dgoran
Hall of Fame
It worked for AndersonSold! Placing an order for 10 of these. Mindless placement with full swings is exactly the Holy Grail I was looking for.
It worked for AndersonSold! Placing an order for 10 of these. Mindless placement with full swings is exactly the Holy Grail I was looking for.
There is a technology called Sonic Core VG that dampens vibration (About 30% in reduction). It's available in some of the Srixon rackets such as the CZ series.Ok, thanks.
Did they talk anything about the arm-friendliness? I feel that the repulsion effect will absorb the shocks and increase the arm-friendliness. Definitely worth looking if they fall around or below the 65 RA.
I agree. Out of their three marquee sponsors, a journeyman, a retiree, and a moonballer, who knew one of them would make it to a slam final.This must be one of the luckiest product launches in the history of the tennis industry.
I actually have the previous model love the racket. Super solidYeah the 98 and strung with diadem SP @49. I will add a wilson shock shield grip to add weight to the handle and somewhere around 4 or 5gms to the head for added stability and SW
Good to hear! Are the specs close to this model? weight, SW?I actually have the previous model love the racket. Super solid
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Word. Looks like they ran out of money for a graphics designer after thinking of all of the "new" technologies hahaThe Anderson stick intrigues, but man, that paintjob looks confused.
It's like exactly opposite principle that @PeterFig sold to Wilson. While I am not a fan of matte and some of the color choices he made I must say he is correct in urging Wilson to do away with technologies decal pj and did a good job with WilsonWord. Looks like they ran out of money for a graphics designer after thinking of all of the "new" technologies haha
The Anderson stick intrigues, but man, that paintjob looks confused.
Srixon is giving a Yonex a run for their money on who can make the most confusing or busy looking racquets.Word. Looks like they ran out of money for a graphics designer after thinking of all of the "new" technologies haha
I've hit with previous version in stock form for a while. Feels like pt57e with comfort level of pt57a. Good control and unique beam geometry. Grip runs a size larger like yonex. Anderson uses a different layup and is extended.Has anyone here actually hit with the 61RA Tour 18x20 version? With all the tech and silicone in the handle, I'm sure it feels soft, but what I'm looking for is actual frame flex, specifically at the throat. I'm looking for real world feedback.
I have a Prince TT 100P which has a 62RA, but due to then Textreme at the throat, it doesn't really feel flexible even though it's supposed to resist twisting and allow bending. I also had a Dunlop HM200G which had a 61RA and it felt noticeably stiffer than the 60RA MW200G.
The ProKennex Heritage Redondo Type C 98 MP has a 57RA and everyone says it really doesn't play like it has a 57RA. The Prince racquets with EXO3 ports have even lower RA's, but they're flexible in the hoop. The RA can be misleading at times.
Pronounced according to spelling using Japanese syllables. Fu = the first half of food without holding full o sound length like in food.Is his name pronounced like Chucky or cookie? i.e. short or long 'U'?
You forgot about Head...Srixon is giving a Yonex a run for their money on who can make the most confusing or busy looking racquets.
i think they stressed it's not "sponge" material but much denser, resilient material (silicon i think).Found that video too; at 1:40; it's all in Japanese though! Could anyone just give the gist of the reviews in English?
He is stressing the characteristics of Sonic Core where the material returns energy to the ball compared to a sponge material. The sponge absorbs and dissipates the energy. He does not mention the material being denser. He said it may be hard to see, but the material (Sonic Core) has properties that rebounds well and is flexible.i think they stressed it's not "sponge" material but much denser, resilient material (silicon i think).
it's also interesting it's only half filled to the outside layer.
Are you playing with the Prince Textreme Tour 95?I've never put much stock in all the "technologies" that companies come out with and market. However, I'm sure there are a few out there that actually make somewhat of a difference. I just hope this racquet has the solid feel I'm looking for. Been trying several things over the last 2 years since I finally put my original 200gs down. I pre-ordered this the day it came up on TW. We will see.![]()
Currently, yes. While it's the best thing I've found for me so far, I find the ball sailing every once in a while. I'm much more of an old school flat hitter than a spin generator.Are you playing with the Prince Textreme Tour 95?
Any idea on what your swing weight is?Currently, yes. While it's the best thing I've found for me so far, I find the ball sailing every once in a while. I'm much more of an old school flat hitter than a spin generator.
It's been a while since I've checked it. But, I believe it was in the neighborhood of 350-355.Any idea on what your swing weight is?
That's pretty beefy. I usually weight my racquets to 12.5ounces/340-350 swing weight/8-10 points head lightIt's been a while since I've checked it. But, I believe it was in the neighborhood of 350-355.
I have tried to replace my mw200g for some time now and I have not had any success. I have a TC97 18x20 on the way. Ill be awaiting your review of this one.I just hope this racquet has the solid feel I'm looking for. Been trying several things over the last 2 years since I finally put my original 200gs down. I pre-ordered this the day it came up on TW. We will see.![]()
yeah nothing quite like the 200gI've never put much stock in all the "technologies" that companies come out with and market. However, I'm sure there are a few out there that actually make somewhat of a difference. I just hope this racquet has the solid feel I'm looking for. Been trying several things over the last 2 years since I finally put my original 200gs down. I pre-ordered this the day it came up on TW. We will see.![]()
likely true... I hit with a lot of spin on backhands and I modernized my forehand 4-6 years ago going from eastern to semiwestern forehands. I also hit heavy topspin ant twist serves as a second serve. That said my main hitting partner is also an ex 200g user and he's using the TC100. That said a MW200g is different from the 200g and yeah a tc97 shares a lot more in common with the mw200g (including the fact that the same designer is responsible).I had my first session with the TC97 and for me, it's a good stick to transition from the mw200g. The TC95 just had too much boom boom pow. Could not control it without that sweeping spin. I can hit flat snipers similar to the mw. A year ago, Paul told me the 97 would probably suit me better but I didn't listen and got the 95 just because the mw was the same size. Trust me and paul, tc 97 is the Angell to get if you are looking for the modern 200g replacement.
This. I'd love to try one, but it is essentially the same racquet as the tecnifibre 315ltd. which is only $179, or $169 elsewhereNot too happy with the price though; $219, seems expensive![]()