Edberg: «Federer needs to use his weapons»

edberg volleys

Hall of Fame
Thursday, 22 May 2014 18:22

from Eurosport.de
translated into English by Mauro Cappiello


In an exclusive interview Stefan Edberg talks with Eurosport about his cooperation with Roger Federer, the Swiss' potential and the importance of the French Open. Since the beginning of the year, the Swede is now, next to Severin Lüthi, the coach of the 17-time Grand Slam champion. With Edberg, Federer flourished again and seems ready to aim at the big titles.

Mr. Edberg, how satisfied were you with the collaboration with Roger Federer at the Australian Open, the first Major of the year?

Stefan Edberg: We are both very happy with our collaboration in Australia. Certainly, the hope was to go all the way there (Federer was eliminated in the semifinals, editor's note) . But when one considers the last year, it must be said that Roger has played a good tournament.

What is the secret behind Federer's good performance?

Edberg: This is actually easy to explain. Last year he had a lot of injuries. The most important for him is that he is pain free for a long time and this also can improve his training. Thus he plays again more and also has more self-confidence. I joined the team to inspire him and to show a new angle.

What were you talking exactly?

Edberg: One of the things we talked about was that he wants to develop his game. Roger is 32 years old and I think he needs to attack a little more. I think he has realized that himself and so he has probably wondered if he needed new influences and that worked quite well.

It is impressive how frequently now Federer goes to the net.

Edberg: That's part of his game, he can still improve. He's a pretty complete tennis player. To go through with his play on the court, he needs time and space. In the past he has played from too far back. The tactics to push and play aggressive is of tremendous importance in order to improve and ultimately get back to successes. I think most people would agree with me that Roger can not beat the best players in the world from the baseline. They are too good. He should use the weapons that he has got. He has a good serve, a good forehand and is good at the net.

You yourself are a great idol for Federer. Is this a blessing or a curse for your cooperation?

Edberg: I think we both have great respect for each other. I was a little model for him as he grew up and Bjorn Borg was mine. I have very great respect for Roger, both as a tennis player as well as an ambassador for the sport. I think we understand each other very well and that makes me positive.

Have there been discussions about a longer-term?

Edberg: We work together until the end of the year. I will travel about ten to 15 weeks. Everything else we will keep it open, depending on the results. I will be with him, but if I do not travel with him, then I will follow the tour with a very different interest than I did before.

Has Federer got the potential to win a Grand Slam once again?

Edberg: I really think that he can still make it. That's what I told him. By the way he has developed and the way he has played this season, he has improved again. The French Open may not be the highest priority, but with a bit of luck in the draw he has the chance to win Wimbledon or the U.S. Open.
 
''I think most people would agree with me that Roger can not beat the best players in the world from the baseline. They are too good. He should use the weapons that he has got. He has a good serve, a good forehand and is good at the net.''

Candid stuff from Edberg, and I approve.

''Edberg: I really think that he can still make it. That's what I told him. By the way he has developed and the way he has played this season, he has improved again. The French Open may not be the highest priority, but with a bit of luck in the draw he has the chance to win Wimbledon or the U.S. Open.''

Edberg seeing the bigger picture, such is his sageness.
 
Edberg doesn't sound too optimistic. I guess that kind of humble understatement is a Swedish tendency, but he should be more buoyant about Fed's chances at the French given Rafa's questionable form.

I think Fed is capable of beating pretty much anyone except Nadal at the FO. And he might not need "luck in the draw" to win Wimbledon. He had a very tough draw in 2012 and went right through the two best players in the world!
 
Edberg doesn't sound too optimistic. I guess that kind of humble understatement is a Swedish tendency, but he should be more buoyant about Fed's chances at the French given Rafa's questionable form.

I think Fed is capable of beating pretty much anyone except Nadal at the FO. And he might not need "luck in the draw" to win Wimbledon. He had a very tough draw in 2012 and went right through the two best players in the world!
Technically the 2 best players in the world were Djokovic and Nadal. He beat Nole, but Rafa didn't make it to him.

He did beat 2 of the Big 4 but not the 2 best players in the world. He only beat at the time THE best player in the world though, so it was still great :)
 
''I think most people would agree with me that Roger can not beat the best players in the world from the baseline. They are too good. He should use the weapons that he has got. He has a good serve, a good forehand and is good at the net.''

Candid stuff from Edberg, and I approve.

''Edberg: I really think that he can still make it. That's what I told him. By the way he has developed and the way he has played this season, he has improved again. The French Open may not be the highest priority, but with a bit of luck in the draw he has the chance to win Wimbledon or the U.S. Open.''

Edberg seeing the bigger picture, such is his sageness.

Well, that's exactly the problem.. Yes Federer is good at some things, but he's not great in any specific respect. And in the net department Edberg is even quite generous to his pupil, but that's very understandable of course. But being arguably the greatest volleyer of all time he must cringe whenever Fed approaches the net. That said, he has probably improved Federer's approach and net game as much as possible but he also knows you never make a quarter out of a dime. But hey at least he's giving his pupil some confidence, that's a good thing :)
 
Well, that's exactly the problem.. Yes Federer is good at some things, but he's not great in any specific respect. And in the net department Edberg is even quite generous to his pupil, but that's very understandable of course. But being arguably the greatest volleyer of all time he must cringe whenever Fed approaches the net. That said, he has probably improved Federer's approach and net game as much as possible but he also knows you never make a quarter out of a dime. But hey at least he's giving his pupil some confidence, that's a good thing :)
It is much more difficult today to be a top volleyer.

Edberg was one of the best volleyers of all time, but the era he played in did encourage net play.

If he played the same way in this era, Edberg would struggle a lot.
 
''I think most people would agree with me that Roger can not beat the best players in the world from the baseline. They are too good. He should use the weapons that he has got. He has a good serve, a good forehand and is good at the net.''

Candid stuff from Edberg, and I approve.

''Edberg: I really think that he can still make it. That's what I told him. By the way he has developed and the way he has played this season, he has improved again. The French Open may not be the highest priority, but with a bit of luck in the draw he has the chance to win Wimbledon or the U.S. Open.''

Edberg seeing the bigger picture, such is his sageness.

Rafa always leaves him stranded at the net. Edberg is hardly going to say, pack it in, you're done.
 
I like Edberg's honesty here, mentioning that Fed can't rally at the baseline with the top players and has a chance to win Wimbledon and USO with 'a bit of luck with the draws'.
 
I like Edberg's honesty here, mentioning that Fed can't rally at the baseline with the top players and has a chance to win Wimbledon and USO with 'a bit of luck with the draws'.

Underplaying his chances a little bit too, to be honest with Nadal's current form and Wawrinka's inconsistency I could see Federer ending #2 in the world this year, with a fine chance at all 3 of the remaining slams. Djokovic is the only player who is clearly better than Federer at the moment.
 
I like Edberg's honesty here, mentioning that Fed can't rally at the baseline with the top players and has a chance to win Wimbledon and USO with 'a bit of luck with the draws'.

Ah finally somebody concurs. He dares to say much... might even make Federer raise his eyebrows. He should respond accordingly by winning a CYGS.


'Played Rodge.
 
Edberg being brutally honest. Basically even at Wimbledon, Federer needs a lucky draw to win it. I Don't think he has any chance to win US Open which has become a slow hard court.
 
Ah finally somebody concurs. He dares to say much... might even make Federer raise his eyebrows. He should respond accordingly by winning a CYGS.


'Played Rodge.

There's nothing that can motivate papa Fed like Edberg saying he needs a bit of luck to win another. Fed will probably win the next 8 or 10 now just to prove a point and then retire abruptly after also winning Olympic singles and doubles gold in Rio (he may finish the year and play US Open and the WTF that year as well to complete the Golden CYGS WTF-season).

Did I mention, I like it?
 
he said what alot of tennis folk think. like me and plenty others on forums that hanging aroung the baseline like its 2006 he CANNOT win a major again, he's not mid 20s anymore,

but doing what Stefan said could still snag fedster a major or two, he needs to breeze through first 4 rds unscathed with quick matches (2hrs), then reset and go for broke qf onwards.
 
Back
Top