Andre Agassi beat Pete Sampras 4-6, 6-1, 7-6(6), 6-4 in the Australian Open final, 1995 on hard court
It was Agassi's first Australian Open, while Sampras had been the defending champion. The two would go onto meet in the finals of both Indian Wells (Sampras won) and Miami (Agassi won) shortly after
Agassi won 135 points, Sampras 122
Sampras serve-volleyed off all but 5 first serves and occasionally off seconds
Serve Stats
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (82/118) 69%
- 1st serve points won (58/82) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (22/36) 61%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (36/118) 31%
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (71/139) 51%
- 1st serve points won (54/71) 76%
- 2nd serve points won (30/68) 44%
- Aces 28, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (57/139) 41%
Serve Patterns
Agassi served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 5%
Sampras served...
- to FH 43%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Agassi made...
- 76 (34 FH, 42 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 7 Winners (3 FH, 4 BH)
- 28 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (7 FH, 4 BH), including 1 return-approach attempt
- 17 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (76/133) 57%
Sampras made...
- 78 (23 FH, 55 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (3 BH)
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 22 Unforced (9 FH, 13 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (78/114) 68%
Break Points
Agassi 5/21 (8 games)
Sampras 2/4 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Agassi 40 (25 FH, 11 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
Sampras 25 (11 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
Agassi had 7 return passes (3 FH, 4 BH) and 12 regular passes (9 FH, 3 BH)
- FH returns - 1 dtl and 2 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc and 2 inside-in
- regular FHs - 6 cc, 1 dtl, 1 longline/cc and 1 lob
- regular BHs - 2 cc and 1 dtl
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 4 cc (1 at net), 3 dtl, 2 inside-out and 4 inside-in
- regular BHs - 2 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 longline/inside-out
- 1 FHV can reasonably be called an OH and 1 BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH (neither were smashes)
Sampras had 6 from serve-volley points
- 4 first 'volleys' (3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 2 second volleys (2 FHV)
- 1 from a return-approach point (1 OH)
- 1 other BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH
- FHs - 1 cc, 7 dtl (1 pass), 2 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 3 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out return and 1 net chord dribbler return
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Agassi 36
- 15 Unforced (9 FH, 5 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 21 Forced (11 FH, 9 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 BH at net & 1 non-net BHV pass attempt
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
Sampras 53
- 36 Unforced (18 FH, 11 BH, 4 FHV, 3 BHV)… with 1 FH at net
- 17 Forced (5 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Agassi was...
- 10/15 (67%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Sampras was...
- 39/76 (51%) at net, including...
- 26/54 (48%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 22/41 (54%) off 1st serve and...
- 4/13 (31%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Agassi commands play - including when Sampras is at net - while Sampras barely stays in touching distance on back of big serving on a slow hard court
Agassi wins 135 points to Sampras' 122, despite Sampras serving 139 of those points and break point figures -
- Agassi 5/21 in 8 games, Sampras 2/4 in 3
... accurately indicates Agassi large superiority. Even so, result isn't a sure thing. Sampras has the first 2 set points in the third set tiebreak - 1 of them on his serve, on which he gets his first serve in (on which he wins 76% match long). Still, he needs things to fall just so to even reach the tiebreak in the first place, having saved 6 break points across 2 games (including holding from 0-40 down), 4 of them second serve points (of which he wins just 44% over match) in the set. Earlier, he'd survived a torrid 18 point hold in the first set also
Its not uncommon for Sampras to be ineffective returning most of match, only to pull out a particularly strong game to break. As long as he can keep holding, that's good enough
Here, he's stretched to limits to hold - and probably lucky not to have been broken more often.
Outstanding baseline play from Agassi and poor returning from Sampras are two keys to the match
Agassi's service games
The usual dynamic for an Agassi-Sampras match is
- Agassi hitting BH cc's to keep Sampras pinned in BH corner and Sampras playing along with very safe, less hard hit BH cc's
Agassi virtually always has more consistent - and harder hit - BH cc and wins bulk of points by outlasting Pete. Otherwise, if Pete's BH holds up better, Agassi eventually goes dtl attackingly and Pete takes his chances on the running FH winner attempt. Usually missing but if he makes a couple in a row, it tends to end the point and goes a long way to getting him a break
In this match, there are two things making matters more in Agassi's favour than usual. He hits his BH exceptionally well, firm to hard while barely missing (match low 5 UEs. about half as many as the next shot, his FH with 9) and occasionally goes attackingly wide with the shot and use of FH inside-out and inside-in to either go at the Sampras BH still harder or finish the point. He has 4 FH inside-in winners, 2 BH dtl and his FH inside-out puts Pete firmly on back foot along the staple rally. Not bad on the BH from Pete - he has 11 UEs and hits firmly - but he's out of his league exchanging BH cc's with Agassi
On the FH, Agassi tends to hit wider while looking for errors. Its necessary because Sampras is constantly on the look out for killing FHs. With a fair amount of success - he has 10 baseline-to-baseline winners to Agassi's 9 - but also match high 18 UEs (to Agassi's 9). Agassi's wide FH cc also forces most of Pete's 5 FH FEs. Agassi misses just 2 winner attempts, while for Pete, the figure is a huge 16. Most of these would be FHs, which up 18 of his 36 UEs
Prospects for grabbing a break aren't too bad for Pete but for poor returning as he gives up 31% unreturned rate. The court is slow and Agassi's serve is harmless. 22/26 return errors have been marked unforced, just regulation, in swing-zone returns that Pete can't make. Agassi's serve is slow enough that even wide-ish serves aren't difficult to put in play
Agassi does have high 10 aces. Almost all of them are out wide to the FH and surprise element has a hand in there going through (he only serves to FH 34% of the time). They're not placed overly wide and Sampras regularly doesn't move as they go by
So Agassi predictably the stronger baseliner and playing particularly well from the back with Pete gaining some counter-play with ambitious attacking FHs. As a match long strategy, that's not bad outlook from Pete's point of view. Its the 31% unreturned rate - for which I'd completely discredit him - that allows Agassi to hold comfortably almost always. Against Agassi's serve on this court, 80-85% return rate is achievable. Pete manages just 68%
It was Agassi's first Australian Open, while Sampras had been the defending champion. The two would go onto meet in the finals of both Indian Wells (Sampras won) and Miami (Agassi won) shortly after
Agassi won 135 points, Sampras 122
Sampras serve-volleyed off all but 5 first serves and occasionally off seconds
Serve Stats
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (82/118) 69%
- 1st serve points won (58/82) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (22/36) 61%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (36/118) 31%
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (71/139) 51%
- 1st serve points won (54/71) 76%
- 2nd serve points won (30/68) 44%
- Aces 28, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (57/139) 41%
Serve Patterns
Agassi served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 5%
Sampras served...
- to FH 43%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Agassi made...
- 76 (34 FH, 42 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 7 Winners (3 FH, 4 BH)
- 28 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (7 FH, 4 BH), including 1 return-approach attempt
- 17 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (76/133) 57%
Sampras made...
- 78 (23 FH, 55 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (3 BH)
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 22 Unforced (9 FH, 13 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (78/114) 68%
Break Points
Agassi 5/21 (8 games)
Sampras 2/4 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Agassi 40 (25 FH, 11 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
Sampras 25 (11 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
Agassi had 7 return passes (3 FH, 4 BH) and 12 regular passes (9 FH, 3 BH)
- FH returns - 1 dtl and 2 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc and 2 inside-in
- regular FHs - 6 cc, 1 dtl, 1 longline/cc and 1 lob
- regular BHs - 2 cc and 1 dtl
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 4 cc (1 at net), 3 dtl, 2 inside-out and 4 inside-in
- regular BHs - 2 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 longline/inside-out
- 1 FHV can reasonably be called an OH and 1 BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH (neither were smashes)
Sampras had 6 from serve-volley points
- 4 first 'volleys' (3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 2 second volleys (2 FHV)
- 1 from a return-approach point (1 OH)
- 1 other BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH
- FHs - 1 cc, 7 dtl (1 pass), 2 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 3 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out return and 1 net chord dribbler return
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Agassi 36
- 15 Unforced (9 FH, 5 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 21 Forced (11 FH, 9 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 BH at net & 1 non-net BHV pass attempt
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
Sampras 53
- 36 Unforced (18 FH, 11 BH, 4 FHV, 3 BHV)… with 1 FH at net
- 17 Forced (5 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Agassi was...
- 10/15 (67%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Sampras was...
- 39/76 (51%) at net, including...
- 26/54 (48%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 22/41 (54%) off 1st serve and...
- 4/13 (31%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Agassi commands play - including when Sampras is at net - while Sampras barely stays in touching distance on back of big serving on a slow hard court
Agassi wins 135 points to Sampras' 122, despite Sampras serving 139 of those points and break point figures -
- Agassi 5/21 in 8 games, Sampras 2/4 in 3
... accurately indicates Agassi large superiority. Even so, result isn't a sure thing. Sampras has the first 2 set points in the third set tiebreak - 1 of them on his serve, on which he gets his first serve in (on which he wins 76% match long). Still, he needs things to fall just so to even reach the tiebreak in the first place, having saved 6 break points across 2 games (including holding from 0-40 down), 4 of them second serve points (of which he wins just 44% over match) in the set. Earlier, he'd survived a torrid 18 point hold in the first set also
Its not uncommon for Sampras to be ineffective returning most of match, only to pull out a particularly strong game to break. As long as he can keep holding, that's good enough
Here, he's stretched to limits to hold - and probably lucky not to have been broken more often.
Outstanding baseline play from Agassi and poor returning from Sampras are two keys to the match
Agassi's service games
The usual dynamic for an Agassi-Sampras match is
- Agassi hitting BH cc's to keep Sampras pinned in BH corner and Sampras playing along with very safe, less hard hit BH cc's
Agassi virtually always has more consistent - and harder hit - BH cc and wins bulk of points by outlasting Pete. Otherwise, if Pete's BH holds up better, Agassi eventually goes dtl attackingly and Pete takes his chances on the running FH winner attempt. Usually missing but if he makes a couple in a row, it tends to end the point and goes a long way to getting him a break
In this match, there are two things making matters more in Agassi's favour than usual. He hits his BH exceptionally well, firm to hard while barely missing (match low 5 UEs. about half as many as the next shot, his FH with 9) and occasionally goes attackingly wide with the shot and use of FH inside-out and inside-in to either go at the Sampras BH still harder or finish the point. He has 4 FH inside-in winners, 2 BH dtl and his FH inside-out puts Pete firmly on back foot along the staple rally. Not bad on the BH from Pete - he has 11 UEs and hits firmly - but he's out of his league exchanging BH cc's with Agassi
On the FH, Agassi tends to hit wider while looking for errors. Its necessary because Sampras is constantly on the look out for killing FHs. With a fair amount of success - he has 10 baseline-to-baseline winners to Agassi's 9 - but also match high 18 UEs (to Agassi's 9). Agassi's wide FH cc also forces most of Pete's 5 FH FEs. Agassi misses just 2 winner attempts, while for Pete, the figure is a huge 16. Most of these would be FHs, which up 18 of his 36 UEs
Prospects for grabbing a break aren't too bad for Pete but for poor returning as he gives up 31% unreturned rate. The court is slow and Agassi's serve is harmless. 22/26 return errors have been marked unforced, just regulation, in swing-zone returns that Pete can't make. Agassi's serve is slow enough that even wide-ish serves aren't difficult to put in play
Agassi does have high 10 aces. Almost all of them are out wide to the FH and surprise element has a hand in there going through (he only serves to FH 34% of the time). They're not placed overly wide and Sampras regularly doesn't move as they go by
So Agassi predictably the stronger baseliner and playing particularly well from the back with Pete gaining some counter-play with ambitious attacking FHs. As a match long strategy, that's not bad outlook from Pete's point of view. Its the 31% unreturned rate - for which I'd completely discredit him - that allows Agassi to hold comfortably almost always. Against Agassi's serve on this court, 80-85% return rate is achievable. Pete manages just 68%