FEDAL-Try to be Objective

abmk

Bionic Poster
Says the person who has Federer in his profile pic and swears to people who don't rate Fed's opponents highly :-D
LOL, so trollLew has nothing on this part. :-D :-D :-D :-D
Why do you come back again and again to be schooled?

Fed played cr*p in RG 08 final. And so did Nadal in AO 19 final.
Roddick played great in Wim 04 and Wim 09 final

I also put Thiem of RG 2019 as 6.5/10 - above Fed of RG 08 final and Nadal of AO 19 final
Similarly for Thiem of AO 2020 final - 7/10 - above Fed of RG 08 final and Nadal of AO 19 final

I also put Roddick of Wim 05 final as 5/10.

It has nothing specific to do with Roddick.
To address your point, I have the profile pic of my favorite player. So? Burns you? Too bad, apply some burnol.

I only criticize badly when someone is spewing BS propaganda or so wrong that its so far out of the zone of reality.
I don't criticize someone for saying Roddick did not play well in WIm 05 or Hewitt in USO 04 final - because they didn't.

This applies not only to fed, but in general. If someone says djokovic played well in RG 2020 final, I'll call that out too.

Considering you don't watch sh*t and only sit&cherrypick stats that favor your agenda, its rich coming a hack like you.
 
LOL you seriously gave Roddick a 9.5 and a 9 rating, and to Federer and Nadal a 3.5 and a 4.5 rating...
I assume they based it on their interpretation of the respective players' performances and not their names. You should try it sometime.

Oh and thanks @abmk for digging up this turd of a thread... Just LOL at Gore passive-aggressively pretending to be impartial and 'objective', whilst emphasizing in brackets exclusively <22yo and >29yo opponent ages for Fed and exclusively >22yo and <30yo opponent ages for Nadal. Absolutely shagged effort.
 

RS

Legend
Nadal wins

RG 05 Puerta - 7/10
RG 06 Federer - 8/10
RG 07 Federer - 8/10
RG 08 Federer - 4.5/10
Wim 08 Federer - 9.25/10
AO 09 Federer - 9/10
RG 10 Soderling - 6/10
Wim 10 Berdych - 5/10
USO 10 Djokovic - 7.5/10
RG 11 Federer - 7.5/10
RG 12 Djokovic - 8/10
RG 13 Ferrer - 5/10
USO 13 Djokovic - 6.5/10
RG 14 Djokovic - 7/10
RG 17 Wawrinka - 4.5/10
USO 17 Anderson - 4.5/10
RG 18 Thiem - 5/10
RG 19 Thiem - 6.5/10
USO 19 Medvedev - 7.5/10
RG 20 Djokovic - 5/10

Nadal losses

Wim 06 Federer - 10/10
Wim 07 Federer - 9.5/10
Wim 11 Djokovic - 9/10
USO 11 Djokovic - 9/10
AO 12 Djokovic - 9.25/10
AO 14 Wawrinka - 8.5/10
AO 17 Federer - 8.75/10
AO 19 Djokovic - 10/10


Federer wins

Wim 03 Scud - 5.5/10
AO 04 Safin - 5/10
Wim 04 Roddick - 8.5/10
USO 04 Hewitt - 4.5/10
Wim 05 Roddick - 5/10
USO 05 Agassi - 7/10
AO 06 Baggy - 5.5/10
Wim 06 Nadal - 7.5/10
USO 06 Roddick - 7/10
AO 07 Gonzalez - 6.5/10
Wim 07 Nadal - 9.25/10
USO 07 Djokovic - 6.5/10
USO 08 Murray - 4/10
RG 09 Soderling - 5.5/10
Wim 09 Roddick - 9/10
AO 10 Murray - 6/10
Wim 12 Murray - 8/10
AO 17 Nadal - 8/10
Wim 17 Cllic - 2.5/10
AO 18 Cllic - 6.5/10

Federer losses

RG 06 Nadal - 9.25/10
RG 07 Nadal - 10/10
RG 08 Nadal - 11/10
Wim 08 Nadal - 9.5/10
AO 09 Nadal - 9.25/10
USO 09 Del Potro - 8/10
RG 11 Nadal - 9/10
Wim 14 Djokovic - 9/10
Wim 15 Djokovic - 9.5/10
USO 15 Djokovic - 8.5/10
Wim 19 Djokovic - 7.5/10

Djokovic wins

AO 08 Tsonga - 8/10
AO 11 Murray - 4.5/10
Wim 11 Nadal - 7/10
USO 11 Nadal - 7/10
AO 12 Nadal - 9/10
AO 13 Murray - 7.5/10
Wim 14 Federer - 8.5/10
AO 15 Murray - 7/10
Wim 15 Federer - 8/10
USO 15 Federer - 8/10
AO 16 Murray - 5.5/10
RG 16 Murray - 5/10
Wim 18 Anderson - 3.5/10
USO 18 Del Potro - 6/10
AO 19 Nadal - 4.5/10
Wim 19 Federer - 8/10
AO 20 - Thiem 7/10

Djokovic losses

USO 07 Federer - 8.5/10
USO 10 Nadal - 9.5/10
RG 12 Nadal - 9.5/10
USO 12 Murray - 8/10
Wim 13 Murray - 7.5/10
USO 13 Nadal - 9/10
RG 14 Nadal - 9/10
RG 15 Wawrinka - 8.5/10
USO 16 Wawrinka - 7.5/10
RG 20 Nadal - 9.25/10

Just for the fun of it.
 
Last edited:

Lew II

Legend
says the person who is cherry picking numbers and creates random metrics that would promote the results of one player and demote the results of another 2 players
so the ATP ranking for example is a ''random metric'' that is on par with rating players on a personal scale? :unsure:
 

BackhandDTL

Professional
If prime Fed is that weak of an opponent for Nadal at RG then that undermines his “versatility.”

if people are giving RG 08 a 1/2 out of 10 then Fed is merely a 2 surface player and is nowhere near GOAT status.

Whereas in W 06-08 he was a tough opponent and obviously prime v prime on HC slams Nadal wipes the floor with Fed.
 

RS

Legend
If prime Fed is that weak of an opponent for Nadal at RG then that undermines his “versatility.”

if people are giving RG 08 a 1/2 out of 10 then Fed is merely a 2 surface player and is nowhere near GOAT status.

Whereas in W 06-08 he was a tough opponent and obviously prime v prime on HC slams Nadal wipes the floor with Fed.
What do you think ?
 
Last edited:
Top