Donald Young, The Former Junior #1

Pancho

Semi-Pro
Donald Young's Broken Promise: What Happened to the Former Phenom?
By Zain Pasha (Contributor) on March 15, 2010


Trust me when I say that I am as surprised as everyone else that I haven't seen Donald Young's name in the draws of many major ATP tournaments.

Young played phenomenally in the juniors, demonstrating talent that some said was akin to that of Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi.

He has, however, also done a 180-degree turn in the pros with a career characterized by marginal success and overwhelming disappointment (at least by the expectations he set in the juniors).

Looking back, Young went from an ITF No. 1 and junior Wimbledon champion to a career-high ATP ranking of 73 that has since hovered between the mid to upper 100s. Largely playing matches on the Challenger circuit and having some success, Young has yet to break into the highest levels of ATP competition.

This is not to say that that we haven't been treated to glimpses of Young's promise. In fact, the reality is quite the opposite. Young qualified for the Australian Open main draw and had a good win over then world No. 85 Christophe Rochus, eventually falling to former Grand Slam champion Lleyton Hewitt, who, albeit a little old, still has some game.

Hailing from the same generation of players as Victoria Azarenka and Sam Querrey, Young certainly has a lot to live up to. Indeed, Azarenka has secured herself a spot as a solid top 10 player, and Querrey has demonstrated that he has the talent to win matches. Compared to this, Young's career certainly leaves something to be desired.

This is not Donald's fault, however, or at the very least he should not be entirely blamed for it. I've read too many articles blaming Young's immaturity and lack of work ethic for his lackluster pro career. While it is true that Young has been caught moping around like a teenager on the court, the root of these problems is something entirely different.

Young was pushed (by his parents) into the pros at an early age (16-17) when his playing style was still developing. He did not have the match experience that his older and more experienced opponents had, and as such Young was unable to win any main draw matches during the early part of his career.

Add to this the pressure of meeting expectations and the pressure the USTA put on him to change coaches, and you get a recipe for disaster—not to mention Young's tendency to get down on himself after losing matches. Indeed, Young's confidence took a serious hit from the start and apparently has yet to recover.

None of this is to absolve Donald Young of all responsibility for his career, but we should give him some slack. He is doing the "dirty work" now that some have said he should have done when he was playing in the main draws of Grand Slams, and I hope it pays off. American tennis could use the talents of a player like Donald Young.
 
How about this; who cares? Get over it, let the real talents rise to the top instead of trying to force feed us players that don't win.
 
How about this; who cares? Get over it, let the real talents rise to the top instead of trying to force feed us players that don't win.

Some people have loads of talent and rise to top with out any support.
Some people need lots of support. Nothing wrong in supporting donald Young.I would give him a few more chances before i give up on him.
 
Mother Marjorie asks herself why they continue to bash this nice young man? Sure, there have been mistakes with his coaching and progression, but it appears that the real frustration lies in the fact that the US is left without an up-and-coming talent. That's tons of pressure to apply on such a young, growing mind.

Mother Marjorie will pray for Donald's emergence and wishes him well in whatever life brings.

So On and Henceforth,

Mother Marjorie Ann
 
Mother Marjorie asks herself why they continue to bash this nice young man? Sure, there have been mistakes with his coaching and progression, but it appears that the real frustration lies in the fact that the US is left without an up-and-coming talent. That's tons of pressure to apply on such a young, growing mind.

Mother Marjorie will pray for Donald's emergence and wishes him well in whatever life brings.

So On and Henceforth,

Mother Marjorie Ann

You crack me up sometimes.
 
Donald Young's Broken Promise: What Happened to the Former Phenom?
By Zain Pasha (Contributor) on March 15, 2010


Trust me when I say that I am as surprised as everyone else that I haven't seen Donald Young's name in the draws of many major ATP tournaments.

Young played phenomenally in the juniors, demonstrating talent that some said was akin to that of Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi.

He has, however, also done a 180-degree turn in the pros with a career characterized by marginal success and overwhelming disappointment (at least by the expectations he set in the juniors).

Looking back, Young went from an ITF No. 1 and junior Wimbledon champion to a career-high ATP ranking of 73 that has since hovered between the mid to upper 100s. Largely playing matches on the Challenger circuit and having some success, Young has yet to break into the highest levels of ATP competition.

This is not to say that that we haven't been treated to glimpses of Young's promise. In fact, the reality is quite the opposite. Young qualified for the Australian Open main draw and had a good win over then world No. 85 Christophe Rochus, eventually falling to former Grand Slam champion Lleyton Hewitt, who, albeit a little old, still has some game.

Hailing from the same generation of players as Victoria Azarenka and Sam Querrey, Young certainly has a lot to live up to. Indeed, Azarenka has secured herself a spot as a solid top 10 player, and Querrey has demonstrated that he has the talent to win matches. Compared to this, Young's career certainly leaves something to be desired.

This is not Donald's fault, however, or at the very least he should not be entirely blamed for it. I've read too many articles blaming Young's immaturity and lack of work ethic for his lackluster pro career. While it is true that Young has been caught moping around like a teenager on the court, the root of these problems is something entirely different.

Young was pushed (by his parents) into the pros at an early age (16-17) when his playing style was still developing. He did not have the match experience that his older and more experienced opponents had, and as such Young was unable to win any main draw matches during the early part of his career.

Add to this the pressure of meeting expectations and the pressure the USTA put on him to change coaches, and you get a recipe for disaster—not to mention Young's tendency to get down on himself after losing matches. Indeed, Young's confidence took a serious hit from the start and apparently has yet to recover.

None of this is to absolve Donald Young of all responsibility for his career, but we should give him some slack. He is doing the "dirty work" now that some have said he should have done when he was playing in the main draws of Grand Slams, and I hope it pays off. American tennis could use the talents of a player like Donald Young.

So basically 99% of us who have ever picked up a racquet will never be anywhere near as good as Donald Young.
 
Donald Suck??
Juniors are quite different from pros.
Sometimes somebody will dominate because He is more consistent,but the ones who have the talent and game take longer to develop,that's why Donald Suck is nothing in the Pro Tour,because He has no game,no weapons,no talent,no nothing.
 
Last edited:
we'll see. why do people try to over-analyze this kid. if he breaks through as a major force, then he does. if not, then not, who cares right now?
 
It shouldn't surprise people that highly ranked and highly touted juniors don't reach the same level in the pros. It happens all the time in every sport.
 
Donald Suck??
Juniors are quite different from pros.
Sometimes somebody will dominate because He is more consistent,but the ones who have the talent and game take longer to develop,that's why Donald Suck is nothing in the Pro Tour,because He has no game,no weapons,no talent,no nothing.

Agreed! Prediction: Donald Suck will be a 1st round loser
 
Mother Marjorie asks herself why they continue to bash this nice young man? Sure, there have been mistakes with his coaching and progression, but it appears that the real frustration lies in the fact that the US is left without an up-and-coming talent. That's tons of pressure to apply on such a young, growing mind.

Mother Marjorie will pray for Donald's emergence and wishes him well in whatever life brings.

So On and Henceforth,

Mother Marjorie Ann

Fantom wonders why Mother Marjorie goes "third person" in every post. Does Mother Marjorie think she's OchoConco, Lebron James, Jimmie (from Seinfeld), or Elmo?
 
Another product of USTA player development. 'nuff said...

Actually, the word is that the Young's have a reputation of asking for money from the USTA but never allowed them any type of input into Donald's development. The general feeling is that his parents are too controlling and are holding him back. There's a really interesting account by Patrick McEnroe in his book about how a conversations with Donald's parents really illustrate this point.
 
Actually, the word is that the Young's have a reputation of asking for money from the USTA but never allowed them any type of input into Donald's development. The general feeling is that his parents are too controlling and are holding him back. There's a really interesting account by Patrick McEnroe in his book about how a conversations with Donald's parents really illustrate this point.

I'm torn between indignation and admiration towards parents savvy enough to get money from USTA while avoiding USTA coaching like the plague.
 
Actually, the word is that the Young's have a reputation of asking for money from the USTA but never allowed them any type of input into Donald's development. The general feeling is that his parents are too controlling and are holding him back. There's a really interesting account by Patrick McEnroe in his book about how a conversations with Donald's parents really illustrate this point.

Has the USTA done a great job coaching and developing players in the last 15 years? Maybe his parents are right.
 
I don't know what the answer is for Donald Young, but I recall watching his first round match against Gael Monfils in Cincinnati 2008. I think Young came through the qualifying that year.

Monfils looked like he was feeling ill. It was a humid night and Monfils looked like he was going to pass out. He was sweating profusely and kept hunching over with his hands on his knees trying to catch his breath between every point. In the few rallies that happened, Monfils was really gasping for air.....

.....but he knew against whom he was playing. Even though he was clearly feeling like crap, he kept glancing up with a smile and a smirk on his face. He definitely knew if he just hung in there Donald Young would fold.

Young kept forcing points. Trying to serve big and hit big forehands. He seemed totally oblivious to Monfils physical condition. It was like he wasn't even paying attention to what was going on across the net. I felt like Monfils would have called the trainer, but abstained trying not to tip off Young.

Young just quickly self-destructed and lost badly 6-1, 6-1. To Monfils, the previously hyped #1 junior and junior Wimbledon Champ.

It has to be one of the worst "pro" match performances I've ever seen. Believe me, I'm NOT hating on the guy. I've actually been rooting for him (although not this week against Gulbis - another hyped player that I'm for whom I'm rooting) I hope he gets it together quickly. It took a while for Patrick Rafter to get his game to the top. I'm curious to see what happens in the career of Donald Young in the next couple of years.
 
Young's parents made a decision. They decided to get him as much money early on as possible. Some say it was a bad decision, others say he already made enough for life if he invests it wisely. It is up to the family. To those who criticize the decision, well, who is to say he wouldn't have ended up this way even by another route, only with no money. I would say this option was better.

You can see this everyday with families who prioritize tennis over academics (though they will not admit it). They are making a choice and some of them end up with nice scholarships which they would not have gotten by just getting better grades in school.
 
Back
Top