Federer : Im playing the best tennis of my life and I'm still not the best player eve

Wimbledon 2012: I'm not greatest player - Roger Federer

Roger Federer says he does not feel like the greatest player ever despite winning his seventh Wimbledon title.

The Swiss beat Britain's Andy Murray to capture a record 17th Grand Slam triumph - his first since January 2010.

But he said the modern era meant players were under more pressure to chase records.

"I don't feel better than anyone, because we need past champions to pave the way for our generation and we have become very professional," he said.

"They have led the way and inspired myself and other players to chase the big records out there.

"Back in the day they weren't doing that, they were just playing to play tennis. Things have changed dramatically with the press reminding us 'you should do this and win that and you'll be considered the greatest of all time'.

"And anyway I don't think you can compare different eras in tennis."

Victory means Federer has emulated Pete Sampras and William Renshaw by capturing seven men's singles titles at the All England Club.

And it took the 30-year-old back to the top of the world rankings, defying critics who had suggested he was past his best.

"I knew how close I was for the last few years but some people didn't quite see that," he said.

"I think the belief got me to victory today, and almost two other ones in the last couple of years as well."

Federer had endured a 30-month wait for his 17th Grand Slam title, having last won a major at the 2010 Australian Open, where he beat Murray in straight sets.

"I think it was a time where I just had to believe that things were going to turn around for me," he said.

"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

Last year's showing at the All England Club was a low point for Federer, going out in the quarter-finals to Frenchman Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.

Murray, having had a shot at sporting immortality, will be haunted by this one for a while. But while it will be of little comfort to him now, another rather different battle might finally have been won.

But he admitted his winning return, and record-equalling seventh SW19 triumph, had come as a relief.

"When it all happened I was just so happy that it was all over and that the pressure was gone, basically," he said.

"I guess that came due to the tough loss I had here last year. There were a couple of tough moments for me over the last couple years."

And Federer had words of comfort for his beaten opponent Murray, who is still striving for an elusive first Grand Slam title despite reaching four finals.

"I really do believe he will win Grand Slams, not just one," he said.

"I do wish him all the best. This is genuine. He works extremely hard. He's as professional as you can be.

"Things just didn't quite turn out for him in the finals liked he hoped for. But today I'm sure he got another step closer to a Grand Slam title."


Federer's winning moment and reaction
 
Wimbledon 2012: I'm not greatest player - Roger Federer

Roger Federer says he does not feel like the greatest player ever despite winning his seventh Wimbledon title.

The Swiss beat Britain's Andy Murray to capture a record 17th Grand Slam triumph - his first since January 2010.

But he said the modern era meant players were under more pressure to chase records.

"I don't feel better than anyone, because we need past champions to pave the way for our generation and we have become very professional," he said.

"They have led the way and inspired myself and other players to chase the big records out there.

"Back in the day they weren't doing that, they were just playing to play tennis. Things have changed dramatically with the press reminding us 'you should do this and win that and you'll be considered the greatest of all time'.

"And anyway I don't think you can compare different eras in tennis."

Victory means Federer has emulated Pete Sampras and William Renshaw by capturing seven men's singles titles at the All England Club.

And it took the 30-year-old back to the top of the world rankings, defying critics who had suggested he was past his best.

"I knew how close I was for the last few years but some people didn't quite see that," he said.

"I think the belief got me to victory today, and almost two other ones in the last couple of years as well."

Federer had endured a 30-month wait for his 17th Grand Slam title, having last won a major at the 2010 Australian Open, where he beat Murray in straight sets.

"I think it was a time where I just had to believe that things were going to turn around for me," he said.

"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

Last year's showing at the All England Club was a low point for Federer, going out in the quarter-finals to Frenchman Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.

Murray, having had a shot at sporting immortality, will be haunted by this one for a while. But while it will be of little comfort to him now, another rather different battle might finally have been won.

But he admitted his winning return, and record-equalling seventh SW19 triumph, had come as a relief.

"When it all happened I was just so happy that it was all over and that the pressure was gone, basically," he said.

"I guess that came due to the tough loss I had here last year. There were a couple of tough moments for me over the last couple years."

And Federer had words of comfort for his beaten opponent Murray, who is still striving for an elusive first Grand Slam title despite reaching four finals.

"I really do believe he will win Grand Slams, not just one," he said.

"I do wish him all the best. This is genuine. He works extremely hard. He's as professional as you can be.

"Things just didn't quite turn out for him in the finals liked he hoped for. But today I'm sure he got another step closer to a Grand Slam title."


Federer's winning moment and reaction

But he did say that he feels the best of maybe last 10 years.
 
What are you trying to prove with this amount of useless threads?

"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

Why does this anger you? All I did was post an article.......did I give an opinion?

Did I say even one word?

It's amazing how simply printing an article causes this much anger?
 
I loved the Dark Knight Rises, but I loved The Avengers even more. It was more Federer-like style :)

New batman is so overrated. What were his rivals? Joker? I mean he owned him before so he is a mental midget and we know he folds against Bruce anytime. And some guy with two faces who was only 50% all the time.

The old batman had Mr. Freeze and the Riddler at the same time. He had the Catwoman (has 9 lives)and that penguin guy. And he was also handicapped babysitting Robin all the time. Mr. Freeze the ex terminator is way more impressive than anything new Batman has to deal with.

So wins from the old Batman are way more impressive. Dark Knight stats are inflated.
 
New batman is so overrated. What were his rivals? Joker? I mean he owned him before so he is a mental midget and we know he folds against Bruce anytime.  And some guy with two faces who was only 50% all the time. 




The old batman had Mr. Freeze and the Riddler at the same time. He had the Catwoman (has 9 lives)and that penguin guy. And he was also handicapped babysitting Robin all the time. Mr. Freeze the ex terminator is way more impressive than anything new Batman has to deal with.




So wins from the old Batman are way more impressive. Dark Knight stats are inflated.


Again......shows how crazy you guys are.....

Now simply quoting and article without even saying a world drives you

"batty"......hence the name Dark Knight is perfect. :-)

We both drive villains crazy.....

Which you are....your hypersensitivity knows no bounds.

(Jg....that was funny though . Have to admit ).
 
Yes, Federer plays good matches still. But he doesn't do it nearly as consistently as before. He has declined a lot. He used to play 90 insanely high-level matches a year. Now maybe he will play 10.
 
Yes, Federer plays good matches still. But he doesn't do it nearly as consistently as before. He has declined a lot. He used to play 90 insanely high-level matches a year. Now maybe he will play 10.

Fed 2012 :"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

It's from the horses mouth. You disagree with the man himself?
 
Fed 2012 :"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

It's from the horses mouth. You disagree with the man himself?

There's no contradiction between what I said and the Federer quote. You're trying to contrive a controversy over nothing.
 
Federer : ""I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."


Do you disagree with Federer? Are you Fed haters?

Do you disagree with Nadal when he says Fed's the best in history? Are you a Nadal hater?

Regardless, if you knew anything about tennis before Nadal you'd realize that great players (in any sport) rarely admit they're past their best, Sampras was saying 2002 Pete would beat 1995 Pete easily, Agassi thought he was playing his best tennis in 2004 and 2005 etc. It's important for their mental composure for them to believe they still have it.

Heck, since you bring up boxing so much, Ali was saying he was better than ever before the match in which he regained the title last time in 1978 and the guy was barely able to speak coherently anymore because of Parkinson.
 
There's no contradiction between what I said and the Federer quote. You're trying to contrive a controversy over nothing.

Fed said:

"I think I'm playing some of the best tennis of my life right now."

You said he is not as consistent.

You don't see a contradiction?
 
Do you disagree with Nadal when he says Fed's the best in history? Are you a Nadal hater?

Regardless, if you knew anything about tennis before Nadal you'd realize that great players (in any sport) rarely admit they're past their best, Sampras was saying 2002 Pete would beat 1995 Pete easily, Agassi thought he was playing his best tennis in 2004 and 2005 etc. It's important for their mental composure for them to believe they still have it.

Heck, since you bring up boxing so much, Ali was saying he was better than ever before the match in which he regained the title last time in 1978 and the guy was barely able to speak coherently anymore because of Parkinson.

Don't know about Ali saying that but the man had Parkinson's.....obviously he was not rational.

Are you saying Fed is not rational? Bit of a difference .....Fed won Wimbledon and was #1 in the world.

Maybe Roger Federer is right ? Maybe he is playing the best tennis of his life and that exposes the fact that the competition is tougher today.

That is what really upsets you.

I would like to note that all I have done here is simply print an article. I have not once stated my opinion.
 
Do you disagree with Nadal when he says Fed's the best in history? Are you a Nadal hater?

Regardless, if you knew anything about tennis before Nadal you'd realize that great players (in any sport) rarely admit they're past their best, Sampras was saying 2002 Pete would beat 1995 Pete easily, Agassi thought he was playing his best tennis in 2004 and 2005 etc. It's important for their mental composure for them to believe they still have it.

Heck, since you bring up boxing so much, Ali was saying he was better than ever before the match in which he regained the title last time in 1978 and the guy was barely able to speak coherently anymore because of Parkinson.

The thing is Fed was right and wrong at the same time. Yes his game improved, his tactics, serve, to compensate for speed.

But overall his game declined. Skills don't help so much if you can't reach the ball. And today footwork is the most important part. Also fitness.
Fed is in god mode for some matches. But his form fluctuates a lot more.
And he doesn't recover or heal as fast.

But also the field is improving because of evolution a little. Young people also have more motivation and drive.

So it's not one or the other, there is a combination of many things.
 
The thing is Fed was right and wrong at the same time. Yes his game improved, his tactics, serve, to compensate for speed.

But overall his game declined. Skills don't help so much if you can't reach the ball. And today footwork is the most important part. Also fitness.
Fed is in god mode for some matches. But his form fluctuates a lot more.
And he doesn't recover or heal as fast.

But also the field is improving because of evolution a little. Young people also have more motivation and drive.

So it's not one or the other, there is a combination of many things.

That's a fair statement.

Don't know if I agree.....

But it's a fair statement
 
Don't know about Ali saying that but the man had Parkinson's.....obviously he was not rational.

Nah, he was rational, he had trouble speaking, with motor functions etc. but his mind was sharp, heck it was sharp in an interview he conducted merely few years ago.

Are you saying Fed is not rational? Bit of a difference .....Fed won Wimbledon and was #1 in the world
No, I'm saying he's doing what other champions do when they're in the twilight of their career, trying to convince himself and others he still has it.

Maybe Roger Federer is right ? Maybe he is playing the best tennis of his life and that exposes the fact that the competition is tougher today.

That is what really upsets you..

And maybe Nadal is right, maybe Laver is right, maybe Fed is one of the best players of all time (if not the best as he is according to them), that is what really upsets you.

I would like to note that all I have done here is simply print an article. I have not once stated my opinion.

Yes, article from last year (and you didn't post the source from what I've seen), when Fed did something your idol couldn't since 2011 when Novak stopped being a boy :), reclaim #1 and win the biggest prize in tennis - Wimbledon.
 
Zagor.....

Fed won Wimbledon.....crushed joker in Wimby badly, beat Murray and was the #1 player in the world.

Maybe he is not washed up.....maybe he is a lot smarter now.....

In fact I heard a commentator say that fed is even better now on his bh as he runs around it more and hits more FH.......

Truth is the field is a lot tougher than when Ferrero was the # 1 player on the planet
 
The thing is Fed was right and wrong at the same time. Yes his game improved, his tactics, serve, to compensate for speed.

But overall his game declined. Skills don't help so much if you can't reach the ball. And today footwork is the most important part. Also fitness.
Fed is in god mode for some matches. But his form fluctuates a lot more.
And he doesn't recover or heal as fast.

Tennis is a young man's game ever since the Open Era, otherwise we'd see majority of the slams being won with people in their 30s.

Fed doesn't have springs in his legs anymore, he doesn't return serve as he did, his FH has lost it's bite, it's now merely a good shot while at the time it was one of the best ever etc.

His 1st serve maybe did improve but his 2nd serve is nowhere near as potent as it was in his best years.

TBut also the field is improving because of evolution a little. Young people also have more motivation and drive.

So it's not one or the other, there is a combination of many things.

I don't buy the evolution of the game, I never did.

My belief is that as much as conditions, equipment etc. change over time but the qualities that make one player separate himself from the pack and dominate the game are more or less the same.

In short, my opinion is that if say Laver grew up today with modern sticks he'd still be a beast regardless of his "height".
 
Last edited:
The us open was won by Sampras at I believe 30? He played against Agassi who was also 30 or over.

Agassi played a slam final against fed at 35 !
 
Zagor.....

Fed won Wimbledon.....crushed joker in Wimby badly, beat Murray and was the #1 player in the world.

Yes, that was last year.

Sampras won USO in 2002 and then he retired, Agassi played some terrific tennis in 2005 USO but next year he was done.

The difference between 25 and 26 is not the same as difference between 31 and 32, especially when we're talking about someone with Fed's mileage and who has a family already.

Maybe he is not washed up.....maybe he is a lot smarter now.....

Yeah and maybe if smarts and experience where so crucial in winning tennis matches we'd see ton of 30+ people winning slams, fact is, we don't.

In fact I heard a commentator say that fed is even better now on his bh as he runs around it more and hits more FH.......

Yeah, and what the commentator says you repeat like a parrot.

Try thinking for yourself sometime.

Truth is the field is a lot tougher than when Ferrero was the # 1 player on the planet

Yeah, or when Haas was #2 (which was basically in the same period), oh wait, the guy's in top 10 now at the age of 35.
 
Last edited:
Zagor.....

Fed won Wimbledon.....crushed joker in Wimby badly, beat Murray and was the #1 player in the world.

Maybe he is not washed up.....maybe he is a lot smarter now.....

In fact I heard a commentator say that fed is even better now on his bh as he runs around it more and hits more FH.......

Truth is the field is a lot tougher than when Ferrero was the # 1 player on the planet

But this is only average for Fed. He won only 1 slam and was nr.1 for only four months. Fed lost to Berdych even and Murray. Ne lost even vs Djokovic from 4 match points up at 2 USO semis. He lost to Tsonga now twice. You don't see the decline? Before he lost only to Nadal at RG. He is now losing to all kind of people.

At his best he was winning 3 slams a year and being nr.1 for years.
 
The us open was won by Sampras at I believe 30? He played against Agassi who was also 30 or over.

Agassi played a slam final against fed at 35 !

Yes, and you call him wheelchair Agassi, seems smarts and experience don't count when it comes to degrading Fed's competition?

Regardless, I'd never claim Agassi's best tennis came in that period no matter how much I'm biased in favour of Fed.
 
"I was ranked No.1 possibly even at 33," Agassi said.

"When I was ranked No 1 at that age, I felt better than when I was 25. I felt like I was a better player.

"Given that, I would assume that Roger probably feels like a better player because he's smarter.

"He's dealing with tougher competition. He might not win like he used to. But he himself (now) would beat himself (from back then).

"That would be a fair assumption." Andre Agassi

Now is Andre a fed hater as well? Should he be lumped in with Sampras,Mcenroe,Becker and all the other People you call Fed haters because they have a different opinion than yours?

Boy oh boy your Fed hater list is growing to include every great .
 
So apparently prime Murray > prime Federer? He is posting better results than Federer these days, and he leads the h2h...
 
Now is Andre a fed hater as well? Should he be lumped in with Sampras,Mcenroe,Becker and all the other People you call Fed haters because they have a different opinion than yours?

Boy oh boy your Fed hater list is growing to include every great .

You really don't get the contradiction here, do you? You call him "wheelchair Agassi" yet he said he felt he was the better player in that period than when he was 25.

Sampras isn't a hater, he just doesn't like seeing his records surpassed which is a normal reaction and he flips flops a lot when it comes to his opinion on Fed.

McEnroe is a bandwagon jumper and a media head and I though the same (and posted it here) at the time when he was hailing Fed as the GOAT, you see I don't take opinions of former greats as gospel when they suit my views/agenda.

Becker, I agree completely with what he said.
 
Yes, and you call him wheelchair Agassi, seems smarts and experience don't count when it comes to degrading Fed's competition?

Regardless, I'd never claim Agassi's best tennis came in that period no matter how much I'm biased in favour of Fed.

Did you see the match....he could barely walk. He had to be carried out of the FO in the first round and couldn't even play Wimbledon and he was 35

That's a bit different than 31 and winning Wimby and being the #1 player in the world.

Maybe Fed should pull a Sampras and retire at the top.....but when Sampras won the USO at 30 or so......he was still playing as great as he ever was.

How much longer he could have done that is another issue.

I agree with Agassi and Roger Federer himself.......he is playing great but the competition is just a lot tougher.

You are the ones that disagree with Roger, with Agassi and with almost every great.....somehow you all know better.
 
"I was ranked No.1 possibly even at 33," Agassi said.

"When I was ranked No 1 at that age, I felt better than when I was 25. I felt like I was a better player.

"Given that, I would assume that Roger probably feels like a better player because he's smarter.

"He's dealing with tougher competition. He might not win like he used to. But he himself (now) would beat himself (from back then).

"That would be a fair assumption." Andre Agassi

Is Agassi a fed hater and band wagoner ?
 
Did you see the match....he could barely walk. He had to be carried out of the FO in the first round and couldn't even play Wimbledon and he was 35

Yes, I saw Agassi's USO performance, unlike you I watched every match he played in that tourney.

That's a bit different than 31 and winning Wimby and being the #1 player in the world.

Actually Agassi said 33 in that quote of yours and the last time he was ranked #1 was in 2003 when he was 33, of course you have had no idea about that.

Fed beat Agassi twice in that year.

Maybe Fed should pull a Sampras and retire at the top.....but when Sampras won the USO at 30 or so......he was still playing as great as he ever was.

How much longer he could have done that is another issue.

Sampras didn't retire at the top (in 2002 after his USO win) but of course you wouldn't know that.

He was committing to playing tourneys in 2003 only to withdraw from them, that was going on until Wimbledon when he finally realized he can no longer do it.

I agree with Agassi and Roger Federer himself.......he is playing great but the competition is just a lot tougher.

And I agree with Laver and Nadal himself :lol:

Not entirely though, I consider Fed to be one of the best ever, not the best (no such thing as far as I'm concerned).

Becker is the one with whose views I agree with the most.

You are the ones that disagree with Roger, with Agassi and with almost every great.....somehow you all know better.

But you're the one that disagrees with Laver, Nadal and almost every great.

BTW. Agassi also claimed Fed is the greatest so you disagree with him as well even if you don't realize it.
 
Zagor, you can't help but lay the smackdown, can you? :)

At least find yourself a worthy challenge my friend.
 
Do you know better than Agassi?

He claims he was the better player in 2003 than when he was 25, you address him as wheelchair Agassi.

I answered this already. I swear its like a merry go round with you:


Did you see the match....he could barely walk. He had to be carried out of the FO in the first round and couldn't even play Wimbledon and he was 35

That's a bit different than 31 and winning Wimby and being the #1 player in the world.

Maybe Fed should pull a Sampras and retire at the top.....but when Sampras won the USO at 30 or so......he was still playing as great as he ever was.

How much longer he could have done that is another issue.

I agree with Agassi and Roger Federer himself.......he is playing great but the competition is just a lot tougher.

You are the ones that disagree with Roger, with Agassi and with almost every great.....somehow you all know better.
 
Is Agassi a fed hater and band wagoner ?

Look, some people say Fed is goat, some people say he is not. Some people say Laver is goat. A lot of people say different things and also change their minds.
Some people say it is impossible to compare eras, so we don't know who the goat is.

Nadal says Fed is goat. Fed says we can't tell who is goat. Laver says Fed is goat if there is such a thing. Becker says Fed is the most successful but you can't compare eras.

That means that there is no undisputed goat. But most expert usually put Laver or Fed at the top.

Until some players come and break Feds and Lavers achievements.
This is all subjective. There is no 100% right or wrong here.
 
Look, some people say Fed is goat, some people say he is not. Some people say Laver is goat. A lot of people say different things and also change their minds.
Some people say it is impossible to compare eras, so we don't know who the goat is.

Nadal says Fed is goat. Fed says we can't tell who is goat. Laver says Fed is goat if there is such a thing. Becker says Fed is the most successful but you can't compare eras.

That means that there is no undisputed goat. But most expert usually put Laver or Fed at the top.

Until some players come and break Feds and Lavers achievements.
This is all subjective. There is no 100% right or wrong here.

That's correct.....

Except to me and a growing number of people we just can't get by the fact that Nadal dominates Federer.

Does that mean Nadal is the goat....NO!!!.....but it does mean to us that Federer cannot be the Goat.
 
Did you see the match....he could barely walk. He had to be carried out of the FO in the first round and couldn't even play Wimbledon and he was 35

That's a bit different than 31 and winning Wimby and being the #1 player in the world.

Maybe Fed should pull a Sampras and retire at the top.....but when Sampras won the USO at 30 or so......he was still playing as great as he ever was.

How much longer he could have done that is another issue.

I agree with Agassi and Roger Federer himself.......he is playing great but the competition is just a lot tougher.

You are the ones that disagree with Roger, with Agassi and with almost every great.....somehow you all know better.


"When it’s all said and done, Andre Agassi believes tennis superstar Roger Federer must be ranked alongside the likes of Jack Nicklaus and Michael Jordan as one of the greatest athletes of all time."
Agassi;
“The guy has single-handedly separated himself from a world-class field year after year after year in a way that’s probably never been done"

Conveniently you kept this one away from everybody, because it hurts your 'opinion' that Fed is not the GOAT
 
I answered this already. I swear its like a merry go round with you:

Ah but you didn't answer it directly, was Agassi in 2003 wheelchair Agassi or not, because he himself says he played the best tennis of his career, are you an Agassi hater?

Fed beat Agassi twice in 2003, that's also the year that incredibly weak player (according to you) Roddick finished as #1.
 
"When it’s all said and done, Andre Agassi believes tennis superstar Roger Federer must be ranked alongside the likes of Jack Nicklaus and Michael Jordan as one of the greatest athletes of all time."
Agassi;
“The guy has single-handedly separated himself from a world-class field year after year after year in a way that’s probably never been done"

Conveniently you kept this one away from everybody, because it hurts your 'opinion' that Fed is not the GOAT

He said a lot of things.....he also said that Federer not beating Nadal is a dark cloud over Feds legacy.

Look there will be players on both sides .......neither is wrong or right

That's why you see players themselves saying contradictory things.

But I personally believe that like all tennis fans we were all sucked into a Federer illusion.

We all thought this man came from another planet because he destroyed everyone before Nadal. We didn't know that guys like Ferrero were not really that great.

The difference is that the Pros publicly anointed Fed as the goat and now they are trying to save face and politely back pedaling .

But we as fans can say it point blankly.....we were wrong .
 
Ah but you didn't answer it directly, was Agassi in 2003 wheelchair Agassi or not, because he himself says he played the best tennis of his career, are you an Agassi hater?

Fed beat Agassi twice in 2003, that's also the year that incredibly weak player (according to you) Roddick finished as #1.

Well I'm not sure......

I'm talking about the slam when he was 35 and was limping in the final, the year he had to be carried out of the FO after losing in the first round the year he missed Wimbledon .

Whatever year that was .....he was wheelchair agassi
 
Well I'm not sure......

I'm talking about the slam when he was 35 and was limping in the final, the year he had to be carried out of the FO after losing in the first round the year he missed Wimbledon .

Whatever year that was .....he was wheelchair agassi

Just one question, was Agassi playing his best Tennis in 2003? I would appreciate if you can answer with an yes or no.
 
Back
Top