Dominance and the #1 stats should be as important as the Slam count

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beerus
  • Start date Start date

Who is greater?


  • Total voters
    46
Yes, maybe we understand this feel factor of watching them live but people born in 2010s/2020s/2030s won't care for feel at all, they will just look at numbers and decide who was what.

Only numbers will stand the test of time.

Whoever achieved numbers will be ahead if not already ahead.
Why we are still arguing about those who watched them live and stuff.

Even if you like a player better doesn't make them better. I have friends who liked raonic and Zverev but that doesn't mean there are anywhere close to the best.

Roger was the best. Nole is better than Roger.

Fedal fans have to adjust to the reality.
 
Why we are still arguing about those who watched them live and stuff.

Even if you like a player better doesn't make them better. I have friends who liked raonic and Zverev but that doesn't mean there are anywhere close to the best.

Roger was the best. Nole is better than Roger.

Fedal fans have to adjust to the reality.

@Azure is a Rafa fan, she rates Fed as best, very interesting :unsure:
 
We don't need to care about fedal fans sensitivities. Even if they are fan of someone, they can't spread lies now. Every single metric Nole is better than fed.

Yes stats don't care for feelings anymore, numbers are ruthless, they just impose themselves. I mean Azure is a good poster, so even I care for her sensitivity unfortunately the numbers won't, the numbers are ruthless, unbiased and they tell the truth. The whole universe runs on maths & laws of physics and I am sure she understands that very well.
 
We don't need to care about fedal fans sensitivities. Even if they are fan of someone, they can't spread lies now. Every single metric Nole is better than fed.
Yes stats don't care for feelings anymore, numbers are ruthless, they just impose themselves. I mean Azure is a good poster, so even I care for her sensitivity unfortunately the numbers won't, the numbers are ruthless, unbiased and they tell the truth. The whole universe runs on maths & laws of physics and I am sure she understands that very well.
I didn’t ask you to care lol. How old are you guys? 12?
 
I think Federer is the better player. But history will remember Nadal as the better player because of his H2H advantage. Fed was a shot or 2 shots away from being ahead of Nadal, his two 40-15 matches are a black mark. He should have won both USOpen 2011 and Wimbledon 2019.
yeah bit of a bummer that fed could be at 22 right now...match points, oof.
 
Back
Top