Dunlop Aerogel 100

AT92292

Semi-Pro
For people who now use this racket what racket did you use before? I usually use a 300 so Im skeptical about the 90 head size
 

jzief128

New User
I used a Wilson PSC 6.1 before my AG100. It is a big difference, but I adapted pretty well. The new racquet is smaller, lighter, flexier, and less powerful. The control is great, not better or worse, just different. I like it alot. So easy to use. I don't notice the 90 head at all. Coming from a larger racquet (100+) might be a bigger difference (don't know what the 300 is) though.
 
A

ATIRagePro

Guest
I was using a M-fil 200 16x19 before I switched over to the AG100. Went down about 7" in headsize and I'm glad I did. I feel great using this racket. Don't get me wrong, the M-fil was great too while it lasted.
 

Keifers

Legend
The two frames I was using before I started playing with the AG100 were: a Dunlop Revelation Tour Pro (95") and a Prince Graphite Pro (110"). I've had no problem at all going to a 90" head -- in fact, it's more maneuverable and precise.

I've owned and hit with many mids over the years, and the AG100 is the most remarkable of them all. Here's what I wrote about it in another thread:

For most remarkable among the currently available mids, I would nominate the Aerogel 100. It provides all the advantages of midsize racquets (precision, control, maneuverability, stability) while having almost none of the disadvantages (the sweetspot is bigger and easier to find than many MPs) -- and does so weighing in at only 11.7oz / 332g.

In fact, its low weight and low swingweight (312) are key to the tremendous flexibility and control it gives users. If you're coming from other (heavier) player's Mids and MPs, you'll find you can get the racquet into position and make micro-adjustments during the swing much faster and much easier. Plus you'll find you have further opportunity to control your shot while the ball is on (in) the stringbed because the frame cups and holds the ball far better than you've probably ever experienced with a mid. All this with impressive stability.

If I can put it this way, what you think and want gets translated into action better and more predictably with this racquet than almost any other, at least in my experience. (I own and have hit with a bunch of mids over the years, btw.)

And if the stock weight is too low for the pace and heaviness of balls you typically face, it's quite easy to weight up without compromising the attributes I've been describing.

Imo, a truly unique and very fun to hit with racquet.

It's been a long time since I was this excited about a new racquet.
 

Rabbit

G.O.A.T.
Moved from a 98 sq in C10 to the AG100 and haven't had an issue. I've also had a ton of fun with it.
 

hoodjem

G.O.A.T.
Before the AG100, I used a Wilson nCode nPS 95 (18 X 20).

Before that it was a Wilson PS 6.0 85 SV.

Before that it was a Wilson Jack Kramer Pro Staff woodie.
 

ced

Professional
Ag100

For people who now use this racket what racket did you use before? I usually use a 300 so Im skeptical about the 90 head size


Just finished demoing the AG100..... it is a nice stick, but it really just made me appreciate my G325 that much more ...... in fact I sent the demo back and ordered a new G325 to have when I wear out the other 4.
 
Top