Draper open-hearted: “I still drive a used Polo. Everything changed when I realized I wasn’t the player I wanted”

Winner Sinner

Hall of Fame
When it comes to tennis players and non-trivial people, Jack Draper fits right into this category. The British left-hander exploded in 2024, finally exploiting his potential: first career victory, on grass in Stuttgart, then the semifinal at the US Open, where only a formidable Jannik Sinner stopped his rise, and second title in Vienna. Powerful, complete, he can take the point from any position and has the rare ability to make the opponent play “badly” and then punish him suddenly with a sudden change, all this and much more is Draper, also a fragile physique that has forced him to take long breaks too many times. Currently, for a change, he is struggling with physiotherapy and rehabilitation: a sore hip and no winter training session with Alcaraz, as planned months ago. He will be at the Australian Open, but who knows in what conditions. The feeling is that when Jack shows up on the court in full health he is already a tennis player who is well worth the top 10, ready to fight for the big trophies. Draper gave a long and interesting interview to his colleague Simon Briggs of the Telegraph, in which he speaks openly about his priorities, and how despite tennis having always been his home environment (his father Roger was executive director of the LTA, the British Tennis Federation) his interests are varied. He suffers a lot from the condition of his grandmother Brenda, his first real coach, who suffers from Alzheimer's, so much so that supporting the fight against this disease has become one of his priorities. Here are some of the most significant passages of his thoughts expressed in the interview.

"You look at that person you love, and you realize that they no longer understand who you are or what is happening to them," says Draper speaking of grandmother Brenda. "There are many stages of Alzheimer's. At the beginning, you don't think properly and you lose your memory. Then the worst phase is when you are physically able, but you can’t do things anymore. I’ve seen her go through many different phases, like not wanting to get in the shower. ‘How do you get this strong woman to get in the shower every day?’ It’s impossible. And so you are proud of people like my grandfather, he is a real hero for how he continues to do what he is doing”. Right after the interview with the British media, Jack took part in the “walk of memory” along the Thames, in support of the Alzheimer’s Society, an event attended by the director general of the LTA Scott Lloyd and a wide range of coaches, journalists and family members. Financial and moral support, of presence, that of Draper, who lives this terrible disease in the family.

Jack tells how his lifestyle has changed radically, focusing more and more on tennis. “When I was a little younger, I just liked to work out a little bit, come home and eat chips and watch TV all day… Now that I feel like I have a bigger goal and purpose than myself, I want to be fully engaged in what I do. I want to progress. That’s all I really think about. When I have days off, I go through periods of being injured or not being able to play and going to the gym, it’s incredibly difficult. Now I’ve started to understand why Andy [Murray] had such a hard time quitting the sport. Tennis players are weird, we’re kind of chasing something all the time, we’re on that dopamine rush of playing and traveling to win. It’s not real life. So when you go back to not having a million things going on, you feel a little lost, like, how do I get through the day? What do I do? Watch a little TV? And then what?”

Draper thinks something clicked after the clay-court season last spring. With Wayne Ferreira by his side, he thought he would improve many things, starting with his serve. Things didn’t go at all as he hoped, with the terrible defeat he suffered at Roland Garros against Jesper de Jong, no. 176 in the world. It was like a slap in the face… so much so that as soon as he started working again with his trusted coach James Trotman, the light bulb went on. “At that moment I felt like I was out of control. I was like, ‘I have to get myself together. What am I doing? I’m not fulfilling my potential. I’m not the player I want to be.’ So, when I look back on this year, that’s the thing that gives me the most satisfaction, even more than the ride at the US Open. It’s being able to resolve certain situations and transform myself into a different player thanks to the change in mentality. During those two weeks, which started with training on the grass at Wimbledon and continued until the triumph in Stuttgart, I really changed”.

The work with Ferreira, which ended after the grass-court season, paid off in the summer. “Wayne wanted me to try to be more courageous, to play tennis that pushes right from the start. I guess I needed that, but at the same time I had to figure out what kind of player I was. I’m not a John Isner, one of my main attributes is that I move well for my size, that I can put a few more balls back, because that’s how I won matches when I was younger, when I was little. I had to see for myself that it wasn’t going to be a radical, big change. It was just maybe a five or 10 percent change in my tennis, it was moving up the court a little more, or taking a few more risks on returns, or hitting a few more serve-and-volleys, and just trying to create more presence around my game and not be so samey. I had to change, but I didn’t have to change a lot. I just had to figure out when to push and when not to.” It may seem like little, but it was everything for him: finally understanding how to use his means, his qualities. From then on, everything took off.
“What works for me is to come to practice every day and try to understand what I need to do better to be able to compete at my best in the big tournaments, to get to the big days of the tournaments and compete with the top players, mentally, emotionally, physically, everything. I think I’m ready mentally, I feel like I have the right personality to do it. I’m not going to go into my shell, I’m not going to sit in my living room every day thinking ‘I’m the British No. 1, what does that mean?’. I’m focused on getting better. And whether a good result comes in Australia, or if it’s in the middle of the year, at Wimbledon, we’ll see. The main thing is to feel like I’m getting better all the time. And yes, I hope I can be one of the best players in the world.”

Closing down for the off-court, Jack says he’s a very simple guy, who doesn’t think too much about money and material things. “I’ve earned good money this year, that’s true, but I’m still driving a second-hand Polo… I’m not materialistic. I don’t think of myself or what I do as something impressive.”

From tons of French fries to that continuous adrenaline rush that leads Draper to eat “bread and tennis,” never staying still and thinking almost obsessively about how to win. Yes, in the head of the British player something really seems to have clicked, that little magic that makes an athlete a potential champion.
 
Last edited:
The Volkswagen Polo is not sold in the United States.
  1. Volkswagen has confirmed that it has no plans to introduce the Polo to the U.S. market. The company's global sales boss stated that the U.S. market is dominated by SUVs and sedans, making it less viable for a compact hatchback like the Polo
  2. Market Strategy: Volkswagen's focus in the U.S. has shifted towards larger vehicles, and they have prioritized models that align better with consumer preferences in this market, such as SUVs and crossovers.
  3. Importing Options: While individuals can import a Volkswagen Polo into the U.S., this process can be complicated and may involve various inspections and duties. However, any imported vehicle must comply with U.S. safety and emissions standards, which can be a significant hurdle
While the Volkswagen Polo is a popular model in many countries, it is not available for sale in the United States due to market strategy decisions by Volkswagen.
 
I do like Gentleman Jack. He should at least be a top-20 player for the next several years. But don't give me any 'humble' nonsense. The guy has been through a highly privileged private-education system, with direct links through the top echelons of UK sports all his life, thanks to his parents. He has no clue what it's like to be 'normal'. The Polo is just the typical way comfortable people distinguish themselves from the nouveau-riche. He probably wears jumpers with holes in, and shoes without laces, when picking up the case of Bollinger from Fortnums each week.
 
When it comes to tennis players and non-trivial people, Jack Draper fits right into this category. The British left-hander exploded in 2024, finally exploiting his potential: first career victory, on grass in Stuttgart, then the semifinal at the US Open, where only a formidable Jannik Sinner stopped his rise, and second title in Vienna. Powerful, complete, he can take the point from any position and has the rare ability to make the opponent play “badly” and then punish him suddenly with a sudden change, all this and much more is Draper, also a fragile physique that has forced him to take long breaks too many times. Currently, for a change, he is struggling with physiotherapy and rehabilitation: a sore hip and no winter training session with Alcaraz, as planned months ago. He will be at the Australian Open, but who knows in what conditions. The feeling is that when Jack shows up on the court in full health he is already a tennis player who is well worth the top 10, ready to fight for the big trophies. Draper gave a long and interesting interview to his colleague Simon Briggs of the Telegraph, in which he speaks openly about his priorities, and how despite tennis having always been his home environment (his father Roger was executive director of the LTA, the British Tennis Federation) his interests are varied. He suffers a lot from the condition of his grandmother Brenda, his first real coach, who suffers from Alzheimer's, so much so that supporting the fight against this disease has become one of his priorities. Here are some of the most significant passages of his thoughts expressed in the interview.

"You look at that person you love, and you realize that they no longer understand who you are or what is happening to them," says Draper speaking of grandmother Brenda. "There are many stages of Alzheimer's. At the beginning, you don't think properly and you lose your memory. Then the worst phase is when you are physically able, but you can’t do things anymore. I’ve seen her go through many different phases, like not wanting to get in the shower. ‘How do you get this strong woman to get in the shower every day?’ It’s impossible. And so you are proud of people like my grandfather, he is a real hero for how he continues to do what he is doing”. Right after the interview with the British media, Jack took part in the “walk of memory” along the Thames, in support of the Alzheimer’s Society, an event attended by the director general of the LTA Scott Lloyd and a wide range of coaches, journalists and family members. Financial and moral support, of presence, that of Draper, who lives this terrible disease in the family.

Jack tells how his lifestyle has changed radically, focusing more and more on tennis. “When I was a little younger, I just liked to work out a little bit, come home and eat chips and watch TV all day… Now that I feel like I have a bigger goal and purpose than myself, I want to be fully engaged in what I do. I want to progress. That’s all I really think about. When I have days off, I go through periods of being injured or not being able to play and going to the gym, it’s incredibly difficult. Now I’ve started to understand why Andy [Murray] had such a hard time quitting the sport. Tennis players are weird, we’re kind of chasing something all the time, we’re on that dopamine rush of playing and traveling to win. It’s not real life. So when you go back to not having a million things going on, you feel a little lost, like, how do I get through the day? What do I do? Watch a little TV? And then what?”

Draper thinks something clicked after the clay-court season last spring. With Wayne Ferreira by his side, he thought he would improve many things, starting with his serve. Things didn’t go at all as he hoped, with the terrible defeat he suffered at Roland Garros against Jesper de Jong, no. 176 in the world. It was like a slap in the face… so much so that as soon as he started working again with his trusted coach James Trotman, the light bulb went on. “At that moment I felt like I was out of control. I was like, ‘I have to get myself together. What am I doing? I’m not fulfilling my potential. I’m not the player I want to be.’ So, when I look back on this year, that’s the thing that gives me the most satisfaction, even more than the ride at the US Open. It’s being able to resolve certain situations and transform myself into a different player thanks to the change in mentality. During those two weeks, which started with training on the grass at Wimbledon and continued until the triumph in Stuttgart, I really changed”.

The work with Ferreira, which ended after the grass-court season, paid off in the summer. “Wayne wanted me to try to be more courageous, to play tennis that pushes right from the start. I guess I needed that, but at the same time I had to figure out what kind of player I was. I’m not a John Isner, one of my main attributes is that I move well for my size, that I can put a few more balls back, because that’s how I won matches when I was younger, when I was little. I had to see for myself that it wasn’t going to be a radical, big change. It was just maybe a five or 10 percent change in my tennis, it was moving up the court a little more, or taking a few more risks on returns, or hitting a few more serve-and-volleys, and just trying to create more presence around my game and not be so samey. I had to change, but I didn’t have to change a lot. I just had to figure out when to push and when not to.” It may seem like little, but it was everything for him: finally understanding how to use his means, his qualities. From then on, everything took off.
“What works for me is to come to practice every day and try to understand what I need to do better to be able to compete at my best in the big tournaments, to get to the big days of the tournaments and compete with the top players, mentally, emotionally, physically, everything. I think I’m ready mentally, I feel like I have the right personality to do it. I’m not going to go into my shell, I’m not going to sit in my living room every day thinking ‘I’m the British No. 1, what does that mean?’. I’m focused on getting better. And whether a good result comes in Australia, or if it’s in the middle of the year, at Wimbledon, we’ll see. The main thing is to feel like I’m getting better all the time. And yes, I hope I can be one of the best players in the world.”

Closing down for the off-court, Jack says he’s a very simple guy, who doesn’t think too much about money and material things. “I’ve earned good money this year, that’s true, but I’m still driving a second-hand Polo… I’m not materialistic. I don’t think of myself or what I do as something impressive.”

From tons of French fries to that continuous adrenaline rush that leads Draper to eat “bread and tennis,” never staying still and thinking almost obsessively about how to win. Yes, in the head of the British player something really seems to have clicked, that little magic that makes an athlete a potential champion.
Well, I must appreciate you posting this article in bold letters.
It would have been very rude to post that in capital letters. Or uppercase.
I hope you voted correctly.
 
I do like Gentleman Jack. He should at least be a top-20 player for the next several years. But don't give me any 'humble' nonsense. The guy has been through a highly privileged private-education system, with direct links through the top echelons of UK sports all his life, thanks to his parents. He has no clue what it's like to be 'normal'. The Polo is just the typical way comfortable people distinguish themselves from the nouveau-riche. He probably wears jumpers with holes in, and shoes without laces, when picking up the case of Bollinger from Fortnums each week.

If you are invited to go hunting by aristocracy, be sure to wear your most battered and patched-up hunting outfit of well-known quality…
 
Last edited:
VW probably thinks it's neither large nor muscular enough in fat-bottom markets.

The Volkswagen Polo is not sold in the United States.
  1. Volkswagen has confirmed that it has no plans to introduce the Polo to the U.S. market. The company's global sales boss stated that the U.S. market is dominated by SUVs and sedans, making it less viable for a compact hatchback like the Polo
  2. Market Strategy: Volkswagen's focus in the U.S. has shifted towards larger vehicles, and they have prioritized models that align better with consumer preferences in this market, such as SUVs and crossovers.
  3. Importing Options: While individuals can import a Volkswagen Polo into the U.S., this process can be complicated and may involve various inspections and duties. However, any imported vehicle must comply with U.S. safety and emissions standards, which can be a significant hurdle
While the Volkswagen Polo is a popular model in many countries, it is not available for sale in the United States due to market strategy decisions by Volkswagen.
 
Draper showed me all I need to know with the FAA Canada fiasco.
no need to read his humble guy act.

What fiasco? Incidents like these happen every 2 weeks. The umpire made a mistake and luckily for him it benefitted him but wasn't his job to correct it. Blame the umpire, not the player. Draper was focused on his own game and may not even have realized it was a mistake to begin with. He and FAA talked about it after the match and are fine.

If that's all you need to label a player a cheater and write him off forever, then you must not support a lot of players. All players with more than 100 career matches have been involved in some similar situation at some point. I'm sure Nadal Federer and Djokovic are no exceptions.

Draper has shown good sportmanship in dozens of other situations. Everyone on the tour seems to think highly of him. He's become one of the most popular sportsman in the UK (not just for his tennis, obviously...). It's only gonna get better if he keeps improving.
 
What fiasco? Incidents like these happen every 2 weeks. The umpire made a mistake and luckily for him it benefitted him but wasn't his job to correct it. Blame the umpire, not the player. Draper was focused on his own game and may not even have realized it was a mistake to begin with. He and FAA talked about it after the match and are fine.

If that's all you need to label a player a cheater and write him off forever, then you must not support a lot of players. All players with more than 100 career matches have been involved in some similar situation at some point. I'm sure Nadal Federer and Djokovic are no exceptions.

Draper has shown good sportmanship in dozens of other situations. Everyone on the tour seems to think highly of him. He's become one of the most popular sportsman in the UK (not just for his tennis, obviously...). It's only gonna get better if he keeps improving.
The replay was inconclusive. The umpire didn't make a mistake.
 
Should post every 2nd paragraph bold, not the whole thing 8-B
Its easier to read big amounts of text if each paragraph is different!
I never read big amounts of text otherwise (n)

What if the original was bold?
Well i'd change the original to being only every 2nd paragraph bolded (y)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He looked bad at first, but the slow motion replay was actually inconclusive, so it's reasonable to assume he didn't actually know., and none of us do either.
Are you high? The ball went straight down into the court off his racquet, it was in no way inconclusive. I don't think it's fair to hold it against him for the rest of his life, and frankly it's the umpire's job to get it right but there's no way you play tennis that long and don't realize what happened with that shot if you're him; in the replay he even starts to swing at it a second time because he knows it's now a dead point. Again the real blame lies with Allensworth who has proven himself to be pretty useless over the last couple of seasons but there was nothing "inconclusive" about the replay.
 
Are you high? The ball went straight down into the court off his racquet, it was in no way inconclusive. I don't think it's fair to hold it against him for the rest of his life, and frankly it's the umpire's job to get it right but there's no way you play tennis that long and don't realize what happened with that shot if you're him; in the replay he even starts to swing at it a second time because he knows it's now a dead point. Again the real blame lies with Allensworth who has proven himself to be pretty useless over the last couple of seasons but there was nothing "inconclusive" about the replay.
Of course I'm high - it's the Holidays. My assessment when it happened was similar to yours. But upon further review, and watching the replay slowed down to .25 speed, what seemed obvious is not at all clear. And certainly not clear to the chair umpire live. Check out some clips on YouTube where people have analyzed the sequence.
 
Of course I'm high - it's the Holidays. My assessment when it happened was similar to yours. But upon further review, and watching the replay slowed down to .25 speed, what seemed obvious is not at all clear. And certainly not clear to the chair umpire live. Check out some clips on YouTube where people have analyzed the sequence.
Yeah I've watched it multiple times, including HQ versions that have been slowed down further. There is zero analysis necessary, the ball goes from the frame to the ground, back off the frame and then over the net, it's clear as day. Again you can see him look up and consider taking another swing at it because it is so obviously a dead ball.
 
Yeah I've watched it multiple times, including HQ versions that have been slowed down further. There is zero analysis necessary, the ball goes from the frame to the ground, back off the frame and then over the net, it's clear as day. Again you can see him look up and consider taking another swing at it because it is so obviously a dead ball.
You've looked at it numerous times on high quality slow motion video. Others have done the same, and come to different conclusions than you. The one thing that is certain is that no one can reasonable blame the umpire for not seeing it clearly when he watched it live. Also, you have no idea if or why Draper may have considered taking another swing at the ball. If he did, perhaps he thought the ball would not go over the net. The entire set of circumstances were very odd, and we don't know what Draper was thinking. He looked confused more than anything.
 
You've looked at it numerous times on high quality slow motion video. Others have done the same, and come to different conclusions than you. The one thing that is certain is that no one can reasonable blame the umpire for not seeing it clearly when he watched it live. Also, you have no idea if or why Draper may have considered taking another swing at the ball. If he did, perhaps he thought the ball would not go over the net. The entire set of circumstances were very odd, and we don't know what Draper was thinking. He looked confused more than anything.
Honestly I didn't need to see it in slow motion because it was so insanely obvious in the moment, and even having gone to YouTube as you mentioned most of the analyses that I've found agree that Draper shanked the ball into the ground - the only difference is that most people don't need a 10 minute technical analysis to see and understand this. And yes, you absolutely can 100% blame the umpire for not seeing it live, I don't know why you're insisting that this was some sort of unknowable, mythic event that happened so fast that it was impossible to see - Allensworth was not paying attention (something he seems to have a problem with considering he keeps making crucial mistakes near the end of matches) and even a child could tell that the ball hit the court first and then went over from the way the ball behaved in the air and then when it bounced again. I'm not kidding, I have literally seen children I've coached figure this out between themselves in less than 30 seconds, I have no idea why you're arguing about this.

If it was so difficult to see in the moment then why was it so obvious to Felix and everyone else in the stadium?
 
Honestly I didn't need to see it in slow motion because it was so insanely obvious in the moment, and even having gone to YouTube as you mentioned most of the analyses that I've found agree that Draper shanked the ball into the ground - the only difference is that most people don't need a 10 minute technical analysis to see and understand this. And yes, you absolutely can 100% blame the umpire for not seeing it live, I don't know why you're insisting that this was some sort of unknowable, mythic event that happened so fast that it was impossible to see - Allensworth was not paying attention (something he seems to have a problem with considering he keeps making crucial mistakes near the end of matches) and even a child could tell that the ball hit the court first and then went over from the way the ball behaved in the air and then when it bounced again. I'm not kidding, I have literally seen children I've coached figure this out between themselves in less than 30 seconds, I have no idea why you're arguing about this.

If it was so difficult to see in the moment then why was it so obvious to Felix and everyone else in the stadium?
Saying you're right over and over again and calling anyone who disagrees stupid is not actually an argument. You can usually tell from the spin on the ball whether it's a legal shot, but not always. Look up Berdych apologizing to the chair umpire after going on a rant, and then being wrong. Draper said in an interview he wasn't sure. It was a very unusual shot. It likely was a double bounce, but it certainly was not conclusive for a chair umpire in real time. Try chair umpiring sometime - it's not as easy as you think.
 
Last edited:
Saying you're right over and over again and calling anyone who disagrees stupid is not actually an argument. You can usually tell from the spin on the ball whether it's a legal shot, but not always. Look up Berdych apologizing to the chair umpire after going on a rant, and then being wrong. Draper said in an interview he wasn't sure. It was a very unusual shot. It likely was a double bounce, but it certainly was not conclusive for a chair umpire in real time. Try chair umpiring sometime - it's not as easy as you think.
Guys I found Greg Allensworth's account here on Talk Tennis.

Seriously you are the only person I've come across among serious (or even semi-serious) tennis players who think there's even a possibility that Draper's shot was clean - I'm not just saying "I'm right, you're stupid", it's just clear as day in both full-speed and on the replay: I'm not making an argument because there's no need for an argument if you just use your eyes and brain in this situation. Draper "isn't sure" because he was trying to get off the court and into the next round. To be clear I don't fault him for that, not his job to make the call, but even his offer to "replay the point" is a joke - the ball hit the ground, the point was dead, it's back to deuce. Stop making excuses for absolutely no reason.

Oh, and I have umpired (along with competing and coaching at a variety of levels for 20+ years) and while it's not easy it's also not difficult to avoid making horrendously stupid calls like this.
 
The Volkswagen Polo is not sold in the United States.
  1. Volkswagen has confirmed that it has no plans to introduce the Polo to the U.S. market. The company's global sales boss stated that the U.S. market is dominated by SUVs and sedans, making it less viable for a compact hatchback like the Polo
  2. Market Strategy: Volkswagen's focus in the U.S. has shifted towards larger vehicles, and they have prioritized models that align better with consumer preferences in this market, such as SUVs and crossovers.
  3. Importing Options: While individuals can import a Volkswagen Polo into the U.S., this process can be complicated and may involve various inspections and duties. However, any imported vehicle must comply with U.S. safety and emissions standards, which can be a significant hurdle
While the Volkswagen Polo is a popular model in many countries, it is not available for sale in the United States due to market strategy decisions by Volkswagen.
This is ***** mindset by VW.
 
In this interview, Draper strikes us as a right proper good egg. Drives a used Polo. A very simple hard-working man. An honest man.
Draper says he was not sure and that he was not looking down at the ground. That is very plausible indeed.
The play happened right under the umpire's nose. The shot was ruled good. Game, set and match Draper.

Let's stop the Draper slander. Nobody can read Draper's mind. A man must be given the benefit of the doubt.


As for the umpire, he made the split-second call in real-time. The ump is NOT allowed to review the replay.
The umpire needs to stick with his original split-second call. Reversing the call will only make the umpire look ridiculous.
What outcome is the disgruntled Felix expecting? Replay is not allowed. And Draper is not allowed to concede the point (nor should he if he has any doubt).
 
Last edited:
The umpire Allsworth told Felix that he was not allowed to review the replay but promised Felix that he would look at it after the match and would admit he was wrong if replay contradicted his call...

Has Allsworth followed up on this promise?

WhatsApp-Image-2024-08-17-at-10.32.23-AM.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top