Arther ashe kids day as well.Looking fairly likely now that Federer and Nadal will meet on Friday, possibly (probably?) for the last time.
Who's excited?
Are you joking? Last time this was going to happen, frickin' Tommy Rebredo beat Fed.
No the last time the party was spoiled was Raonic d. Nadal at IW.
I think you mean eggs.Count those chickens carefully...
Are you joking? Last time this was going to happen, frickin' Tommy Rebredo beat Fed. I'd say Nadal's chances against Feliciano are 50/50.
But what about Deadadal?Even Declindal will beat this Federer.
Well, if it actually happens, history has proven that recently there is really only one winner, regardless of the form of the two players, and regardless of the surface they meet on.
IF this match happens, this is the first time in a long while, I have Fed as the firm favorite. Which I would have any year in Cinci aside from 2013.Well, if it actually happens, history has proven that recently there is really only one winner, regardless of the form of the two players, and regardless of the surface they meet on.
I think the Nadal knows that with chances of him ever winning another Slam dwindling, his H2H is the only (flimsy) argument the unintelligent will have, and is doing his best to protect it.Rafa bails out one more time. What's new ?
this is what I was thinkingI think the Nadal knows that with chances of him ever winning another Slam dwindling, his H2H is the only (flimsy) argument the unintelligent will have, and is doing his best to protect it.
Right, because 23-11 is a whole lot better than 23-10I think the Nadal knows that with chances of him ever winning another Slam dwindling, his H2H is the only (flimsy) argument the unintelligent will have, and is doing his best to protect it.
How would it look if he lost his last 4/5 matches with Federer and retired before Federer did?Right, because 23-11 is a whole lot better than 23-10
Well, at least you agree it'd have been an upset.Nadal did not want to upset Federer and make it 24-10, so he tanked to Deliciano.
I think the Nadal knows that with chances of him ever winning another Slam dwindling, his H2H is the only (flimsy) argument the unintelligent will have, and is doing his best to protect it.
How would it look if he lost his last 4/5 matches with Federer and retired before Federer did?![]()
Right, because 23-11 is a whole lot better than 23-10