Dolgopolov85
G.O.A.T.
What I said was clear enough and needs no explaining. Too bad it went over your head.Youll have to explain what youre talking about, as you've jumped into a conversation and youre making no sense....
What I said was clear enough and needs no explaining. Too bad it went over your head.Youll have to explain what youre talking about, as you've jumped into a conversation and youre making no sense....
Interesting how the weak era would have lasted longer had Fed won a few more points in the Wimbledon final.And what made Nadal in 2008 as good on grass as Fed all of a sudden? The fact that he won? It's way too convenient...
What I said was clear enough and needs no explaining. Too bad it went over your head.
Thank you!
Always interesting to see what other people are doing to maximise their efforts, and learn something along the way.
I think the 3 times 5-0 streaks Nadal has against Federer is a lot worse .
Federer is supposed to be the GOAT, yet was on losing streaks 3 times in his career to his nearest rival. LOL That's baaaaaddddddd
It is. But maybe selective loss of comprehension is a peculiar affliction that you have and in that case please accept my commiserations.Maybe English isn't your first language. No problem.
And i think nadals 0-2 to dustin brown, 1-2 at wimby vs mueller, his losing h2h v ferrer at HC slams to ferrer and same with blake, of course is 1-6 to davednko on HC is worse
Are you sure he is an ATG? Dustin brown? Losing to h2h vs djokovic is one thing but dustin brown at a SLAM? Mueller at a SLAM?
And no sorry if it was helping you to sleep at night but nadals 7-0 7-0 humiliation at his absolute peak is the worst humiliation any member of big four has done. No big four member has suffered such a outclassing and out playing
Id also class nadals 0-5 and counting to a 36 year old near 37 as pretty bad too
Of course, Nadal fans like you use the clay-courter excuse when it suits you. No guy with 2 Wimb finals and a bunch of masters on HC was just a clay courter. That argument should have been put to bed a long time ago.No, but clearly you could see from 2006 to 2007 the gap was closing. It was inevitable that eventually he would beat Fed on grass, no?
Whereas on clay Fed seemed to get worse against Nadal over time.
I mean wasn't Fed still in his supposed peak in 07 ? Yet he was mighty close to losing to a clay courter at his pet slam.
It is. But maybe selective loss of comprehension is a peculiar affliction that you have and in that case please accept my commiserations.
Of course, Nadal fans like you use the clay-courter excuse when it suits you. No guy with 2 Wimb finals and a bunch of masters on HC was just a clay courter. That argument should have been put to bed a long time ago.
Nice try, but the 7-0 in 2015-16 was vulturing from Djokovic. Since y'all like to use things like that as an excuse. Nadal would be the same tally up on Novak if they met consistently right now.
Exactly. All this weak era schtick is way too convenient. It could have started in 2007 is Fed had lost to Nadal/Djokovic at Wimb/USO, but Fed withstood their attacks and instead of the arrival of the strong era, 2007 remained the same weak era dominated by Roger Federer.Interesting how the weak era would have lasted longer had Fed won a few more points in the Wimbledon final.
Yes, I accept that.But do you accept that Nadal was getting closer each year to Fed on grass? This isn't just about Nadal winning in 08. He could've also won in 07 too.
Oh boy, Humbalito fan feels so proud just watching his matches. Good thing Rafa is not like you!Maybe go watch some more Dolgopolov matches?
This is about slam champions...
You're welcome.
Keep protein constant throughout the week, the trick to get insanely shredded looking, even if you are natural, is manipulation of your carbs and fats. Remember, nutrition is 80 percent, get the kitchen in order first before you step into the gym.
Actually we have been saying this for a long time and we're glad that some of our Humbalito brethren also agree that he didn't leave his diapers behind for the first time in 2008.But do you accept that Nadal was getting closer each year to Fed on grass? This isn't just about Nadal winning in 08. He could've also won in 07 too.
2003 and 04 were strong years. 05 was okey dokey. 06 was legit weak. 07 was strong again.Exactly. All this weak era schtick is way too convenient. It could have started in 2007 is Fed had lost to Nadal/Djokovic at Wimb/USO, but Fed withstood their attacks and instead of the arrival of the strong era, 2007 remained the same weak era dominated by Roger Federer.
If Fed had won 2008 Wimb, it would have still been another weak year dominated by Roger Federer. And the weak era would have lasted until USO 2009 when the great strong era player Juan Martin Del Potro finally exposes weak era benefactor Roger Federer. And yes, I'm assuming Fed wins AO 2009 too after the Wimb 2008 victory.
Nope why would nadals form just drop in his twenties like that? Its not possible. He was just made to look like a mug by djokovic. A guy in his twenties cant just slip off like that remember?
Nope h2h is what it is enough said no excuses.
If youre opening up excuses then nadal fed h2h just got destroyed too. And its to nadals discredit he doesnt have a bigger lead vs a 37 year old. Its shameful
So whats your excuse for mueller, davednko, brown etc
And no youre wrong 2011 7-0 demolition (the worst humiliation of all time by a big four player not even murray has suffered such humiliation) was nadal at his absolute very best. He cant play better. And he was outclassed, outplayed and demolished
Yes, I accept that.
Which is why the weak era shtick starting in 2008 is way too convenient.
Thankfully, this has never been a problem, as I have the comfort of choosing what I eat at all times (well, unless I am not at home, but even then it hasn't been a big issue) and the foundations for healthy eating habits were laid a long time ago by a family tradition.
I don't eat junk food and generally eat very balanced and healthy food (my biggest weakness in this regard is chocolate), but since I always eat different food and have never done fitness for anything else other than general good health and being somewhat competent in the sports of my choice, it is interesting to look into other areas that are linked to food, as is high level performance nutrition.
These days I have a bit more time on my hands, so I always play with different possibilities and looking to incorporate something new in my daily routines.
Not that I am going into bodybuilding, mind you, but maybe some small goals are a possibility.
In my personal opinion, the tour is weaker now than in 04-07.
Its went up and down since the so called big 4 have all been among the titles. Theres not been that often where they've all been at their best.
That would've been crazy.
Well, I think a lot of people say that despite all this strong era, weak era talk, there were only five years of it. 08-09 and 11-13.
Clay tennis should not be disrespected just because Federer can’t possibly ever claim his GOATness on it.Clay tennis is a niche sport anyway. Federer needs to focus on Wimbledon which remains the pinnacle of tennis.
What do you personally feel was the time they were at close to their best all together? What was the strongest time?
* Puts on spot *
As we talking about the big four?
Let me make this clear first, they all peaked at different times, so I don't think they ever all met at their absolute best
But the peak of the big four competition was 2011-2012 for me. The matches during that time were insane between the four of them.
Yes pretty much.
This has inspired a new thread..... LOL
Those were fun times.2011-2012 is often called Big Four seasons. Their most bruising matches mainly happened in this period.
Those were fun times.
And it must make it 10 times more fun that the Earth's Mightiest Warrior got the biggest piece of the pie during that periodThey indeed were. It will be a long time before we see something like that again, so many forces converging together.
The rise of Earth's Mightiest Warrior
Federer's return to world number one
Nadal breaking the RG record
Lendl's Murray stepping up to become a slam winner
They all delivered during that time in one way or another.
Nor do I buy the veneer of impartiality.
And it must make it 10 times more fun that the Earth's Mightiest Warrior got the biggest piece of the pie during that season
There's a new trend on TTW right now: hide you're a Fed hater by saying things like "I like Federer, but..." or "Federer is my favorite player, but..." and hide that you are just a Nadal fan by saying "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan".Don't. He/she is a Nadal fan first. Always has been. It always strikes me that anybody here (at least that I can remember lately) who claims to be a fan of both (like "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan") is always a Nadal fan first. It's mind boggling really.
There's a new trend on TTW right now: hide you're a Fed hater by saying things like "I like Federer, but..." or "Federer is my favorite player, but..." and hide that you are just a Nadal fan by saying "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan".
Good thing Fed fans are honest.
You're catching onI'm a Federer and Nadal fan, but...I am a bigger fan of Djokovic.
You're catching on
That gives you the signed right to do thatRight, I guess I can go on now and trash them, because as you know...I am a fan.
That gives you the signed right to do that
Cool. I'm a Kyrgios fanI am also a Zverev fan.
Cool. I'm a Kyrgios fan
Love and peace, no hate. Pepe was rightHaters is so yesterday.
Being a Fan is the new fashion.
Love and peace, no hate. Pepe was right
Even worse for Federer, it was 23-10 when he was still in his prime 4 years ago
Don't. He/she is a Nadal fan first.
It always strikes me that anybody here (at least that I can remember lately) who claims to be a fan of both (like "I'm a Federer and Nadal fan") is always a Nadal fan first. It's mind boggling really.
I think I will create a new Fedal fan account and talk about how Federer is a coward, how Nadal is irrelevant on non-clay, how Wimbledon 2008 is the greatest match ever...but don't judge me, because I am fan, just like you.
There's one Fedal fan that prefered Fed (atleast that's the impression I got) but I haven't seen her post in quite a while. Very friendly and open to conversation though, nothing like your usual "Fedal" fan.
The trouble is these people don't actually know what a Fedal fan is. It doesn't mean you're an equal fan of both players. It means you appreciate the rivalry almost as a third person and find it interesting in some way, whether purely in tennis terms, or the psychology, or sociology or whatever. [A few people have a different aspect but we won't go into that!!].
It's good because genuine Fedal fans obviously have some appreciation for the other and it means you can have genuinely good and pleasant interactions with "the other side". But you're still either a Fed or a Nadal fan primarily.
They do, they're just being intellectually dishonest. Most of supposed TTW Fedal fans are not even neutral towards Fed, they absolutely can't stand the guy.
Clay tennis should not be disrespected just because Federer can’t possibly ever claim his GOATness on it.
They do, they're just being intellectually dishonest. Most of supposed TTW Fedal fans are not even neutral towards Fed, they absolutely can't stand the guy.
Yeah, I am a Fedal fan in a manner of speaking. My father wanted to turn off the RG final last year and I said, he's playing amazing tennis, how can you not watch. But I know I am more of a Fed fan and have always identified that way. I am not saying it's impossible for somebody to like both players almost equally but I don't know that I have met many, if any, who actually fit that description. And usually if they say upfront that they are Fedal fans, they are really Nadal fans trying to impart a veneer of objectivity, as you put it, to their arguments. Fed fans usually say upfront that they are Fed fans rather than pretending to be Nadal fans. Nothing special about Fed fans, just that most Fed fans have been fans of him longer than Nadal fans were fans of Nadal so there's no reason to obfuscate unless it's some fickle glory hunter who jumped ship in 2008-09 (know a few who did).