Emma Raducanu won't complain about tennis calendar, said "we make a great living"

Spielgame

Hall of Fame

Emma Raducanu has garnered many endorsement deals in her nascent career, but there is perhaps one elusive sponsorship that would be most pleasing to the British No 1 women’s tennis player: ambassador of the London borough of Bromley.

During a roundtable discussion with tennis journalists at the end of a gruelling yet satisfying season, Raducanu is merely attempting to describe a quiet off-season spent in her family home when she finds herself delivering a sales pitch about the benefits of living in Bromley. “I’m just so settled,” she says. “I’ve barely been in the UK this year because I’ve been competing so much, but I think just spending really good quality time with my parents has been so nice. I have loved just being in Bromley. It just reminds me of when I was a younger kid and it’s the same bedroom, same everything.

“Bromley has some amazing speciality coffee shops now that didn’t exist a few years ago. And I’ve been trying every new spot. It’s been really nice, and obviously so much greenery, and it’s been fun actually. I’ve been commuting on the train. So I’ve been part of rush hour every day, which has also been an experience. But it’s like my switch off. As soon as I get on the South Western to Waterloo, I’m just like: ‘My day is done now.’”

The inner peace and contentment that Raducanu speaks of has been hard‑earned at the end of a positive if unspectacular season when she took several steps forward. The 23‑year‑old rose from outside the top 60 to No 29 in 2025, her highest ranking since 2022. She played more frequently than ever this year with largely consistent results.

She has also taken steps to find stability within her team, a glaring issue since the start of her career. Raducanu appears to have found a fruitful coaching partnership with the Spaniard Francisco Roig, previously a longtime member of Rafael Nadal’s coaching team, and she will start the 2026 season with a new combined physiotherapist and strength and conditioning coach in Emma Stewart, an experienced professional who has worked in tennis and was most recently part of British Rowing’s Olympic medal‑winning setup.


5268.jpg

Emma Raducanu beat former champion Marketa Vondrousova at Wimbledon this year and reached the third round, where she lost to Aryna Sabalenka. Photograph: Tom Jenkins/The Guardian

In recent weeks, however, the goal has been to not think about tennis. After prematurely ending her season in Asia due to illness, Raducanu devoted significant time to improving her Chinese language skills during her time visiting family in her mother’s country of birth, her Spanish at the urging of Roig, and her French. “I was just like: ‘I’m trying to do everything,’” she says, smiling. “I really need rest days from my rest days. It’s actually quite consuming.”

As the 2021 US Open champion describes her language learning odyssey, a member of her team interjects to note that he now receives texts from her in French, even though he does not speak the language. “It’s funny, because then I’ll just start mixing languages,” Raducanu says. “I’m saying a sentence with three different languages, and I just don’t even know what I’m saying. But I think it’s been great for me to put my mind to something else and to be occupied and feed my brain. It’s the best thing I can do for myself. And I feel like I’m just in a pretty content place, just trying to become a better version off the court.”

4021.jpg

Emma Raducanu is about to embark on pre-season training with Francisco Roig. Photograph: Robert Prange/Getty Images

Alongside some positive results, there have been ample difficult moments in 2025. Most notably, Raducanu’s encounters with a fixated individual in February drew global headlines. Those incidents naturally hurt her confidence, with the Briton previously stating that her neck would hurt from looking down in public to avoid people recognising her. “Now I don’t. My neck doesn’t hurt as much. I’m not looking down as much. Better posture,” she says, laughing. “But I’m like: ‘OK, what? Are they going to see me on the tube?’ It’s not a bad thing.”

The comfort with which Raducanu navigated the city during the off-season has also shown her that she has put the incident behind her. “Honestly, I have gotten over it,” she says. “What did creep me out was I saw a photo of myself in London, and I didn’t see the paps [paparazzi]. I was with my two best friends. This happened last week, and it was some tabloid article saying I had a new boyfriend or whatever. But it’s literally my best friend’s brother. I was like: ‘Come on, guys. Come on. Be better. This is not [true].’ I was with my best friend’s brother, and we were going to the rugby. And of course, they cropped my best friend out. It was just me and this guy, and I just didn’t see the paps. So that’s obviously creepy. You know, when you’re like: ‘I didn’t see them. How did they take this photo?’ But other than that, I feel good because someone’s always watching my back.”

Off the court, 2025 has been a contentious and controversial year in tennis. The most recent discourse has focused on the length of the season, with various players being critical of the demanding season. Raducanu, however, offers a different perspective to the likes of Iga Swiatek, Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner and her fellow British No 1, Jack Draper.

“I think that’s a challenge,” she says. “I don’t necessarily think it’s something to complain about because it’s what we are given. And we are making a great living as well. I mean it’s not all glamorous. There are definitely times when it’s very difficult and we are flagging mentally, physically, everything hurts. But at the same time what are we going to do about it? I am sure there are certain people who go to work and their bosses make them do something, but they have to do it, it’s their job. If we put up a front that isn’t complaining, I think that is a better example to the people watching, trying to get into tennis, the younger people. If they see all the top players moaning about the calendar, I don’t think that’s necessarily inspiring to look up to.”

Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper at Wimbledon

Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper will be playing doubles together in the United Cup in January. Photograph: John Walton/PA

The next time Raducanu competes, she will be playing alongside her old friend Draper in the United Cup, the mixed-gender international team event that kicks off the season in Australia. Before then, an intense pre‑season block begins this week with Roig in Barcelona with the goal to build on the solid foundations established in 2025, to improve the quality of her shotmaking and begin to close the considerable gap between herself and the very best players in the world.

“I think I went through some very difficult times on and off the court at the start of the year,” she says. “But I think it really taught me, like the strength that I have to pull myself out of it. Also what I need to do to avoid falling back in again. A lot of it is spending time studying, spending time learning, spending time nurturing my brain and just constantly that’s something I need. Learning about myself has been a great thing. So I feel very content.”
 
If someone ambitious would please do a chart including every ATP/WTA pro ranked within the top 500 which clearly shows who are complaining about the calendar then I can conduct a poll to determine what TTW thinks should be done about the complainers.

I don’t have the resources to do the chart but I have developed some expertise in conducting free and fair TTW polls, which poll process I try to continually improve. For example, a recently introduced rule invalidating votes from any poster that has been drinking within 8 hours of voting.
 
Emma understands that the fame and money that she got from Tennis is worth playing the schedule instead of whining.

She respects the money and fame, good for her.
She ought to considering she has made so much money for winning ONE tournament in her entire career, so far.
 
Women tennis,.. funny, they should thank and kiss Serena Williams and sister azz for the scam they doing in every slam, the fact they earning same Money is absurd. But nobody is ready for that
 
Women tennis,.. funny, they should thank and kiss Serena Williams and sister azz for the scam they doing in every slam, the fact they earning same Money is absurd. But nobody is ready for that

^ Translation: "Cave-grunter hates the Williams sisters for reasons quite apparent, and, as a cave-grunter. believes in regressive BS only supported by--you guessed it--other cave-grunters"

Could someone explain to me why the mention of Genie Bouchard or Emma Raducanu immediately brings out every bitter troll from the woodwork?

Both were once girls sexualized by that part of tennis fandom home to sexually predatory males. In Bouchard's case, I recall all of their lustful fantasies were dashed to pieces when she once expressed having a crush on Justin Bieber. That was enough to attack her, since the predators despised Bieber, mainly for his image and a certain cultural style he adopted in his career and personal life. That style suggested that Bouchard was attracted to that overall, and the implications of that (at least in their violent minds) made them resent her, when they once made her the object of their then-illegal intentions.
 
Last edited:
She ought to considering she has made so much money for winning ONE tournament in her entire career, so far.

What does this even mean? :unsure:

Do you need a reminder her ONE title was the USO which 99% of pros will never win including ATG Bjorn Borg. And she did it coming out of qualies. Unprecedented in the Open Era.
 
What does this even mean? :unsure:

Do you need a reminder her ONE title was the USO which 99% of pros will never win including ATG Bjorn Borg. And she did it coming out of qualies. Unprecedented in the Open Era.

She is female, so the Cave-Grunters must attack her for doing something--as you point out--99% of pros will never win, and they conveniently forget how many of their woefully untalented male idols never won, because they were and ever shall be...untalented.
 
Who in their right mind reads this piece and decides to (verbally) attack Emma?
There is nothing rational to attack her for.

For being gracious?
Articulate?
Wanting to nourish her mind?
Wanting to improve herself?
For being appreciative?

What is wrong with some of you?
 
What does this even mean? :unsure:

Do you need a reminder her ONE title was the USO w
First of all, she had an easy draw compared to her final opponent. Still, a fine achievement but the fact is that she has won nothing since and doesn't deserve all the money she has made due to endorsements. For me, Emma is the ultimate One Slam Wonder.
 
Last edited:
If someone ambitious would please do a chart including every ATP/WTA pro ranked within the top 500 which clearly shows who are complaining about the calendar then I can conduct a poll to determine what TTW thinks should be done about the complainers.

I don’t have the resources to do the chart but I have developed some expertise in conducting free and fair TTW polls, which poll process I try to continually improve. For example, a recently introduced rule invalidating votes from any poster that has been drinking within 8 hours of voting.
You cannot be serious-LOL!
 
Yeah she's made a ton of endorsement money in her career despite being a non factor outside of one tournament. So she has no reason to be anything other than grateful for everything she has.

You can say the same for a guy like FAA whose made some pretty decent money despite never winning a big title in his career.
 
She is female, so the Cave-Grunters must attack her for doing something--as you point out--99% of pros will never win, and they conveniently forget how many of their woefully untalented male idols never won, because they were and ever shall be...untalented.

Lol. I agree. Unlike others I've never attacked her for winning the US Open. That would be beyond stupid. You are correct most tennis players will never lift the USO winners trophy so she will always have that. It's something no one can ever take away from her.

So from that standpoint the pressure isn't on Emma. It's on those who have yet to win a slam.

Still though it's been over four years and she still has yet to win title number two. Not even a small 250 or 500 title. How long is going to take her? So these are legitimate criticisms people have about her as a supposed star. We can't say they are wrong either.
 
First of all, she had an easy draw compared to her final opponent. Still, a fine achievement but the fact is that she has won nothing since and doesn't deserve all the money she has made due to endorsements. For me, Emma is the ultimate One Slam Wonder.

giphy.gif
 
Lol. I agree. Unlike others I've never attacked her for winning the US Open. That would be beyond stupid. You are correct most tennis players will never lift the USO winners trophy so she will always have that. It's something no one can ever take away from her.

So from that standpoint the pressure isn't on Emma. It's on those who have yet to win a slam.

Still though it's been over four years and she still has yet to win title number two. Not even a small 250 or 500 title. How long is going to take her? So these are legitimate criticisms people have about her as a supposed star. We can't say they are wrong either.
Okay, but what does that have to do with the article that the OP posted?

Now, if someone claimed that she is a top 5 or 10 player in the world, even top 20 right now, that would be at odds with the facts.
But we have other ludicrous posters crying about the endorsements she's received -- as if there's a formula to determine who deserves endorsements.
And some of those same people are still crying that she didn't have a tough enough draw at the '21 USO for their liking....as if an 18-year-old, as a qualifier in her second pro slam, winning 20 straight sets...not even taken to a tiebreaker...wasn't an amazing achievement. On top of that, not only her looks but how she has handled everything with intelligence, grace and poise obviously appeals to fans and advertisers.
 
Okay, but what does that have to do with the article that the OP posted?

Now, if someone claimed that she is a top 5 or 10 player in the world, even top 20 right now, that would be at odds with the facts.
But we have other ludicrous posters crying about the endorsements she's received -- as if there's a formula to determine who deserves endorsements.
And some of those same people are still crying that she didn't have a tough enough draw at the '21 USO for their liking....as if an 18-year-old, as a qualifier in her second pro slam, winning 20 straight sets...not even taken to a tiebreaker...wasn't an amazing achievement. On top of that, not only her looks but how she has handled everything with intelligence, grace and poise obviously appeals to fans and advertisers.
An article stating she’s not complaining about the schedule and certain posters respond by complaining that she hasn’t won enough and has too many endorsements. Something else is going on. :unsure:
 
Emma understands that the fame and money that she got from Tennis is worth playing the schedule instead of whining.

She respects the money and fame, good for her.
Exactly. Much respect for her.
Love her or hate her. But more atp pros should look in the mirror.
Carlos is about to play an exhibition in Miami. Then he’ll complain about the schedule.
Shut up dude- you’re worth how much? Some of these lower ranked players want this schedule to make a living.
 
Okay, but what does that have to do with the article that the OP posted?

Now, if someone claimed that she is a top 5 or 10 player in the world, even top 20 right now, that would be at odds with the facts.
But we have other ludicrous posters crying about the endorsements she's received -- as if there's a formula to determine who deserves endorsements.
And some of those same people are still crying that she didn't have a tough enough draw at the '21 USO for their liking....as if an 18-year-old, as a qualifier in her second pro slam, winning 20 straight sets...not even taken to a tiebreaker...wasn't an amazing achievement. On top of that, not only her looks but how she has handled everything with intelligence, grace and poise obviously appeals to fans and advertisers.
Well in fairness I think what they are pointing out was her draw wasn't hard as the standard slam winning draw. Usually to win a slam you have to beat at least two top 10 players. Emma didn't even beat a single top 15 players. I think that's what they are pointing out.

Still though all the top players were in the draw and lost. Not her fault. So I don't have an issue with her draw. I never try to discredit a player for a draw falling apart. That's silly. For me it wasn't about her USO win at all. For me it's about what she has done since that win...which is basically to say nothing.
 
Lol. I agree. Unlike others I've never attacked her for winning the US Open. That would be beyond stupid. You are correct most tennis players will never lift the USO winners trophy so she will always have that. It's something no one can ever take away from her.

So from that standpoint the pressure isn't on Emma. It's on those who have yet to win a slam.

Still though it's been over four years and she still has yet to win title number two. Not even a small 250 or 500 title. How long is going to take her? So these are legitimate criticisms people have about her as a supposed star. We can't say they are wrong either.
There's probably something even better than being a great tennis player worth millions. Being a comparatively mediocre one worth millions due to a piece of good fortune.
 
First of all, she had an easy draw compared to her final opponent. Still, a fine achievement but the fact is that she has won nothing since and doesn't deserve all the money she has made due to endorsements. For me, Emma is the ultimate One Slam Wonder.
Easy draw? How would you have faired? Would you thrust through 10 matches at the pro level and win the women’s USO GS of 2021?
 
An article stating she’s not complaining about the schedule and certain posters respond by complaining that she hasn’t won enough and has too many endorsements. Something else is going on. :unsure:
That "something" is the same knuckle-dragging mentality that first sexualizes a female player (as archived Talk Tennis Warehouse threads bear out), and eventually, the woman says something or commits some act her predatory fanboys cannot stand (or did not give their nonexistent "approval" of), then comes the torrential flood of hate posts. Its happened to several female players, and on this board. Let us not forget that the usual suspects also resent a woman who is successful and does not need them for any reason (and shatters initial fantasies that they ever had a "chance" with her--a pathetic fantasy at best), hence the attacks.
 
^ Translation: "Cave-grunter hates the Williams sisters for reasons quite apparent, and, as a cave-grunter. believes in regressive BS only supported by--you guessed it--other cave-grunters"



Both were once girls sexualized by that part of tennis fandom home to sexually predatory males. In Bouchard's case, I recall all of their lustful fantasies were dashed to pieces when she once expressed having a crush on Justin Bieber. That was enough to attack her, since the predators despised Bieber, mainly for his image and a certain cultural style he adopted in his career and personal life. That style suggested that Bouchard was attracted to that overall, and the implications of that (at least in their violent minds) made them resent her, when they once made her the object of their then-illegal intentions.
lol good comedy
 
Astounding departure from reality. Typical of...well, does it really need to be spelled out? Me thinks not.

Only the Cave grunters live in a world divorced from reality. You occupy the same space as the bitter *****s who either sexualize or resent women who will never, ever have anything to do with extinction block creatures of your kind, which is fitting.
 
She is female, so the Cave-Grunters must attack her for doing something--as you point out--99% of pros will never win, and they conveniently forget how many of their woefully untalented male idols never won, because they were and ever shall be...untalented.
Women players earn the same money as mens players despite playing roughly 33% less tennis during a major tournament.
 
Astoundingly false equivalency tactic fails out of the gate. Typical of the Cave Grunting ilk.
In this very forum we had a female poster with a picture of Nadal's butt as avatar, we had a 45+ married woman drooling like crazy over underaged Holger Rune and we have two posters who are in love with Nadal. If you seriously believe women are not sexualising male sportstars/celebrities the same way men do with females, you are living under a rock. Do you also believe girls or women are going to boy band/Robbie Williams concerts because they are so interested in the music?

Both sexes do the same here and there is nothing wrong about it.
 
What does this even mean? :unsure:

Do you need a reminder her ONE title was the USO which 99% of pros will never win including ATG Bjorn Borg. And she did it coming out of qualies. Unprecedented in the Open Era.
How can you put Borg and Emma in the same paragraph. She did not even beat a top player during her lucky run. This is downright insulting to Borg.
 
In this very forum we had a female poster with a picture of Nadal's butt as avatar, we had a 45+ married woman drooling like crazy over underaged Holger Rune and we have two posters who are in love with Nadal. If you seriously believe women are not sexualising male sportstars/celebrities the same way men do with females, you are living under a rock. Do you also believe girls or women are going to boy band/Robbie Williams concerts because they are so interested in the music?

Both sexes do the same here and there is nothing wrong about it.

False equivalency. You can count on one hand the number of female members of Talk Tennis Warehouse who also engaged in relentlessly sexist posts about men. This board has always been predominantly male, and through the years, endless sexualized comments about female players (or girlfriends of male players) have been posted by innumerable male members, including predatory posts about Halep's breasts (complaining about her breast reduction procedure), Raducanu, Sharapova, Ivanovic, Muguruza, pedo-posts about any teenage player, or women in general, often pushing the demeaning, proof-of-no-life-experience-with-women BS that anyone could "get" them with enough money. Again, the named players are just samples of the eras where constant sexualized posts were as much a part of discussion about female players as their matches. That is the nature of a large part of this board's membership.
 
False equivalency. You can count on one hand the number of female members of Talk Tennis Warehouse who also engaged in relentlessly sexist posts about men. This board has always been predominantly male, and through the years, endless sexualized comments about female players (or girlfriends of male players) have been posted by innumerable male members, including predatory posts about Halep's breasts (complaining about her breast reduction procedure), Raducanu, Sharapova, Ivanovic, Muguruza, pedo-posts about any teenage player, or women in general, often pushing the demeaning, proof-of-no-life-experience-with-women BS that anyone could "get" them with enough money. Again, the named players are just samples of the eras where constant sexualized posts were as much a part of discussion about female players as their matches. That is the nature of a large part of this board's membership.
There is only a handful of female posters in general in TTW but of those who are, percentage-wise there are as many drooling about male players than male posters who drool over female players.
 
False equivalency.

Uhhhhhh, it's reaalllyyy not. It's just one example amongst countless others in the real world showing how women sexualize men every bit as much as men do women. Of course, if you actually spent time around women, you'd know that already.

Men are ALWAYS going to sexualize women and vice versa because....wait for it.....we're sexual creatures.
 
Back
Top