Federer, Nadal or Djokovic will win the 2019 US Open

Your courage is noted.

Djokovic and RF are favourites. They are at 100%. No Rafa needed to get that 100%.

Rafa has zero chances of winning it if he has to face either RF or Novak, and he would have to.

The rest of the field?

Snicker.
 

Pantera

Banned
Your courage is noted.

Djokovic and RF are favourites. They are at 100%. No Rafa needed to get that 100%.

Rafa has zero chances of winning it if he has to face either RF or Novak, and he would have to.

The rest of the field?

Snicker.
Translated to mean you think Nadal will win.

Nadal will crush Federer with consummate ease. If it is hot he will also beat Djokovic with ease as well. If it is cooler and wet and roof is closed then Djokovic probably favourite.

Anyone thinking Federer even makes it past QF is delusional. He has been a non factor at USO for 11 years.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
I'm taking those odds. 99,9% looks pretty good. Who wants to bet against this?
You are really making a dangerous prediction here...but I would agree with you here.

I have it as Djokovic at one, a gap, then Federer and Nadal joint second.
 
Federer has no chance.
He almost won a slam this year, and by almost I don't mean he blew some break points, I mean he blew match points (plural) on his own serve.

He also almost had a second M1000. He also won two semi-prestigious 500s. Did well at FO.

If that isn't impressive form, what is?

No, RF fans, you have reason to hope. Novak is only a slight favourite over RF. It's one or the other.
 
Translated to mean you think Nadal will win.
I hope you don't translate for a living, otherwise you can't have money enough for a bargain-bin DVD.

I repeat, again in English, the official language of TTW: Rafa has zero chances of winning USO. To find an explanation scroll back.
 

Pantera

Banned
He almost won a slam this year, and by almost I don't mean he blew some break points, I mean he blew match points (plural) on his own serve.

He also almost had a second M1000. He also won two semi-prestigious 500s. Did well at FO.

If that isn't impressive form, what is?

No, RF fans, you have reason to hope. Novak is only a slight favourite over RF. It's one or the other.
What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.

Almost doesn't cut it. you win or don't win. Nadal and Djokovic win events...Federer doesn't. Hence I can guarantee Federer will not win USO, or frankly any major again.
 

Pantera

Banned
I hope you don't translate for a living, otherwise you must be residing in a container.

I repeat, again in English, the official language of TTW: Rafa has zero chances of winning USO. To find an explanation scroll back.
Who won Montreal lol....Who in Australia thrashed the guy that beat Federer...who in Paris embarrassed Federer in straight sets.....Nadal. LMAO.
 
What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.

Almost doesn't cut it. you win or don't win. Nadal and Djokovic win events...Federer doesn't. Hence I can guarantee Federer will not win USO, or frankly any major again.
Nadal often leads the race after the clay season (and sometimes even Wimby). Then comes USO and the indoor season... and Novak snatches it.
 

Noleberic123

G.O.A.T.
What a load of drivel. Nadal leads the race, clearly the best player of 2019 hence he leads the race ,Djokovic clearly 2nd just behind nadal, Federer miles away from either.

Almost doesn't cut it. you win or don't win. Nadal and Djokovic win events...Federer doesn't. Hence I can guarantee Federer will not win USO, or frankly any major again.
Lol Nadal leads the race but Djokovic has won 2 of the 3 GS played. If Nadal wins the USO then yeah he is the best player of 2019 so far.
 
Who won Montreal lol....Who in Australia thrashed the guy that beat Federer...who in Paris embarrassed Federer in straight sets.....Nadal. LMAO.
Oh yeah beating the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Federer, a very telling achievement for sure!

Rafa won Montreal by not playing semis, by facing a perplexed and fearful Medvedev (M1000 finale newbie), a M1000 devoid of Djokovic and RF, and by beating the likes of Evans. Yes a masterful win, legendary by all standards.
 

Pantera

Banned
Nadal often leads the race after the clay season (and sometimes even Wimby). Then comes USO and the indoor season... and Novak snatches it.
Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.
 

Pantera

Banned
Oh yeah beating the guy who beat the guy who beat the guy who beat Federer, a very telling achievement for sure!

Rafa won Montreal by not playing semis, by facing a perplexed and fearful Medvedev (M1000 finale newbie) and by beating the likes of Evans. Yes a masterful win, legendary by all standards.
Federer just got schooled by Rublev, who is ranked lower than all those Nadal beat lol. Id give up if I was you lol. Not your finest hour is it.
 
Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.
Much is made of Rafa's 2-1 over Novak. It took the BEST Rafa ever to make those two wins.

Is the current Rafa the best Rafa ever?

Hardly.

Besides, the odds of him getting injured are high, as usual.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
Nadal does better at USO than Djokovic unless injured, hence the 2-1 h2h. Nadal rarely plays indoors lol. I expect Nadal to end his season after he wins USO this year. No need to play irrelevant indoor events.
Nadal wasn't injured in 2015 when he lost to Fognini and couldn't make it to Djokovic in the quarters...
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
From what we have seen since 2017. I cannot put Nadal ahead of Federer outside of clay. No matter the draw.
But if Federer is drawn on Djokovic's side, Nadal is the one who is more likely to be in the final, Federer is more likely to lose to Novak in the semis.

I would agree with your point, if they were on the same side of the draw.
 

Pantera

Banned
Much is made of Rafa's 2-1 over Novak. It took the BEST Rafa ever to make those two wins.

Is the current Rafa the best Rafa ever?

Hardly.

Besides, the odds of him getting injured are high, as usual.
Djokovic is not as good as 2013..whats your point? We will never see peak v peak of any of them again, but they still good enough to be top 3.
 
Federer just got schooled by Rublev, who is ranked lower than all those Nadal beat lol. Id give up if I was you lol. Not your finest hour is it.
The LOLs they are a multiplyin, always a sign of insecurity. Add more smileys now, that might really convince me...

You are as usual mixing apples and oranges. Rublev beating RF in the 3rd round does NOT compare to beating him in the finale.
 
Djokovic is not as good as 2013..whats your point? We will never see peak v peak of any of them again, but they still good enough to be top 3.
Djokovic is so BAD that he won 4 of the last 5 slams. And he simply can't lose to Rafa or RF in slams for many years.

Yes, his form sucks. You win. He is a total failure.
 

Pantera

Banned
From what we have seen since 2017. I cannot put Nadal ahead of Federer outside of clay. No matter the draw.
Lol this is hilarious. Nadal was YE1 in 2017 so even if we use 2017 as the yardstick (which is nonsensical as so long ago) Nadal would still be favourite. As Federer sais in New York in 2017..delpo had more chance v Nadal in SF than he did.

Nadal will utterly humiliate Federer at USO this year, although Federer wont make it far enough as usual for every Nadal fan's dream match up.
 

Pantera

Banned
The LOLs they are a multiplyin, always a sign of insecurity. Add more smileys now, that might really convince me...

You are as usual mixing apples and oranges. Rublev beating RF in the 3rd round does NOT compare to beating him in the finale.
LOl...lol....lol....So you are saying the favourite is the one who loses in straight sets to the world no 78 rather than the one who wins Montreal beating the form player of past 3 weeks...glad you are not my lawyer lol.
 
Lol this is hilarious. Nadal was YE1 in 2017 so even if we use 2017 as the yardstick (which is nonsensical as so long ago) Nadal would still be favourite. As Federer sais in New York in 2017..delpo had more chance v Nadal in SF than he did.

Nadal will utterly humiliate Federer at USO this year, although Federer wont make it far enough as usual for every Nadal fan's dream match up.
So Nadal being no 1 during Novak's worst year (due to injury mostly) is a valid argument?

Seriously, I am slowly suspecting you're trolling us all here. I've read your posts and every single one of them on this thread is a mix of bad logic, non-facts and random argumentation.

If you are trying to be funny, say it, be done with it, so we can laugh together.

I sure hope you're joking though...
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
It's one of those imaginjuries.
Well, I am curious, because this is news to me, and I would like to make sure I have the correct. And Pantera only deals with facts, so should be able to provide factual information to confirm this.
 

Pantera

Banned
So Nadal being no 1 during Novak's worst year (due to injury mostly) is a valid argument?

Seriously, I am slowly suspecting you're trolling us all here. I've read your posts and every single one of them on this thread is a mix of bad logic, non-facts and random argumentation.

If you are trying to be funny, say it, be done with it, so we can laugh together.

I sure hope you're joking though...
Don't be a sore loser . admit defeat and move on. Nadal bagelled and breadsticked Djokovic last time they played, has the better h2h at USO, has won the last HC masters 1000...hence is favourite. Facts, not opinions.
 
LOl...lol....lol....So you are saying the favourite is the one who loses in straight sets to the world no 78 rather than the one who wins Montreal beating the form player of past 3 weeks...glad you are not my lawyer lol.
Add more LOLs. And you forgot the smileys.

I could of course list all the slam champs in the Open Era who won a slam just days or weeks after losing an early round. I could, but why would I spend hours and hours writing them all up, just for you?
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
You are a clever chap...research it yourself, google would be a good start. I'll be generous,,check Tennis world facebook page.
I cannot find it, which is why I am asking you. You must have heard this, or seen this somewhere. Please provide me with the link. Thanks.
 

Pantera

Banned
Add more LOLs. And you forgot the smileys.

I could of course list all the slam champs in the Open Era who won a slam just days or weeks after losing an early round. I could, but why would spend hours and hours writing them all up, just for you?
But they are not Nadal fella...…:):):):):):)):)::)
 

Pantera

Banned
I cannot find it, which is why I am asking you. You must have heard this, or seen this somewhere. Please provide me with the link. Thanks.
Ive just told you..Tennis World. I haven't saved the link as I tend not to be a library, but you so obsessed by this then you can scroll through their posts, I believe it was 2018 sometime after Roland Garros it was posted if memory serves me right.
 
Well, I am curious, because this is news to me, and I would like to make sure I have the correct. And Pantera only deals with facts, so should be able to provide factual information to confirm this.
He deals with facts, which is why
Don't be a sore loser . admit defeat and move on. Nadal bagelled and breadsticked Djokovic last time they played, has the better h2h at USO, has won the last HC masters 1000...hence is favourite. Facts, not opinions.
OK, now I know you're trolling...

But because I want to indulge you, not blow your cover...

Nadal also won last year's Canadian. And what happened?

He also won it in 2005 and 2008. Did he win the USO?

Give up already, you're no match for me...
 

weakera

G.O.A.T.
He deals with facts, which is why

OK, now I know you're trolling...

But because I want to indulge you, not blow your cover...

Nadal also won last year's Canadian. And what happened?

He also won it in 2005 and 2008. Did he win the USO?

Give up already, you're no match for me...

He didn't lose USO last year because of his level of play.
 

TheAssassin

Legend
Ive just told you..Tennis World. I haven't saved the link as I tend not to be a library, but you so obsessed by this then you can scroll through their posts, I believe it was 2018 sometime after Roland Garros it was posted if memory serves me right.
You just love making stuff up...
 

Pantera

Banned
He deals with facts, which is why

OK, now I know you're trolling...

But because I want to indulge you, not blow your cover...

Nadal also won last year's Canadian. And what happened?

He also won it in 2005 and 2008. Did he win the USO?

Give up already, you're no match for me...
Im afraid I am schooling you and you are getting upset. I am sorry this is hurting but I am posting facts. 2008 Nadal was shattered after winning the OG, which was the priority at the time.

Last year injury struck, and 2005 Nadal was 18.

So if you are relying on Nadal being injured, then that proves me right. Yes injury might strike, as ive always said GOATDAL biggest opponent is himself...and you have just accepted it.
 
He didn't lose USO last year because of his level of play.
That is irrelevant. He has an injury in nearly half the HC slams he plays. That's always a factor, we are talking about what will happen, not what MIGHT have happened had he always been injury-free.
 

Pantera

Banned
Yes, Nadal is one of them. 2010 Wimby he won despite losing at Queens in the QFs to clownish Lopez. Just one example.

Check-mate.
Queens was a 250 event back then....whats the relevance of a 250 event? Do you actually follow tennis? I mean that in all seriousness as it seems you cannot differentiate between a 250 event and 1000 event?
 
Top