Fed is literally almost 38, it's crazy how much better the big 3 are than the nextgen.... but no way Nadal or Djokovic will be making masters finals at almost 40.
Will fedr play Rome if he loses early in Madrid?This has already been put to bed, Meles. He's not playing MC and you were provided the reasons and the source why he will not. He's on vaca with the family when MC is contested. He's already said this several times.
Not sure, Meles, if that's a good idea. .
Many, many reasons:
1. His form is actually building right now and its starting to look like shades of 2017, but betterer. No tough matches at Miami and Isner final will not tax him. In 2017, Bendych and Kyrgios took him to three sets in back to back matches and he needed the time off. That's just not the case now.
2. Federer is playing Madrid (confirmed on entry list) and RG. Two weeks off and then Monte Carlo would be the perfect addition to his schedule to keep his form sharp without overdoing it (Madrid two weeks after MC). Skip Rome and he gets another two weeks off before RG. (Madrid/Rome back to back would be insane.)
3. Fed's new backhand might take extremely well on clay as he'll have plenty of time to really unload.
4. With Miami win Federer is 2100 points behind Nadal who has bad knee and defends MC, Barcelona, and Rome titles (2680 points with Madrid QF). If Federer can amass nearly 1000 points on clay (final and SF) he might pass Nadal for 2nd seed at RG. This gives him 50/50 chance of Nadal/Djoko SF at RG and of course he'd love to be waiting for a likely beleaguered Djoko in the final.
5. Not playing Monte Carlo risks Thiem overtaking him for 4th seed at RG and then the chance of very hard draw at RG. (Thiem playing three masters on clay and Barcelona has good chance of winning one of them, more if Nadal's knee causes him to drop Madrid, Barcelona and/or Rome to rest for RG.)
6. Would add tremendously to his legacy and if his last year on clay, why not make a full go of it.
7. Federer has never won Monte Carlo and with Djoko reeling and Rafa heeling, time to strike.
I don't ask much and Fresherer looks clearly up to the task.
If I were Federer, I would play Monte Carlo, Rome, and RG, and skip Madrid. What benefit does playing Madrid offer him? Okay, it's probably the one claycourt event he might actually win. But it won't be very good preparation for RG compared to the other two events.
Montecarlo plays more like RG than Rome.A better choice would be Rome and RG imo
Montecarlo is the most RG-alike tournament, it is located near the sea like RG, while Rome is in a higher land outside the coast, even though not so pronounced as Madrid.
I hate you Mainad haha. I was about to delete my comment as soon as I saw the mistake, but you were too fast for me. Now people will laugh at that ridiculous mistake.RG is in a suburb of Paris which is nowhere near the sea!
Montecarlo plays more like RG than Rome.
I hate you Mainad haha. I was about to delete my comment as soon as I saw the mistake, but you were too fast for me. Now people will laugh at that ridiculous mistake.
Montecarlo plays more like RG than Rome.
RG is in a suburb of Paris which is nowhere near the sea!
I don't think there is a significant difference in climate between Montecarlo and Paris. Montecarlo is near of Paris, after all, Montecarlo is just next to France.In my opinion, there isn't much in it. I would agree that, these days, Monte Carlo is marginally more like RG. But that is mostly because of scheduling and not because of anything fundamental about the locations: Rome has night matches, where Monte Carlo and Rome do not. Night matches are rather different from day matches. (Federer handled Wawrinka pretty easily in an evening match in Rome in 2015, but Wawrinka manhandled him in a day match in Paris a few weeks later. While part of that was the result of Wawrinka being inconsistent, the conditions also helped Wawrinka much more in Paris). If Rome abolished night matches, I think it would also be very like Paris.
It's also partly dependent on weather: Monte Carlo and Rome would tend to be warmer than Paris, except that they are played earlier in the year.
A better choice would be Rome and RG imo
Fraud and dirt. What a beauty.I agree with OP.
"Only" 5 years ago:
So... Fed GOAT? [emoji16]
Wrong. Stylish Fed in MC with Royalty is all we need.This has already been put to bed, Meles. He's not playing MC and you were provided the reasons and the source why he will not. He's on vaca with the family when MC is contested. He's already said this several times.
PreachWrong. Stylish Fed in MC with Royalty is all we need.
Gritty Ned is anticlimactic.
I don't think there is a significant difference in climate between Montecarlo and Paris. Montecarlo is near of Paris, after all, Montecarlo is just next to France.
And in RG we tipically have very sunny matches like these:
Call him berdych or birdich in this case since we are talking pigeonsIf Nextgen does not include Thiem or Kyrgios and strictly is players that have been at Milan well then this is not much of a surprise.
The problem is their geriatric pigeons and the original lostgen who created a vacuum in the middle rankings that NextGen are scampering in to fill rather nicely.
Some on TTW have tempered the Big 3's slam bonanza siting changes in the game, but its becoming clearerer and clearerer that all three plus Murray and Stanimal are all very special players. You can't expect that kind of greatness to be displaced, only replaced. The match between Shapo and Tsits was amazingly good at Miami plus some others so tennis will do quite well with the NextGen. The issue has been the long term pigeons and good riddance to them with Bendych at the top of the heap.
Actually even Birdman intentionally mispronounces his name due to marketing reasons.Call him berdych or birdich in this case since we are talking pigeons
Many, many reasons:
1. His form is actually building right now and its starting to look like shades of 2017, but betterer. No tough matches at Miami and Isner final will not tax him. In 2017, Bendych and Kyrgios took him to three sets in back to back matches and he needed the time off. That's just not the case now.
2. Federer is playing Madrid (confirmed on entry list) and RG. Two weeks off and then Monte Carlo would be the perfect addition to his schedule to keep his form sharp without overdoing it (Madrid two weeks after MC). Skip Rome and he gets another two weeks off before RG. (Madrid/Rome back to back would be insane.)
3. Fed's new backhand might take extremely well on clay as he'll have plenty of time to really unload.
4. With Miami win Federer is 2100 points behind Nadal who has bad knee and defends MC, Barcelona, and Rome titles (2680 points with Madrid QF). If Federer can amass nearly 1000 points on clay (final and SF) he might pass Nadal for 2nd seed at RG. This gives him 50/50 chance of Nadal/Djoko SF at RG and of course he'd love to be waiting for a likely beleaguered Djoko in the final.
5. Not playing Monte Carlo risks Thiem overtaking him for 4th seed at RG and then the chance of very hard draw at RG. (Thiem playing three masters on clay and Barcelona has good chance of winning one of them, more if Nadal's knee causes him to drop Madrid, Barcelona and/or Rome to rest for RG.)
6. Would add tremendously to his legacy and if his last year on clay, why not make a full go of it.
7. Federer has never won Monte Carlo and with Djoko reeling and Rafa heeling, time to strike.
I don't ask much and Fresherer looks clearly up to the task.
Points are points and the WC wildcard would put Federe in range of Nadal who might make the fatal mistake of over playing before RG. This only happens if Fed snaps out of it and plays MC.How can anyone in their right mind argue that FRAUD can do extremely well on clay at 35 ?
You are really talented @Meles
Ye of little faith in the new Federe backhand, yet to be unleashed on clay. Djoko formidable and ready to roll back the years to around 2011.Who the f*ck has he beat that shows he is back to 2017 level. He lost to Thiem on freaking Hard, choked against Tstisipas. He almost couldn't beat Albot, and draws have been a joke. Federer deserved to win Miami, but he's not beating Nadal 6-2, 6-3 on Hard again, that's for sure! Djokovic will stop him in Slams, and Nadal will stop him too if injury doesn't trouble him.
The timing is amazing: win Miami, two weeks off, win MC, two weeks off, win Madric, two weeks off, win RG, one week off, win Halle, one week off and then lose to Raonic at Wimbledon.If I were Federer, I would play Monte Carlo, Rome, and RG, and skip Madrid. What benefit does playing Madrid offer him? Okay, it's probably the one claycourt event he might actually win. But it won't be very good preparation for RG compared to the other two events.
Tennis flights of fancy are the point on TTW.You don't have to consider the idea of Fed playing MC because it's not happening. Sev just said again in Dubai that the transition for Roger on clay this year will be "careful and slow" (vorsichtig und langsam) with a two week intensive training block prior to Madrid. Fed has also dismissed that he will accept a WC into MC saying, "we'll be on vacation, sorry."
Pointless thread. Sorry, Meles.
Handwringering nonsense. Time to unleash the new backhand on clay for the first time.Here is why Fed shouldn't play Monte Carlo:
1.Because his form is building he should slow down and not get too excited and risk being tired and injured.
2.I think even 2 masters is too much. Madrid / FO is all he needs, if we assume he wants to go for the win and not just play for fun, so we expect he goes deep - the more reason why not play too much.
3.I don't see this as a reason why he should play Monte Carlo, his backhand is great for all clay, why is it more suited for Monty Carlos?
4.No, he needs to hide his from on clay and play as little as possible, so Djokodal don't learn how his new clay game works.
5.Fed had a hard draw at AO17, I think Fed being rested and having a mental edge is more important for him at this stage than avoiding top guys. Also, if Fed adopts this mindset he lost in advance, what's the point anyway? He has to believe he can beat top guys back to back. Also weak draw means he won't be match ready for Djokovic and Nadal in the final. The reason Fed almost lost to Cilic in 2018 is soft semi and why he won 17 against Nadal. Because Wawrinka made him match ready. Lately Fed needs rest and being match ready more than he needs to avoid a few players.
6.Risking all that for Monte Carlo won't add his legacy much. He also has to think about the rest of the season and next year.
7.Federer also never won 2nd RG and 9th Wimby, that's why it's time to strike now and forget Monte Carlo.
He also is scared of dogs, man’s best friend. Just another reason to root against him.True. Nadal lives with his mother and is afraid of the dark and lighting. Cowards are dangerous, you never know what they will do to you and backstab you from behind. In my real life I'm also afraid cowards the most. Real man would come at me right, I would see him and he would make it quick like Fed with precision. Rafa would come from behind, like he plays from behind and torture me with a knife slowly.
So, yeah, of course cowards are more dangerous and are to be afraid more, I totally agree with you.
Why on Earth would he care about points at this time in his career?Points are points and the WC wildcard would put Federe in range of Nadal who might make the fatal mistake of over playing before RG. This only happens if Fed snaps out of it and plays MC.
100% true, but when people engage in flights of fancy centering around the distant future ("Nole will win 30 slams, guaranteed") that's different than speculating on an event taking place in another week which Fed has already said he won't play.Tennis flights of fancy are the point on TTW.
0-3 vs RBA in recent times; will that do?
On this forum, you're only as good as your last match performance. It's the forum rule number 1 or something.I'm aware of his record but I'm also aware that he's already won a Grand Slam in 2019. You're point was pointless, Monty Python deserved better.
This has already been put to bed, Meles. He's not playing MC and you were provided the reasons and the source why he will not. He's on vaca with the family when MC is contested. He's already said this several times.
If I were Federer, I would play Monte Carlo, Rome, and RG, and skip Madrid. What benefit does playing Madrid offer him? Okay, it's probably the one claycourt event he might actually win. But it won't be very good preparation for RG compared to the other two events.
I know but people that post here need to develop a slightly longer-term memory. LOLOn this forum, you're only as good as your last match performance. It's the forum rule number 1 or something.