"Federer is focusing on the larger picture by skipping clay"

D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Thank you!

Always interesting to see what other people are doing to maximise their efforts, and learn something along the way.

:)

You're welcome.

Keep protein constant throughout the week, the trick to get insanely shredded looking, even if you are natural, is manipulation of your carbs and fats. Remember, nutrition is 80 percent, get the kitchen in order first before you step into the gym.
 

roleaux987

New User
I think the 3 times 5-0 streaks Nadal has against Federer is a lot worse .
Federer is supposed to be the GOAT, yet was on losing streaks 3 times in his career to his nearest rival. LOL That's baaaaaddddddd :D

And i think nadals 0-2 to dustin brown, 1-2 at wimby vs mueller, his losing h2h v ferrer at HC slams to ferrer and same with blake, of course is 1-6 to davednko on HC is worse

Are you sure he is an ATG? Dustin brown? Losing to h2h vs djokovic is one thing but dustin brown at a SLAM? Mueller at a SLAM?

And no sorry if it was helping you to sleep at night but nadals 7-0 7-0 humiliation at his absolute peak is the worst humiliation any member of big four has done. No big four member has suffered such a outclassing and out playing

Id also class nadals 0-5 and counting to a 36 year old near 37 as awful too. A post surgery 37 year old! Come on!!
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
And i think nadals 0-2 to dustin brown, 1-2 at wimby vs mueller, his losing h2h v ferrer at HC slams to ferrer and same with blake, of course is 1-6 to davednko on HC is worse

Are you sure he is an ATG? Dustin brown? Losing to h2h vs djokovic is one thing but dustin brown at a SLAM? Mueller at a SLAM?

And no sorry if it was helping you to sleep at night but nadals 7-0 7-0 humiliation at his absolute peak is the worst humiliation any member of big four has done. No big four member has suffered such a outclassing and out playing

Id also class nadals 0-5 and counting to a 36 year old near 37 as pretty bad too

Nice try, but the 7-0 in 2015-16 was vulturing from Djokovic. Since y'all like to use things like that as an excuse:D. Nadal would be the same tally up on Novak if they met consistently right now.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
No, but clearly you could see from 2006 to 2007 the gap was closing. It was inevitable that eventually he would beat Fed on grass, no?
Whereas on clay Fed seemed to get worse against Nadal over time.

I mean wasn't Fed still in his supposed peak in 07 ? Yet he was mighty close to losing to a clay courter at his pet slam.
Of course, Nadal fans like you use the clay-courter excuse when it suits you. No guy with 2 Wimb finals and a bunch of masters on HC was just a clay courter. That argument should have been put to bed a long time ago.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
Of course, Nadal fans like you use the clay-courter excuse when it suits you. No guy with 2 Wimb finals and a bunch of masters on HC was just a clay courter. That argument should have been put to bed a long time ago.

But do you accept that Nadal was getting closer each year to Fed on grass? This isn't just about Nadal winning in 08. He could've also won in 07 too.
 

roleaux987

New User
Nice try, but the 7-0 in 2015-16 was vulturing from Djokovic. Since y'all like to use things like that as an excuse:D. Nadal would be the same tally up on Novak if they met consistently right now.

Nope why would nadals form just drop in his twenties like that? Its not possible. He was just made to look like a mug by djokovic. A guy in his twenties cant just slip off like that remember?

Nope h2h is what it is enough said no excuses.

If youre opening up excuses then nadal fed h2h just got destroyed too. And its to nadals discredit he doesnt have a bigger lead vs a 37 year old. Its shameful

So whats your excuse for mueller, davednko, brown etc

And no youre wrong 2011 7-0 demolition (the worst humiliation of all time by a big four player not even murray has suffered such humiliation) was nadal at his absolute very best. He cant play better. And he was outclassed, outplayed and demolished
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Interesting how the weak era would have lasted longer had Fed won a few more points in the Wimbledon final.
Exactly. All this weak era schtick is way too convenient. It could have started in 2007 is Fed had lost to Nadal/Djokovic at Wimb/USO, but Fed withstood their attacks and instead of the arrival of the strong era, 2007 remained the same weak era dominated by Roger Federer.

If Fed had won 2008 Wimb, it would have still been another weak year dominated by Roger Federer. And the weak era would have lasted until USO 2009 when the great strong era player Juan Martin Del Potro finally exposes weak era benefactor Roger Federer. And yes, I'm assuming Fed wins AO 2009 too after the Wimb 2008 victory.
 
You're welcome.

Keep protein constant throughout the week, the trick to get insanely shredded looking, even if you are natural, is manipulation of your carbs and fats. Remember, nutrition is 80 percent, get the kitchen in order first before you step into the gym.

Thankfully, this has never been a problem, as I have the comfort of choosing what I eat at all times (well, unless I am not at home, but even then it hasn't been a big issue) and the foundations for healthy eating habits were laid a long time ago by a family tradition.

I don't eat junk food and generally eat very balanced and healthy food (my biggest weakness in this regard is chocolate), but since I always eat different food and have never done fitness for anything else other than general good health and being somewhat competent in the sports of my choice, it is interesting to look into other areas that are linked to food, as is high level performance nutrition.

These days I have a bit more time on my hands, so I always play with different possibilities and looking to incorporate something new in my daily routines.

Not that I am going into bodybuilding, mind you, but maybe some small goals are a possibility.

:)
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
But do you accept that Nadal was getting closer each year to Fed on grass? This isn't just about Nadal winning in 08. He could've also won in 07 too.
Actually we have been saying this for a long time and we're glad that some of our Humbalito brethren also agree that he didn't leave his diapers behind for the first time in 2008.
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
Exactly. All this weak era schtick is way too convenient. It could have started in 2007 is Fed had lost to Nadal/Djokovic at Wimb/USO, but Fed withstood their attacks and instead of the arrival of the strong era, 2007 remained the same weak era dominated by Roger Federer.

If Fed had won 2008 Wimb, it would have still been another weak year dominated by Roger Federer. And the weak era would have lasted until USO 2009 when the great strong era player Juan Martin Del Potro finally exposes weak era benefactor Roger Federer. And yes, I'm assuming Fed wins AO 2009 too after the Wimb 2008 victory.
2003 and 04 were strong years. 05 was okey dokey. 06 was legit weak. 07 was strong again.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
Nope why would nadals form just drop in his twenties like that? Its not possible. He was just made to look like a mug by djokovic. A guy in his twenties cant just slip off like that remember?

Nope h2h is what it is enough said no excuses.

If youre opening up excuses then nadal fed h2h just got destroyed too. And its to nadals discredit he doesnt have a bigger lead vs a 37 year old. Its shameful

So whats your excuse for mueller, davednko, brown etc

And no youre wrong 2011 7-0 demolition (the worst humiliation of all time by a big four player not even murray has suffered such humiliation) was nadal at his absolute very best. He cant play better. And he was outclassed, outplayed and demolished

Even worse for Federer, it was 23-10 when he was still in his prime 4 years ago :D:D
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
Yes, I accept that.

Which is why the weak era shtick starting in 2008 is way too convenient.

In my personal opinion, the tour is weaker now than in 04-07.
Its went up and down since the so called big 4 have all been among the titles. Theres not been that often where they've all been at their best.
That would've been crazy.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Thankfully, this has never been a problem, as I have the comfort of choosing what I eat at all times (well, unless I am not at home, but even then it hasn't been a big issue) and the foundations for healthy eating habits were laid a long time ago by a family tradition.

I don't eat junk food and generally eat very balanced and healthy food (my biggest weakness in this regard is chocolate), but since I always eat different food and have never done fitness for anything else other than general good health and being somewhat competent in the sports of my choice, it is interesting to look into other areas that are linked to food, as is high level performance nutrition.

These days I have a bit more time on my hands, so I always play with different possibilities and looking to incorporate something new in my daily routines.

Not that I am going into bodybuilding, mind you, but maybe some small goals are a possibility.

:)

I live by the 5 Ps

Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance

Use that in every aspect of your life, and you will get your goals.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
In my personal opinion, the tour is weaker now than in 04-07.
Its went up and down since the so called big 4 have all been among the titles. Theres not been that often where they've all been at their best.
That would've been crazy.

Well, I think a lot of people say that despite all this strong era, weak era talk, there were only five years of it. 08-09 and 11-13.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
Well, I think a lot of people say that despite all this strong era, weak era talk, there were only five years of it. 08-09 and 11-13.

What do you personally feel was the time they were at close to their best all together? What was the strongest time?

* Puts on spot * :p
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
What do you personally feel was the time they were at close to their best all together? What was the strongest time?

* Puts on spot * :p

As we talking about the big four?

Let me make this clear first, they all peaked at different times, so I don't think they ever all met at their absolute best

But the peak of the big four competition was 2011-2012 for me. The matches during that time were insane between the four of them.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
As we talking about the big four?

Let me make this clear first, they all peaked at different times, so I don't think they ever all met at their absolute best

But the peak of the big four competition was 2011-2012 for me. The matches during that time were insane between the four of them.

Yes pretty much.
This has inspired a new thread..... LOL
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Those were fun times.

They indeed were. It will be a long time before we see something like that again, so many forces converging together.

The rise of Earth's Mightiest Warrior
Federer's return to world number one
Nadal breaking the RG record
Lendl's Murray stepping up to become a slam winner

They all delivered during that time in one way or another.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
They indeed were. It will be a long time before we see something like that again, so many forces converging together.

The rise of Earth's Mightiest Warrior
Federer's return to world number one
Nadal breaking the RG record
Lendl's Murray stepping up to become a slam winner

They all delivered during that time in one way or another.
And it must make it 10 times more fun that the Earth's Mightiest Warrior got the biggest piece of the pie during that period ;)
 

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
Nor do I buy the veneer of impartiality.

Don't. He/she is a Nadal fan first. Always has been. It always strikes me that anybody here (at least that I can remember lately) who claims to be a fan of both (like "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan") is always a Nadal fan first. It's mind boggling really.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Don't. He/she is a Nadal fan first. Always has been. It always strikes me that anybody here (at least that I can remember lately) who claims to be a fan of both (like "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan") is always a Nadal fan first. It's mind boggling really.
There's a new trend on TTW right now: hide you're a Fed hater by saying things like "I like Federer, but..." or "Federer is my favorite player, but..." and hide that you are just a Nadal fan by saying "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan".

Good thing Fed fans are honest.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
There's a new trend on TTW right now: hide you're a Fed hater by saying things like "I like Federer, but..." or "Federer is my favorite player, but..." and hide that you are just a Nadal fan by saying "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan".

Good thing Fed fans are honest.

I'm a Federer and Nadal fan, but...I am a bigger fan of Djokovic. :cool:;)
 

roleaux987

New User
Even worse for Federer, it was 23-10 when he was still in his prime 4 years ago :D:D

Im not sure what your point is. Yes nadal at one point led 23-10. He doesnt now. What exactly is your point? Federer has actually lost hundreds of matches. Karlovic double faults and gets broken, djokovic hits unforced errors, nadal gets bagelled on clay. Jordan repeatedly missed game winning shots. Baseball hall of famers screw up more than they succeed

But who won the most? Federer

And a peaking nadal just lost 5 times in a row to a 36 year old post surgery semi retired father of four. More to the point mueller, dustin brown, davedenko and ferrer and blake who have perfect HC slam records vs nadal

Trying to be as objective as possible the only really damaging h2h legacy wise i think any of the big four have is nadals 7-0 destruction to same age djokovic peak for peak.
 
Last edited:

zagor

Bionic Poster
Don't. He/she is a Nadal fan first.

Oh I don't doubt it. In general though, fandom declarations or I'm very objective declarations and such I pay very little heed to.

TTW always had more than it's fair share of BSitters, your posts will tell everything on their own, no need to declare anything.

It always strikes me that anybody here (at least that I can remember lately) who claims to be a fan of both (like "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan") is always a Nadal fan first. It's mind boggling really.

Oh yeah, almost always without mistake, lol. It has gotten to ridiculous levels but nothing you can do except occasionally call them on their nonsense. There are even longtime Nadal fans running around with a Fed "fan" accounts now (like Rusty).

There's one Fedal fan that prefered Fed (atleast that's the impression I got) but I haven't seen her post in quite a while. Very friendly and open to conversation though, nothing like your usual "Fedal" fan.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
I think I will create a new Fedal fan account and talk about how Federer is a coward, how Nadal is irrelevant on non-clay, how Wimbledon 2008 is the greatest match ever...but don't judge me, because I am fan, just like you. :cool:

You mean 2011 Wimbledon? Closely followed by 14/15 editions.

2007/2008 were overrated, the only reason they transpired in the first place was because Novak was a toddler.

Coming from a big Fedal fan who doesn't like Djokovic but has learned to grudgingly respect him, that would carry much weight.
 

Fedforever

Hall of Fame
There's one Fedal fan that prefered Fed (atleast that's the impression I got) but I haven't seen her post in quite a while. Very friendly and open to conversation though, nothing like your usual "Fedal" fan.

The trouble is these people don't actually know what a Fedal fan is. It doesn't mean you're an equal fan of both players. It means you appreciate the rivalry almost as a third person and find it interesting in some way, whether purely in tennis terms, or the psychology, or sociology or whatever. [A few people have a different aspect but we won't go into that!!].

It's good because genuine Fedal fans obviously have some appreciation for the other and it means you can have genuinely good and pleasant interactions with "the other side". But you're still either a Fed or a Nadal fan primarily.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
The trouble is these people don't actually know what a Fedal fan is. It doesn't mean you're an equal fan of both players. It means you appreciate the rivalry almost as a third person and find it interesting in some way, whether purely in tennis terms, or the psychology, or sociology or whatever. [A few people have a different aspect but we won't go into that!!].

It's good because genuine Fedal fans obviously have some appreciation for the other and it means you can have genuinely good and pleasant interactions with "the other side". But you're still either a Fed or a Nadal fan primarily.

They do, they're just being intellectually dishonest. Most of supposed TTW Fedal fans are not even neutral towards Fed, they absolutely can't stand the guy.
 

Fedforever

Hall of Fame
They do, they're just being intellectually dishonest. Most of supposed TTW Fedal fans are not even neutral towards Fed, they absolutely can't stand the guy.

Well, I like to give people the benefit of the doubt!! Anyway, they'll presumably be off enjoying this afternoon's demolition job, so I guess we'll get an hours break.
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
They do, they're just being intellectually dishonest. Most of supposed TTW Fedal fans are not even neutral towards Fed, they absolutely can't stand the guy.

Yeah, I am a Fedal fan in a manner of speaking. My father wanted to turn off the RG final last year and I said, he's playing amazing tennis, how can you not watch. But I know I am more of a Fed fan and have always identified that way. I am not saying it's impossible for somebody to like both players almost equally but I don't know that I have met many, if any, who actually fit that description. And usually if they say upfront that they are Fedal fans, they are really Nadal fans trying to impart a veneer of objectivity, as you put it, to their arguments. Fed fans usually say upfront that they are Fed fans rather than pretending to be Nadal fans. Nothing special about Fed fans, just that most Fed fans have been fans of him longer than Nadal fans were fans of Nadal so there's no reason to obfuscate unless it's some fickle glory hunter who jumped ship in 2008-09 (know a few who did).
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Yeah, I am a Fedal fan in a manner of speaking. My father wanted to turn off the RG final last year and I said, he's playing amazing tennis, how can you not watch. But I know I am more of a Fed fan and have always identified that way. I am not saying it's impossible for somebody to like both players almost equally but I don't know that I have met many, if any, who actually fit that description. And usually if they say upfront that they are Fedal fans, they are really Nadal fans trying to impart a veneer of objectivity, as you put it, to their arguments. Fed fans usually say upfront that they are Fed fans rather than pretending to be Nadal fans. Nothing special about Fed fans, just that most Fed fans have been fans of him longer than Nadal fans were fans of Nadal so there's no reason to obfuscate unless it's some fickle glory hunter who jumped ship in 2008-09 (know a few who did).

Very well put. I'm not saying you can't respect Nadal as a tennis fan or watch his matches (I certainly do, I actually would be less interesting in the current CC season without him, he keeps up the standard) but everyone has a clear favourite at the end of the day, it's just the way it is. I prefer Novak and Delpo to anyone but Fed but if they play him I'll lean towards rooting for him, it's spontaneous.

Fed fans are indeed more straightforward (which I prefer honestly) and usually don't engage in this whole nonsense (Fedal fans, double accounts for trolling etc.) but their complete focus on Fed has a bad side-effect of GOAT worship threads which I do find nauseating to a degree, I have to admit. No need to pollute the forum with 20 gloryhunting threads everytime Fed wins a big tourney. They also have a tendency to be way too disrespectful towards different playing styles, especially those more defensive oriented.
 
Top