Don't Fly Too Close To the Sun

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
It started at the Australian Open, where Roger Federer decided to get into Andy Murray's head. Who knew Murray would make it so easy? He had finally become aggressive enough to beat Rafael Nadal, and looked like he was ready to win the big one. He would play Federer in the final.

And then Federer started talking:

"Look, he's in his second Grand Slam final now ... But now that he didn't win the first one, that doesn't help for the second one around. Plus, he's playing, you know, me.''

Murray has not been the same since then. He lost this week 6-2, 6-1 in his first match in Monte Carlo to Philipp Kohlschreiber, not even trying by the end. The crowd booed.

What is wrong with Andy Murray? He seems to be all tangled up, skipping tournaments, ticking off officials at one event when he said he was just practicing out there.

Murray's rise to greatness has stopped one step short, at very, very goodness. Now he's falling.

But it's not just Murray. This is about flying too close to the sun. That's my theory, anyway. Novak Djokovic is having the same problem. Even Nikolay Davydenko had it.

In January, Davydenko was playing better than anyone. And when he took it to a major, the Australian, he started to crush Federer.

Then, Federer pretended he had to go to the bathroom, took a break and gave Davydenko's brain a few minutes to realize what was on the verge of happening.

So Davydenko lost it.

How simple it has been for Federer to swat away these next-tier players.

He blows on them, and they fall down.

"It's purely down to me, what goes on inside my head. No one else can make that better or change it. You need to do that yourself.''
-- Andy Murray Djokovic has reached No. 2 in the rankings, and suddenly he can't serve anymore. Is he actually trying to serve without bending his elbow or something? So he fired co-coach Todd Martin, said he's going back to his old serve and now can't remember how he did that.

The problem for Djokovic isn't a shortage of skills. He can do everything. Instead, his brain can't wrap itself around these heights. He won the Australian Open in 2008, beating Federer along the way. And he has had every chance since then to show that he truly belongs at the very top.

Now, he can't serve.

We saw similar mental blocks on the women's tour. Ana Ivanovic hit No. 1 and forgot how to toss the ball. Jelena Jankovic fell apart when she got there. Dinara Safina was crying on court after hitting No. 1, calling herself a chicken.

"It's purely down to me, what goes on inside my head,'' Murray said. "No one else can make that better or change it. You need to do that yourself.''

Murray was great at the Australian Open, until the final. Until he got close to the sun.

The annoying thing about Murray's game is that he also can do everything: power, touch, smarts, speed. And that's good enough to beat just about anyone, anywhere.

But you cannot outsmart Federer or Nadal, especially in a major.

Sometimes it takes blunt force. Just ask Juan Martin del Potro, who beat both stars at the U.S. Open that way last year.

In Miami this year, Andy Roddick was trying to play along with Nadal, and was bullied on the baseline. So he decided to take huge swings on his forehand, take big chances. It's not safe, but it was either that or lose.

He won.

Something seems to block Murray from being aggressive. When he finally stepped up against Nadal in Australia, that should have been his coming-out.

Instead, Federer started talking and Murray went timid again.

That loss to Federer has knocked Murray backward, because now his patience isn't even good enough to beat Mardy Fish, Robin Soderling or Kohlschreiber. This is his first three-match losing streak since his first full-year on tour. He figures to drop to No. 5 in the rankings on Monday.

But this isn't just a slump for him. It's a mental block. It's a hurdle he has tripped over. Instead of being crowned in Australia, as he expected, he discovered flaws.

Now, he's trying to think only of majors, which has torn him down. On court and off, he's thinking too much.

And think about this: He gave up against Kohlschreiber after asking for a wild card into the tournament. He didn't have to play in Monte Carlo, and wasn't planning to. But after losing so quickly in Indian Wells and Miami, he wanted more match play.

Then, he couldn't fight to the end?

"I think he really needs it more than I do, you know?'' Federer said that day in January before the final, when he blew Murray down. "So I think the pressure's big on him. But we'll see how he's going to handle it. It's not going to be easy for him, that's for sure.''

It has been a disaster.

Look, even the great players usually go through a learning curve in major finals. Maybe that's all that's happening to Murray, who is just 22.

Or maybe he has been exposed. Maybe Djokovic and Davydenko have, too, their wings melted by the sun.
 
^^^^ Written by Geroge Couch.

I laughed reading this. Not in a negative way. He does a good job of mixing it with some humor.


He forgot to mention Nadal. He flew too close to the Sun for too long and look what happened to him. Burnt, literally, for life.

Muhahahahahaaa
 
Last edited:
Ouch....the best part of this piece is the title. The rest is pretty routine.

David Foster Wallace where are you?
 
Yeah Wallace was great, too bad he decided to leave.

But this Sun thing is original, I liked it.


I really liked the title...grabbed my attention. But as I read the piece I kept looking for something more...some insight that we are all missing. Instead I got nothing out of it that I hadn't already thought or considered. If I am already "there", I'd rather read a piece that challenges my position rather than affirming it. This piece didn't do that.
 
This article is awesome, and I specifically liked the part that said something about the mental part only being inside the player's head and that it can't be changed by coaching, that's very true
 
I really liked the title...grabbed my attention. But as I read the piece I kept looking for something more...some insight that we are all missing. Instead I got nothing out of it that I hadn't already thought or considered. If I am already "there", I'd rather read a piece that challenges my position rather than affirming it. This piece didn't do that.

heh the title was actually mine. The original title was:

Murray's No. 1 Obstacle: Strength of Mind

http://tennis.fanhouse.com/2010/04/16/something-is-in-murrays-head-and-it-is-more-than-he-can-take/

I see what you're saying. Not every article has that unique insight you're looking for. It's better than the repeated junk you read on these boards tho.
 
At first I thought this was a new song by Pink Floyd. Or Simple Minds.

btw, its BRUTE force not blunt force (as far as I know).
 
^^^^ Written by Geroge Couch.

I laughed reading this. Not in a negative way. He does a good job of mixing it with some humor.


He forgot to mention Nadal. He flew too close to the Sun for too long and look what happened to him. Burnt, literally, for life.

Muhahahahahaaa

Nadal? How can you put him in the same category as murray and djoker?

Nadal was scarring "the sun" that you speak of,he administered more pain to fed that the other way round. He is basically the only constant tormentor "the sun" ever had. Sure,some fed fans would like to entertain the theory that nadal chasing for nr.1 and fed's records broke his knees down,but actually it is Nadal's style that did it and mostly playing this style on HC,which is two thirds of the tour. Nadal has been playing like a energizer bunny since he was very young and he started on the pro tour since he was 16,having physical problems even before he was a top player and chasing fed.
Nadal playing a very taxing style of tennis for about 8 and a half years on tour has led to his "downfall",he was leading comfortably when his injuries took toll.

Murray has been traumatized by Fed only cause Fed keeps blocking him on HC GS's. On clay he knows he does not have a chance should he meet Rafa and there is way too much pressure on the poor guy for WB. Losing two GS finals broke him but I think he will be back once he gets it out of his system.

With Djoker it's another story. He got close to Fed a couple of times at the USO but got beat. Then Nadal beat him once in WB and blocked his path for RG 3 times(two times straight sets and in the third rafa was leading when novak retired),not to mention the heart breaking defeats he suffered in 09' on clay against Rafa.

What Djoker and Murray are experiencing is depression that they can't get a foothold on any surface. Murray and Djoker don't own surfaces,Fed and Nadal do. Fed is the best HC'er and grasscourter out there and a damn good claycourter. Nadal is perhaps the best CC'er of all time,is the second best(along with roddick) grasscourter of this generation and is top five on HC IMO.

Djoker and Murray know that they can beat Fed and Rafa but they can't seem to do it constantly on the big stages. Djoker and Murray haven't been able to beat Rafa on his best surface,just on his worst. Djoker has one win at GS's over mono fed. Murray has no GS wins against Fed.

Like I said,their problem is that they cannot get a foothold on any surface because of these two guys.
 
It is a nice article, however I think people read to much into these mental tactics.
In the end Federer is just the better player.
Let's not forget that Federer's backhand was incredably good in this match and the forehand was also as good as ever.
Murray did try to hit the ball to the Federer backhand with a lot of pace on it, yet Federer often produced clean winners of those shots.
Perhaps Murray still could have been more aggressive in the match against Federer,
but I don't understand why people refer to another match to prove that somebody is able to play more aggressive.

You also have to take into consideration whether a player will let you play aggressive or not.
Nadal is the type of player that likes long grinding rallies, whereas Federer likes short points.
In my opinion it is much easier to play aggressive against Nadal, especially on this surface.
The notion that Murray should have been more aggressive against Federer is ofcourse correct,
but to me the question is whether he is capable of doing this. At this point in his career I think not.
 
Ok um ok but I don't think all agree that the sun shines from whence it should when it comes to Fed.

To liken him to some sunny deity is a bit stretched, as I think he carries his media duties well. Down to earth.

I think Fed's more doing the boxing thing of talking up his chances, putting the pressure on his opponent, getting a jab in beforehand.

Anyway this is about Murray, and I think he's young and will soon find a happy grind that will enable him to stabilise. If he's considered streaky now then I believe that no problem when you're 22. (So long as, looking back later, you have had a long career!)
 
Nadal? How can you put him in the same category as murray and djoker?

Nadal was scarring "the sun" that you speak of,he administered more pain to fed that the other way round. He is basically the only constant tormentor "the sun" ever had. Sure,some fed fans would like to entertain the theory that nadal chasing for nr.1 and fed's records broke his knees down,but actually it is Nadal's style that did it and mostly playing this style on HC,which is two thirds of the tour. Nadal has been playing like a energizer bunny since he was very young and he started on the pro tour since he was 16,having physical problems even before he was a top player and chasing fed.
Nadal playing a very taxing style of tennis for about 8 and a half years on tour has led to his "downfall",he was leading comfortably when his injuries took toll.

Murray has been traumatized by Fed only cause Fed keeps blocking him on HC GS's. On clay he knows he does not have a chance should he meet Rafa and there is way too much pressure on the poor guy for WB. Losing two GS finals broke him but I think he will be back once he gets it out of his system.

With Djoker it's another story. He got close to Fed a couple of times at the USO but got beat. Then Nadal beat him once in WB and blocked his path for RG 3 times(two times straight sets and in the third rafa was leading when novak retired),not to mention the heart breaking defeats he suffered in 09' on clay against Rafa.

What Djoker and Murray are experiencing is depression that they can't get a foothold on any surface. Murray and Djoker don't own surfaces,Fed and Nadal do. Fed is the best HC'er and grasscourter out there and a damn good claycourter. Nadal is perhaps the best CC'er of all time,is the second best(along with roddick) grasscourter of this generation and is top five on HC IMO.

Djoker and Murray know that they can beat Fed and Rafa but they can't seem to do it constantly on the big stages. Djoker and Murray haven't been able to beat Rafa on his best surface,just on his worst. Djoker has one win at GS's over mono fed. Murray has no GS wins against Fed.

Like I said,their problem is that they cannot get a foothold on any surface because of these two guys.

Rayando el sol, OOHHHEEHHHOHHHH
 
Back
Top