D
Deleted member 743561
Guest
.
Last edited by a moderator:
That girl is cute btw.
Sent from Fedr's Den.
![]()
Sent from a bathroom somewhere in Taiwan while I figure this crap out. Not that crap, THIS crap.
That is exactly why I immediately jumped on the Tapatalk bandwagon. I am just enjoying this image upload from phone feature for now. After that I will probably uninstall this mess. Or maybe I will disable it's notifications and keep it and will use it when there's need for small talk. The best thing is no need for refresh. This has a lot of advantages.
Sent from Fedr's Den.
I am really disappointed in the meme maker. There is a lot more to the universe than eight planets. And Pluto is again a planet lol. So it's 9.
Sent from Fedr's Den.
Is Pluto back to being a planet again?
Honestly all this sounds less like astronomy and more a messy relationship.
Sent from a bathroom somewhere in Taiwan while I figure this crap out. Not that crap, THIS crap.
They haven't made it official yet but they will. I was reading a few days ago how researchers found evidence of Pluto being a planet. Its a messy relationship indeed.
Sent from Fedr's Den. vhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjjbjj
b
h
h
h
hmc
glad
h
hey
.vjgm
BGM
mhjdgm
.m
jk
njkghj
MBM.hh..gv.
.hj
.bn
hd
hm
j
You already in Taiwan??
Sent from Fedr's Den.
They haven't made it official yet but they will. I was reading a few days ago how researchers found evidence of Pluto being a planet. Its a messy relationship indeed.
Sent from Fedr's Den. vhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjjbjj
b
h
h
h
hmc
glad
h
hey
.vjgm
BGM
mhjdgm
.m
jk
njkghj
MBM.hh..gv.
.hj
.bn
hd
hm
j
Hey!
Did you also read about Nuclear Pasta?
![]()
The above is the most amazing sentence I’ve come across in a very long time.
Sent from a bathroom somewhere in Taiwan while I figure this crap out. Not that crap, THIS crap.
Hey!
Did you also read about Nuclear Pasta?
![]()
The above is the most amazing sentence I’ve come across in a very long time.
Sent from a bathroom somewhere in Taiwan while I figure this crap out. Not that crap, THIS crap.
It's one of his consecutive type records IMO. Those will be hardest to break. Either the 10 straight finals, 23 straight SFs or the 237 straight weeks at #1. I say this mostly because even Djokovic and Nadal didn't get near any of those, and if they didn't I don't see anyone on the horizon that will.
No didn't see the nuclear pasta but they are asking me if I need some money.![]()
Mister Fedr challenges the call on the left baseline. The ball was called out.
I have similar thoughts about it. I am using the good old site too.I’ve gone back to the home screen bookmark because well, I can’t control myself on tapatalk.
It’s just too ridiculously convenient to put up pictures and images and whatever.
It’s the kind of freedom someone like me can’t handle easily.
You missed the record of
18/19 finals recahed in consecutive slams.
That's from 2005 W to 2010 AO, all finals reached. Only miss 2008 AO
18/19 consecutive finals. The one missed was a semi due to mono.
LAWL. I thought I had been redirected to some strange site just now. All I saw when I posted was something about the universe.Scared the crap out of me.
I would never use such language to describe anyone who makes living by playing tennis. However, if you think carefully, he was pretty much helpless when playing Nadal.
He was 10:23 which was quite inappropriate H2H for a multi-slam winner against anyone. Not to mention that among those 10 were wins against sperm/zygote Nadal.
Impressive for a GOAT to have losing h2h against not one but two of his main rivals, making his GOAThood forever in doubt.
Can't use this argument at all against Nadal.
A lot of damage was done by 2012. Fed turned 31 in August 2012 and by then the H2H stood at 18-10.
At the end of 2009 it was 13-7. Since then Nad has 10 wins and Fed has 8.
Even if you only consider how the H2H stood at the end of 2009(the supposed end of Fed's prime) you can see how much Nadal beat him.
Now all the talk about the red surface will begin but it's upon Fed that he has a losing H2H to Nadal because Djoker too had the red surface problem but he still has a winning H2H against Nadal. By the end of 2009 Fedal stood at 5-5 off clay. 2-1 grass for Fed. 4-3 Hard for Nad.
Now given that this was all in Federer's prime and peak, an equal H2H on his best surfaces against a non peak Hardgrassdal seems really bad.
The only argument in favour of Fed is that he has a bad matchup against Nadal but that argument can be made for the losing party of all matchups. So every loser is a good player but has a bad matchup. No.
The Fedovic rivalry can be brought down to age but the Fedal rivalry has always been Nadal's.
So now are we saying that Nadal is a better slow Hard court player than Fed?? I refuse to believe that. In my opinion Fed is the better slow Hard court player and he is only second to Novak.Well if you look at 2004-2010 it’s ridiculous how many matches were on clay or slow HC compared to faster HC, grass.
If you look at the H2H properly, Fed owns Nadal on faster surfaces. It’s only the 2013 wins for Rafa (Cincy, YEC) that bring this back in his favour slightly along with the 08 Wimbledon final.
Shame for Fed that Rafa failed so often to meet him on faster surfaces since 2005-2010... yet so many clay finals.
Btw they had more matches on fast hard courts than on slow ones between '04-10.Well if you look at 2004-2010 it’s ridiculous how many matches were on clay or slow HC compared to faster HC, grass.
Nah Fed is the better slow HC player but Nadal matches up better on slow courts (he can run down would be winners)Btw they had more matches on fast hard courts than on slow ones between '04-10.
2006-07 Masters Cup, 2010 WTF, 2009 AO, 2006 Dubai. 2004-2005 Miami.
Score reads 4-3 Fed on hard courts. 3 of those 4 wins on Indoor Hard courts.
Now I don't know how fast Miami was in 04-05. Or Dubai in 06. This was before USO really slowed down so I am guessing they were medium fast courts(?). Now all left is AO09. I didn't watch tennis back then and have no idea about AOs speed in 09. You tell me.
Also I agree that Rafa didn't meet Fed on Hard Courts many times during Fed's best time and all the matches were on clay but looking at 3-3 on HCs till 2009 or 4-3 till 2010 doesn't give me much evidence to believe that had they met more on HCs between 04-10 it would have benefited Roger.
Btw they had more matches on fast hard courts than on slow ones between '04-10.
2006-07 Masters Cup, 2010 WTF, 2009 AO, 2006 Dubai. 2004-2005 Miami.
Score reads 4-3 Fed on hard courts. 3 of those 4 wins on Indoor Hard courts.
Now I don't know how fast Miami was in 04-05. Or Dubai in 06. This was before USO really slowed down so I am guessing they were medium fast courts(?). Now all left is AO09. I didn't watch tennis back then and have no idea about AOs speed in 09. You tell me.
Also I agree that Rafa didn't meet Fed on Hard Courts many times during Fed's best time and all the matches were on clay but looking at 3-3 on HCs till 2009 or 4-3 till 2010 doesn't give me much evidence to believe that had they met more on HCs between 04-10 it would have benefited Roger.
ASCII art it is, then.
What's that thing at the end of every. last. @3fees post?
"Cheers
3Fees" or something similar. He actually types this out every time?
But what I was really getting at was it seems like a small image could be embedded in place of a smiley or whatever.