I don't know man.
Some posters might get angry at me, but Djoko 2011 might be the best performance in a GS ever against serious competition.
Nadal was crazy good, and we all know what happened.
I agree, but Nadal wasn't peak there. Nadal reached his peak at RG in 2008.I agree, but Murray wasn't peak there. Andy reached his peak at Madrid final in 2015.
No lol.Think it's USO 2012, even though he didn't win there (due to the wind). Murray was better and deserved to win the title, but if the wind was not there, Djokovic would be favored. What do you think?
Lol, no. We only have to go back a year earlier where he was clearly better in every aspect in the 2010 USO F.2011 Djokovic at USO completely ripped apart a Nadal playing the best possible Baseline game he could. Djokovic could barely serve due to the back pain but his baseline level was off the charts.
In semifinal in sets 3 and 4 he reached heights that Federer couldn't do anything against despite playing so well before.
2015 is worse because he was making errors without being aggressive. It was only on break points he went into proper GS Final lockdown mode. The semis is good on score but Cilic was actually injured, Novak actually acknowledged that post match interview.
2011 Djokovic is better than 2015 by some margin.
But none compares to 2021 Djokovic who was in the form of his life winning all three slams before and basically having the highest level he ever had on any surface.
Too bad he played someone with an even higher level of play in finals and got straight setted.
But none compares to 2021 Djokovic who was in the form of his life winning all three slams before and basically having the highest level he ever had on any surface.
Too bad he played someone with an even higher level of play in finals and got straight setted.
Truth always hurts.LOL, wut?
Truth always hurts.
Think it's USO 2012, even though he didn't win there (due to the wind). Murray was better and deserved to win the title, but if the wind was not there, Djokovic would be favored. What do you think?
Sure, the truth is Med BOAT, GOAT, bestest, GOATest..
next it will be tsitsipas becoming best returner eva, right!
Yeah I think this is just correct. You can make a case for 15 too because of the huge gap in serve quality.
Up the SF 2012 was obviously his best IMO. Without the wind he probably cleans up in the SF and F as well.
The gap in serve quality didn't really help him against Lopez, RBA and Fed though. I guess comparing the finals you could say the serve quality gap is massive between 2011 and 2015 but he served fine in the SF.
USO 11 QF < USO 12 QF
but
USO 11 SF > USO 12 SF
USO 11 F > USO 12 F
USO 11 SF serving > USO 15 final serving > USO 11 final serving.
Djoko didn't just serve fine in the 2011 USO semi, he served pretty well.
Yes but we're extrapolating sans the wind, the USO 2012 final two rounds were marred by terrible conditions. I think his QF versus Delpo was maybe his best match at the USO, I expect without the wind he would have been similar in the SF's but better in the F due to better serving.
its possible.
I was just talking about actual levels though.
It's near pointless to talk about actual levels in the SF and F because neither guy could do much with the ball. Based off the SF/F and the actual level of ballstriking it would be Djokovic's worst late round showing at the USO.
Am I the only one who thinks Murray has a chance even without the wind? He was a tough matchup for Djokovic in 12-13.
Am I the only one who thinks Murray has a chance even without the wind? He was a tough matchup for Djokovic in 12-13.
You folks just need a small push and you go out and run a marathon, don't y'all? I was just joking around in my original post.
It was Novak, actually, who changed things up by coming to net. 50 net approaches to 20 according to TA. Novak seemed less willing or able than Murray to dictate from the back of the court and astutely started coming to net more. Murray was definitely more assertive more frequently with the forehand than either player was with any other baseline shot, but even so the standard rally from both guys was very passive and sloppy, so it’s a rather small margin. He wasn’t out there bullying Novak with the forehand outside a small handful of points.Murray's 2012 USO F level is pretty underrated is the conclusion I came to. He actually had a dangerous forehand for one, but more than that his touch and willingness to come forward saved him on a few occasions. Djokovic as amazing as he is had serious issues with changing things up and could sometimes be susceptible to Thiem esque 'over hitting' and brainlessness. See USO '13 final, matches vs. Nadal pre-2011, Wawrinka matches when he refused to slice or change it up too much. Becker really helped him with this.
That said the Del Potro QF Djoko played in 2012 was one of the best HC matches he's played in his entire life and is in the top 3 best USO performances he's had. The power and directional control he had off both wings was truly a joke. It boggles the mind how this guy didn't win 6 Slams between '12-14, if you look at his Bo3 and pre-final performances.
Definitely. Plus, Novak’s thrown plenty of US Open finals down the toilet even in perfect conditions.Am I the only one who thinks Murray has a chance even without the wind? He was a tough matchup for Djokovic in 12-13.
I felt that the general pattern of BH to BH, Djokovic gains slight advantage bc he’s a better player, Murray slices back defensively and deep to reset rally, Djokovic pushes back, wins war of attrition was much more in Murray’s favor. Certainly compared to the AO ‘12 SF.It was Novak, actually, who changed things up by coming to net. 50 net approaches to 20 according to TA. Novak seemed less willing or able than Murray to dictate from the back of the court and astutely started coming to net more. Murray was definitely more assertive more frequently with the forehand than either player was with any other baseline shot, but even so the standard rally from both guys was very passive and sloppy, so it’s a rather small margin. He wasn’t out there bullying Novak with the forehand outside a small handful of points.
Agreed on the Delpo match. I was in awe watching that one.
To be clear, I'm taking about actual levels while taking into consideration the windy conditions.
So this way, Fed-Agassi in USO 04 was pretty good level wise taking into consideration the windy conditions.
USO 12 final, Murray was good in the windy conditions and Djokovic below par taking into consideration the windy conditions.
True.The wind just made things worse.The wind definitely impacted play that day but not more than Murray’s and Novak’s own tightness and tentative play. Novak lost that one between the ears (and in the feet: such lazy footwork at times), not in the wind.
I think you're on point re: the slice and backhand exchanges.I felt that the general pattern of BH to BH, Djokovic gains slight advantage bc he’s a better player, Murray slices back defensively and deep to reset rally, Djokovic pushes back, wins war of attrition was much more in Murray’s favor. Certainly compared to the AO ‘12 SF.
Reason being that slice and defensive reset shot was so much more effective in the wind and it forced Novak to either hit a shot he wasn’t comfortable doing or accept the neutral rally. And rhythm which was Djokovic’s best friend was really hard to find. But Murray also flattened his FH out well, better than I saw him ever do after ‘13 imo. And crucially he served very well when needed.
iirc most of those net points came in Set 3/4 when angryvic decided he was done playing with this guy and started coming in. Those first two sets were as close as any two could be.. sometimes it goes that way, while Murray didn’t get lucky per se, Djokovic could just as easily been up 2-0 easily. Sort of like AO ‘13 final.
It upsets me because as a Murrovic enjoyer that’s the one epic USO match we were supposed to get and we got… windy, muggy, bleh instead.
Normal conditions could have forced Murray to play cleaner as well as Djokovic but yes of course I see why Djokovic is considered the favourite to win would the wind and he was in better form beforehand.No, you're not the only one. But judging by how the match went in tornado conditions, his chances would've been slim. QF and even SF apart from the 1st set were very good from Djoko. In comparison, the final was just lame from both him and Murray.
Both made the same number of breaks but one was good and the other below par. Classic propaganda.
Novak 2015 was his best level at USO I my opinion. Fed didn't drop a single set on route which I believe was either the first or second time in USO history and Novak pretty well stoned him.
Novak 2015 was his best level at USO I my opinion. Fed didn't drop a single set on route which I believe was either the first or second time in USO history and Novak pretty well stoned him.
It wasn't his top level or his most aggressive, however, his shot tolerance was crazy in that match. I wouldn't even call him a wall in that one and more like a force field. He refused to be hit through.
Normal conditions could have forced Murray to play cleaner as well as Djokovic but yes of course I see why Djokovic is considered the favourite to win would the wind and he was in better form beforehand.
It wasn't his top level or his most aggressive, however, his shot tolerance was crazy in that match. I wouldn't even call him a wall in that one and more like a force field. He refused to be hit through.
Fed hit through him ok when it wasn't break point
Look what you started nowIt wasn't his top level or his most aggressive, however, his shot tolerance was crazy in that match. I wouldn't even call him a wall in that one and more like a force field. He refused to be hit through.
Look what you started now
Federer threw everything he had at him to his credit but yea his bp conversion rate was abysmal, much like it has been most of his career. Lol
I think part of the problem is that as Fed evolved he became more of a percentage player, especially on BP's, but it's hard to play the percentages against superior athletes. Coming out of that comfort zone is easier on low pressure points. To Djokovic's credit he seems to find another level of intensity at times when he's BP down - an extra food of depth or width etc...
It's all mental. I don't think he even knows he's doing it but he tightens up on breakpoints and is not aggressive enough, or mishits, or overhits.