Fed did it, Rafa did it, Djoker didn't

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Fed beat Sampras and Agassi at slams. Two ATG's. Rafa beat Agassi. Djoker? Zero wins against those greats. Ouch.

tenor.gif

Fed shook Sinatra's hand.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Laver and Pancho > Kenny
Laver is debatable. I still have Ken over Rod due to a superior number of Majors, but I understand pro-Laver claims based on the Grand Slam achieved both in 1962 and 1969, plus the leading H2H.

Now, I don't see any compelling argument pro-Gonzales. Gonzales only won 14 Majors, 9 less than Rosewall. Additionally, it is also relevant to mention Gonzales' inability to win Majors on clay. Rosewall won Majors in all the surfaces he played in, unlike Gonzales with 0 Majors on clay. In sum. Rosewall was more succesful, dominant and complete than Gonzales.
 

Tennisfan339

Professional
Has he ever played against Sampras and Agassi? Wasn't Sampras retired in 2005 when Djokovic played his first matches?
 
D

Deleted member 771911

Guest
Yes, it's interesting as I read here a lot lately that Federer did not have to usurp any ATGS. But isn't Agassi an ATG? A good one, too, with his Golden Career slam.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Kenny was the original Nadal.
It is a compliment to compare Rosewall to Nadal. Rosewall won the most Majors in his era, I wish Nadal could replicate his success. The only difference is that Rosewall had a losing H2H against Laver, while Nadal has a winning H2H over Federer and Djokovic in Slams. Thus, Nadal can become an improved version of Rosewall.
 
D

Deleted member 629564

Guest
Djoko did collect a loss to 2005 Safin, which is about as great an honor as can be
Funny thing:
Djokovic eliminating Safin in 1R 2005 AO would result in Federer win of this tournament.
Safin was the only player able to defeat Federer at 2005 AO and he did it in the SF.
 
Top