Dunlop Biomimetic 100 vs. Biomimetic 200

[BreakPoint]

Has anyone played with both the Dunlop Biomimetic 100 and the Biomimetic 200 (non Tour)? If so, can you please compare them for playability, ease of swing, flex (stiffness), feel, maneuverability, stability, solidness, power, spin, serves, volleys, groundstrokes, etc.?

Which would you choose and why? Also, do you use a 1HBH or 2HBH?

Thanks!

 

[acura9927]

I demoed the 100 and thought it was a POS, really small sweetspot and flat dull response. The 200 Bio is a jack of all trades racquet, I sold it pretty much how much you can get a new one for now. I will probably buy it back at some point. The Bio 200 is solid.

1hbh here.

 

[roundiesee]

Has anyone played with both the Dunlop Biomimetic 100 and the Biomimetic 200 (non Tour)? If so, can you please compare them for playability, ease of swing, flex (stiffness), feel, maneuverability, stability, solidness, power, spin, serves, volleys, groundstrokes, etc.?

Which would you choose and why? Also, do you use a 1HBH or 2HBH?

Thanks!

I was also wondering how the Bio 200 plays, not so much in comparison to the Bio 100, but more compared to the PSBLX90.

 

[BreakPoint]

Seems like there's not much love for the Bio 100 on this board. I would have thought with the higher swingweight and lower stiffness that it would be better than the AG100? But sometimes the ratings so not reflect actual play so this may be one of those cases?

 

[BreakPoint]

Since the Biomimetic series has been out for over 2 years now, I had assumed a lot more people have played with both the Bio 100 and the Bio 200? Is this not true?

 

[ptr]

Nice writen comparition between these 2 sticks would be appreciated here as well . I curies which is less foregiving between these 2... I need such to fight with my laziness...