Fed, Nads, DJoker...One Big Difference!

BHud

Hall of Fame
As has been discussed at length, Fed is better suited to faster courts, and Nads is better suited to slower courts...but what about Novak? DJesus can win regularly on all surfaces. As a Fed fan it pains me to say this, but I was acutally very happy for him Sunday...being the first to win ALL Masters 1000s is huge! He is the most comprehensive player of the big three...only time will tell if he can surpass Fed as GOAT (keep Pee Pee out of the picture and focus on slams). Kudos!
 
This was true in the past. I'll actually be very interested to see how Djokovic does on a slower surface where the impact of his serve is neutralized somewhat. The two titles he won were on fast surfaces. He didn't do as well in Toronto, though this obviously could be due to him adjusting to hardcourts again.
 
As has been discussed at length, Fed is better suited to faster courts, and Nads is better suited to slower courts...but what about Novak? DJesus can win regularly on all surfaces. As a Fed fan it pains me to say this, but I was acutally very happy for him Sunday...being the first to win ALL Masters 1000s is huge! He is the most comprehensive player of the big three...only time will tell if he can surpass Fed as GOAT (keep Pee Pee out of the picture and focus on slams). Kudos!

In smaller tournaments that might be true. In slams, however he unfortunately hasn't won regularly enough on all surfaces. A first Cincinnati win doesn't change that fact.
 
In smaller tournaments that might be true. In slams, however he unfortunately hasn't won regularly enough on all surfaces. A first Cincinnati win doesn't change that fact.

Really? With the exception of 1 FO (due to the greatest clay player of all time), do the Masters titles on clay offset that a bit? I don't know what you're saying about other surfaces (he has plenty at W, AO, and USO in addition to the Masters).
 
Back
Top