Nice interview.Good interview. Interesting that he said very firmly he wants a coach.
Nice interview.
Also, said that for French he needs to be more on the baseline and work his way to the net. He'd like to come to the net more often, but he doesn't have a Sampras serve.
Mike and Chris do a great job. Thanks for the post.
Dude
Chris does a great job. I don't think mike said 3 words.
I heard that interview at work with the radio on and I was laughing when Fed said "I may not have been feeling 100%, but no excuses you know." I immediately thought of Gut Reaction's threads about the "Fed language". Making excuses and then saying "no excuses". So it comes off as humility, but fake. In this interview I saw what he meant.
I heard that interview at work with the radio on and I was laughing when Fed said "I may not have been feeling 100%, but no excuses you know." I immediately thought of Gut Reaction's threads about the "Fed language". Making excuses and then saying "no excuses". So it comes off as humility, but fake. In this interview I saw what he meant.
Whats he suppose to say>?? He is a champion and he thinks like one... he cant be an arse about things and say that he considers himself the greatest athlete to walk on this earth, but i bet deep down he thinks it ... like a champion should think... its called confidence.. without confidence, the greatest athlete would be mediocre at best
in interviews.... one needs to be pc and also honest which is a tough balance sometimes
Who would know better how good Sampras is and how good the Top 5 are? You or Federer?I just got done watching the interview. It was well done and I doubt if Sampras returned to the ATP he would be top 5 in the world.
I just got done watching the interview. It was well done and I doubt if Sampras returned to the ATP he would be top 5 in the world.
I think you inadvertently added 1 or 2 extra zeros. :shock:I Think if Sampras returned he would probably be in the top 100, if he trained well.
I think you inadvertently added 1 or 2 extra zeros. :shock:
OK, go tell Tommy Hass he shouldn't even be in the Top 100,000 in the world since he couldn't even beat Sampras. :roll:He should have added 3.
...-Fed's upbeat and not upset about the loss. He even said losing can be a good thing once in a while.....
The interviewer is the same ********* whom Pat McEnroe took to task for some of his macho and idiotic remarks when Sports Illustrated chose Dwayne Wade over Federer as Sportsman of the Year.
He kept talking about Fed's loss to Djokovic, to Safin, to Sampras ad nauseum. And then, he displayed his great knowledge of tennis if Fed was going for five Wimbledons.
Federer seemed to be in an accommodating and modest mood today. This particular interviewer should stick to baseball and football.
Get your stuff straight. I listen to these guys on the radio at work and Chris "Maddog" Russo is a big Fed fan and he's always trying to find ways for Fed to beat Nadal on certain days when he's talking tennis. He actually was outraged at Dwane Wade getting the Sportsman of the year instead of Fed and called up the Sports Illustrated chairman (thereabouts) to complain and question his decision. His answer was pathetic and Maddog was yelling at him saying that Wade only won because he's more popular in the US and with him on the cover it'll sell more copies instead of an unknown tennis player from Switzerland. The average Yank doesn't know who he is and if they know I don't think they'll be compelled to buy the SI issue because of him.
Maddog knew this and stated it to the SI chairman and he gave the "well, he only won 3 grand slams and not all 4 in the same year" excuse. PMac was actually listening to the show on that day and he called in to voice his opinion and agree with the Maddog as well. He felt that the answer the SI chairman gave was a cop out and a really poor excuse for not putting Fed on the cover. I agreed and for once I was rooting for Fed and defending his case. Now, having said all that. Russo is really a baseball & football encyclopedia (ala Bud Collins) and should stick to that on the radio. Which he usually does. But he does know enough about tennis to talk about it on occasion which he also does. At least he's talking tennis occasionally, which is more than any other AM sports radio in the country. So I appreciate that. Even though I know more than him he's fairly competent in his knowledge of the sport.
Hi,
I am also told that Chris plays at the 4.5 level... not too bad..
Steve
Where did you hear that? How do you know?
I have always been interested in Mad Dogs tennis abilities. I have a hard time advancing my mediocre game and it always gets me angry to think that a big doofus like Mad Dog can beat me.
Here are a few things I remeber learning about Mad Dog's game:
1) About 2-3 years ago, Mad Dog was going up to Albany and he announced on the air that he'd like to meet a listner inorder get some tennis in. He said something to the effect that he didn't want any rinky-dink 4.0, he wanted a good player who could challenge him. Well, he apparently hit with a 5.0 and got destroyed. The score was something like 6-0, 6-1.
2) During one of their summer shows at the Jersey shore, I believe it was last year, they had Mad Dog's tennis instructor on for a few minutes. Mike was asking the coach questions to try and determine how good of a player Mad Dog is. The coach said that Mad Dog's 2hbh is his best shot and that he needs work on the forehand side. The coach said that Mad Dog is a Northeast 4.0; he would be rated lower in FL or CA.
3) Tennis Nj saw him play. He said he stinks and is a 3.5 at best.
4) In a New Yorker (or is it New York magazine) article profiling Mike and the Mad Dog the author mentioned that Russo had been suspended from his racquet club. Mad Dog was near the end of a close match when his court time expired and another member tried to kick them off b/c he had reserved the time. Mad Dog through a fit.
So, I doubt he's a 4.5. On the other hand, he is in good shape for his age and does have a lot of free time (his show runs from 1-6:30). Plus he is rich (apparently he earns 1.5 million+/year) and therefore he has access to courts (indoor and outdoor), coaching, and equipment. So he might be nearing the 4.5 level. That would really tick me off b/c that would mean he could beat me.
I think Mad Dog might be a decent athlete. He's about 6' and he's definetly in pretty good shape for his age (almost 50). He's an avid runner. He can run a 10k in sub 8 min/mile. He's a decent golfer, they showed some of his shots on tv and he looks ok. Pus I heard he's starting to hit the weights with the express purspose of improving his tennis game.
I hate to think about it, but maybe, just mabe he is a 4.5.
He's got fire and energy. So he can get himself pumped up on the court.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lM_8AQwk4gY&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zy6ShZYlj68
Plus he's got some sweet footwork.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=umKg5Sxyljw
Get your stuff straight. I listen to these guys on the radio at work and Chris "Maddog" Russo is a big Fed fan and he's always trying to find ways for Fed to beat Nadal on certain days when he's talking tennis. He actually was outraged at Dwane Wade getting the Sportsman of the year instead of Fed and called up the Sports Illustrated chairman (thereabouts) to complain and question his decision. His answer was pathetic and Maddog was yelling at him saying that Wade only won because he's more popular in the US and with him on the cover it'll sell more copies instead of an unknown tennis player from Switzerland. The average Yank doesn't know who he is and if they know I don't think they'll be compelled to buy the SI issue because of him.
First, you try to get your understanding straight about the difference between facts and opinions. I expressed an opinion that the interviewer is a *********. It is a fact that he harped on Fed's losses in the interview.
This has absolutely nothing to do with whether he is a Fed fan or not. He might very well be a Fed fan. I just think he doesn't understand the game, it is as simple as that. That is nothing to be bothered about. I think Peter Bodo doesn't understand the game either, but that is just my unimportant view of things.
Nice interview, sounds like Fed is gonna either blast away the competition the rest of the year or wilt slowly. But he seems to have his schedule set up to go for the French Open.
Looks like he's wilting!!!
Let's hope so if you're a FED fan. I am a Nadal guy.he's wilting but soon to bloom again
m and md aren't talk radio's best.
They've both admitted on the air that their relationsip has soured alot in the past year but they're still under contract and both make a ton of money. They dont work very much together during the summer anyway so we'll see in the fall but it seems that they're both going to honor the contract. The thing is they're worth alot more together than they are seperately.
I just got a bloomberg news alert (must be a slow news day) that Chris Russo is leaving The FAN. Cant say I didn't see this coming. He is speculated to have landed a job at Sirius. Unfortunately, during the US Open, Chris did a ton of tennis talk and he knows his stuff, so that will be missed.