Each Players' H2H Record at Slams vs Big 3

[Entername]

Among notable players who made at least one slam semifinal. Here are the following.

Stan Wawrinka: 6-14 (1-3 vs Nadal; 4-4 vs Djokovic; 1-7 vs Federer) - 30%

Tomas Berydch: 5-16 (1-4 vs Nadal; 2-4 vs Djokovic; 2-8 vs Federer) - 24%

Andy Murray: 5-20 (2-7 vs Nadal; 2-8 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

Jo-Wilfred Tsonga: 4-13 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-7 vs Djokovic; 2-4 vs Federer) - 24%

Juan Martin Del Potro: 4-14 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 2-5 vs Federer) - 22%

Dominic Thiem: 3-7 (1-5 vs Nadal; 2-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 30%

Lleyton Hewitt: 3-15 (2-4 vs Nadal; 1-4 vs Djokovic; 0-7 vs Federer) - 17%

Stefanos Tsitsipas: 2-3 (1-1 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 40%

Robin Soderling: 2-10 (1-5 vs Nadal; 0-0 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

David Ferrer: 2-10 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Andy Roddick: 2-11 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-1 vs Djokovic; 0-8 vs Federer) - 15%

Marin Cilic: 2-12 (1-2 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 14%

Daniil Medvedev: 1-4 (0-2 vs Nadal; 1-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Grigor Dimitrov: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-2 vs Federer) - 14%

Kevin Anderson: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 14%

Milos Raonic: 1-8 (0-1 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-3 vs Federer) - 11%

Kei Nishikori: 1-12 (0-4 vs Nadal; 1-6 vs Djokovic; 0-2 vs Federer) - 7%

Alexander Zverev: 0-5 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 0%

Matteo Berretinni: 0-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-1 vs Federer) - 0%

Gael Monfils: 0-13 (0-3 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

Richard Gasquet: 0-14 (0-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

 

[Entername]

Monfils and Gasquet....yikes! Que sont devenus les joueurs français ?

 

[Antonio Puente]

So at 48%, Fed is only slightly better than Stan at 43%?

 

[Entername]

Feel free to add any notable players I missed, there's too many out there lol

 

[Krish872007]

So at 48%, Fed is only slightly better than Stan at 43%?

What do the 48% and 43% refer to?
6-14 for Wawrinka is a win rate of 30%. Against Djokovic alone it's 50%

 

[SonicNirvana]

So at 48%, Fed is only slightly better than Stan at 43%?

Stan was really good against Djoker

 

[Antonio Puente]

What do the 48% and 43% refer to?

They refer to me looking at the wrong number. Lol

 

[Impressario]

45 - 221 in total across all eras weak, strong, all surfaces, all nationalities. The Big-3 should have a statue of their own, like the Iwo Jima soldiers

 

[killerboss]

Feel free to add any notable players I missed, there's too many out there lol

I think you got every big name from the big 3 era. No point adding your Seppis, Browns, Chungs etc if they only have 1 isolated win against a big 3 member.

 

[Entername]

They refer to me looking at the wrong number. Lol

I added the win% in there as reference

 

[Krish872007]

Monfils and Gasquet just don't come out well in these stats I'm afraid.

In fact if you add Murray into the mix alongside the Big 3, Gasquet's record worsens to 0-19

 

[Krish872007]

Among notable players who made at least one slam semifinal. Here are the following.

Stan Wawrinka: 6-14 (1-3 vs Nadal; 4-4 vs Djokovic; 1-7 vs Federer) - 30%

Tomas Berydch: 5-16 (1-4 vs Nadal; 2-4 vs Djokovic; 2-8 vs Federer) - 24%

Andy Murray: 5-20 (2-7 vs Nadal; 2-8 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

Jo-Wilfred Tsonga: 4-13 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-7 vs Djokovic; 2-4 vs Federer) - 24%

Juan Martin Del Potro: 4-14 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 2-5 vs Federer) - 22%

Dominic Thiem: 3-7 (1-5 vs Nadal; 2-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 30%

Lleyton Hewitt: 3-15 (2-4 vs Nadal; 1-4 vs Djokovic; 0-7 vs Federer) - 17%

Stefanos Tsitsipas: 2-3 (1-1 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 33%

Robin Soderling: 2-10 (1-5 vs Nadal; 0-0 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

David Ferrer: 2-10 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Andy Roddick: 2-11 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-1 vs Djokovic; 0-8 vs Federer) - 15%

Marin Cilic: 2-12 (1-2 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 14%

Daniil Medvedev: 1-4 (0-2 vs Nadal; 1-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Grigor Dimitrov: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-2 vs Federer) - 14%

Kevin Anderson: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 14%

Milos Raonic: 1-8 (0-1 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-3 vs Federer) - 11%

Kei Nishikori: 1-12 (0-4 vs Nadal; 1-6 vs Djokovic; 0-2 vs Federer) - 7%

Alexander Zverev: 0-5 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 0%

Matteo Berretinni: 0-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-1 vs Federer) - 0%

Gael Monfils: 0-13 (0-3 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

Richard Gasquet: 0-14 (0-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

Good list, may as well add some of the other guys from the early 2000s though:

David Nalbandian: 2-5 (0-1 vs Nadal; 0-0 vs Djokovic; 2-4 vs Federer) - 29%

Marat Safin: 3-4 (0-0 vs Nadal; 2-0 vs Djokovic; 1-4 vs Federer) - 43%

Nikolay Davydenko: 0-7 (0-0 vs Nadal; 0-1 vs Djokovic; 0-6 vs Federer) - 0%

Marcos Baghdatis: 0-8 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-3 vs Federer) - 0%

Fernando Gonzalez: 1-7 (1-2 vs Nadal; 0-1 vs Djokovic; 0-4 vs Federer) - 13%

Jurgen Melzer: 1-4 (0-1 vs Nadal; 1-0 vs Djokovic; 0-3 vs Federer) - 20%

 

[duaneeo]

Marat Safin: 3-4 (0-0 vs Nadal; 2-0 vs Djokovic; 1-4 vs Federer)

 

[duaneeo]

Marat Safin: 3-4 (0-0 vs Nadal; 2-0 vs Djokovic; 1-4 vs Federer) - 43%

You beat me.

 

[TheNachoMan]

Gasquet. lol

 

[Krish872007]

Gasquet. lol

 

[Entername]

Good list, may as well add some of the other guys from the early 2000s though:

David Nalbandian: 2-5 (0-1 vs Nadal; 0-0 vs Djokovic; 2-4 vs Federer) - 29%

Marat Safin: 3-4 (0-0 vs Nadal; 2-0 vs Djokovic; 1-4 vs Federer) - 43%

Nikolay Davydenko: 0-7 (0-0 vs Nadal; 0-1 vs Djokovic; 0-6 vs Federer) - 0%

Marcos Baghdatis: 0-8 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-3 vs Federer) - 0%

Fernando Gonzalez: 1-7 (1-2 vs Nadal; 0-1 vs Djokovic; 0-4 vs Federer) - 13%

Jurgen Melzer: 1-4 (0-1 vs Nadal; 1-0 vs Djokovic; 0-3 vs Federer) - 20%

Awesome

I was thinking about guys like Nalbandian and Safin but I wasn't sure if they'd be considered as big 3 era, also I thought the list was already getting kinda long haha

 

[spottishwood]

Frenchmen leading

 

[Sport]

Roddick lower than Ferrer. (Un)surprsing.

 

[Krish872007]

Awesome

I was thinking about guys like Nalbandian and Safin but I wasn't sure if they'd be considered as big 3 era, also I thought the list was already getting kinda long haha

Yeah I was thinking about whether or not to put them forward but seeing as they've all played at least 2 matches on the main tour against each of the Big 3 I thought might as well

 

[Krish872007]

Roddick lower than Ferrer. (Un)surprsing.

Feel bad for A-Rod.

 

[Third Serve]

Awesome

I was thinking about guys like Nalbandian and Safin but I wasn't sure if they'd be considered as big 3 era, also I thought the list was already getting kinda long haha

I think you can argue for Nalbandian since he had some good runs in 2007 (which I’d consider more of a Big 3 year than not) and had a couple of interesting matches with Big 3 members—mostly Nadal—beyond that year.

Safin was, with the exception of Wimbledon 2008, very much a Fed-era relic. He basically stopped being relevant after injuries wrecked him at the tail end of 2005.

By that same logic you could exclude Hewitt from the list though.

 

[TheNachoMan]

Murray really was a flat track bully. Beat everyone except the big boys.
Stan was better at the slams. Sorry to tell you, mate.

 

[Krish872007]

I think you can argue for Nalbandian since he had some good runs in 2007 (which I’d consider more of a Big 3 year than not) and had a couple of interesting matches with Big 3 members—mostly Nadal—beyond that year.

Safin was, with the exception of Wimbledon 2008, very much a Fed-era relic. He basically stopped being relevant after injuries wrecked him at the tail end of 2005.

By that same logic you could exclude Hewitt from the list though.

Safin was a debatable inclusion but Wimbledon 2008 certainly helped his case. He did get a win over Novak (who was already a Slam winner by that point).

 

[duaneeo]

Federer's slam-winning contemporaries Safin/Hewitt/Roddick vs Nadalovic: 7-11

Nadalovic's slam-winning contemporaries Murray/Wawrinka/Cilic/DelPo vs Federer: 5-22

 

[spottishwood]

Feel bad for A-Rod.

Yeah. If only Ferrer got to play Fedr in slams like Roddick did

 

[TheNachoMan]

Federer's slam-winning contemporaries Safin/Hewitt/Roddick vs Nadalovic: 7-11

Nadalovic's slam-winning contemporaries Murray/Wawrinka/Cilic/DelPo vs Federer: 5-22

Context matters too, Novak was a baby in some of those matches and so was Nadal. The age excuse goes both ways.

 

[FRV4]

Federer's slam-winning contemporaries Safin/Hewitt/Roddick vs Nadalovic: 7-11

Nadalovic's slam-winning contemporaries Murray/Wawrinka/Cilic/DelPo vs Federer: 5-22

You sir, are a genius

 

[FRV4]

Context matters too, Novak was a baby in some of those matches and so was Nadal. The age excuse goes both ways.

context does not matter, Fed is GOAT no doubt

 

[Entername]

Federer's slam-winning contemporaries Safin/Hewitt/Roddick vs Nadalovic: 7-11

Nadalovic's slam-winning contemporaries Murray/Wawrinka/Cilic/DelPo vs Federer: 5-22

Thing is, Nadal/Djokovic were very young during a lot of their matches with guys like Safin and Hewitt. That's like beating 2004 LeBron James in a playoff series when he wasn't even old enough to take a drink in the US.

That's why I wasn't 100% sure whether I should include Safin/Roddick/Hewitt cuz I'm not sure if you consider them as "big 3 era" rather than just "Fed era"

 

[FRV4]

Thing is, Nadal/Djokovic were very young during a lot of their matches with guys like Safin and Hewitt. That's like beating 2004 LeBron James in a playoff series when he wasn't even old enough to take a drink in the US.

That's why I wasn't 100% sure whether I should include Safin/Roddick/Hewitt cuz I'm not sure if you consider them as "big 3 era" rather than just "Fed era"

 

[TimHenmanATG]

I'm a bit confused. Why didn't you list Djokovic's record against the Big 3?

 

[TheNachoMan]

I'm a bit confused. Why didn't you list Djokovic's record against the Big 3?

He has a positive record against them all, bud. Including the balding guy in your avi.

 

[TimHenmanATG]

He has a positive record against them all, bud. Including the balding guy in your avi.

He may have a statistical upper-hand against the Big 3, but how many Olympic Gold medals does Djokovic have in his trophy cabinet?

 

[Entername]

Murray really was a flat track bully. Beat everyone except the big boys.
Stan was better at the slams. Sorry to tell you, mate.

Murray didn't have the weapons to hurt the big 3 regularly. A lot of the guys near the top of this list (Delpo, Stan, Bird, Jo, etc.) could score wins off the big 3 by hitting a ton of aces/winners whereas Sir Andeh didn't have such a luxury

 

[Sport]

Federer's slam-winning contemporaries Safin/Hewitt/Roddick vs Nadalovic: 7-11

Nadalovic's slam-winning contemporaries Murray/Wawrinka/Cilic/DelPo vs Federer: 5-22

Roddick and Hewitt defeated 18 years old Nadal at the USO 2004 and the AO 2005. Safin won against 17 years old Djokovic at the AO 2005. Not particularly impressive victories.

That's like hyping Kafelnikov for beating 18 years old Federer at WB 2000:

 

[mahatma]

Among notable players who made at least one slam semifinal. Here are the following.

Stan Wawrinka: 6-14 (1-3 vs Nadal; 4-4 vs Djokovic; 1-7 vs Federer) - 30%

Tomas Berydch: 5-16 (1-4 vs Nadal; 2-4 vs Djokovic; 2-8 vs Federer) - 24%

Andy Murray: 5-20 (2-7 vs Nadal; 2-8 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

Jo-Wilfred Tsonga: 4-13 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-7 vs Djokovic; 2-4 vs Federer) - 24%

Juan Martin Del Potro: 4-14 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 2-5 vs Federer) - 22%

Dominic Thiem: 3-7 (1-5 vs Nadal; 2-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 30%

Lleyton Hewitt: 3-15 (2-4 vs Nadal; 1-4 vs Djokovic; 0-7 vs Federer) - 17%

Stefanos Tsitsipas: 2-3 (1-1 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 33%

Robin Soderling: 2-10 (1-5 vs Nadal; 0-0 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 20%

David Ferrer: 2-10 (2-5 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Andy Roddick: 2-11 (1-2 vs Nadal; 1-1 vs Djokovic; 0-8 vs Federer) - 15%

Marin Cilic: 2-12 (1-2 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 1-5 vs Federer) - 14%

Daniil Medvedev: 1-4 (0-2 vs Nadal; 1-2 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 20%

Grigor Dimitrov: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-2 vs Djokovic; 1-2 vs Federer) - 14%

Kevin Anderson: 1-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-0 vs Federer) - 14%

Milos Raonic: 1-8 (0-1 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 1-3 vs Federer) - 11%

Kei Nishikori: 1-12 (0-4 vs Nadal; 1-6 vs Djokovic; 0-2 vs Federer) - 7%

Alexander Zverev: 0-5 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-0 vs Federer) - 0%

Matteo Berretinni: 0-6 (0-2 vs Nadal; 0-3 vs Djokovic; 0-1 vs Federer) - 0%

Gael Monfils: 0-13 (0-3 vs Nadal; 0-5 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

Richard Gasquet: 0-14 (0-5 vs Nadal; 0-4 vs Djokovic; 0-5 vs Federer) - 0%

Tsitsipas 2-3 is 40%. Not 33%.

 

[titoelcolombiano]

Let's do the big 3 against the other two, this will be fun:

Nadal: 21 - 11 v Fed & Djoker
Djokovic: 18 - 17 v Rafa & Fed
Federer: 10 - 21 v Rafa & Djoker

 

[duaneeo]

Context matters too, Novak was a baby in some of those matches and so was Nadal.

Some, not all. Still, even baby versions of Nadalovic shouldn't lose to the likes of Hewitt and Roddick...players who _______ (fill in the blank with all the disparaging comments made by Nadalovic fans about them over the years). Nole was old enough to beat 2008 Federer at the AO, so surely he was old enough to beat 2008 Safin at WB.

 

[Mainad]

Murray really was a flat track bully. Beat everyone except the big boys.
Stan was better at the slams. Sorry to tell you, mate.

Murray beat the 'Big Boys' more times than any other player. Sorry to tell you, mate.

 

[Mustard]

Roddick and Hewitt defeated 18 years old Nadal at the USO 2004 and the AO 2005. Safin won against 17 years old Djokovic at the AO 2005. Not particularly impressive victories.

That's like hyping Kafelnikov for beating 18 years old Federer at WB 2000:

The 2005 Australian Open match between Nadal and Hewitt was very impressive, an important match to springboard Nadal's rise, even though he lost. Their 2004 Australian Open match was also good.