UnderratedSlam
G.O.A.T.
Or at least the who's-best-HC-player-of-this-era debate. Coz GOATs don't exist in tennis.
To be honest, I just thought it'd be fun to compare the stats post-AO20, I'm not that bothered about who is "the best" on HC.
Slams:
Novak 11
Federer 11
Novak - AO/USO: 8/3
Federer - AO/USO: 6/5
Slam finales:
Novak 16
Federer 14
M1000s:
Novak 25
Federer 22
WTF:
Novak 5
Federer 6
Olympics:
Novak 0
Federer 0
(MurrayGOAT)
All HC titles:
Federer 71
Djokovic 59
H2H in HC slams:
7-4 for Djokovic
H2H in all HC events:
20-18 for Djokovic
Not included are winning %s because I find them fairly irrelevant next to these key facts.
My conclusion: A very clear tie between them. Only a slight edge for Djokovic but not enough to claim that he is the no 1 HC player of this century.
For this to occur he needs to win at least 2 slams more on HC than Federer does. Ditto Federer. A 12-11 edge wouldn't be enough. (And anyway, doesn't tennis require a 2-point/game difference in nearly everything?)
To be honest, I just thought it'd be fun to compare the stats post-AO20, I'm not that bothered about who is "the best" on HC.
Slams:
Novak 11
Federer 11
Novak - AO/USO: 8/3
Federer - AO/USO: 6/5
Slam finales:
Novak 16
Federer 14
M1000s:
Novak 25
Federer 22
WTF:
Novak 5
Federer 6
Olympics:
Novak 0
Federer 0
(MurrayGOAT)
All HC titles:
Federer 71
Djokovic 59
H2H in HC slams:
7-4 for Djokovic
H2H in all HC events:
20-18 for Djokovic
Not included are winning %s because I find them fairly irrelevant next to these key facts.
My conclusion: A very clear tie between them. Only a slight edge for Djokovic but not enough to claim that he is the no 1 HC player of this century.
For this to occur he needs to win at least 2 slams more on HC than Federer does. Ditto Federer. A 12-11 edge wouldn't be enough. (And anyway, doesn't tennis require a 2-point/game difference in nearly everything?)
Last edited: