Federer L'equipe Interview "I don't see myself in Novak at all"

"I don't see myself in Novak at all"

I agree: it's an insult to any 1HBH player to be compared to any workmanlike 2HBH player :-)

Totally different styles, artistically speaking.
 
And that's why I kinda hate Federer. He's too damn stuffy to appreciate the man that is Novak Djokovic: a man of colorful personality, a man of high expectations, and a man that won't roll over to the "great Federer" when on the other side of the court.

I bet Federer feels that Djokovic doesn't "appreciate his greatness" or something egotistical like that.
How does it feel to live inside Roger Federers head?
 
"Mentally, it can't be easy for him. I don't feel I'm in the same situation towards Djokovic.Even if I've lost my last 3 matches against him, I don't have the feeling he's dominating me. Rafa, with Novak, it could probably play more"

No, Novak's not dominating him, he's spanking him, BIG time. Rogi is denial again. I'm so awesome blah blah blah. Sure they are great, but not like me, blah blah blah.
 
"Mentally, it can't be easy for him. I don't feel I'm in the same situation towards Djokovic.Even if I've lost my last 3 matches against him, I don't have the feeling he's dominating me. Rafa, with Novak, it could probably play more"

No, Novak's not dominating him, he's spanking him, BIG time. Rogi is denial again. I'm so awesome blah blah blah. Sure they are great, but not like me, blah blah blah.



What do you expect, he is having his hand at the mind games. IE " I did not make it as far as Nadal, but I am better off than Nadal. "


Really..... Really....


He does not believe that BS.
 
The difference is that Nadal is in the prime of his career while Federer is at the twilight of his career and could probably care less about who beats him now adays. He plays to play, because he enjoys the game. Federer has seemed to accept that although he can sneak in a slam here and there if he gets the right draws, he is no longer the Federer of old.


That definitely changes the way your outlook on the game and your opponents. Nadal is still very, very, very close to the peak of his career. If he has fallen off any, it is only very slight; the only guy who has been able to do any damage to Nadal has been Djokovic anyways who is beating the rest of the tour along with Nadal. That plays a totally significant different role on how you view your opponent; it is very similar to how Nadal was beating Federer while Fed was in his prime.


Basically, Federer knows he's not a consistent contender when he steps out onto the court against the big guns these days. He'll get a few of his wins simply because he's crafty now due to age, and still has the weapons to do so. However, he knows he's not going to be rolling off 41 match win streaks anymore.


Nadal KNOWS he is a top 2 contender for every tournament still (just look at from IW to Rome). The only person that can beat him is Novak. That definitely weighs on Nadal though when Novak continues to defeat him time and time again; it is probably even more pressure on Nadal considering Nadal has actually never been in this position before.

Very good post!!! I completely agree, and this is how I perceive his comments.

Q. Roger, what's the difference between you and Novak?


RF: 14 majors.


(Pete smiling in the background)

Now that is how you deal with it!
 
What do you expect, he is having his hand at the mind games. IE " I did not make it as far as Nadal, but I am better off than Nadal. "


Really..... Really....


He does not believe that BS.

LOL, ****s, LOL so dense, Mozilla Firefox, ****s, Really... Really....??? Nards, But ****s are worse, i use Djokovic's mullet, ****s...? Double Standard... LOL, Dense, LOL, ****s....

Really... Really...?
 
Why are the Nards so offended by it unlike the Djards? Why are the Djards not offended?

Perhaps it's cuz Djards know that Djokovic participates in anti Fed stuff that goes on in Serbian TV talkshows? ;)
 
Wilander: (re full house for this match) for as long as Fed is playing, he'll remain the public favorite, for his style of play

Enough said about what the public likes and what is beautiful :-) :-) :-)
 
> Federer L'equipe Interview "I don't see myself in Novak at all"

Who could see him in Djoko? He was a class by himself, in breaking Djoko's streak and schooling him.

The comparison is still there: 16 - 2.

A beating at the worst of moments for Djoko, and in what a style!
 
Djokovic is a very good tennis player. Federer is a legend. Only thing is, he is a bit smarmy.

But all I can say is that right NOW, we are witnessing real historic ****. Just like Agassi/Sampras, Connors/Borg, McEnroe/Borg.

I hate some aspects of Federer, he is real smarmy *******, but his game, is just soooooooo amazing.
 
Bump.

I came across this by accident and have never seen it or heard anybody talk about it and well...:oops:...Roger really had no idea of the storm that had arrived did he? This attitude ultimately paid off at RG, since he beat Novak and ended his streak, but other than that, not a good look. I mean, some of the stuff he is saying is true but I don't think you're supposed to say it out aloud. Djokovic fans, thoughts?
 
F me !:eek::eek::eek:.

God this guy was arrogant.
I'm not taking anything from what Novak has just accomplished, but I think he has to do even more. Rafa has 9 Grand Slams, me 16, and he has 2. He needs a lot more to create that famous monster. Rafa had become it when he came into Australia chasing his "Rafa slam". That was an extraordinary thing. He was injured when he lost, so it was easier to explain for him. Me, I had created a monster to the extreme. I had dozens of records going on, the consecutive GS semis, the consecutive finals won, etc. I don't know if Rafa and Novak evolve in the same "monster" category.
 
Technically what he said about Novak was somewhat correct for that time

But Rafael already was doing unimaginable things, had 5 RGs and just a season before had won 3 straight slams.

Can't believe that someone who can see Rublev performing so well before any tennis pundit did , could not see that what Rafael and later Djokovic were doing was special!
 
F me !:eek::eek::eek:.

God this guy was arrogant.

Can you imagine if Djokovic said any of this how the media would have a field day? I never heard a peep of this anywhere. At this point, he had the Slam record, close to weeks record, streaks, etc. and everybody was labeling him the greatest but he went out of his way to downplay Novak's success. At this point everybody knew what Djokovic was doing was quite special.
 
Can you imagine if Djokovic said any of this how the media would have a field day? I never heard a peep of this anywhere. At this point, he had the Slam record, close to weeks record, streaks, etc. and everybody was labeling him the greatest but he went out of his way to downplay Novak's success. At this point everybody knew what Djokovic was doing was quite special.

If Novak said something like , " Thiem. He beat me and Nadal and Roger but I see nothing special about him and he has to do more"

Half the tennis would probably start advocating criminal punishment against him.
 
Man Fed had no idea of what was coming, he could have said better things but anyways.

He did beat him at RG that year, so his confidence was rightly placed...although the 16, 9, 2 slams argument. Damn!
 
Fed over the years has been significantly humbled. What else is new?

However, his attitude at that time helped him do better against Novak, compared to Nadal.
 
Fed over the years has been significantly humbled. What else is new?

However, his attitude at that time helped him do better against Novak, compared to Nadal.
Exactly. The infamous 'Nadal is not unbeatable on clay' did seem arrogant but it showed that he was confident of not going without a fight against Nadal.

These things seem arrogant but that's an ATG mentality...it is hard for us commoners to understand lol
 
The last I checked , Tennis still exists and the Big 3 haven't stopped yet...that number's gonna change lol
Since the time of this interview Djokovic have won 15 Slams and Federer 4 ( 3 of those during the Novak Pepovic's mental sabbatical in 2017-2018). Yep, karma punished Djokovic really hard. :laughing: :-D
 
Djokovic will always be third. He is past his prime and struggling physically and mentally, and the newer generation are getting stronger. It's over. 8-B
He won't be third with the most slams and weeks at no.1 record. He will force you to acknowledge that he is no.1 .
 
Federer doesn't respect you unless you earn it. There nothing Novak achieved before May 2011 that would concede guy of Federer' self esteem that Novak is next dominant Champ. Yes there was streak but he himself broke it few days after. Novak was just 2 time Slam winner then. I'm sure Federer wouldn't say it a year after in May 2012 as Novak went to win 4/5 Slams beating Fedal in all those, became #1 dethroning Nadal.
 
He won't be third with the most slams and weeks at no.1 record. He will force you to acknowledge that he is no.1 .

giphy.gif
 
Back
Top