Federer Has Three Seasons with Higher Winning Percentage Than Djokovic

McEnroeisanartist

Hall of Fame
After Novak's **** poor performance in the ATP Tour Finals, did anyone else notice that Federer has had three seasons with a higher winning percentage than Novak Djokovic's 2011 season.
 
Yup, I did and I posted that on a few novak threads that were trending his success. Everybody made a huge deal about this year (69-4) but they failed to take any real notice when fed won 81-4 in 2005, and was 92-5 in 2006. In fact after 2006 nobody even whispered his win percentage that year, but I felt like it was broadcasted everywhere what an anomalical event novak's year was. And in those two years fed did this 3 out of 4 majors won in two consecutive years. Yet we have some people posting some idiot like Pat Cash ALREADY deeming novak as the Greatest of All Time.

One thing I've learned about people on the internet. They have a short memory and just like in high school, they are addicted to trends.

Novak had a great year, what he did was really impressive, especially what he did to nadal, but that was more of a matchup and you can't base that and one good year with the culmination of what federer has done winning 16 gs on every surface and forget about that. Especially now, since he's won over 800 + career wins.
 
No one in tennis history has won "the finals" 6 times but Federer. Consistency over tennis career separates the wheat from the chaff. Federer is the best!
 
Yup, I did and I posted that on a few novak threads that were trending his success. Everybody made a huge deal about this year (69-4) but they failed to take any real notice when fed won 81-4 in 2005, and was 92-5 in 2006. In fact after 2006 nobody even whispered his win percentage that year, but I felt like it was broadcasted everywhere what an anomalical event novak's year was. And in those two years fed did this 3 out of 4 majors won in two consecutive years. Yet we have some people posting some idiot like Pat Cash ALREADY deeming novak as the Greatest of All Time.

One thing I've learned about people on the internet. They have a short memory and just like in high school, they are addicted to trends.

Novak had a great year, what he did was really impressive, especially what he did to nadal, but that was more of a matchup and you can't base that and one good year with the culmination of what federer has done winning 16 gs on every surface and forget about that. Especially now, since he's won over 800 + career wins.

Novaks unbeaten run up until the FO got alot of press because he was undefeated and chasing the longest ever win streak and start to the year. The fact he was tooling the seemingly dominant Nadal on all surfaces only added to the hype.

Shame hes been injured and playing like crap since the USO.
 
Nole had a great year, what he did was really impressive, especially what he did to Federer. What he did to Nadal was not big surprise.
69 matches-20% ageins top 5 players.
5 wins against top ranking player
4 wins against second ranking player
1 win against ATP No.3
1 win against ATP No.4
2 wins against ATP No.5

6:0 against Nadal
4:1 against Federer
2:1 against Murray

12:2 against top 4 at the end of the year.
Sometimes quality matter!

This is about one season, has nothing to do with carrier achievements, number of slams, style of play, or who have longer hair.
Regarding statistic, and numbers, Federer has three seasons with a higher winning percentage than Novak Djokovic's 2011 season.
 
Back
Top