for the stadium courts.
 
I think Rafa has hired contractors out of his own pocket to build a roof to take away one more disadvantage the USTA might throw at him in the future.
 
Arthur Ashe needs to be nuked from orbit, preferably with the current USTA board and Pam Shriver in it. Its a quick, easy and permanent solution.

They can then beg Wimbledon to tell them how to host a slam properly.
 
Rain may push both men's semifinals to Sunday

By Tom Perrotta

U.S. Open officials are hoping for a dry spell around 3:00 p.m. Friday afternoon, or else the tournament will conclude on Monday, at the earliest, for the second straight year, according to a spokesman.

If the weather cooperates, women’s semifinalists Serena Williams and Kim Clijsters would be first on Arthur Ashe Stadium Friday, followed by Yanina Wickmayer and Caroline Wozniacki. Though the men’s quarterfinal between Rafael Nadal and Fernando Gonzalez is currently scheduled for Ashe after the Williams-Clijsters match, it most likely will be moved to Louis Armstrong stadium, though not before 2:00 p.m.

Chris Widmaier, a spokesman for the USTA, said that on Wednesday, tournament officials seriously considered canceling Thursday evening’s night session and holding both men’s quarterfinals Thursday afternoon.

“Certainly we discussed it,” Widmaier said. “But you had guys who were preparing for the night. And we’ve got 23,000 fans who wanted to come and we thought we had a possible window.”

At around 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, the weather forecast became more dire and the USTA considered asking Nadal and Gonzalez to change their start time at the last minute. Before any plans could be made, an updated weather forecast suggested the match could be completed if it began just after 7:00 p.m. Nadal and Gonzalez played almost two full sets—and endured two lengthy rain delays—before being sent home around midnight. The winner of their match will play Juan Martin del Potro in the semifinals, currently scheduled for Saturday afternoon.

If Nadal and Gonzalez don’t complete their match Friday, however, both men’s semifinals would likely be moved to Sunday, Widmaier said, to prevent the other men’s semifinalists, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic, from having a day of rest before Monday’s final. If the women do not complete their semifinals Friday, the tournament would have to hold the men’s semifinals and the women’s final on Sunday.

Fans who endured last night’s cold, rainy conditions are not eligible for a refund under U.S. Open tournament policy, which does not allow for refunds if a match is completed in an hour or more, or if fans see 90 minutes of tennis in that session. However, in the past the USTA has loosened its rules during particularly bad weather and offered those ticketholders passes to another session. Widmaier said no decision had been made about last night’s ticketholders.

After rain wreaked havoc on the final days of last year’s tournament, Arlen Kantarian, then the USTA CEO of professional tennis, said building a roof over Arthur Ashe Stadium was “a question of when, not if.” The USTA has yet to confirm a date for the roof’s arrival.

Tom Perrotta is a Senior Editor at TENNIS magazine. Follow him on Twitter.
 
Arthur Ashe needs to be nuked from orbit, preferably with the current USTA board and Pam Shriver in it. Its a quick, easy and permanent solution.

They can then beg Wimbledon to tell them how to host a slam properly.

Yea yeah. It sticks to tradition and yet brings in more revenue and TV ratings. Also, it is not dictated to by the networks. I'd like to hear a network executive try to persuade AELTC to stagger the R16.
 
Arthur Ashe stadium is the biggest tennis stadium so it would be very expensive to put a roof up. It would be nice if Ashe had a roof though.

I'll admit these rain delays have been a pain in the fart so someone just put a huge tarp over the roof and start the matches.
 
here is a solution -

instead of putting a roof on the entire stadium...

just blow a transparent bubble over the court - this way, players get to play, TV coverage is not affected, people in the stands just need to use umbrellas, wear rain coats, or pay up to sit in the lux boxes.
 
What if they put a roof on Louis Armstrong Stadium instead?
I know it's not the main stadium, but it's small enough to put a roof over.
 
NEW YORK -- In the not-too-distant future, there could be a retractable roof on the U.S. Open's main stadium, and organizers won't have to worry about tropical storms the way they were worrying Friday.

"It's a matter of 'when,' not 'if," a dome will be added to Arthur Ashe Stadium, said Arlen Kantarian, the U.S. Tennis Association's CEO for professional tennis. "It's the right next thing to do."

The USTA has looked into the possibility of adding a roof in the past but rejected the project as too costly. A recent new study suggests it could be done now because of lighter materials that could be used.

"We're hearing it's a lot more feasible," Kantarian said. "We're a bit more optimistic."
-http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/usopen08/news/story?id=3571584

This was from LAST year, when imminent rain from Tropical Storm Hannah pushed the start of the men's semis up an hour, then caused the rescheduling of the men's finals for Monday.
Remember?
So how come there is no more news from the USTA about the much needed roof?
After all, the Roman Colosseum had a roof 2000 years ago (albeit a retractable leather roof), and that is a lot bigger than Arthur Ashe Stadium.
 
here is a solution -

instead of putting a roof on the entire stadium...

just blow a transparent bubble over the court - this way, players get to play, TV coverage is not affected, people in the stands just need to use umbrellas, wear rain coats, or pay up to sit in the lux boxes.

LOL!!

But seriously, I was wondering why they cant do that .. ala.. Wimbledon! :confused:

But, yeah.. it wont work during the rain.. would just help speed the process after

-
 
"first off. i cant ever remember the tournament starting so late in august. "

The tournament always starts the Monday before Labor day weekend and I expect, for many reasons, this will continue at least until everyone reading this post has expired.
 
Back
Top