ESPN: French Open expert picks: Will Djokovic win? Or Alcaraz?

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Both out in the QF.

Who will win the men's singles title and why?
Chris Evert: Novak Djokovic, because his timing to peak is impeccable. He has his clay-court legs and instincts back, and he's fresh from his time off earlier this year.

Pam Shriver: Carlos Alcaraz is ready to win his first major. His last few months have been a meteoric rise towards the top of men's tennis at just 19 years of age. His strength has grown since last year's US Open run. He is ready to grind for seven matches, 3 of 5 sets. While the top half of the draw is loaded with the top three favorites, Alcaraz is in the better section of the top half. His coach Juan Carlos Ferrero has won Roland Garros, and Carlos is ready to join him as a Roland Garros champion.

Rennae Stubbs: Djokovic. After winning in Rome, he is mentally and physically back after the debacle at the beginning of the year, and is ready to show why he is the best player in the world.

Mary Joe Fernandez: Rafa Nadal is the favorite even though he did not win a warm-up clay event. When you win a Grand Slam 13 times, you are the favorite until you retire. Nadal feels at home on Philippe Chatrier, and it has been almost impossible to beat him in best of five sets. He has played so well to start the season that he can draw on that confidence to win in Paris again.

Luke Jensen: Alcaraz. The young and extremely confident Spaniard is ready to take his first major. He has every shot on the court, and his super weapon is his calm demeanor under pressure. He won in Madrid, beating Nadal and Djokovic, soooooo look out! The kid is 16-1 this year in the red mud!

Patrick McEnroe: Djokovic will get past Nadal, Alcaraz and Stefanos Tsitsipas to win his 21st Grand Slam title.

Brad Gilbert: The imbalance of the top half of the draw (group of death), with Djokovic rounding into form, the emergence of Alcaraz and Nadal (with injury concerns there), makes me look to the bottom half of the draw and the great opportunity for Tsitsipas to win it.

Cliff Drysdale: Alcaraz. He is young, but so were Boris Becker, Mats Wilander, Chrissie Evert, Tracy Austin, Michael Chang and Pete Sampras.

D'Arcy Maine: I can't resist: Alcaraz. Could this be slightly premature? Absolutely. He's only played in four five-set matches thus far in his career and has an incredibly tough draw, with potential showdowns with Sebastian Korda (the only man to beat him on clay thus far this season), Alexander Zverev and Nadal or Djokovic en route to the final.
But he's been nearly flawless on the surface in the lead-in events, and it seems all but certain he will be hoisting a major trophy at some point in the near future, so why not now?

Tom Hamilton: I'm backing Alcaraz to win. The young Spaniard was immense at the Madrid Open and is riding a wave of confidence into Roland Garros. There are question marks over whether he can prevail in five-set matches, but he's the man to beat with those around him tipping him for multiple Grand Slams. This time around, it could all come down to that semifinal (if he makes it) where he will likely face the winner of the potential Nadal-Djokovic quarterfinal.

Simon Cambers: Djokovic. It didn't look that way when he was losing early in Monte Carlo, but with Nadal not 100 percent and having won Rome in style, everything's in his favor. Alcaraz may prove me wrong, but I think he's a year away from winning, while Djokovic will channel all that happened in Australia into winning a third Roland Garros title.

Bill Connelly: I was fully prepared to pick Alcaraz here. "He's been unbelievable this year, and with Nadal hobbled and Djokovic still trying to find his form, this is his moment," I would have said. But then Djokovic laid waste to a loaded field in Rome. His serve and forehand are in rhythm again. His forehand looks as dangerous as ever, and it's fair to assume that defeating him in a best-of-5 match remains one of the most difficult feats in sports. Djokovic's the favorite.

Aishwarya Kumar: Alcaraz. The 19-year-old is unstoppable right now. In the span of two months -- from March 22 when the Miami Open began to May 22 when the French Open will begin -- he has won two ATP 1000 titles and one ATP 500s title. And he didn't beat just any top player for those trophies. He became the first person to beat Nadal and Djokovic in a single clay-court tournament to win the Madrid Open earlier this month. He is playing impeccable tennis right now. He has suddenly become the man to beat -- and he told me earlier this month that he is ready to win a Grand Slam!

.
 

dapchai

Legend
He didn't even play his best. Or near it. No troll.

Through 3-0 in the second he was an A-
Third set he was a C
First half of fourth set he was a D, second half of fourth set he was an A

Overall, averages out to about a B-
Agree. The only thing I felt satisfied about him today was his BH. Pretty solid and discouraged Choco to go topspin FHCC indefinitely like last year :D

His FH still needs some work. Patchy and let Choco back in the match several times.
 

fox

Professional
Alcaraz will win because he won Micky Mouse tournament played BO3 8-B great experts. Because after all when Zverev/Tsitsipas/Thiem won some Masters on clay they won RG after right?
 
Of course the "experts" don't pick Nadal, he never gets any respect (except from MJF). Nadal has to not only start the season 20-0, he has to win multiple Clay Court tournaments coming into RG to even be considered in Djoko's league. It truly is exhausting being a Rafa fan, as these "experts" act like newbies who have never set foot on a tennis court (and they've been doing this regarding Rafa since 2005-2006, along with swearing his career is gonna be over due to injuries)
 

mistik

Hall of Fame
Mary Joe just doesn’t like to troll thats it.The rest trolling.Altough Rafa not being an overwhelming favaurite holds some water this year they act like this so many times the previous years as well.
 

Topspin_80

Hall of Fame
Tonite was Djokovic biggest match ever, he needed to beat, destroy Nadal, and he came up short even playing at a great level.

Tonite, Nadal destroyed Djokovic dreams and soul.

Djokovic is not going to sleep well tonite.
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
Tonite was Djokovic biggest match ever, he needed to beat, destroy Nadal, and he came up short even playing at a great level.

Tonite, Nadal destroyed Djokovic dreams and soul.

Djokovic is not going to sleep well tonite.
Disagree, his biggest match ever was the USO 2021 final, and he played even worse.

I am no fan of his but I am beginning to feel for the guy. Two huge chances to either win or tie the slam race and he flops in both matches.
 

Topspin_80

Hall of Fame
Disagree, his biggest match ever was the USO 2021 final, and he played even worse.

I am no fan of his but I am beginning to feel for the guy. Two huge chances to either win or tie the slam race and he flops in both matches.
I disagree with your disagreement.

Regarding your feeling for the loser, well, good for you. I have no feelings for a piece of c$ap like Djokovic.
 

Topspin_80

Hall of Fame
I think a chance to win CYGS and tennis immortality is more important than any QF.
I could agree with "........... is more important than a QF" but not any QF.

This was not any QF, it was the best QF ever, a QF for ages, pitting the world #1 and 20 slams winner vs the king of clay and 21 slams winner, and both needing the win for their supremacy agendas.

This was not a QF, for Djokovic (and Nadal as well) it was the MATCH.

When Djokovic lost the USo final, Fed, Nad, and himself were all tied up at 20 slams a piece.

Djokovic, in spite of the loss, was counting on winning AUSO, then RG, then W, and lead the slam count, head and shoulders above the rest.
His father was talking about more than 30 slams when everything was said and done.

Everything changed at the AUSO 2022, Nadal won, and now leads the field on the slam count, and the slam count is the gold standard of tennis greatness.

In this particular QF, Djokovic had the opportunity of crashing Nadal, and getting 21, it was a do or die for Djokovic, and he died.

The USO final important as it was, it is water under the bridge, this QF had the possibility to sooth all the pain Djokovic is enduring, and he failed.

You feel for him, I neither feel for him nor for any Djokovic fans, tonite both, Djokovic, and his fans, got what they deserved.

Long live the King!!!
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
I could agree with "........... is more important than a QF" but not any QF.

This was not any QF, it was the best QF ever, a QF for ages, pitting the world #1 and 20 slams winner vs the king of clay and 21 slams winner, and both needing the win for their supremacy agendas.

This was not a QF, for Djokovic (and Nadal as well) it was the MATCH.

When Djokovic lost the USo final, Fed, Nad, and himself were all tied up at 20 slams a piece.

Djokovic, in spite of the loss, was counting on winning AUSO, then RG, then W, and lead the slam count, head and shoulders above the rest.
His father was talking about more than 30 slams when everything was said and done.

Everything changed at the AUSO 2022, Nadal won, and now leads the field on the slam count, and the slam count is the gold standard of tennis greatness.

In this particular QF, Djokovic had the opportunity of crashing Nadal, and getting 21, it was a do or die for Djokovic, and he died.

The USO final important as it was, it is water under the bridge, this QF had the possibility to sooth all the pain Djokovic is enduring, and he failed.

You feel for him, I neither feel for him nor for any Djokovic fans, tonite both, Djokovic, and his fans, got what they deserved.

Long live the King!!!
OK I see your reasoning now, you make a strong point.

Enjoy the win.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
Both out in the QF.

Who will win the men's singles title and why?
Chris Evert: Novak Djokovic, because his timing to peak is impeccable. He has his clay-court legs and instincts back, and he's fresh from his time off earlier this year.

Pam Shriver: Carlos Alcaraz is ready to win his first major. His last few months have been a meteoric rise towards the top of men's tennis at just 19 years of age. His strength has grown since last year's US Open run. He is ready to grind for seven matches, 3 of 5 sets. While the top half of the draw is loaded with the top three favorites, Alcaraz is in the better section of the top half. His coach Juan Carlos Ferrero has won Roland Garros, and Carlos is ready to join him as a Roland Garros champion.

Rennae Stubbs: Djokovic. After winning in Rome, he is mentally and physically back after the debacle at the beginning of the year, and is ready to show why he is the best player in the world.

Mary Joe Fernandez: Rafa Nadal is the favorite even though he did not win a warm-up clay event. When you win a Grand Slam 13 times, you are the favorite until you retire. Nadal feels at home on Philippe Chatrier, and it has been almost impossible to beat him in best of five sets. He has played so well to start the season that he can draw on that confidence to win in Paris again.

Luke Jensen: Alcaraz. The young and extremely confident Spaniard is ready to take his first major. He has every shot on the court, and his super weapon is his calm demeanor under pressure. He won in Madrid, beating Nadal and Djokovic, soooooo look out! The kid is 16-1 this year in the red mud!

Patrick McEnroe: Djokovic will get past Nadal, Alcaraz and Stefanos Tsitsipas to win his 21st Grand Slam title.

Brad Gilbert: The imbalance of the top half of the draw (group of death), with Djokovic rounding into form, the emergence of Alcaraz and Nadal (with injury concerns there), makes me look to the bottom half of the draw and the great opportunity for Tsitsipas to win it.

Cliff Drysdale: Alcaraz. He is young, but so were Boris Becker, Mats Wilander, Chrissie Evert, Tracy Austin, Michael Chang and Pete Sampras.

D'Arcy Maine: I can't resist: Alcaraz. Could this be slightly premature? Absolutely. He's only played in four five-set matches thus far in his career and has an incredibly tough draw, with potential showdowns with Sebastian Korda (the only man to beat him on clay thus far this season), Alexander Zverev and Nadal or Djokovic en route to the final.
But he's been nearly flawless on the surface in the lead-in events, and it seems all but certain he will be hoisting a major trophy at some point in the near future, so why not now?

Tom Hamilton: I'm backing Alcaraz to win. The young Spaniard was immense at the Madrid Open and is riding a wave of confidence into Roland Garros. There are question marks over whether he can prevail in five-set matches, but he's the man to beat with those around him tipping him for multiple Grand Slams. This time around, it could all come down to that semifinal (if he makes it) where he will likely face the winner of the potential Nadal-Djokovic quarterfinal.

Simon Cambers: Djokovic. It didn't look that way when he was losing early in Monte Carlo, but with Nadal not 100 percent and having won Rome in style, everything's in his favor. Alcaraz may prove me wrong, but I think he's a year away from winning, while Djokovic will channel all that happened in Australia into winning a third Roland Garros title.

Bill Connelly: I was fully prepared to pick Alcaraz here. "He's been unbelievable this year, and with Nadal hobbled and Djokovic still trying to find his form, this is his moment," I would have said. But then Djokovic laid waste to a loaded field in Rome. His serve and forehand are in rhythm again. His forehand looks as dangerous as ever, and it's fair to assume that defeating him in a best-of-5 match remains one of the most difficult feats in sports. Djokovic's the favorite.

Aishwarya Kumar: Alcaraz. The 19-year-old is unstoppable right now. In the span of two months -- from March 22 when the Miami Open began to May 22 when the French Open will begin -- he has won two ATP 1000 titles and one ATP 500s title. And he didn't beat just any top player for those trophies. He became the first person to beat Nadal and Djokovic in a single clay-court tournament to win the Madrid Open earlier this month. He is playing impeccable tennis right now. He has suddenly become the man to beat -- and he told me earlier this month that he is ready to win a Grand Slam!

.
The only one who knows about tennis is Mary Joe.
8-B
 

Federev

Legend
Both out in the QF.

Who will win the men's singles title and why?
Chris Evert: Novak Djokovic, because his timing to peak is impeccable. He has his clay-court legs and instincts back, and he's fresh from his time off earlier this year.

Pam Shriver: Carlos Alcaraz is ready to win his first major. His last few months have been a meteoric rise towards the top of men's tennis at just 19 years of age. His strength has grown since last year's US Open run. He is ready to grind for seven matches, 3 of 5 sets. While the top half of the draw is loaded with the top three favorites, Alcaraz is in the better section of the top half. His coach Juan Carlos Ferrero has won Roland Garros, and Carlos is ready to join him as a Roland Garros champion.

Rennae Stubbs: Djokovic. After winning in Rome, he is mentally and physically back after the debacle at the beginning of the year, and is ready to show why he is the best player in the world.

Mary Joe Fernandez: Rafa Nadal is the favorite even though he did not win a warm-up clay event. When you win a Grand Slam 13 times, you are the favorite until you retire. Nadal feels at home on Philippe Chatrier, and it has been almost impossible to beat him in best of five sets. He has played so well to start the season that he can draw on that confidence to win in Paris again.

Luke Jensen: Alcaraz. The young and extremely confident Spaniard is ready to take his first major. He has every shot on the court, and his super weapon is his calm demeanor under pressure. He won in Madrid, beating Nadal and Djokovic, soooooo look out! The kid is 16-1 this year in the red mud!

Patrick McEnroe: Djokovic will get past Nadal, Alcaraz and Stefanos Tsitsipas to win his 21st Grand Slam title.

Brad Gilbert: The imbalance of the top half of the draw (group of death), with Djokovic rounding into form, the emergence of Alcaraz and Nadal (with injury concerns there), makes me look to the bottom half of the draw and the great opportunity for Tsitsipas to win it.

Cliff Drysdale: Alcaraz. He is young, but so were Boris Becker, Mats Wilander, Chrissie Evert, Tracy Austin, Michael Chang and Pete Sampras.

D'Arcy Maine: I can't resist: Alcaraz. Could this be slightly premature? Absolutely. He's only played in four five-set matches thus far in his career and has an incredibly tough draw, with potential showdowns with Sebastian Korda (the only man to beat him on clay thus far this season), Alexander Zverev and Nadal or Djokovic en route to the final.
But he's been nearly flawless on the surface in the lead-in events, and it seems all but certain he will be hoisting a major trophy at some point in the near future, so why not now?

Tom Hamilton: I'm backing Alcaraz to win. The young Spaniard was immense at the Madrid Open and is riding a wave of confidence into Roland Garros. There are question marks over whether he can prevail in five-set matches, but he's the man to beat with those around him tipping him for multiple Grand Slams. This time around, it could all come down to that semifinal (if he makes it) where he will likely face the winner of the potential Nadal-Djokovic quarterfinal.

Simon Cambers: Djokovic. It didn't look that way when he was losing early in Monte Carlo, but with Nadal not 100 percent and having won Rome in style, everything's in his favor. Alcaraz may prove me wrong, but I think he's a year away from winning, while Djokovic will channel all that happened in Australia into winning a third Roland Garros title.

Bill Connelly: I was fully prepared to pick Alcaraz here. "He's been unbelievable this year, and with Nadal hobbled and Djokovic still trying to find his form, this is his moment," I would have said. But then Djokovic laid waste to a loaded field in Rome. His serve and forehand are in rhythm again. His forehand looks as dangerous as ever, and it's fair to assume that defeating him in a best-of-5 match remains one of the most difficult feats in sports. Djokovic's the favorite.

Aishwarya Kumar: Alcaraz. The 19-year-old is unstoppable right now. In the span of two months -- from March 22 when the Miami Open began to May 22 when the French Open will begin -- he has won two ATP 1000 titles and one ATP 500s title. And he didn't beat just any top player for those trophies. He became the first person to beat Nadal and Djokovic in a single clay-court tournament to win the Madrid Open earlier this month. He is playing impeccable tennis right now. He has suddenly become the man to beat -- and he told me earlier this month that he is ready to win a Grand Slam!

.
WOW.
 

tsp_207

Semi-Pro
All these experts need to be fired. Too much recency bias. You get paid all this money to give a prediction not based on general hype.
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
Of course the "experts" don't pick Nadal, he never gets any respect (except from MJF). Nadal has to not only start the season 20-0, he has to win multiple Clay Court tournaments coming into RG to even be considered in Djoko's league. It truly is exhausting being a Rafa fan, as these "experts" act like newbies who have never set foot on a tennis court (and they've been doing this regarding Rafa since 2005-2006, along with swearing his career is gonna be over due to injuries)
In last year's same ESPN predictions literally everyone but 1 person picked Nadal to win

 

kailash

Hall of Fame
Both out in the QF.

Who will win the men's singles title and why?
Chris Evert: Novak Djokovic, because his timing to peak is impeccable. He has his clay-court legs and instincts back, and he's fresh from his time off earlier this year.

Pam Shriver: Carlos Alcaraz is ready to win his first major. His last few months have been a meteoric rise towards the top of men's tennis at just 19 years of age. His strength has grown since last year's US Open run. He is ready to grind for seven matches, 3 of 5 sets. While the top half of the draw is loaded with the top three favorites, Alcaraz is in the better section of the top half. His coach Juan Carlos Ferrero has won Roland Garros, and Carlos is ready to join him as a Roland Garros champion.

Rennae Stubbs: Djokovic. After winning in Rome, he is mentally and physically back after the debacle at the beginning of the year, and is ready to show why he is the best player in the world.

Mary Joe Fernandez: Rafa Nadal is the favorite even though he did not win a warm-up clay event. When you win a Grand Slam 13 times, you are the favorite until you retire. Nadal feels at home on Philippe Chatrier, and it has been almost impossible to beat him in best of five sets. He has played so well to start the season that he can draw on that confidence to win in Paris again.

Luke Jensen: Alcaraz. The young and extremely confident Spaniard is ready to take his first major. He has every shot on the court, and his super weapon is his calm demeanor under pressure. He won in Madrid, beating Nadal and Djokovic, soooooo look out! The kid is 16-1 this year in the red mud!

Patrick McEnroe: Djokovic will get past Nadal, Alcaraz and Stefanos Tsitsipas to win his 21st Grand Slam title.

Brad Gilbert: The imbalance of the top half of the draw (group of death), with Djokovic rounding into form, the emergence of Alcaraz and Nadal (with injury concerns there), makes me look to the bottom half of the draw and the great opportunity for Tsitsipas to win it.

Cliff Drysdale: Alcaraz. He is young, but so were Boris Becker, Mats Wilander, Chrissie Evert, Tracy Austin, Michael Chang and Pete Sampras.

D'Arcy Maine: I can't resist: Alcaraz. Could this be slightly premature? Absolutely. He's only played in four five-set matches thus far in his career and has an incredibly tough draw, with potential showdowns with Sebastian Korda (the only man to beat him on clay thus far this season), Alexander Zverev and Nadal or Djokovic en route to the final.
But he's been nearly flawless on the surface in the lead-in events, and it seems all but certain he will be hoisting a major trophy at some point in the near future, so why not now?

Tom Hamilton: I'm backing Alcaraz to win. The young Spaniard was immense at the Madrid Open and is riding a wave of confidence into Roland Garros. There are question marks over whether he can prevail in five-set matches, but he's the man to beat with those around him tipping him for multiple Grand Slams. This time around, it could all come down to that semifinal (if he makes it) where he will likely face the winner of the potential Nadal-Djokovic quarterfinal.

Simon Cambers: Djokovic. It didn't look that way when he was losing early in Monte Carlo, but with Nadal not 100 percent and having won Rome in style, everything's in his favor. Alcaraz may prove me wrong, but I think he's a year away from winning, while Djokovic will channel all that happened in Australia into winning a third Roland Garros title.

Bill Connelly: I was fully prepared to pick Alcaraz here. "He's been unbelievable this year, and with Nadal hobbled and Djokovic still trying to find his form, this is his moment," I would have said. But then Djokovic laid waste to a loaded field in Rome. His serve and forehand are in rhythm again. His forehand looks as dangerous as ever, and it's fair to assume that defeating him in a best-of-5 match remains one of the most difficult feats in sports. Djokovic's the favorite.

Aishwarya Kumar: Alcaraz. The 19-year-old is unstoppable right now. In the span of two months -- from March 22 when the Miami Open began to May 22 when the French Open will begin -- he has won two ATP 1000 titles and one ATP 500s title. And he didn't beat just any top player for those trophies. He became the first person to beat Nadal and Djokovic in a single clay-court tournament to win the Madrid Open earlier this month. He is playing impeccable tennis right now. He has suddenly become the man to beat -- and he told me earlier this month that he is ready to win a Grand Slam!

.
Only Nadal is still there from that list!! Basically expert picks failed.

All got into the hype, except Mary Joe!!
 
In last year's same ESPN predictions literally everyone but 1 person picked Nadal to win

That's great, does nothing to disprove what I said. Going into RG 2021, Nadal has beaten Djoko in Rome Finals, and had beaten Tsitsipas in a terrific Barcelona Final. And yet since that loss, seemingly every tennis fan on every social media outlet and on ESPN....has pretended that Djoko is now magically the favorite to beat Rafa on any surface.

That article was also BEFORE the tournament last year. I'd like to see what they thought before the Semis


They still call him a "Clay Court specialist", still pretend Hardcourts are foreign to him, and still pretend to be his physio or personal physicians...whenever Rafa has an injury. Been hearing them yap about how they (ESPN, Tennis Channel and the American tennis media) doubt Rafa can beat so and so....for over 15 years
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
That's great, does nothing to disprove what I said. Going into RG 2021, Nadal has beaten Djoko in Rome Finals, and had beaten Tsitsipas in a terrific Barcelona Final. And yet since that loss, seemingly every tennis fan on every social media outlet and on ESPN....has pretended that Djoko is now magically the favorite to beat Rafa on any surface.

That article was also BEFORE the tournament last year. I'd like to see what they thought before the Semis


They still call him a "Clay Court specialist", still pretend Hardcourts are foreign to him, and still pretend to be his physio or personal physicians...whenever Rafa has an injury. Been hearing them yap about how they (ESPN, Tennis Channel and the American tennis media) doubt Rafa can beat so and so....for over 15 years
Have a bigger chip on your shoulder.
 
Top