Our favourite BEV Bart is an extremely low-mileage driver. He walks/cycles/uses public transport more than he drives. As is typical for Green Star people.
He drives less than 50 miles a week. In his trusty ICE no less. He loathes driving. Does not enjoy long romantic road trips.
Yet we are supposed to believe that such a person is a staunch BEV enthusiast. It does not add up. It is a huge Red Flag.
He is under orders to promote expensive inconvenient BEVs to bring down the economies and living standards of Western capitalist Democracies.
American ICE vehicle are a symbol of personal freedom and mobility. The freedom to fuel up at any time and and drive 3000 miles cross-country without government interference and surveillance.
It is no coincidence that BEVs are promoted and heavily subsidized by authoritarian regimes.
The CCP's promotion of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) can be interpreted as a strategy to enhance state control over its population.
BEVs, due to their reliance on centralized infrastructure and digital connectivity, are particularly well-suited for authoritarian regimes seeking to monitor and restrict individual mobility.
BEVs and Authoritarian Control
- Surveillance Capabilities: BEVs are inherently connected devices, equipped with GPS tracking, internet connectivity, and data-sharing capabilities. In an authoritarian system like the CCP's, this technology facilitates real-time monitoring of citizens' movements, making it easier to enforce restrictions or track dissidents. Such capabilities are harder to implement with Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles, which lack similar digital integration.
- Centralized Energy Infrastructure: BEVs depend on charging stations connected to the state-controlled power grid. The CCP can regulate access to these stations, potentially restricting travel during politically sensitive times or limiting access to certain regions. This level of control is less feasible with ICE vehicles, which rely on decentralized networks of gas stations.
- Policy Enforcement: The CCP has aggressively promoted BEVs through subsidies and mandates while phasing out ICE vehicles. For instance, automakers are required to meet stringent quotas for EV production, with a goal of 40% of all vehicle sales being electric by 2030. Such policies not only consolidate control over transportation systems but also strengthen the CCP’s industrial dominance in EV manufacturing and battery production.
- Travel Restrictions: The limited range of BEVs and the strategic placement of charging stations naturally restrict long-distance travel without state approval. This contrasts with ICE vehicles, which offer greater flexibility for spontaneous or long-range trips due to the widespread availability of fuel.
Comparison with American Road Freedom
In the United States, ICE vehicles have historically symbolized personal freedom and mobility. The extensive network of gas stations and open highways allows Americans to embark on road trips without government interference. This culture of unrestricted travel stands in stark contrast to the CCP's controlled environment, where even road trips could be monitored or curtailed through BEV infrastructure.
Broader Implications
By promoting BEVs, the CCP gains dual advantages: embedding tools for population control into daily life while claiming progress in green energy initiatives. However, given the CCP’s continued reliance on coal and environmentally harmful practices domestically and abroad, its green agenda appears more strategic than genuine. This approach reflects how technology can serve both progressive goals and authoritarian objectives under centralized governance.