It would also compete with the new Ultra Tour, maybe causing Wilson to reduce that high price.A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.
I hope so too. I am down to about my last three A200T's. It would be nice to have an upgraded next gen successor available to choose from. It could make for a smooth transition.A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.
I don't think that the purchase of the Dunlop brand included Slazenger.maybe .. just maybe they will bring back a replica of the black/white pro braided...
If that's a total then not really a fair comparison since Srixon tennis racquets aren't available wordlwide while their golf clubs are...Snap shot / these values are based on Yens in Billions from Srixon in 2015
(1 Yen = .0091 US dollars)
Golf total: 56.9 (516,859,240 million/us)
Tennis: 6.3 (~57 million / us)
Well, simple really, they can’t start off with manufacturing in mass and need to get a feel for demand, marketing, QC issue before they ramp up to higher volumesSrixon racquets won't be out in the UK or Europe till 2018. Seems strange, what country actually manufacturers the frames? Dunlop have a designed in the UK label, but I suppose they can be made anywhere. I don't see why they can't be distributed all over the globe right now
Fair, Really...If that's a total then not really a fair comparison since Srixon tennis racquets aren't available wordlwide while their golf clubs are...
I have messaged the Dunlop Facebook team saying to them exactly the same, they got back to me and told me the 95 frame will be very similiar, it's a nice looking racquet I think so I can't wait to try them out. I wonder if they'll tweak the specs from the japanese market ones or if they'll continue with the same set-up, obviously western players are a bit more physical in terms of average height/weight and Wilson changes their specs depending on the geographical region.I hope the Revo CX 2.0 Tour plays like the earlier 200s (AG, Mfil, HM, etc.). Would make for a great stick, especially in today's market.
Actually not fair. You are right about the value of the sports but using Srixon revenue when their golf presence is worldwide (thus generating income worldwide)and tennis where the latter is only sold in Asia (thus generating income only from that continent) shows nothing. You can't generate income if you don't sell your products. Showing the big scheme was a good move but the arguments used were weak.Fair, Really...
That is not a comparison man, that is Srixon revue for 2015 broken down.
That just the numbers man...nothing fair with revenue, marketing and sales, regional sales, global, US or even local sales.... Who's choice was it not market the Srixon frames in the US? Fair???
The true take away man is
>>>>>>>That tennis $'s is a **** in the wind compared to golf dollars, period....
>>>>>>>The next is there more tennis revenue in balls and softgoods. Small share in frames and strings...
Big Picture look:
US alone is like 70 Billion dollars for Golf......
"Total Global Tennis " is like 5.73 Billions dollars....
That is all I am saying, just try to raise a little tennis equipment business awareness here.
This is for those that think "frames and strings" are the center of the business universe for companies in the tennis business.....
WOW,,, if Blake is using it,, it must be a great racket.... I am thinking about switching myself
No arguments stated, do not what you are smoking..just using the srixon 2015 annual rev statement, data from both the tennis industry and golf industry.Actually not fair. You are right about the value of the sports but using Srixon revenue when their golf presence is worldwide (thus generating income worldwide)and tennis where the latter is only sold in Asia (thus generating income only from that continent) shows nothing. You can't generate income if you don't sell your products. Showing the big scheme was a good move but the arguments used were weak.
Blake outright says he uses it and I tend to believe it because of the Babolat paint-job lawsuit. Manufacturers can worm around that with fine print, but this is an actual video of his testimonial and there's no wiggle room unless the racquet shown in the commercial is his PJ custom frame. Then he wouldn't be lying, but a judge could still deem it as deceptive advertising using bait and switch.WOW,,, if Blake is using it,, it must be a great racket.... I am thinking about switching myself
I don't think so because the throat is 19mm and the hoop's cross section is different. Srixon made this racquet before they were acquired by Dunlop and wouldn't have had access to the mold, but it could have been inspired by it. Can someone create a side by side of the MW200G and Srixon to compare like what @moon shot did with the i.Prestige and Ultra Tour?is it the dunlop 200 tour mold?
A blast from the past there, I forgot about Dunlop, Blake and THAT forehand.
I hope they bring back a true successor for the Aerogel 200. That was one of my absolute favorite modern frames. So solid. That would interest suffering Prestige fans too.