Xemi666
Professional
Unexpected to say the least, Marat is much younger than Edberg and was playing profesionally until recently.
http://www.tennis-x.com/xblog/2010-11-07/5674.php
http://www.tennis-x.com/xblog/2010-11-07/5674.php
A great SV player like Edberg can beat anybody when he is on his game. This is one statement that is not a factor in tennis post 2000 since Federer and Rafa have been able to dominate without having to face any great SV players. Im waiting for some more great SV players to win slams again ... Edberg was one of the last greats as well as Rafter and Becker and a few others. Who from the post 2000 era has won a slam playing SV ?
Safin said he never played Edberg, but if I remember correctly, Safin beat him in the quarters of the US Open in Edberg's last Open, '95 or '96.
Safin was probably involved in a threesome the night before the match.
If he wasn't ... he has no excuse ESPECIALLY on clay. On fast indoor carpet ... OK ... but on CLAY ??!??
A great SV player like Edberg can beat anybody when he is on his game. This is one statement that is not a factor in tennis post 2000 since Federer and Rafa have been able to dominate without having to face any great SV players. Im waiting for some more great SV players to win slams again ... Edberg was one of the last greats as well as Rafter and Becker and a few others. Who from the post 2000 era has won a slam playing SV ?
Very surprising, especially since it's on clay. I'm guessing Safin was off his game a bit. But if you think about it, Edberg is a pain in the a** to deal with. He's constantly attacking and probing - which is disastrous for any opponent who is lacking conviction in his shots. Safin doesn't like opponents who don't give him any rhythm; he found Santoro to be painful and Edberg can play a game with almost as much variety plus some added viciousness.
Safin was probably involved in a threesome the night before the match.
IMO serve and volleyplayers from the 90s has always been more talented than the robots of today. And if you keep fit you will not loose the talent or touch, but when the wheels of the robots fall off... nothing left. Champions tour will not be too entertaining in 2025....
Well, Sampras won the 2002 US Open playing serve and volley, and Philippoussis and Federer both made the 2003 Wimbledon final playing serve and volley.Who from the post 2000 era has won a slam playing SV ?
How many times do I have to say it?
A good serve and volleyer beats a good baseliner every time. Attacking tennis beats defensive tennis at the highest levels.
How many times do I have to say it?
A good serve and volleyer beats a good baseliner every time. Attacking tennis beats defensive tennis at the highest levels.
Incorrect. You must be thinking of Goran Ivanisevic. Edberg lost in the quarters of his last US Open to Ivanisevic in 1996.Safin said he never played Edberg, but if I remember correctly, Safin beat him in the quarters of the US Open in Edberg's last Open, '95 or '96.
Hmmm....really? Then how did Safin make the finals? :???:Dude EVERYBODY beats Marat on the champions series...
How many times do I have to say it?
A good serve and volleyer beats a good baseliner every time.
You must have missed the other two times that Safin played Sampras at the US Open. Sampras destroyed Safin in straight sets both times, in 2001 and in 1998.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msmelVjUAgY
You must have missed this match. I doubt any serve and volleyer would have beaten Safin that day.
Safin was probably involved in a threesome the night before the match.
Can we really take that much away from a Champion's Series result without knowing how seriously they are taking the match, how good of shape they are in, etc.?
Seemed to work for him at the AO several years back if I recall. The TV cameras couldn't stop showing his box full of tarts he had drug in from the night before...classic!
Unexpected to say the least, Marat is much younger than Edberg and was playing profesionally until recently.
http://www.tennis-x.com/xblog/2010-11-07/5674.php
Safin said he never played Edberg, but if I remember correctly, Safin beat him in the quarters of the US Open in Edberg's last Open, '95 or '96.
Can that dress be cut any lower?LOL.. I can remember that
Here's one of them:
Seemed to work for him at the AO several years back if I recall. The TV cameras couldn't stop showing his box full of tarts he had drug in from the night before...classic!
Dude EVERYBODY beats Marat on the champions series...
Safin said he never played Edberg, but if I remember correctly, Safin beat him in the quarters of the US Open in Edberg's last Open, '95 or '96.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msmelVjUAgY
You must have missed this match. I doubt any serve and volleyer would have beaten Safin that day.
Proof that the "modern game" struggles against the "big game."
Proof that Safin is a headcase, and you like to troll.
How many times do I have to say it?
A good serve and volleyer beats a good baseliner every time. Attacking tennis beats defensive tennis at the highest levels.
According to the article they were playing ON CLAY. Good luck to Edberg serving and volleying @ 44 yo against a Federer/Nadal/Djokovic type player on clay.
Yes...I'm aware he made the final of the French. He had a good draw and was a good player...even on clay.
Still...if I were Safin I would drink less and "date" less before a match like this one...to avoid such embarrassment.
Edit.
Yes...it IS an embarrassment for a 30 yo pro who retired last year to lose to somebody that's almost 45 and has been retired for 15 years. If it would have been an exhibition ...fine...but in a tournament type setting...no way.
Im not claiming that Edberg or McEnroe can beat Rafa or Federer today, but in thier prime, they could and would still be contending for slams against any player today.
LOL, you are at it again !!
Not to mention that Bill Tilden (and I'm sure other players too) disagree. But of course, what does Tilden know compared to breaktroll?