A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.
A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.
I don't think that the purchase of the Dunlop brand included Slazenger.maybe .. just maybe they will bring back a replica of the black/white pro braided...
If that's a total then not really a fair comparison since Srixon tennis racquets aren't available wordlwide while their golf clubs are...Snap shot / these values are based on Yens in Billions from Srixon in 2015
(1 Yen = .0091 US dollars)
Golf total: 56.9 (516,859,240 million/us)
Tennis: 6.3 (~57 million / us)
Well, simple really, they can’t start off with manufacturing in mass and need to get a feel for demand, marketing, QC issue before they ramp up to higher volumesSrixon racquets won't be out in the UK or Europe till 2018. Seems strange, what country actually manufacturers the frames? Dunlop have a designed in the UK label, but I suppose they can be made anywhere. I don't see why they can't be distributed all over the globe right now
Fair, Really...If that's a total then not really a fair comparison since Srixon tennis racquets aren't available wordlwide while their golf clubs are...
I hope the Revo CX 2.0 Tour plays like the earlier 200s (AG, Mfil, HM, etc.). Would make for a great stick, especially in today's market.
Actually not fair. You are right about the value of the sports but using Srixon revenue when their golf presence is worldwide (thus generating income worldwide)and tennis where the latter is only sold in Asia (thus generating income only from that continent) shows nothing. You can't generate income if you don't sell your products. Showing the big scheme was a good move but the arguments used were weak.Fair, Really...
That is not a comparison man, that is Srixon revue for 2015 broken down.
That just the numbers man...nothing fair with revenue, marketing and sales, regional sales, global, US or even local sales.... Who's choice was it not market the Srixon frames in the US? Fair???
The true take away man is
>>>>>>>That tennis $'s is a **** in the wind compared to golf dollars, period....
>>>>>>>The next is there more tennis revenue in balls and softgoods. Small share in frames and strings...
Big Picture look:
US alone is like 70 Billion dollars for Golf......
"Total Global Tennis " is like 5.73 Billions dollars....
That is all I am saying, just try to raise a little tennis equipment business awareness here.
This is for those that think "frames and strings" are the center of the business universe for companies in the tennis business.....
WOW,,, if Blake is using it,, it must be a great racket.... I am thinking about switching myself
No arguments stated, do not what you are smoking..just using the srixon 2015 annual rev statement, data from both the tennis industry and golf industry.Actually not fair. You are right about the value of the sports but using Srixon revenue when their golf presence is worldwide (thus generating income worldwide)and tennis where the latter is only sold in Asia (thus generating income only from that continent) shows nothing. You can't generate income if you don't sell your products. Showing the big scheme was a good move but the arguments used were weak.
WOW,,, if Blake is using it,, it must be a great racket.... I am thinking about switching myself
is it the dunlop 200 tour mold?
A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.