Pete Sampras beat Andre Agassi 6-3, 1-6, 6-3 in the Year End Championship round robins, 1991 on carpet in Frankfurt, Germany
Both players would advance to the semi-final, Agassi top of the group, Sampras second. Agassi would lose in the semi-finals to Jim Courier, who Sampras would go onto beat for his first title in the final. Agassi was the defending champion. The two had met at same stage previous year, with Agassi winning
Sampras won 83 points, Agassi 77
Sampras serve-volleyed off all first serves
Serve Stats
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (50/78) 64%
- 1st serve points won (39/50) 78%
- 2nd serve points won (14/28) 50%
- Aces 16
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/78) 49%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (48/82) 59%
- 1st serve points won (31/48) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (21/34) 62%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/82) 28%
Serve Patterns
Sampras served...
- to FH 47%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 1%
Agassi served...
- to FH 41%
- to BH 59%
Return Stats
Sampras made...
- 58 (22 FH, 36 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- 6 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (58/81) 72%
Agassi made...
- 38 (18 FH, 20 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 5 Winners (2 FH, 3 BH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (4 FH, 3 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 15 Forced (7 FH, 8 BH)
- Return Rate (38/76) 50%
Break Points
Sampras 2/6 (5 games)
Agassi 2/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sampras 16 (9 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BH1/2V)
Agassi 30 (15 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 2 BHV, 4 OH)
Sampras had 4 from serve-volley points
- 3 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 FH at net)
- 1 second volley (1 FHV)
- FHs - 3 cc (1 return), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl pass, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 1 dtl, 1 longline and 1 net chord dribbler
Agassi had 9 passes - 4 returns (1 FH, 3 BH) & 5 regular (4 FH, 1 BH)
- FH return - 1 inside-out
- BH returns - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-in
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- regular BH - 1 lob
reglar (non-pass) FHs - 5 cc (1 return), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 2 inside-in
regular BHs - 2 dtl
-3 from serve-volley points - 2 FHV, 1 BHV - all first volleys, all swinging shots
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
- 1 OH on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sampras 22
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 9 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.3
Agassi 28
- 16 Unforced (12 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net and both FHV and BHV were swinging shots
- 12 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sampras was...
- 28/44 (64%) at net, including...
- 23/34 (68%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 1/1 retreated
Agassi was...
- 11/18 (61%) at net, including...
- 4/6 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Match Report
A simple but bright little match. Sampras serve-bots behind his big first serve. On everything else, Agassi looks to break the world record for how hard a tennis ball can be hit without exploding. Court is quick, but probably not as quick as Sampras’ serve makes it look
Both generally and here, Agassi has the tendency of making servers - particularly those in the heavyweight category, like Sampras - look even better than they are. By standing up close, the wider serves are bound to go through for aces, while he barely moves and the ones in his swing zone seem to be on him in a flash too. The impression it creates is lightning fast conditions. Its clearly not slow, but doesn’t look as frightening when anyone else is returning in this particular event - Becker, Lendl, Courier all have their cracks at Pete too. None of them get it easy, but all of them are more at ease than Agassi
Ace frequency and unreturned rates for Sampras at this event (all played on the same court) -
- vs Becker - unreturned rate 30%, ace frequency 9% of first serves
- vs Lendl - unreturned rate 39%, ace frequency 15% of first serves
- vs Courier - unreturned rate 25%, ace frequency 13% of first serves
- here vs Agassi - unreturned rate 49%, ace frequency 32%
Were the court as quick as Agassi’s returning makes it look, its unlikely that some of the wind-up groundies he throws himself into would be coming back as often as they do. Sampras isn’t exactly tapping balls either
Action can readily be divided into Pete’s first serve points and everything else
Sampras’ first serve points
The ‘botting part
Pete serve-volleys behind all first serves. 31/50 don’t come back. 16 of those 31 are aces and most of the rest are hard forced errors, not Agassi just hitting top of tape or missing lines by an inch
Pete wins 8/19 of the points when the return does come back
Agassi has 4 return-pass winners. Only 1 is well struck. The other 3 are full stretched out pokes that slide by the incoming Pete
Couple good half-volleys by Pete, including a first ‘volley’ winner. Misses just 1 in the match. Not faced with difficult volleys. Powerful at comfy height is mode of what he’s faced with
This is all pretty common in matches between the 2; Agassi getting aced right, left (he does manage to avoid center) standing around the baseline to take serves that are on him far too quickly to react to from such a position
He hits a return-winner or 2, and off go the commentators raving about the greatest returner of all time
Reality is usually a lot closer to what happens here; The ton of freebies he’s giving up isn’t worth the odd smacked return winner (of which he has 1 in this match). Formidable as Pete’s serve is, it isn’t as formidable as Agassi makes it appear. And there are several players who return Pete more regularly than Agassi does, sans whatever gung-ho appeal there is in standing up tall and taking on the big bully (and no mention that he got creamed doing it)
Both players would advance to the semi-final, Agassi top of the group, Sampras second. Agassi would lose in the semi-finals to Jim Courier, who Sampras would go onto beat for his first title in the final. Agassi was the defending champion. The two had met at same stage previous year, with Agassi winning
Sampras won 83 points, Agassi 77
Sampras serve-volleyed off all first serves
Serve Stats
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (50/78) 64%
- 1st serve points won (39/50) 78%
- 2nd serve points won (14/28) 50%
- Aces 16
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/78) 49%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (48/82) 59%
- 1st serve points won (31/48) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (21/34) 62%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/82) 28%
Serve Patterns
Sampras served...
- to FH 47%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 1%
Agassi served...
- to FH 41%
- to BH 59%
Return Stats
Sampras made...
- 58 (22 FH, 36 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- 6 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (58/81) 72%
Agassi made...
- 38 (18 FH, 20 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 5 Winners (2 FH, 3 BH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (4 FH, 3 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 15 Forced (7 FH, 8 BH)
- Return Rate (38/76) 50%
Break Points
Sampras 2/6 (5 games)
Agassi 2/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sampras 16 (9 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BH1/2V)
Agassi 30 (15 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 2 BHV, 4 OH)
Sampras had 4 from serve-volley points
- 3 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 FH at net)
- 1 second volley (1 FHV)
- FHs - 3 cc (1 return), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl pass, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 1 dtl, 1 longline and 1 net chord dribbler
Agassi had 9 passes - 4 returns (1 FH, 3 BH) & 5 regular (4 FH, 1 BH)
- FH return - 1 inside-out
- BH returns - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-in
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- regular BH - 1 lob
reglar (non-pass) FHs - 5 cc (1 return), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 2 inside-in
regular BHs - 2 dtl
-3 from serve-volley points - 2 FHV, 1 BHV - all first volleys, all swinging shots
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
- 1 OH on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sampras 22
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 9 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.3
Agassi 28
- 16 Unforced (12 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net and both FHV and BHV were swinging shots
- 12 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sampras was...
- 28/44 (64%) at net, including...
- 23/34 (68%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 1/1 retreated
Agassi was...
- 11/18 (61%) at net, including...
- 4/6 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Match Report
A simple but bright little match. Sampras serve-bots behind his big first serve. On everything else, Agassi looks to break the world record for how hard a tennis ball can be hit without exploding. Court is quick, but probably not as quick as Sampras’ serve makes it look
Both generally and here, Agassi has the tendency of making servers - particularly those in the heavyweight category, like Sampras - look even better than they are. By standing up close, the wider serves are bound to go through for aces, while he barely moves and the ones in his swing zone seem to be on him in a flash too. The impression it creates is lightning fast conditions. Its clearly not slow, but doesn’t look as frightening when anyone else is returning in this particular event - Becker, Lendl, Courier all have their cracks at Pete too. None of them get it easy, but all of them are more at ease than Agassi
Ace frequency and unreturned rates for Sampras at this event (all played on the same court) -
- vs Becker - unreturned rate 30%, ace frequency 9% of first serves
- vs Lendl - unreturned rate 39%, ace frequency 15% of first serves
- vs Courier - unreturned rate 25%, ace frequency 13% of first serves
- here vs Agassi - unreturned rate 49%, ace frequency 32%
Were the court as quick as Agassi’s returning makes it look, its unlikely that some of the wind-up groundies he throws himself into would be coming back as often as they do. Sampras isn’t exactly tapping balls either
Action can readily be divided into Pete’s first serve points and everything else
Sampras’ first serve points
The ‘botting part
Pete serve-volleys behind all first serves. 31/50 don’t come back. 16 of those 31 are aces and most of the rest are hard forced errors, not Agassi just hitting top of tape or missing lines by an inch
Pete wins 8/19 of the points when the return does come back
Agassi has 4 return-pass winners. Only 1 is well struck. The other 3 are full stretched out pokes that slide by the incoming Pete
Couple good half-volleys by Pete, including a first ‘volley’ winner. Misses just 1 in the match. Not faced with difficult volleys. Powerful at comfy height is mode of what he’s faced with
This is all pretty common in matches between the 2; Agassi getting aced right, left (he does manage to avoid center) standing around the baseline to take serves that are on him far too quickly to react to from such a position
He hits a return-winner or 2, and off go the commentators raving about the greatest returner of all time
Reality is usually a lot closer to what happens here; The ton of freebies he’s giving up isn’t worth the odd smacked return winner (of which he has 1 in this match). Formidable as Pete’s serve is, it isn’t as formidable as Agassi makes it appear. And there are several players who return Pete more regularly than Agassi does, sans whatever gung-ho appeal there is in standing up tall and taking on the big bully (and no mention that he got creamed doing it)