Grigor Dimitrov beat David Goffin 7-5, 4-6, 6-3 in the Year End Championship final, 2017 on indoor hard court in London, England
To date, this is the only final at event for both players. The two had met earlier in the round robin as well with Dimitrov, who topped the group with a 3-0 record, winning. Goffin finished second with a 2-1 record and defeated both Rafael Nadal (in the group stages, before his withdrawal from the event) and Roger Federer (in the semi-final) en route to the final
Dimitrov won 108 points, Goffin 102
Serve Stats
Dimitrov...
- 1st serve percentage (67/103) 65%
- 1st serve points won (47/67) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (18/36) 50%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (31/103) 30%
Goffin...
- 1st serve percentage (54/107) 50%
- 1st serve points won (42/54) 78%
- 2nd serve points won (22/53) 42%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (31/107) 29%
Serve Pattern
Dimitrov served...
- to FH 40%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 1%
Goffin served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Dimitrov made...
- 71 (34 FH, 37 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (1 FH, 6 BH)
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (71/102) 70%
Goffin made...
- 66 (33 FH, 33 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 5 Winners (4 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (8 FH, 5 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 13 Forced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (66/97) 68%
Break Points
Dimitrov 4/15 (7 games)
Goffin 3/10 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Dimitrov 15 (5 FH, 3 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Goffin 26 (15 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Dimitrov's FHs - 1 cc pass, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in at net
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 net chord dribbler
Goffin's FHs - 5 cc (1 runaround return, 1 at net), 3 dtl (1 runaround return, 1 at net), 4 inside-out (1 runaround return,1 at net), 3 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 5 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl return
- 3 from serve-volley points (2 FHV, 1 BHV), all first volleys
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Dimitrov 39
- 25 Unforced (17 FH, 8 BH)
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 Back-to-Net)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.8
Goffin 57
- 41 Unforced (23 FH, 15 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Dimitrov was 13/17 (76%) at net
Goffin was...
- 16/25 (64%) at net, including...
- 4/5 (80%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 3/3 (100%) off 1st serve and...
- 1/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Bright, fluent match, with Goffin taking up the aggressor role, Dimitrov solid, careful, opportunistically attacking. Ultimately, Goffin’s hit rate going for his shots is just a little under what it needs to be to gain the win. Court is normal paced, with low bounce
Match comes through in stats like a neat mathematical formula
Things that are virtually equal -
- unreturned serves and double faults (Gof +1)
- double faults (Dimi +1)
- FEs (Gof +2)
… leaving just winners and UEs to look at
- Winners - Dimi 15, Gof 26
“Goffin… in aggressor role”, check
UEs - Dimi 25, Gof 41, broken down as…
Defensive and neutral UEs - Dimi 17, Gof 19
Attacking and winner attempt UEs - Dimi 8, Gof 22
“Goffin’s hit rate going for his shots is just a little under what it needs to be”, check
Gof takes charge to be the aggressor in all ways, including...
Serve & Return
He serves wide, while Dimi’s content to get decent first serves in
Consequently -
- first serve in - Dimi 70%, Gof 50%
- aces - Dimi 5, Gof 10
- first serve ace rate - Dimi 7%, Gof 19%
He’s very aggressive with the return. Not all the time or wildly, but he’s ready, willing and able to go for the point ender with the second shot itself to a degree that would be unusual in any era, but especially this one
He’s got 5 return winners, none of of them passes. Dimi has the conventional 0. When not striking winners, he misses a few going for them and when not going for them, is otherwise apt to not just take the return aggressively early, but going wide with it too. Andre Agassi wasn’t this aggressive returning baseliners
He’s got 1 FH return winner in all 4 basic shot directions. You’d be hard pressed to find any other instances of that. Its rare even against serve-volleying
All that leads to errors too of course. Return errors -
- UEs - Dimi 7, Got 13
- FEs - Dimi 14, Gof 13
Quite a stew of aggression and percentages and funnily enough, it all comes out virtually equal
Both players have 31 unreturned serves
Unreturned rates - Dimi 30%, Gof 29%
They even have very similar double faults (Dimi 6, Gof 5), with Dimi’s rate much worse (17% to Gof’s 9% off second serves). Logical, given Dimi’s under pressure to deliver good second serves to thwart Gof’s aggressive returns
More importantly, second serve points won - Dimi 50%, Gof 42%
… which goes back to “Goffin’s hit rate not being quite good enough” and the winner and aggressive UE figures
Play - Baseline & Net
Play is FH centered and as the aggressor, its largely Gof’s choice to keep it so. Whether that’s sound strategy or not remains to be seen
There are 40 FH UEs, to just 23 BHs
Gof’s aggression is product of shot-making (going for point ending shots from not obvious positions) more than point construction (outplaying opponent to point of leaving an obvious go for winner position). He does it off both wings, and like most players, better off the FH with the shot-making
Leading with FHs is thus sound, taking into account just his game
But Dimi’s FH is no pushover. He doesn’t unduly look to attack, let alone engage in point-ending shot-making, but his FH is more than a match for Gof’s. Slightly stronger of force and ability to get the ball a little wide, short of outright attacking in fact
To date, this is the only final at event for both players. The two had met earlier in the round robin as well with Dimitrov, who topped the group with a 3-0 record, winning. Goffin finished second with a 2-1 record and defeated both Rafael Nadal (in the group stages, before his withdrawal from the event) and Roger Federer (in the semi-final) en route to the final
Dimitrov won 108 points, Goffin 102
Serve Stats
Dimitrov...
- 1st serve percentage (67/103) 65%
- 1st serve points won (47/67) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (18/36) 50%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (31/103) 30%
Goffin...
- 1st serve percentage (54/107) 50%
- 1st serve points won (42/54) 78%
- 2nd serve points won (22/53) 42%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (31/107) 29%
Serve Pattern
Dimitrov served...
- to FH 40%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 1%
Goffin served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Dimitrov made...
- 71 (34 FH, 37 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (1 FH, 6 BH)
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (71/102) 70%
Goffin made...
- 66 (33 FH, 33 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 5 Winners (4 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (8 FH, 5 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 13 Forced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (66/97) 68%
Break Points
Dimitrov 4/15 (7 games)
Goffin 3/10 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Dimitrov 15 (5 FH, 3 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Goffin 26 (15 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Dimitrov's FHs - 1 cc pass, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in at net
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 net chord dribbler
Goffin's FHs - 5 cc (1 runaround return, 1 at net), 3 dtl (1 runaround return, 1 at net), 4 inside-out (1 runaround return,1 at net), 3 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 5 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl return
- 3 from serve-volley points (2 FHV, 1 BHV), all first volleys
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Dimitrov 39
- 25 Unforced (17 FH, 8 BH)
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 Back-to-Net)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.8
Goffin 57
- 41 Unforced (23 FH, 15 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Dimitrov was 13/17 (76%) at net
Goffin was...
- 16/25 (64%) at net, including...
- 4/5 (80%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 3/3 (100%) off 1st serve and...
- 1/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Bright, fluent match, with Goffin taking up the aggressor role, Dimitrov solid, careful, opportunistically attacking. Ultimately, Goffin’s hit rate going for his shots is just a little under what it needs to be to gain the win. Court is normal paced, with low bounce
Match comes through in stats like a neat mathematical formula
Things that are virtually equal -
- unreturned serves and double faults (Gof +1)
- double faults (Dimi +1)
- FEs (Gof +2)
… leaving just winners and UEs to look at
- Winners - Dimi 15, Gof 26
“Goffin… in aggressor role”, check
UEs - Dimi 25, Gof 41, broken down as…
Defensive and neutral UEs - Dimi 17, Gof 19
Attacking and winner attempt UEs - Dimi 8, Gof 22
“Goffin’s hit rate going for his shots is just a little under what it needs to be”, check
Gof takes charge to be the aggressor in all ways, including...
Serve & Return
He serves wide, while Dimi’s content to get decent first serves in
Consequently -
- first serve in - Dimi 70%, Gof 50%
- aces - Dimi 5, Gof 10
- first serve ace rate - Dimi 7%, Gof 19%
He’s very aggressive with the return. Not all the time or wildly, but he’s ready, willing and able to go for the point ender with the second shot itself to a degree that would be unusual in any era, but especially this one
He’s got 5 return winners, none of of them passes. Dimi has the conventional 0. When not striking winners, he misses a few going for them and when not going for them, is otherwise apt to not just take the return aggressively early, but going wide with it too. Andre Agassi wasn’t this aggressive returning baseliners
He’s got 1 FH return winner in all 4 basic shot directions. You’d be hard pressed to find any other instances of that. Its rare even against serve-volleying
All that leads to errors too of course. Return errors -
- UEs - Dimi 7, Got 13
- FEs - Dimi 14, Gof 13
Quite a stew of aggression and percentages and funnily enough, it all comes out virtually equal
Both players have 31 unreturned serves
Unreturned rates - Dimi 30%, Gof 29%
They even have very similar double faults (Dimi 6, Gof 5), with Dimi’s rate much worse (17% to Gof’s 9% off second serves). Logical, given Dimi’s under pressure to deliver good second serves to thwart Gof’s aggressive returns
More importantly, second serve points won - Dimi 50%, Gof 42%
… which goes back to “Goffin’s hit rate not being quite good enough” and the winner and aggressive UE figures
Play - Baseline & Net
Play is FH centered and as the aggressor, its largely Gof’s choice to keep it so. Whether that’s sound strategy or not remains to be seen
There are 40 FH UEs, to just 23 BHs
Gof’s aggression is product of shot-making (going for point ending shots from not obvious positions) more than point construction (outplaying opponent to point of leaving an obvious go for winner position). He does it off both wings, and like most players, better off the FH with the shot-making
Leading with FHs is thus sound, taking into account just his game
But Dimi’s FH is no pushover. He doesn’t unduly look to attack, let alone engage in point-ending shot-making, but his FH is more than a match for Gof’s. Slightly stronger of force and ability to get the ball a little wide, short of outright attacking in fact