http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/reviews/db2h/db2hreview.html
Dunlop Biomimetic 200
Hi Guys and TW,
Just to let you know the review gives flex rating as 57 but the actual racquet says 62 which gives a 5 pt difference. I chose this racquet for the arm friendliness indicator and 57 was one of the lowest I came across. I guess 62is fairly low but my question is what is actually happening during play using a racquet with varying degrees of Flex and is there also a longterm physical benefit to elbow and shoulder through reduce stress and potential injury using a low flex and what is the beneficial cut off point if any ie 57, 60, 63 , 65, 70 etc.
After nearly three decades I have re-entered the tennis world from a golfing background and I have found the selection of equipment mind boggling and fascinating like an Aladdin's Cave. I want to do some experimenting but the end goal is to settle with the ideal racquet for my game. I did that with golf and now I would like to do that with tennis. I shall continue to play golf (single figure handicap) and mix the two sports. I thoroughly enjoy social tennis and as I improve will develop the competitive side of the game.
Comments and related experiences from golfers to tennis players and those who play both golf and tennis would be most welcomed.
:idea: