bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
That SW doesn't sound right, a liitle too high, but then again maybe it's right.
Dunlop Aerogel 300 arrived...
- Thread starter Redflea
- Start date
That SW doesn't sound right, a liitle too high, but then again maybe it's right.
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Those specs look off...for the AG300:
weight is listed as = 305, my AG weighed 309 strung, nowhere near 324
flex is listed as 64 on the racquet, not 63
balance is 330, not 335
SW sounds high
Don't know that I'd trust the numbers from that racquet finder.
Some specs are listed in this other Aerogel thread...
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=108413
weight is listed as = 305, my AG weighed 309 strung, nowhere near 324
flex is listed as 64 on the racquet, not 63
balance is 330, not 335
SW sounds high
Don't know that I'd trust the numbers from that racquet finder.
Some specs are listed in this other Aerogel thread...
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=108413
Last edited:
Redflea,
We've got a nice little community here, very 'fringe' (artists, musicians, immigrants, anyone a bit 'left of centre' lol) so it's good to be able to help out and it's nice that they care enough about the kids to have them active over the holidays instead of stuck in front of a tv. The tennis programme didn't exist, we just proposed it and people said, 'yes please'.
If you're looking to recommend a racquet, you might like to have people check out the Slazenger International Series. I had a hit this afternoon with both the NX2 and NX1 and was pleasantly surprised, especially with the NX2. Nothing overly flash in their construction but the performance is very good and it will certainly do everything you could ask of a racquet. Put a good quality string in it and you could definitely make it sing. The NX 2 specs out very, very close to the old HM 300G so, if you know anyone who liked that frame, they might want to consider it.
The specs are:
Length - 27
Head Size - 98 SQ Inches
Weight - 305g
Balance - 330mm
Beam Width: 21mm
Construction - 100% Hotmelt Graphite (listed as both HM Graphite and 'nano-carbon' - believe whichever you like LOL).
There was no listing for swingweight but you can see that everything else is pretty much identical to the HM300G. The NX2 did feel slightly more 'comfortable' than I remember the HM300G being. A friend who is sponsored by Dunlop and has used the HM300G for a few years (stock) said that the 300G's he recently bought from the UK (he hasn't been able to transition away from the HM300 so has to buy his own) played softer in the head than his originals and felt very much like the NX2. So, perhaps, the extra comfort I felt could just come from a change in the production process, rather than composition. Either way, worth a try if you liked the original 300G.
The NX1 specs out almost the same as the MFil-200 (2006), minus the MFil construction. Good, solid frame that is probably better suited to a bigger hitting player than the NX2 and isn't quite as easy to customise. Again, solid, graphite, does the job, arm friendly, inexpensive and a decent string will bring it to life.
We've got a nice little community here, very 'fringe' (artists, musicians, immigrants, anyone a bit 'left of centre' lol) so it's good to be able to help out and it's nice that they care enough about the kids to have them active over the holidays instead of stuck in front of a tv. The tennis programme didn't exist, we just proposed it and people said, 'yes please'.
If you're looking to recommend a racquet, you might like to have people check out the Slazenger International Series. I had a hit this afternoon with both the NX2 and NX1 and was pleasantly surprised, especially with the NX2. Nothing overly flash in their construction but the performance is very good and it will certainly do everything you could ask of a racquet. Put a good quality string in it and you could definitely make it sing. The NX 2 specs out very, very close to the old HM 300G so, if you know anyone who liked that frame, they might want to consider it.
The specs are:
Length - 27
Head Size - 98 SQ Inches
Weight - 305g
Balance - 330mm
Beam Width: 21mm
Construction - 100% Hotmelt Graphite (listed as both HM Graphite and 'nano-carbon' - believe whichever you like LOL).
There was no listing for swingweight but you can see that everything else is pretty much identical to the HM300G. The NX2 did feel slightly more 'comfortable' than I remember the HM300G being. A friend who is sponsored by Dunlop and has used the HM300G for a few years (stock) said that the 300G's he recently bought from the UK (he hasn't been able to transition away from the HM300 so has to buy his own) played softer in the head than his originals and felt very much like the NX2. So, perhaps, the extra comfort I felt could just come from a change in the production process, rather than composition. Either way, worth a try if you liked the original 300G.
The NX1 specs out almost the same as the MFil-200 (2006), minus the MFil construction. Good, solid frame that is probably better suited to a bigger hitting player than the NX2 and isn't quite as easy to customise. Again, solid, graphite, does the job, arm friendly, inexpensive and a decent string will bring it to life.
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Jonolau...painfully, due to the universe conspiring to ruin my life, work has been just awful, and I've had very limited access to the courts and playing partners since the Aerogel arrived. Had a couple hits w/my family and a couple sets of doubles. So no opportunity to really wind it up on the singles court to give it a full workout, switching between it and the M-Fil to compare.
However, so far w/my limited court time, my feeling is:
1. The AG300 is stiffer and brings a bit more power than the MF300...not a huge change, I didn't have to mess w/my string setup to deal with it. No arm issues from the additional stiffness.
2. The AG300 feels more solid overall...a bit "thumpier" than the MF300, and does appear to handle off-center hits better
3. The AG300 is a bit more dampened than the MF300. Still works for touch shots and feel is still good.
4. The AG300 volleys better for me, getting better results in terms of solid, penetrating volleys, finess volleys still working very well.
Overall, if I had to make a decision which racquet to use in a tournament tomorrow, I'd take the Aerogel, I'm liking it more in most areas. But, if I had to switch back to the MF300 in the middle of the match, I wouldn't sweat it.
I think a lot of MF3 owners could try the AG3 and decide to stick w/the MF3 given the price differential. Whether the differences are worth paying twice as much (or more, depending on where the MF3 price settles) for the AG3 is going to vary greatly based on subjective reaction to the differences, disposable income, price sensitivity, and the always useful (to racquet companies) silly desire to own the latest and presumably greatest technology/paint job at whatever cost.
On note...my Aerogel arrived at 10.95oz/310g, that's actually a tiny bit heavier than the MF3 spec (309/10.9), and .2oz/5g heavier than the AG300 is supposed to be, so either specs were revised a bit, or I got one a bit on the high side of their manuf. tolerances. I was happy it was that way, and if I order another I'm going to request one as close to that weight as possible.
However, so far w/my limited court time, my feeling is:
1. The AG300 is stiffer and brings a bit more power than the MF300...not a huge change, I didn't have to mess w/my string setup to deal with it. No arm issues from the additional stiffness.
2. The AG300 feels more solid overall...a bit "thumpier" than the MF300, and does appear to handle off-center hits better
3. The AG300 is a bit more dampened than the MF300. Still works for touch shots and feel is still good.
4. The AG300 volleys better for me, getting better results in terms of solid, penetrating volleys, finess volleys still working very well.
Overall, if I had to make a decision which racquet to use in a tournament tomorrow, I'd take the Aerogel, I'm liking it more in most areas. But, if I had to switch back to the MF300 in the middle of the match, I wouldn't sweat it.
I think a lot of MF3 owners could try the AG3 and decide to stick w/the MF3 given the price differential. Whether the differences are worth paying twice as much (or more, depending on where the MF3 price settles) for the AG3 is going to vary greatly based on subjective reaction to the differences, disposable income, price sensitivity, and the always useful (to racquet companies) silly desire to own the latest and presumably greatest technology/paint job at whatever cost.
On note...my Aerogel arrived at 10.95oz/310g, that's actually a tiny bit heavier than the MF3 spec (309/10.9), and .2oz/5g heavier than the AG300 is supposed to be, so either specs were revised a bit, or I got one a bit on the high side of their manuf. tolerances. I was happy it was that way, and if I order another I'm going to request one as close to that weight as possible.
halfvolley777
New User
AeroGel 300 New: comments on hit
I customized my new AG300 to 12.4 ounces strung, 3/4 inch headlight, with leather grip and tonic ball feel at 66/64.
Very solid at indoor temps and outserved my old Mfil200 easily...kick and power...had to adjust to volleys a bit...more later.
I customized my new AG300 to 12.4 ounces strung, 3/4 inch headlight, with leather grip and tonic ball feel at 66/64.
Very solid at indoor temps and outserved my old Mfil200 easily...kick and power...had to adjust to volleys a bit...more later.
I think that answers any of my questions regarding the Aerogel 300. Bit more dampened, a bit 'thumpier' and a bit better on off-centre hits is pretty much all I missed with the MFil-300.
Are you finding any change in terms of spin?
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Not really...the balance is similar, so I assume my head speed is about the same, so no big difference. I always found spin easy to access with this racquet, not that I'm a spinny guy normally, but when I do go after spin I don't have any problems generating it.
louis netman
Hall of Fame
I took out my old, modded HM300G which had been sitting on my rack for over a year... The frame, complete with worn,old, gut hybrid string-job was still crisp and very playable. I find that this frame is unique in this respect. All my other frames require fairly fresh strings to feel playable.
Since it seems there are many similarities in specs with the original 300G,
I was wondering how the new 300 compares to the HM300g: 1) in terms of this "crispness/infinite playability" phenomenon, 2) in terms of harshness off-center (which mfil seemed to have improved upon), and 3) in terms of hoop flex @ about 3&9, which I disliked somewhat during execution of volleys on the original 300G...
Thanx!
Since it seems there are many similarities in specs with the original 300G,
I was wondering how the new 300 compares to the HM300g: 1) in terms of this "crispness/infinite playability" phenomenon, 2) in terms of harshness off-center (which mfil seemed to have improved upon), and 3) in terms of hoop flex @ about 3&9, which I disliked somewhat during execution of volleys on the original 300G...
Thanx!
Redflea
Hall of Fame
I haven't hit a 300g in about two years...but:
1. Not sure...haven't had strings in the MF300 or AG300 long enough to comment.
2. Harshness off-center was a real problem for me w/the 300g (main reason I didn't buy one) not an issue for me w/the MF300 (though noticeable on frame or near frame) and further reduced w/the AG300
3. Hoop flex on the AG300 feels less than w/the MF300...for me so far volleys w/the AG300 are improved over the MF300, which I already felt volleyed well
jonolau
Legend
Jonolau...painfully, due to the universe conspiring to ruin my life, work has been just awful, and I've had very limited access to the courts and playing partners since the Aerogel arrived. Had a couple hits w/my family and a couple sets of doubles. So no opportunity to really wind it up on the singles court to give it a full workout, switching between it and the M-Fil to compare.
However, so far w/my limited court time, my feeling is:
1. The AG300 is stiffer and brings a bit more power than the MF300...not a huge change, I didn't have to mess w/my string setup to deal with it. No arm issues from the additional stiffness.
2. The AG300 feels more solid overall...a bit "thumpier" than the MF300, and does appear to handle off-center hits better
3. The AG300 is a bit more dampened than the MF300. Still works for touch shots and feel is still good.
4. The AG300 volleys better for me, getting better results in terms of solid, penetrating volleys, finess volleys still working very well.
Overall, if I had to make a decision which racquet to use in a tournament tomorrow, I'd take the Aerogel, I'm liking it more in most areas. But, if I had to switch back to the MF300 in the middle of the match, I wouldn't sweat it.
I think a lot of MF3 owners could try the AG3 and decide to stick w/the MF3 given the price differential. Whether the differences are worth paying twice as much (or more, depending on where the MF3 price settles) for the AG3 is going to vary greatly based on subjective reaction to the differences, disposable income, price sensitivity, and the always useful (to racquet companies) silly desire to own the latest and presumably greatest technology/paint job at whatever cost.
On note...my Aerogel arrived at 10.95oz/310g, that's actually a tiny bit heavier than the MF3 spec (309/10.9), and .2oz/5g heavier than the AG300 is supposed to be, so either specs were revised a bit, or I got one a bit on the high side of their manuf. tolerances. I was happy it was that way, and if I order another I'm going to request one as close to that weight as possible.
Interesting ... thanks for the views, Redflea.
This is one of the things about the MF3 that I don't really fancy too much - that tinny feeling on off-centre shots.
I'm seriously considering trying out Anirut's suggestion of stuffing the frame and handle chambers with small polystyrene pellets. This should help give it a more "solid" and muted feel on off-centre shots. He offered to do it for free but I didn't bring my racquet up to Bangkok on my last business trip.
Jon
Redflea
Hall of Fame
fielders_80
Semi-Pro
and bring them orangutans too, i think Anirut would love to play a set with them.
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Had a hit with the 3oo Aerogel and found it unforgiving and harsh, also a real small sweetspot, unlike the mfil IMHO - the string was what came with the demo, so maybe that was partially a factor, but in general, really disapointed.
bertrevert
Legend
Harsh? Whoa, oh no. Was that harsh feel? Or harsh on the elbow?
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Both, actually my elbow was sore after the hit, I know Redflea said once he changed the strings the 300 performed much better. BFWIW, I think a stick ( if it's for you ) will feel good even with bad strings.
Redflea
Hall of Fame
You're the only person who's hit w/the Aerogels to complain of harshness...surprises me a lot. I'd suspect either your game was off due to problems related to hitting with a racquet with different specs than your normal stick (swing timing issues, etc.) or you somehow got a really bad setup (or some of both). The stick is definitely not harsh...it's more muted than the M-Fil.
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Maybe it was the much lower swing speed coming for a Prestige, it just felt stiff or board like, no cupping of the ball. The 300 had the dunlop string that came from Dunlop, so I thought it must of been strung midrange. I was really surprised how it hit.
Craig Sheppard
Hall of Fame
HMMMMMMMmmmmm that sounds curiously familiar w/ what happens when I strung my Slazenger X1's too high. That frame CAN feel good, but if it's a bad string and strung too high, it's a stiff, harsh board. I've been eying the Aerogel 300 to try in a few months, so I'm really wondering what it'd be like w/ a multi, gut-hybrid, or even PSGD strung lower. I know you can't control the string it came with, so no it's no dig at you...
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
I might give it another shot if I can talk my friend into restringing it. I wonder how an NXT at say 55lbs would work.
bertrevert
Legend
NXT is nice and soft and I'd imagine that would be better. Obviously Redflea's nat gut is going to be the nicest. I still have my old 300g and people remarked that was fairly harsh in off-centre hits. It can be. But I believe the M-Fil fixed all that, and the M-Fil tech is still in the more recent AG.
Good feedback though. You can see how these Dunlops suit pros with certain sorts of game - am thinking Hass and Robredo (whatever model it is that they truly hit with) - the frame seems great for that big swing style, fairly flat hitting sharp and accurate game. I think Hass is in the net more than Robredo. They both go for the their shots. They get plow-through but not high bounce.
bluegrasser and Redflea (what is all this colour-coding huh?), would you say your games are like that? Aer you demoing the AG and finding it suits your style. Have you incorporated the racquet into your play. If not, why not?
From feedback here it seems that perhaps that the AG is not a significant step from the M-Fil? Darn it looks nice though........
Good feedback though. You can see how these Dunlops suit pros with certain sorts of game - am thinking Hass and Robredo (whatever model it is that they truly hit with) - the frame seems great for that big swing style, fairly flat hitting sharp and accurate game. I think Hass is in the net more than Robredo. They both go for the their shots. They get plow-through but not high bounce.
bluegrasser and Redflea (what is all this colour-coding huh?), would you say your games are like that? Aer you demoing the AG and finding it suits your style. Have you incorporated the racquet into your play. If not, why not?
From feedback here it seems that perhaps that the AG is not a significant step from the M-Fil? Darn it looks nice though........
Redflea
Hall of Fame
I think the M-Fil fixed the harshness on off-center that I also found w/the 300g, but w/the M-Fil there is some remaining "feedback" on frame/near frame that is more noticeable than with some other racquets. But I've had zero arm problems w/the M-Fil 300, unlike the 300g...the 300g kind of killed my arm. I think the Aerogel is the final fix for the remaining vibes around the edges on the M-Fil.
At least bluegrasser's color makes sense! What the heck is a redlea, anyway!?
(I love bluegrass music...bluegrasser, ever been to the Strawberry Festival in Yosemite?) I actually am relatively flat hitter (esp. compared to today's game). I do spin it up on some shots, but prefer and am most comfortable hitting a penetrating ball. I find it almost as easy to get spin w/the M-Fil as I did w/my old RDX Mid, which is saying a lot, and others with more modern games have posted that they found the M-Fil 300 very spin-friendly.
I bought the AG 300 in December from England on a lark, just felt like treating myself for the holidays. I had no particularly good reason, and was very happy w/my M-Fils. I am using the Aerogel 300 full time now, with my M-Fils in backup. I like the Aerogel a bit better for volleying, find it more solid overall...it's a bit stiffer and a bit more muted...evolutionary changes from the M-Fil.
I'd agree, as noted. If I had demo'd an AG before buying, I don't know that I would end up getting one, as the differences from the M-Fil aren't that significant. Cleans up a few things, but I can switch between them when playing w/out skipping a beat. I'm not planning on buying a second Aerogel...I'll keep my two M-Fils as backups and be perfectly happy. So for anyone on a budget, there is no way to beat two M-Fils for $140...if you have tons 'o funds and want the latest and greatest, IMHO the Aerogel is better overall. I'm sure others will either agree or disagree with me on that.
bertrevert
Legend
Yikes I love to splurge on one thing - good racquets. But you know the M-Fil is looking like such a bargain atm (new @ $229 in AUSD) that I'm beginning to think it would be good to update. My old 300g cost about $200, so these are really good prices. Yet when it comes to racquets the price shouldn't govern - first and foremost suitability must.
I'm doing real well with my 001 MP atm. I've not succeeded with the MID. You moved from the RDX to the M-Fil. What was the transition like, or how long did it take? There are some comps coming up and I'd look to a change perhaps after those.
The 001 MP seems to tie me to the baseline a bit. Which is ok but I need to throw in some sharp volleys and I think, well I know, that the 300g type of racquet did that for my game before and will do so again. I just didn't lead my 300g until really late and just about tore my shoulder off trying to get plow-through.... the 001 gives good fat generous volleys that stay stuck, and incredible groundstroke spin. It's quite a racquet.
Gawd, I'm getting convinced alright....
I'm doing real well with my 001 MP atm. I've not succeeded with the MID. You moved from the RDX to the M-Fil. What was the transition like, or how long did it take? There are some comps coming up and I'd look to a change perhaps after those.
The 001 MP seems to tie me to the baseline a bit. Which is ok but I need to throw in some sharp volleys and I think, well I know, that the 300g type of racquet did that for my game before and will do so again. I just didn't lead my 300g until really late and just about tore my shoulder off trying to get plow-through.... the 001 gives good fat generous volleys that stay stuck, and incredible groundstroke spin. It's quite a racquet.
Gawd, I'm getting convinced alright....
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Color ? ok, I'm clueless _ I actually love the looks (A300) of the frame, and to me it feels more like the 300g, not the mfil, but you seem to differ. I think I'll have it restrung and if it doesn't work, then on to the Hornet.
Redflea
Hall of Fame
I really wanted to go to the RDS 001 MP from my RDX, but I just never got the 001 MP working well enough for some reason. Oh well...
The transition from RDX Mid to M-Fil 300 was much easier than I expected it to be overall. The parts that were hardest were:
- Adjusting to the lower weight, had some swing timing issues...at first I had to add lead at 3&9, but removed it a few weeks ago and now only have a couple grams under the butt cap. My RDX mid was about 12.1oz, my M-Fil/Aerogels are about 11.5oz.
- My backhand...I have a 1HBH and it took me a while to get back to the results I had there w/the RDX Mid. I think due in part to the mid being more head light. I've closed the gap and the difference isn't very large any more, but I still don't quite like my 1HBH w/the Dunlops as much as I did w/the RDX. To be fair, I've never felt as comfortable w/my BH w/any other racquet as I have w/the RDX Mid...I think if I could figure out how to play only hitting backhands, I'd still be using my mid.
In other areas...serve, volleys, FH, etc., the transition has gotten me as good or better results, and of course the additional power is helpful as well when I'm on the run/out of position. I've been particularly happy w/the serviing w/the Dunlops...I can place it where I want, hit for spin and/or power, just felt at home w/it on serve right away.
Of course, as always my biggest problem is me, the racquet is the least of my worries...
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Redflea - hope u get some time soon to hit with the new toy. inquiring minds want to read ur review.
I'm not planning on writing up any more than I already have...you can see my comments on it in this thread and in a few other Aerogel 300 threads here.
As I've noted, to me it's a bit more solid than the M-fil and reduces some of the near frame/on frame feedback. I think volleys a bit better, is a bit stiffer and more muted, but still feels very comfortable and provides the feedback I want. It specs a bit more head light, but I don't feel that difference in actual use.
I can switch between the M-Fil and Aerogel during a game w/out skipping a beat. I generally prefer the Aerogel over the M-Fil, but if I popped a string during a match and had to switch back to one of my Aerogels I wouldn't be concerned at all.
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Well I just had the 300 A strung up with the new PSG multi at 55lbs, so I'll give it another go this Sat. I really want this stick to work, the SW, balance etc is just right - wish me luck.
Sup2Dresq
Hall of Fame
I was lucky enough to have the demos for the 200 and 300. I normally play with a Ncode 90. Both had new strings and from my first hit last night I have to say its very muted. This is compared to other racquets on the market I hit with. It feels smooth, "like butter", but no feel. Very muted. Like a cadillac ride.
Forehands are pretty standard. You can swing out, and it rewards you with good control. The 200 had more control than the 300. The 300 will fly on you if you don't direct it the way you want. So defensive shots and split second reaction shots are more for the 200.
Backhands. The feel with my one hander was again muted. No feel if you miss or hit the sweet spot. I rarely mishit and didn't with this racquet, but I would of like more feel. Again. A cadillac.
Serves. In comparison with my Ncode, the weight of the 200 allows you to hit some impressive serves as well. The 300 is similiar but you do have to restrain it a bit.
Volleys. Again the muted feel gives it a low mark. I have good form so I could direct, but you really need that feel to get better results. Again maybe a better string set up, like a hybrid will bring out it's potential.
Looks. Great looking racquet. I really am impressed how classic and modern it looks at the same time. I really am impressed with its looks.
I would say to those who played with the previous version this racquet is a more muted, arm friendly, softer version. It has plenty of punch, but again you get more control with the 200. Advanced strokes can benefits from the200 if they used Lux or a harsher string. Would allow more feedback due to the stiffness.
Dunlop will be in contention with club players. Tournament players and aspiring juniors will need to tweak the stick for better feel.
Good luck.
Forehands are pretty standard. You can swing out, and it rewards you with good control. The 200 had more control than the 300. The 300 will fly on you if you don't direct it the way you want. So defensive shots and split second reaction shots are more for the 200.
Backhands. The feel with my one hander was again muted. No feel if you miss or hit the sweet spot. I rarely mishit and didn't with this racquet, but I would of like more feel. Again. A cadillac.
Serves. In comparison with my Ncode, the weight of the 200 allows you to hit some impressive serves as well. The 300 is similiar but you do have to restrain it a bit.
Volleys. Again the muted feel gives it a low mark. I have good form so I could direct, but you really need that feel to get better results. Again maybe a better string set up, like a hybrid will bring out it's potential.
Looks. Great looking racquet. I really am impressed how classic and modern it looks at the same time. I really am impressed with its looks.
I would say to those who played with the previous version this racquet is a more muted, arm friendly, softer version. It has plenty of punch, but again you get more control with the 200. Advanced strokes can benefits from the200 if they used Lux or a harsher string. Would allow more feedback due to the stiffness.
Dunlop will be in contention with club players. Tournament players and aspiring juniors will need to tweak the stick for better feel.
Good luck.
bluegrasser
Hall of Fame
Redflea - I missed your Q on bluegrass music, sorry - I played mandolin and guitar in a BG group several yrs ago, had a dispute with the ( woman) banjo player and quit, also used to have a jam at my house once a week. I started playing electric guitar again about a year ago, was thinking about starting a blues band, but that went by the wayside, lately I haven't even picked up an instrument - like the song says: " falling in and out of love again."
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Nice review...the only place I differ is regarding the feel, which for me isn't as remote as what you're getting...maybe because I'm using a gut setup. I have had excellent results w/the AG 300 at the net and haven't felt like it is too muted for me to produce both penetrating and touch volleys (but clearly a subjective issue...and I do tend to like a more muted feel in a racquet overall).
Thanks for posting the write-up.
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Thanks...your story sounds like a subject for a song to me, maybe you should write it up, could be a hit!
bertrevert
Legend
Thanks for posting. I realise you don't post often (too busy playing?) and that's a good write-up adn I respect your view.
I wonder if in giving the sticks a little more power with the aerogel, that however they have deadened the feel? Dunlops have been getting the "harshness" out of this line of racquets with each succesive model. Have they gone too far? Now that might not be to everyone's taste. I for one certainly don't like a "muted" feel so this is steering me to picking up a cheaper M-Fil and keeping the feel (harsh?) in there.
It sounds like you finished the demo and didn't give up on your Wilson. So you weren't convinced to change.
And as far as Cadillacs go: I've driven one and I'd go so far as to say just about any US car is soft compared to the harder ride we require in Aus
Redflea, you like a more muted feel, have you got a dampener in your 300?
Redflea
Hall of Fame
Yeah...I use a dampener on all my racquets, can't stand it w/out it. I took it off the other day just to see and it is much more "feedbacky" )) w/out a dampener on it...also the sound went from a thump to a pingy-thump (but then I'm at 62 lbs, so pretty high tension).
I don't find the M-Fil harsh, per se, but you do get more vibration with it on frame/near-frame hits, but nothing that every hurt my arm or anything.
)) w/out a dampener on it...also the sound went from a thump to a pingy-thump (but then I'm at 62 lbs, so pretty high tension). I don't find the M-Fil harsh, per se, but you do get more vibration with it on frame/near-frame hits, but nothing that every hurt my arm or anything.
I'm deciding between these two racquets too. I'm a 300G user, but broke one of my frames recently. any feedback b/t the AG 300 and the Pure Storm?
That's almost enough feedback for me. Lol. I've been playing with Dunlop for as long as I can remember, and I don't wanna switch.
I'm demoing both in about a week. I'll let everyone know how it is.
PED
Legend
Choth21, i used the storm for a long time and while I do like it, I prefer the AG300. I demoed an AG300 last week for 4 days and the overall feel is just better. It's a bit more solid and the impression is that it does not have as much POP as the storm and this allows you to really swing out with the 300 and still keep it in. They are both great but I'd rather have the 300. Having said all that, I ended up ordering a Cortex Aeropro.
Got to demo both the Dunlop AG 300 and the Babolat Pure Storm both briefly today. Overall, I really liked the Dunlop a lot better. it felt more stable and solid, and my shots felt very crisp off the strings. I was able to get a decent amount of spin and volleys were great.
The Pure Storm felt pretty good. One plus was that the Babolat was very spin-friendly. But i felt like it had a hollow feeling, and the sweetspot felt smaller
The Pure Storm felt pretty good. One plus was that the Babolat was very spin-friendly. But i felt like it had a hollow feeling, and the sweetspot felt smaller
PED
Legend
I got my apd cortex last week. It was while i was waiting for it to arrive the other week that i demoed the AG300. After hitting with the dunlop all week i was a bit ambivalent about the cortex apd, but all i can say is wow! The APD cortex is really nice. I used cortex all week and played back to back with it on friday night with my son's regular APD and was suprised at how different it felt. I would still consider the AG 300 but i'm glad i went with the cortex. You ought to try it as well, I think you would like it. The AG300 is a kick butt stick though
bertrevert
Legend
Add lead to the Mfil 300 and you're away. It almost requires that you add some lead. It's crying out for it. I added 10g under the buttcap and 8g at 3 and 9 and also another 10g at the top of the grip. It just needs lead to translate that fast spin and action on the ball into some decent plow-through.
21mm95sqin
New User
i was thinking of getting an ag300 too but does it feel as solid as say, the k95, on mishits on the frame? i used a babolat pure drive before and it felt really hollow. is the ag300 foam-filled anyway?
![[d]ragon](/data/avatars/s/26/26312.jpg?1574364787){kind=avatar}