Fedal - Shots Fired!

aman92

Legend
https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...laim-after-withdrawing-from-rogers-cup/261419

Roger Federer hits back at Rafael Nadal claim after withdrawing from Rogers Cup

Swiss Maestro Roger Federer has hit back at Rafael Nadal claim after withdrawal from the Rogers Cup tournament saying that he isn't running away from the rivalry

Tennis ace Roger Federer has been selecting the tournaments for participation very wisely depending on his body and longevity on the court and somehow that has worked wonders for the Swiss Maestro. He opted out for the clay season last year and he won the Wimbledon 2017, before missing out on the hard-court season leading up to the US Open Championship. This year he followed the same with clay season and Rafael Nadal felt disappointed. And now on Saturday, Federer hit back as Nadal claims to say he isn't running away from the rivalry.

Nadal-Federer rivalry is the most anticipated match on a tennis court, whatever be at stake. Last year there were a total of four encounters with Federer winning all four of them - Australian Open final, Indian Wells, Miami Open final and Shanghai Masters final.

Claiming that Federer wanted to play against him on the red dirt at Roland Garros, Nadal teased the 36-year-old saying that the arch-rivals won't get the opportunity to play on the slower surface.

Talking in Spanish ahead of French Open 2018, the Spaniard said, "It's not my interest. It's his decision. He said a couple of days ago that he would love to play against me again on clay, best of five sets, so I thought he would play Roland Garros. Then in a few days, he says he will not play. A little bit of a contradiction."

Federer marked his return to grass court with victories in Stuttgart and Halle. However, his run to ninth Wimbledon title was cut short by a resilient Kevin Anderson in the quarterfinals. Later, he opted out of the Rogers Cup as well citing strategy to maintain longevity on the court. But he insisted that he is not running out of Nadal.

For me, it's about something more than clashes with Nadal: it means health and tennis enjoyment. The main goal is to win titles: that's why numbers and records are secondary', Federer clarified in an interview with Blick.

“It depends a lot also on what numbers. It’s very special to be there personally in the history of my favourite sport. As a kid, I would never think that I would be in the book’s records. The goal was to be the best as possible, hoping to be on the biggest stages of the world, maybe meeting my idol."

“And yes, lifting a trophy on the air. But not to reach those numbers! That was (in) someway impossible for me. That’s why my joy in tennis is still so big. Because inside, I always stayed on the ground, I know it: it’s not normal, it’s not reality. But I accept it and I take it as a challenge to defend my titles or lift some trophies.”

 
Federer from 2000 year until now have missed 4 GS.Nadal from 2005 until now have missed 6.But you always hear complains about Federer missing few GS despite that he started missing them in 2016 when he was 34/35 years old.What about WTF - how many times Nadal missed this tournament.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that nobody actually holds this against Federer, not even Nadal fans. It’s just insincere fanwar fodder. Nobody is daft enough to think that a 36 year old with 20 years of mileage on him should have to play a full schedule to avoid damaging his legacy, practicality/results/happiness be damned. It’s an utterly insane thing to believe.
 
Its not difficult to understand. Roger loves Cincy, and he thinks playing Toronto, Cincy and USO is too much. If Cincy was first i think he would see how deep he got, and then decided to play Toronto or not. If he won Cincy he would pull out or partly tank.

I guess this is what Rafa will do. Should Rafa go deep in Toronto he will either pull out of Cincy or lose early.
 
Its not difficult to understand. Roger loves Cincy, and he thinks playing Toronto, Cincy and USO is too much. If Cincy was first i think he would see how deep he got, and then decided to play Toronto or not. If he won Cincy he would pull out or partly tank.

I guess this is what Rafa will do. Should Rafa go deep in Toronto he will either pull out of Cincy or lose early.
While true, everybody deep down knows it’s pretty lame to skip a major just to get a head start on grass regardless of age.
 
Federer from 2000 year until now have missed 4 GS.Nadal from 2005 until now have missed 6.But you always hear complains about Federer missing few GS despite that he started missing them in 2016 when he was 34/35 years old.What about WTF - how many times Nadal missed this tournament.
Skipping due to injury cannot be compared to skipping due to maintaining longevity. I 100% understand what Roger is doing but those are two different things and you can't conflate them.
 
Fed reached Rafa 4 times in 2013, his worst ever year (post 2001) including a Rome final.

Where the hell was Rafa in his poor 2015 year vs resurgent Fed? Losing to Brown, Lopez, and Fognini and avoiding almost certain losses to in form Fed.

Fed is the absolute last person you can accuse of dodging.
 
While true, everybody deep down knows it’s pretty lame to skip a major just to get a head start on grass regardless of age.
Naah, why would he play? He isnt winning FO and he knows it. He wants to play for as long as possible and doesnt care about points anymore. He probably doesnt see the point in playing tourneys he cant win and neither do i...
 
https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...laim-after-withdrawing-from-rogers-cup/261419

Roger Federer hits back at Rafael Nadal claim after withdrawing from Rogers Cup

Swiss Maestro Roger Federer has hit back at Rafael Nadal claim after withdrawal from the Rogers Cup tournament saying that he isn't running away from the rivalry

Tennis ace Roger Federer has been selecting the tournaments for participation very wisely depending on his body and longevity on the court and somehow that has worked wonders for the Swiss Maestro. He opted out for the clay season last year and he won the Wimbledon 2017, before missing out on the hard-court season leading up to the US Open Championship. This year he followed the same with clay season and Rafael Nadal felt disappointed. And now on Saturday, Federer hit back as Nadal claims to say he isn't running away from the rivalry.

Nadal-Federer rivalry is the most anticipated match on a tennis court, whatever be at stake. Last year there were a total of four encounters with Federer winning all four of them - Australian Open final, Indian Wells, Miami Open final and Shanghai Masters final.

Claiming that Federer wanted to play against him on the red dirt at Roland Garros, Nadal teased the 36-year-old saying that the arch-rivals won't get the opportunity to play on the slower surface.

Talking in Spanish ahead of French Open 2018, the Spaniard said, "It's not my interest. It's his decision. He said a couple of days ago that he would love to play against me again on clay, best of five sets, so I thought he would play Roland Garros. Then in a few days, he says he will not play. A little bit of a contradiction."

Federer marked his return to grass court with victories in Stuttgart and Halle. However, his run to ninth Wimbledon title was cut short by a resilient Kevin Anderson in the quarterfinals. Later, he opted out of the Rogers Cup as well citing strategy to maintain longevity on the court. But he insisted that he is not running out of Nadal.

For me, it's about something more than clashes with Nadal: it means health and tennis enjoyment. The main goal is to win titles: that's why numbers and records are secondary', Federer clarified in an interview with Blick.

“It depends a lot also on what numbers. It’s very special to be there personally in the history of my favourite sport. As a kid, I would never think that I would be in the book’s records. The goal was to be the best as possible, hoping to be on the biggest stages of the world, maybe meeting my idol."

“And yes, lifting a trophy on the air. But not to reach those numbers! That was (in) someway impossible for me. That’s why my joy in tennis is still so big. Because inside, I always stayed on the ground, I know it: it’s not normal, it’s not reality. But I accept it and I take it as a challenge to defend my titles or lift some trophies.”

Lol nothing to see here. If shots were fired, it’s with water guns.
 
Federer from 2000 year until now have missed 4 GS.Nadal from 2005 until now have missed 6.But you always hear complains about Federer missing few GS despite that he started missing them in 2016 when he was 34/35 years old.What about WTF - how many times Nadal missed this tournament.

Yep, Federer is a full generation older than Nadal. Nadal should be wiping the courts clean with Federer and I believe he has lost the last 5 matches they've played.

Nadal got a wave of help from the introduction of ball bashing rackets like APD and ball control and spin strings like co-poly. Nadal also benefited from the ATP slowly the courts down to move away from "servefest" tennis. If not for the changes in the game, Nadal would have only won on clay just like all the other clay court specialist before him.
 
Fed reached Rafa 4 times in 2013, his worst ever year (post 2001) including a Rome final.

Where the hell was Rafa in his poor 2015 year vs resurgent Fed? Losing to Brown, Lopez, and Fognini and avoiding almost certain losses to in form Fed.

Fed is the absolute last person you can accuse of dodging.

Nadal at least entered all tournaments possible, and took his beating in 2015. Fed still picks and chooses the ones he has the best chance to do damage and not be humiliated in.
 
Nadal at least entered all tournaments possible, and took his beating in 2015. Fed still picks and chooses the ones he has the best chance to do damage and not be humiliated in.

So......
In Indian wells, Miami, 35/36 year old fed has best chance to do damage against nadul???????????
Idiocracy of nadal fans....
Nadal failed to reach fed enough times when he was a totally bullsheet
 
Nadal at least entered all tournaments possible, and took his beating in 2015. Fed still picks and chooses the ones he has the best chance to do damage and not be humiliated in.
Meh same end result. I’ll give Fed a pass considering he played a full season up to age 34/35.
 
Nadal fans perhaps need to look no further than Berdych's Twitter feed from earlier this year. Note in particular the part about being 32 years old and not being able to compete any more "without proper rest."

Let's also reflect that aside from the AO, Nadal has not participated in or played one single HC event in 2018.
Yet they call out Fed for skipping events?

Berdych's Tweet:
DVxem6qXUAE8og1.jpg
 
Yeh cos Berdych is the finest example as hes a multiple GS champion too :rolleyes:

PS theres a difference between being injured/ recovering from injury, therefore withdrawing from tournaments, compared to just admitting you don't want to play the clay season because you fancy Wimbledon being fresh.
Pretty funny how it never worked out for him in the end :p
 
Nonsense from a nonsense Tennis site written by a poorly programmed Bot using the Chinese knockoff English grammar module.

“Nadal-Federer rivalry is the most anticipated match on a tennis court, whatever be at stake”

Yeh, whatever be at stake.
 
Last edited:
Yeh cos Berdych is the finest example as hes a multiple GS champion too :rolleyes:

PS theres a difference between being injured/ recovering from injury, therefore withdrawing from tournaments, compared to just admitting you don't want to play the clay season because you fancy Wimbledon being fresh.
Pretty funny how it never worked out for him in the end :p
Berdych has always been one of the biggest hitters on tour and he’s actually quite fit, despite not winning a slam he is a great example. Federer obviously skips clay because his body isn’t at the age of 25-30 when he can play clay with no problems. Clay isn’t exactly a test of tennis skills, it’s a test of who hits harder and who has the most on court endurance. Federer has never had the best endurance compared to some fitness machines like Djokovic Nadal and Dimitrov, so how can he compete a BO5 clay match at the age of 36? Simple, it’s impossible. That’s why he skips it.
 
Berdych has always been one of the biggest hitters on tour and he’s actually quite fit, despite not winning a slam he is a great example. Federer obviously skips clay because his body isn’t at the age of 25-30 when he can play clay with no problems. Clay isn’t exactly a test of tennis skills, it’s a test of who hits harder and who has the most on court endurance. Federer has never had the best endurance compared to some fitness machines like Djokovic Nadal and Dimitrov, so how can he compete a BO5 clay match at the age of 36? Simple, it’s impossible. That’s why he skips it.

So it doesn't matter about tennis ability on clay? Only fitness ? LOL
May as well put Mo Farah in there then, im sure he'd win RG no problem.
 
Federer played in every single slam for 16 straight years.

He's the iron man of tennis.
15 stragth years, not 16. Federer participated since 2000 to 2015 in all GS, but in 2016 he already skipped both Roland Garros and the US Open.

In fact, Feliciano López is the only man who has participated in all GS during 16 consecutive years (since RG 2002 to RG 2018, Feliciano skipped 0 GS).
 
Yeh cos Berdych is the finest example as hes a multiple GS champion too :rolleyes:

PS theres a difference between being injured/ recovering from injury, therefore withdrawing from tournaments, compared to just admitting you don't want to play the clay season because you fancy Wimbledon being fresh.
Pretty funny how it never worked out for him in the end :p
How about Rafa not playing IW and Miami but being miraculously recovered for clay season to play like a beast.
 
15 stragth years, not 16. Federer participated since 2000 to 2015 in all GS, but in 2016 he already skipped both Roland Garros and the US Open.

In fact, Feliciano López is the only man who has participated in all GS during 16 consecutive years (since RG 2002 to RG 2018, Feliciano skipped 0 GS).

That's.. uh.. 16 years.. You forgot to count year 2000. :oops:

And what @True Fanerer said below. ;)
He played in 65 straight GS which is equivalent 16 years worth of slams +1.
 
They both played Canada last year and Rafa lost to a teenager. And Rafa hasn't even played Toronto since 2010.

Even if Roger was scared of facing Nadal, this wouldn't be the tournament to skip.
 
Nadal at least entered all tournaments possible, and took his beating in 2015. Fed still picks and chooses the ones he has the best chance to do damage and not be humiliated in.

When Nadal is as old as Federer, he will be playing zero tournaments and you are faulting Federer for playing a reduced schedule at 35-36 years old. Look up how many more ATP matches Federer has played vs Nadal.
 
How about Rafa not playing IW and Miami but being miraculously recovered for clay season to play like a beast.

Well Nadal never claimed he was skipping IW and Miami to be fresh for the clay season. I think being cautious with an injury is probably smart at his age.
Federer clearly could've played a clay Masters and RG if he wanted to. There is a difference.
 
When Nadal is as old as Federer, he will be playing zero tournaments and you are faulting Federer for playing a reduced schedule at 35-36 years old. Look up how many more ATP matches Federer has played vs Nadal.

Im not faulting anyone for their decisions. Its the smart thing to do for any player. But if 'shots are fired' about Nadals decisions to skip a few HC matches as an injury precaution and him being slated for it, then its only fair that someone else gets slated for skipping tournaments cos they don't like the surface.

Actually Fed has only played a few hundred matches more, and like you said , Nadal has 5 more years to add to his total also.
Id say all things considered neither has done anything significantly less than the other in terms of matches played.
 
Well Nadal never claimed he was skipping IW and Miami to be fresh for the clay season. I think being cautious with an injury is probably smart at his age.
Federer clearly could've played a clay Masters and RG if he wanted to. There is a difference.

That’s my point. Rafa claimed injury but had a miraculous recovery for the clay and D.C. Just a few days after Miami, he was playing like a beast in DC. Roger said out right that he was skipping clay to focus on other surfaces. Maybe Rafa really was that injured that he couldn’t play IW and Miami and maybe not. It seems a little suspicious to me that as soon as he sees red clay under his feet he is running after everything like nothing was ever wrong.
 
Im not faulting anyone for their decisions. Its the smart thing to do for any player. But if 'shots are fired' about Nadals decisions to skip a few HC matches as an injury precaution and him being slated for it, then its only fair that someone else gets slated for skipping tournaments cos they don't like the surface.

Actually Fed has only played a few hundred matches more, and like you said , Nadal has 5 more years to add to his total also.
Id say all things considered neither has done anything significantly less than the other in terms of matches played.

A "few hundred matches" in your mid-30s is very substantial. Also, Federer has played as or more consistently than any player in the open era. He has had very few withdrawals once a tournament starts, has rarely missed time due to injury and very rarely withdrew before a tournament started due to exhaustion.
 
Yet Fedr fanatics kept saying back around 2012 that Nadal at 30+ would be a broken down player and retiring.
yea, well I think in Nadal's case, it will happen a bit more quickly. Once he loses just a little bit of footwork, he will drop fast because he cannot depending on his serve or attacking from inside the court. Djokovic can serve a bit bigger and he can take the ball earlier than Nadal.
 
Yep, Federer is a full generation older than Nadal. Nadal should be wiping the courts clean with Federer and I believe he has lost the last 5 matches they've played.

Federer should have wiped the floor with Nadal when he was in his JesusFed peak and Nadal wasn't in his own, instead Nadal beat him quite regularly, so it goes both ways. Nadal himself is past prime now. Also Federer has lost 5 matches in a row to Nadal 3 times.
 
Nonsense from a nonsense Tennis site written by a poorly programmed Bot using the Chinese knockoff English grammar module.

“Nadal-Federer rivalry is the most anticipated match on a tennis court, whatever be at stake”

Yeh, whatever be at stake.
You be right :D
 
Back
Top