The_Mental_Giant
Hall of Fame
And more so with the motivation to save the slam record..
Nadal will take care of Thiem tomorrow, I be more concerned against Zverev.Nadal is going down to Thiem tomorrow. But anyway I don't believe in miracles. Djokovic is winning it or it will be Wawrinka. No third option.
In 2018 itself Thiem bagelled Nadal at USO. He has improved immensely on hard Court since that. Won IW beating Federer, made Final at WTF beating both Fedovic. He should really beat Nadal.Nadal will take care of Thiem tomorrow, I be more concerned against Zverev.
Thinking Wawrinka will reach the final is believing in miracles.Nadal is going down to Thiem tomorrow. But anyway I don't believe in miracles. Djokovic is winning it or it will be Wawrinka. No third option.
I think somehow Nadal will find his way to win it.In 2018 itself Thiem bagelled Nadal at USO. He has improved immensely on hard Court since that. Won IW beating Federer, made Final at WTF beating both Fedovic. He should really beat Nadal.
At the USO 2018 he lost to Nadal. Who cares about the bagel if then you lose the match? You don't win the match for making a bagel.In 2018 itself Thiem bagelled Nadal at USO. He has improved immensely on hard Court since that. Won IW beating Federer, made Finso at WTF beating both Fedovic. He should really beat Nadal.
Found the European!exactly 52,34 energies.
I think somehow Nadal will find his way to win it.
Nadal will take care of Thiem tomorrow, I be more concerned against Zverev.
Zverev? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHBABABABABABABABDJGKGMRNDNFJE D CM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In 2018 itself Thiem bagelled Nadal at USO. He has improved immensely on hard Court since that. Won IW beating Federer, made Final at WTF beating both Fedovic. He should really beat Nadal.
the main point in the post was not about the bagel but that he improved immensely on hard court since then..if this thesis is true then thiem will win because we also have to draw the attention in what manner he lost that match, it wasn't like 3-0 like today's djok-raonic (or something like that), but more like a tight clash toe-to-toe with 50/50 for both sides..and including this it only tips the scales in thiem' favour even moreAt the USO 2018 he lost to Nadal. Who cares about the bagel if then you lose the match? You don't win the match for making a bagel.
Tall, good ROS, good BH, big wingspan for retrieval, big enough first serve. Has the game to beat Rafa anywhere tbh matchup wise. Depends on mental strength and service yips
Omg HAHAHAHAHAHAHA IT Gets even better hahahahahahahaha omg what a laugh HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABABABABABABABDBFMFMNEBFC AAAAAA
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At the USO 2018 he lost to Nadal. Who cares about the bagel if then you lose the match? You don't win the match for making a bagel.
Because he finally has a real opponent. Not a bunch of chumps and journeymenIf he can pull off one ridiculous, senseless miracle, then why not another?
At that 2018 US Open, Rafa also lost sets to Basilashvili and KhachanovIn 2018 itself Thiem bagelled Nadal at USO. He has improved immensely on hard Court since that. Won IW beating Federer, made Final at WTF beating both Fedovic. He should really beat Nadal.
I don't get connection with that number. What is it??exactly 52,34 energies.
Where did he made the bagel??At the USO 2018 he lost to Nadal. Who cares about the bagel if then you lose the match? You don't win the match for making a bagel.
I dont think, Fed is a bad matchup for Novak, if >jsusfed appears its game over for the serbian pusher-Federer is gonna be slaughtered by Djokovic, unfortunately.
What the heck is 5234??Found the European!
I dont think, Fed is a bad matchup for Novak, if >jsusfed appears its game over for the serbian pusher-
No idea, but the position of the comma, i.e. not as a thousand separator, suggested it was being used as a decimal, which I believe is non-standard for UK and US. Or it was a typo. Lawl.What the heck is 5234??
2009 against nasal??Fed is unbeatable in the 5th at the AO, he is at 6 consecutive wins now:
2017 vs Nishikori
2017 vs Wawrinka
2017 vs Nadal
2018 vs Cilic
2020 vs Millman
2020 vs Sandgren
No one believesDo you really believe that this version of Fed will beat this 2020 version of Djoker ?
No one believes
I think you misunderstand me. I'm saying if he can accomplish the essentially impossible scenario that the OP posits, why should he not be able to accomplish another one? Like, if pigs fly why can't hell freeze over.Because he finally has a real opponent. Not a bunch of chumps and journeymen