"Federer is focusing on the larger picture by skipping clay"

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
Article by Steve Flink of Tennis magazine, making many sound points.

FEDERER IS FOCUSING ON THE LARGER PICTURE BY SKIPPING THE CLAY SEASON

by: STEVE FLINK | April 17, 2018

As the clay-court circuit begins in Monte Carlo this week, the central figure as always will be a Spanish dynamo with boundless competitive spirit, unmistakable brio and a lethal brand of topspin artistry named Rafael Nadal. The estimable left-hander will be looking to reassert himself after an injury-plagued season, remind season.

While Nadal will be ubiquitous in the coming weeks—a fellow from Switzerland will be far away from the center of the tennis universe.

Roger Federer will be tending to his own knitting and needs. The Swiss Maestro has wisely elected to skip the entire clay-court campaign, as he did a year ago. Why mess with a winning formula? A year ago, Federer had been dominating the game majestically, rallying from 1-3 down in the fifth set of the Australian Open final against Nadal to sweep five consecutive games for his fifth title Down Under. Buoyed by that stunning triumph after being gone from the game for six months leading up to the 2017 season, Federer sparkled. This revitalized competitor with the wide-ranging arsenal and the soaring imagination swept the hard-court Masters titles at Indian Wells and Miami. He was ruling tennis ruthlessly, comprehensively and relentlessly.

But Federer refused to allow his stirring run to cloud his judgment or collide up against his priorities. He realized that competing on the clay was a risky proposition. So he stepped aside, trained, recharged his engines, and skipped the entire 2017 clay season. That decision was demonstrably beneficial to Federer.

Still fresh yet fully prepared, Federer moved onto the lawns at the All England Club and won a record eighth Wimbledon singles crown over Marin Cilic. Over the fortnight in Great Britain, he did not drop a set. Would he have prevailed at Wimbledon if he had played a few red clay tournaments, including Roland Garros? I have my doubts.

What too many people forget is that in 2016, after having knee surgery, Federer rushed his return to the game. In his first tournament back, he bowed out in the quarterfinals of Monte Carlo, and lost in Rome in the round of 16. By then, his body was ailing. His knee remained vulnerable. His back was problematic.

Knowing what he was confronting, Federer bypassed Roland Garros, which was surely a painful experience for a fellow who had done himself proud at the world’s premier clay-court tournament. He had appeared at Roland Garros for 17 years in a row, from 1999-2015.

I believe that missing Roland Garros in 2017 was not troubling to Federer. This year, it was almost inevitable that he would again stay away from the clay and gear himself up mentally and physically for an all out bid to defend his Wimbledon title. He did not find the upper level of his game at Indian Wells and Miami this spring, losing to Del Potro in the Indian Wells final despite serving for the title and having three match points in the final set of a blockbuster clash. Federer was subsequently beaten by Kokkinakis in Miami.

Those losses conceivably could have made Federer more inclined to be out there on the dirt right now. But, in my view, he surely realized that he can’t afford the wear and tear of clay-court tennis any longer. He will be 37 in August, and he is well aware that he has to pick his spots carefully, protect his body sedulously, and not do anything that might cause his knee to act up or his back to become burdensome.

There is a part of Federer that would have relished performing on the red clay in places like Monte Carlo, Rome, Madrid and, especially, at Roland Garros once more. He would undoubtedly have enjoyed displaying his shotmaking genius for the Parisian audiences, and they would have welcomed him back wholeheartedly after his absence the last three years.

Federer, however, was not going to make merely a sentimental journey back to Paris; the only reason to go there would be to achieve nothing less than a second title. Deep down, he had to wonder if he could topple Nadal in Court Philippe Chatrier, potentially in another final. Despite sweeping his last five encounters with the Spaniard, he knew full well how difficult it would have been to defeat his revered rival in a best of five-set showdown on clay. That is a feat Federer has never realized.

Frankly, though, I don’t believe Federer was preoccupied with the challenge of facing Nadal when he evaluated whether or not he would appear on the clay this season. He was looking at the larger picture, determining what was best for himself in terms of preserving energy for the rest of this year and beyond, and figuring out what would make the most sense in terms of capturing more majors.

My feeling is that he will be every bit as big a favorite at Wimbledon as he was a year ago. Now that there is a three-week stretch between the end of Roland Garros and the start of Wimbledon, Federer gets the essential preparation he must have to be in peak form for the most prestigious tournament in tennis. His foremost rivals will be enduring a difficulty surface change from clay to grass, but Federer can start his grass court practice sessions sooner and be ahead of the game in adapting to the lawns.

Federer is far and away the most natural grass-court player in the game today. He will always find his range and his footing on those courts, surely and swiftly, efficiently and elegantly. The cast of players who stand a realistic chance of overcoming Federer on grass courts is exceedingly limited. His propensity to sweep through the first four rounds of Wimbledon without the loss of a set is unquestionable. If he can manage a typically smooth excursion through the early rounds, Federer will save his best brand of tennis for the homestretch of the tournament. I fully expect him to do that this year at a venue that means more to him than any other.

A Wimbledon triumph would carry Federer into the summer in good stead, as was the case last year. But, in 2017, Federer was physically compromised in Montreal by an ailing back on the hard courts. In his final-round loss to Alexander Zverev, he was a shell of his normal self. His injury lingered into the US Open, eventually he was beaten by del Potro. He finished the season reasonably well in the autumn, raising his record for the year against Nadal to 4-0, winning their Shanghai final comfortably in straight sets. He also took the title in Basel over Del Potro, but seemed slightly out of sorts when he was beaten in the semifinals of the season-ending Nitto ATP Finals by a top-of-the-line David Gofffin.

So the evidence is clear: Federer remained magnificent in the second half of 2017, but he was not as convincing as he had been during the first half. It is all about pacing and planning for the Swiss as he moves through the latter stages of an exemplary career. Even with intelligent scheduling last year, he still had the back issues that plagued him over the summer and into the autumn. Federer must proceed with a certain caution these days, and that is a fact not lost on him.

As long as he is deliberate, Federer will benefit immensely in what he accomplishes. He remains remarkably motivated, driven by a wide range of goals, propelled by private engines that have not been diminished over time. He already attained one significant goal this year by returning to No. 1 in the ATP rankings after winning Rotterdam, establishing himself as the oldest ever to reside at the top of the official rankings...

What will happen if Federer is at the height of his powers at the US Open this year? That would be fascinating. I would not be shocked if he is the victor in New York this time around. After all, this is a man who seldom sells himself short. Above all else, Roger Federer knows full well who he is, why he is still playing after capturing 20 Grand Slam championships, how he would like to arrange his priorities, and what he can still accomplish.

Federer has more than a few important triumphs ahead of him on the tennis battlefield—just not on clay, this year.

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2018/04/federer-focusing-larger-picture-skipping-clay-season/73366/
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
Of course he is.He wants to prolong his career. Skipping clay season worked the last year.About US Open - unfortunately I dont think he have much chances there.
I still wonder how so many dedicated Fed fans this year totally missed that point: prolonging his career and giving him the best chance to bag #21 on the grass. I expect Nadal and Djokovic fans to be salty about it, but not Fed fans.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
What's with the timing of this article...

Didn't the bulk of of us arrive at these conclusions... like immediately after the announcement? Many of us could have told you these things well before a formal decision was declared.

A: Fed is the only thing tennis has to sell at the moment.
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
Clay is the worst surface for your body.

The atp should do something about how many clay masters there are. Outdated surface
 

maruzo

Semi-Pro
What's with the timing of this article...

Didn't the bulk of of us arrive at these conclusions... like immediately after the announcement? Many of us could have told you these things well before a formal decision was declared.

A: Fed is the only thing tennis has to sell at the moment.

That’s a bit harsh to say, considering there’s over hundreds of professional competitors in the field.

I would agree he’s the best thing Tennis has to sell, ever, but certainly not the only player worth mentioning.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
A: Fed is the only thing tennis has to sell at the moment.

Because you say so? Typical Nadal hater. Nadal is the King of clay tennis, the current US Open champion and the #1. But of course, "Federer is the only thing tennis has to sell at the moment". You live in your own pro-Federer world. You must be delusional to think tennis fans only care about Federer.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
On point, it was the right decission. Federer NEEDS to skip some tournaments if he wants to avoids injuries at his age. Not only the clay season, but also many HC tournaments before the US Open and the WTF. Last year he played Montreal without preparation and we all know what happened.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Nadal has never faced a healthy Federer on clay

Trolling? 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2011 Federer were healthy. But I suppouse you were trolling.

According to this New York Times' article doctors said Federer was recovered from the adverse effects of mononucleosis as soon as late February. He received medical clearance to play normally the 27th of February 2008. Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/sports/07iht-arena.3.10811374.html?pagewanted=all

Federer arrived to the RG final in June (more than 3 months after the medical clearance). Federer was moving perfectly at RG 2008. He was 26 and didn't look less fast than in 2007. So he was at his peak. Nadal also absolutely destroyed Federer in the 2007 RG final and nobody put excuses.

As funny as it is a 37-year old Federer would probably be Nadal's biggest rival on clay today. Let's see what Thiem shows tomorrow.
In your dreams, Federer would not pass the QF of RG. He doesn't pass from the QF of RG since 2012. He has lost to "nobodies" on clay such as Tsonga, Kyrgios and Gulbis in the last years.

Federer would lose to Thiem, Chung or specially Goffin before facing Nadal in the final. Goffin would absolutely "murder" Federer 6-1, 6-2, 6-1 at RG.
 

AlexanderTheGreat08

Hall of Fame
He is 36 and it’s not like he can do much on Clay , He depends of his serve, When his serve fails(Goffin, Kokk matches for example) he is done, On Clay you can’t depend of your serve, Of course it will be fun to see him getting destroyed in the early rounds of every Clay event but why would he do that to himself?
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
He is 36 and it’s not like he can do much on Clay , He depends of his serve, When his serve fails(Goffin, Kokk matches for example) he is done, On Clay you can’t depend of your serve, Of course it will be fun to see him getting destroyed in the early rounds of every Clay event but why would he do that to himself?
I like your respect for Clay, in capital letters.
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
He should learn to slide. It’s never late.

When your actually sliding your putting a ton of pressure on your joints. Like when your holding the slide position.

For bouncing around, its great. Better for his back, worse for his knee's
 

Pheasant

Legend
I still wonder how so many dedicated Fed fans this year totally missed that point: prolonging his career and giving him the best chance to bag #21 on the grass. I expect Nadal and Djokovic fans to be salty about it, but not Fed fans.

I think it is because some of these Fed fans are huge gamblers. I get it. Federer has already accomplished nearly everything anyway. But he hasn’t done the most difficult thing in tennis history; which is beating Nadal at RG. Fed is intrigued by this. Heck, I would consider this the single most impressive win of Fed’s career. It would be incredible because they would have to meet in the final.

However, Federer skipping the clay season is clearly the right move. The clay season would have grinded the 36 year old into powder quickly. A best case scenario is that Fed loses in the semis. A worst case scenario is that Federer would have ended his career. Beating Nadal in the FO final is lottery ticket odds. I never wanted Fed to risk everything for a chance to win the lottery.
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
If Roger doesn't win Wimbledon then he is going to catch more hell from the press and other players then he already is. Huge mistake not to play Istanbul or Rome + RG.
Are you actually expecting him to win a second slam at almost 37 !!!!
He's lucky he won Australia. 2018 isn't going to be as "easy" as 2017.
 

SLD76

G.O.A.T.
Could you imagine if Nadal or Djokovic skipped so many tournaments ??
Not all fans take players at their word...even their favorite player. I think Federer skipping clay to prolong his career is nothing but spin.


Right
cuz a damn near 40 year old player skipping a surface that actively injured his knee just 2 years before is clearly an excuse for wanting to play longer
 

Clay lover

Legend
Federer did what was in his right to maximize his performance but I don't really agree with the rule. A part of the game is the previous generation getting older until they get to a point where they can no longer keep up with the regular schedule, and are phased out and replaced by the younger generation. If we start making exceptions for these guys, then doesn't it interfere with the whole process?

This is competitive sports, no one gets any favours no matter how long they've hung around.
 

reaper

Legend
Federer did what was in his right to maximize his performance but I don't really agree with the rule. A part of the game is the previous generation getting older until they get to a point where they can no longer keep up with the regular schedule, and are phased out and replaced by the younger generation. If we start making exceptions for these guys, then doesn't it interfere with the whole process?

This is competitive sports, no one gets any favours no matter how long they've hung around.

If the young players are only winning because the grind of the tour puts the veterans out of action they're not really winning on their merits. The best option IMO would be no mandatory tournaments for anyone....an exemption for one group but not another isn't a level playing field.
 

SLD76

G.O.A.T.
Federer did what was in his right to maximize his performance but I don't really agree with the rule. A part of the game is the previous generation getting older until they get to a point where they can no longer keep up with the regular schedule, and are phased out and replaced by the younger generation. If we start making exceptions for these guys, then doesn't it interfere with the whole process?

This is competitive sports, no one gets any favours no matter how long they've hung around.



Then blame the last two generations for not being able to push Fed out of the game


Also, if you are going to criticize Fed for skipping events then criticize Nadal for skipping multiple events and even whole chunks of the tennis calendar under the guise of injury even as he magically manages to be fully fit for clay every year

At least Fed is honest about his intentions
 
Federer did what was in his right to maximize his performance but I don't really agree with the rule. A part of the game is the previous generation getting older until they get to a point where they can no longer keep up with the regular schedule, and are phased out and replaced by the younger generation. If we start making exceptions for these guys, then doesn't it interfere with the whole process?

This is competitive sports, no one gets any favours no matter how long they've hung around.
Players get favours for representing the right countries by getting wild cards
 

Clay lover

Legend
Then blame the last two generations for not being able to push Fed out of the game


Also, if you are going to criticize Fed for skipping events then criticize Nadal for skipping multiple events and even whole chunks of the tennis calendar under the guise of injury even as he magically manages to be fully fit for clay every year

At least Fed is honest about his intentions
I'm not blaming Fed at all. Everyone does what they can to secure better results. Just don't agree with the rule.
 

Clay lover

Legend
If the young players are only winning because the grind of the tour puts the veterans out of action they're not really winning on their merits. The best option IMO would be no mandatory tournaments for anyone....an exemption for one group but not another isn't a level playing field.
So endurance isn't part of the game? People tend to glorify the technical aspect of hitting the ball but long term endurance also counts.
 

reaper

Legend
Players get favours for representing the right countries by getting wild cards

Yes, there are too many wild cards IMO. I think it's fair enough that players get wild cards in the home slam, but the reciprocation where an Australian player gets one at Roland Garros etc is ridiculous. About 5 wild cards so the home country has good representation would be about right.
 

ChrisRF

Legend
I still wonder how so many dedicated Fed fans this year totally missed that point: prolonging his career and giving him the best chance to bag #21 on the grass. I expect Nadal and Djokovic fans to be salty about it, but not Fed fans.
Because I don’t believe in those things. For me there is no proof that his career will be longer just because of skipping clay and there is also neither a proof that he won Wimbledon last year because of that nor having a better chance for Wimbledon now. The final stages of Wimbledon are 5 weeks after those at RG. Only a bad injury could matter there, not just “fatigue”.

The only proof is that he deliberately misses a chance for a Slam at RG (and also the small chance for a CYGS). Looking at the current state of the field everything is possible. Or does someone really think the likes of Thiem are unbeatable at RG? Even Nadal isn’t safe because he could have a clay season similar to 2015 or 2016 rather than 2017 (I admit that I personally don’t believe that though).

Anyway, I’m totally fine with Federer skipping the clay Masters, he could just play RG!
 

maruzo

Semi-Pro
There's no complete equality. But we can do our best to ensure maximum quality. Just because other players get favours doesn't mean this is justified.

Not “Other” players. Just older players who have played enough to qualify the exemption rule set by the ATP.

I think you are the very small minority, if not the only voice of objection, against allowing players who have played over 10 years or more on tour to decide on their own schedules.

IMO older players who played enough to qualify deserve to play the season according to their pace. They don’t owe ungrateful people like you anything at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top